[HN Gopher] Stability AI reportedly ran out of cash to pay its c...
___________________________________________________________________
Stability AI reportedly ran out of cash to pay its cloud GPU bills
Author : obelix150
Score : 38 points
Date : 2024-04-03 14:17 UTC (8 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.theregister.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.theregister.com)
| datadrivenangel wrote:
| $11M in revenue on $153M in cloud spend + salaries...
|
| Is the AI bubble going to pop hard soon?
| dlachausse wrote:
| I think it will just shift away from relying on cloud providers
| for the underlying infrastructure.
| romeros wrote:
| AI is not a bubble. Anymore than iphone / the internet was a
| bubble.
| joezydeco wrote:
| So where's the revenue?
| consumer451 wrote:
| At companies with a business plan like Midjourney, which
| has 200M in revenue, 40 employees, and no investors.
| brailsafe wrote:
| > Anymore than iphone / the internet was a bubble.
|
| By that do you mean they're technology platforms that outlive
| their obvious peak hype investment dice rolls?
| kromem wrote:
| As a broad advancement that's true, but on individual
| companies there's going to be a ton that don't make it (which
| is the case for all companies, but for AI there's a
| significant number of new ones to fail within the next 10
| years).
| eek2121 wrote:
| You have no way of knowing that. Remember, the parent poster
| is referring to the current ridiculous hype + push of current
| AI. Current AI models were trained on copyrighted material.
| Lawsuits are taking place.
|
| Many different members of the US government have indicated
| that just because AI is new and fancy, does not mean
| companies get to violate established law, including
| copyright. The head of the FTC was the most recent person to
| state this.
|
| OpenAI could very likely be sued out of existence. When that
| happens, all who invested in them could lose billions. The US
| government very likely won't intervene because there are
| multiple lessons to be learned from this.
|
| Courts are there to enforce the law, regardless of how
| "amazing" a technology may appear.
| eek2121 wrote:
| To add something I forgot to say, yes, AI as a concept is
| here to stay. The current hype surrounding existing
| companies will not, however.
| Legend2440 wrote:
| The internet was a bubble too. Remember the dot com era?
|
| Just because the tech is legit doesn't mean it can't have a
| bubble.
| MomoXenosaga wrote:
| Rookie numbers. How much did Uber lose? Wirecard?
| super256 wrote:
| Wirecard was a fraud, not a bubble.
| John23832 wrote:
| *In a ZIRP environment.
| ChrisArchitect wrote:
| [dupe]
|
| More discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39868539
| ShamelessC wrote:
| Another one of those "what good reason was there for flagging
| this" moments.
| nextworddev wrote:
| There's a vested downvote ring that tries to suppress bad PR
| for stability on HN
| ChrisArchitect wrote:
| Related:
|
| _StabilityAI chief resigns, raising doubts about AI start-up's
| future_
|
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39894334
| barfbagginus wrote:
| This makes me worry that the 20 bux a month I pay for GPT4 could
| end up being more like 200 bux on the backend.
|
| When they stop running gpt4 as a loss leader, I'll probably lose
| access.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-04-03 23:02 UTC)