[HN Gopher] Control Data Corporation's CDC 6600
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Control Data Corporation's CDC 6600
        
       Author : brian_herman
       Score  : 28 points
       Date   : 2024-04-01 18:29 UTC (4 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (chipsandcheese.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (chipsandcheese.com)
        
       | 082349872349872 wrote:
       | One of the 6600 designers said:
       | 
       | > _I suppose the picture of computing is of a topsy-turvy growth
       | obeying laws of a commercial "natural" selection. This could be
       | entirely accurate considering how fast it has grown. Things
       | started out in a scholarly vein, but the rush of commerce hasn't
       | allowed much time to think where we're going._ -- JET
       | 
       | I was amazed to read some of what he wrote at the time about the
       | 6600 design and consider how qualitatively modern it sounds (if
       | one is willing to add zeros and change units where quantitatively
       | needed).
        
         | Animats wrote:
         | The CDC 6600 was really a rather simple machine; it just had
         | multiple copies of some units. The CRAY-I was even simpler, but
         | had 64 copies of some units. Both were designed by small teams
         | and had simple instruction sets.
         | 
         | The other extreme was the Pentium Pro, the first superscalar
         | x86 CPU. I went to the talk at Stanford where the lead designer
         | described the architecture. That was the most insanely
         | complicated CPU built up to that time. People were thinking
         | RISC was the future, because nobody could possibly get
         | something as messy as x86 to go much faster by architectural
         | means. But Intel brought it off.
         | 
         | One of the speaker's graphs showed the number of engineers
         | involved over time. That peaked around 3000 people. Just
         | getting that many people to work together to design one
         | tightly-coordinated thing was an impressive achievement.
        
           | rbanffy wrote:
           | > That peaked around 3000 people.
           | 
           | The number directly from the Pentium team was 3000.0000000001
           | people at the highest point.
        
           | _a_a_a_ wrote:
           | > The CDC 6600 was really a rather simple machine; ... The
           | CRAY-I was even simpler
           | 
           | Pretty bold claim, can you explain why you believe this is
           | so?
           | 
           | > But Intel brought it off.
           | 
           | Not by buying up and killing the Alpha AXP, oh no.
        
             | B1FF_PSUVM wrote:
             | The DEC Alpha was the swan song of Digital Equipment
             | Corporation, which was bought by Compaq (a PC manufacturer
             | that peaked in the 1990s), which was bought by HP.
             | 
             | Intel had little to do with it.
        
               | pdw wrote:
               | I don't know the details, but from Wikipedia: "In May
               | 1997, DEC sued Intel for allegedly infringing on its
               | Alpha patents in designing the original Pentium, Pentium
               | Pro, and Pentium II chips. As part of a settlement, much
               | of DEC's chip design and fabrication business was sold to
               | Intel."
        
       | snakeyjake wrote:
       | Perhaps one day the power of the CDC 6600 will be available to
       | all who need, or merely want, it.
       | 
       | One can dream...
        
       | uticus wrote:
       | > Delivering precise exceptions that the operating system can
       | resume from would be a ludicrous waste of precious logic.
       | Instead, programmers should be honest about the storage their
       | programs need, and get good at their job.
       | 
       | ah the days of yore
        
       | ok123456 wrote:
       | http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/cdc/cyber/books/DesignOfAComput...
        
       | jandrese wrote:
       | I liked the chart comparing the memory bandwidth against a modern
       | video card, which of course had to be in log scale and was still
       | enormously different.
        
       | monocasa wrote:
       | I know it's an Apr1 post, but I'd honestly really like more
       | historic supercomputer content from chipsandcheese; this was a
       | great read.
        
       | nxobject wrote:
       | A classic early example of superscalar execution.
        
       | johnklos wrote:
       | April Fools or not, this is a wonderful writeup that makes for a
       | wonderful contrast between historical computing and modern
       | computing. Love it!
        
       | rhelz wrote:
       | _chuckle_ I got a chance to tour a CDC Cyber 205--one of the last
       | in active use. And  "tour" is the right word--we toured it like
       | you'd tour a house. First and last computer I was ever...inside
       | of.
       | 
       | You'd go down this "hall", the walls full of millions of wires,
       | carefully looped so that the signals wouldn't arrive too early (1
       | foot = 1 nanosecond, and you wanted all the signals of the bus to
       | arrive at the same time, which meant the all the wires on the bus
       | had to be the same length.) "There's the address bus, now down
       | the hall there are two rooms, one is the ALU, the other is the
       | optional square root calculating units....
       | 
       | Yeah, a whole "room" to calculate square roots. I guess they
       | hadn't figured out the fast square root algorithm which DOOM used
       | yet :-)
       | 
       | Absolutely astounding artifact. It was like seeing the great
       | pyramids.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-04-01 23:00 UTC)