[HN Gopher] The illusion of being stuck
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The illusion of being stuck
        
       Author : benoitmalige
       Score  : 172 points
       Date   : 2024-03-31 13:21 UTC (9 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (the-simulation-strategists.beehiiv.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (the-simulation-strategists.beehiiv.com)
        
       | hyperhello wrote:
       | Just a tip, it's actually "break free", not "brake free".
        
         | oskapt wrote:
         | And it also isn't "dreadfull." I am very skeptical of taking
         | any advice from a person unable to use basic spell checking
         | before publishing an article. I'm also skeptical of advice from
         | someone who has only recently discovered a possible solution
         | for his very personal problems and feels he should share it
         | with the world. In the 12-step world there are people who only
         | do the first and last steps. They're called two-steppers. You
         | can look up the steps yourselves, but essentially it translates
         | to, "we admitted we were powerless, that our lives had become
         | unmanageable, and having had a spiritual awakening, we told
         | everyone else how to fix their lives." There are a lot of steps
         | in between being stuck and becoming unstuck. The author should
         | just quietly repair his life and shelve his egotistical need
         | for external validation.
        
           | ufocia wrote:
           | > two-steppers ... "we admitted we were powerless, that our
           | lives had become unmanageable, and having had a spiritual
           | awakening, we told everyone else how to fix their lives."
           | 
           | LOL, though it may be the starting point of all the self-help
           | systems, which later evolve iteratively adding intermediate
           | steps.
        
           | benoitmalige wrote:
           | Thank you for pointing out the spelling mistake.
           | 
           | Your skepticism is valid; advice should be considered
           | carefully, especially when it's based on personal experiences
           | that might not be universally applicable. My letters are less
           | about instructing others and more about sharing my
           | reflections as I navigate through my own journey. It's not
           | about two-stepping around the hard work of self-improvement,
           | but about the ongoing process of understanding and growth.
           | 
           | As for the need for validation, I see this platform more as a
           | conversation with others who might relate or benefit from my
           | experiences, rather than seeking applause.
           | 
           | Again, I appreciate your candor -- it's an important part of
           | the dialogue.
        
           | Eudaimion wrote:
           | You are taking things, way too seriously.
           | 
           | > I'm also skeptical of advice from someone who has only
           | recently discovered a possible solution for his very personal
           | problems and feels he should share it with the world.
           | 
           | Advice should never be just taken at face value. Even if it
           | is a successful person giving it. Personally, any advice from
           | Elon Musk is worth less, than any random link on HN.
           | 
           | > The author should just quietly repair his life and shelve
           | his egotistical need for external validation.
           | 
           | This is just mean.
           | 
           | I one hundred percent guarantee that there are other people,
           | with the same problem as the author. And his solution will be
           | useful. Sharing is a net good.
           | 
           | TL;DR through a Dev World Prism: No, I completely disagree
           | that only staff engineers should be allowed to have technical
           | blogs.
        
       | mhb wrote:
       | Part of this might be that, before starting something, you can
       | maintain the illusion that everything will go as you planned.
       | Actually starting requires abandoning that comfortable illusion
       | in the face of the reality of inevitable obstacles and
       | compromises.
        
       | rwasco wrote:
       | > I impulssively bought a plane ticket to Panama:
       | 
       | > I cried. Haven't done that in years.
       | 
       | > I had the uncomfortable conversation with my business partner
       | to tell them I no longer have passion for it and am leaving them
       | the decision to continue or quit.
       | 
       | > I forced myself to talk to strangers every single day.
       | 
       | These also could be explained by someone entering hypomania. How
       | would you distinguish stuck/unstuck from depressed/hypomanic?
        
         | maroonblazer wrote:
         | 3 of those 4 - crying, having an uncomfortable conversation,
         | and talking to strangers - don't seem like symptoms of
         | hypomania. The impulsive plane ticket to Panama is questionable
         | too. We'd need to know a LOT more about the individual to make
         | the leap from that to a disorder.
        
           | benoitmalige wrote:
           | You're right, those actions by themselves don't necessarily
           | point to hypomania--they're just snippets of a larger
           | journey.
           | 
           | Panama was indeed just the beginning; the real journey has
           | been internal--navigating the landscapes of self-discovery
           | and learning to process my thoughts through writing.
           | 
           | Your comment is much appreciated; it's all part of the
           | conversation about understanding ourselves better. So thank
           | you for that.
        
         | imbnwa wrote:
         | I don't see the virtue of grounding an empirical wisdom in some
         | species of scientific (mechanical might be better the term?)
         | description. Funny enough, in relation to your comment, I've
         | never met anyone motivated by this brand of advocacy who didn't
         | suffer swings in depression; as if 'science' were some exterior
         | mass whose gravity/gravitas would pull them up and out from the
         | dregs of the swamp by virtue of its sheer presence to mind.
        
         | hallway_monitor wrote:
         | I think these labels definitely apply, if you think about it as
         | a spectrum. Maybe the author's state wasn't pathological in
         | either case but he definitely went from low energy to high
         | energy.
         | 
         | I notice these shifts in myself and others; deciding to change
         | it is the only way to get yourself out of a rut in my
         | experience. When I do feel a little too "amped up" I use that
         | energy and just make sure to avoid big decisions.
        
         | mynameisvlad wrote:
         | These energy levels are all relative, though. If you've spent
         | most of your life in a depressed state, then suddenly having
         | energy (possibly because you're dealing with your mental health
         | for the first time) then a lot of things are going to look like
         | "hypomania" in comparison and I feel like that is the case for
         | a lot of people.
        
           | sdwr wrote:
           | Where it turns into mania, in my experience, is when you
           | start doubling down repeatedly. If your good feeling comes
           | from believing that you are making a huge change in your
           | life, you get anchored to the rate of change, and start
           | needing bigger and bigger feelings to keep up.
           | 
           | It's a kind of self-ponzi scheme - nothing has tangibly
           | gotten better, all you have is the belief.
        
           | nullindividual wrote:
           | Hypomania is an unusual level of excitement and happiness;
           | 'thinking straight' becomes difficult, but it doesn't feel
           | that way in the moment.
           | 
           | Happiness and hypomania are easily distinguishable.
        
         | sdwr wrote:
         | There's a big grey area in the middle. How you want to label it
         | is influenced by the outcome and whether you think it's a good
         | idea.
         | 
         | Quitting your job and flying to Central America is risky. If
         | his life improves from there, then it was getting unstuck. If
         | it gets worse or goes back to the same, then it was a manic
         | episode.
         | 
         | History written by the victors!
        
           | benoitmalige wrote:
           | Well said. And for clarification, it was not a job but the
           | business I started 6 years ago. More rencent update: The trip
           | gave me a new perspective and I shifted the business model,
           | rather than shutting it down.
        
             | lgvld wrote:
             | Would you tell me more about it, please?
             | 
             | I sometimes feel like I am in the same position as you
             | were: > I had the uncomfortable conversation with my
             | business partner to tell them I no longer have passion for
             | it and am leaving them the decision to continue or quit.
             | 
             | When I feel burned out and/or unpassionate by my work, I
             | automatically think about leaving it behind and move on,
             | but after some rest (and discussion) I usually come to
             | another easier-on-my-mind perspective which alleviates me,
             | at least for some time. But I am worried I am just making
             | compromises with myself in order to stay stuck in my
             | comfort zone -- instead of going for more radical changes.
             | 
             | Cool article btw, thank you.
        
               | benoitmalige wrote:
               | First off, thank you for your comment, and your
               | compliment is very much appreciated.
               | 
               | I can relate to what you're describing and can only speak
               | from my own journey. The recurring thought of needing
               | change haunted me for years. Financial stability did play
               | a crucial role in allowing me the flexibility to make
               | significant changes. One of the toughest challenges was
               | the idea of letting go of something I had poured so much
               | into over the years.
               | 
               | Before launching my business 6 years ago, I faced a
               | similar crossroads while feeling trapped in an
               | unsatisfying job. With just three months of savings, I
               | took the leap into starting my company, which,
               | fortunately, turned out well. It underscores that there
               | isn't a universal solution; it really depends on each
               | individual's circumstances.
               | 
               | What pushed me to start writing this newsletter was a
               | profound sense of lacking purpose. That feeling of
               | purposelessness eventually outweighed the fear of
               | stepping away from the business I had built.
               | 
               | I hope sharing this provides some clarity.
        
         | charles_f wrote:
         | I guess you could see it as one of the causes of depression?
         | Kinda like having a cold describes a situation that can be
         | caused by 10s of thousands of viruses, in the end you still
         | feel the same kind of shitty. Still useful to know what kind of
         | virus it is so it can be treated?
        
       | Exuma wrote:
       | Now that is a great fucking article. I have to tell people this
       | all the time and no one can truly grasp what I'm saying. You have
       | absolutely nailed it.
        
         | benoitmalige wrote:
         | Thanks so much, Exuma!
         | 
         | It's really encouraging to hear that the article struck a chord
         | with you. Sometimes the hardest ideas to convey are the ones
         | that matter most, and it's awesome to know it resonated.
         | 
         | Here's to hoping it helps more people get the message you've
         | been trying to share.
        
       | thyrox wrote:
       | Is there survivor bias in being stuck? We have accepted that
       | people who leap out of their comfort zone end up always
       | successful. But a lot of time this is not true. I know few people
       | who have regretted jumping and making impulsive decision in the
       | name of growth.
        
         | benoitmalige wrote:
         | Good point. Nothing is without risk, and it doesn't always lead
         | to success. Every jump, impulsive or calculated, has its own
         | set of outcomes and consequences, and it's important to
         | consider both sides.
        
       | rolandog wrote:
       | Estoy orgulloso de ti ;). I like your article.
       | 
       | It takes courage to pivot and get out of your comfort zone.
        
         | benoitmalige wrote:
         | Muchas gracias. Your words mean a lot to me.
         | 
         | It's one thing to step out of the comfort zone, and another to
         | share that journey openly.
         | 
         | I'm glad you liked the article, and I hope it can inspire
         | courage in others as well.
        
       | cess11 wrote:
       | "Here's the problem: Your brain and its cortical columns are
       | designed to conserve energy at all costs."
       | 
       | How does this model explain substance addiction?
       | 
       | 'You need to consciously and repetitively seek out "False"
       | signals and embrace the discomfort they bring. You need to
       | construct a new reality.'
       | 
       | Much like the 'why aren't you growing? you need to grow. grow!'
       | sentiment in the beginning this seems more in line with something
       | tumorous than what I'd like to be or become.
        
         | pier25 wrote:
         | It explains psychological addiction. You grow attached to a
         | familiar and seemingly safe numbing sensation.
         | 
         | Physical addiction is another thing.
        
           | cess11 wrote:
           | OK, so this is a model relevant for people that believe in a
           | dualist worldview? Kinda like a soul that needs to be kept
           | pure or something?
        
         | throwaway11460 wrote:
         | Substance addiction is free reward with no effort at all.
         | Sounds like it fits!
        
         | benoitmalige wrote:
         | The brain's tendency to conserve energy does play a part in
         | substance addiction, reinforcing behaviors that provide a high
         | reward for little effort. However, this model overlooks the
         | complexity of addiction, which involves not just the pursuit of
         | rewards but also the avoidance of withdrawal discomfort.
         | 
         | The conversation around addiction would also need to consider
         | the neurological changes that perpetuate the cycle, making it a
         | state that's incredibly challenging to break free from.
         | 
         | However, I can't specifically speak on physical addiction, as
         | it's outside my area of expertise. The intention behind my
         | writing is to unpack my own thoughts, aiding me in my journey
         | toward self-discovery and the pursuit of purpose.
        
       | galleywest200 wrote:
       | When I was getting my undergraduate degree one of my chemistry
       | professors taught us that "I don't know" is one of the most
       | important sentences a scientist can and should say. You will be
       | viewed as a source of knowledge or as an expert, do not fill
       | people with BS or guesses.
        
       | noufalibrahim wrote:
       | I've come across these kinds of articles before and they always
       | seem to suggest that you rewrite the metaphorical firmware of
       | your brain so that it operates in a way that is advantageous to
       | you. There's some notion of self discovery from first principles.
       | 
       | I'm not convinced that this is generally a good idea. It makes a
       | person unmoored and open to anything ("so open minded that your
       | brains fall out"). It's also often amoral. The only metric that's
       | maximised is utility regardless of other more subtle
       | consequences.
       | 
       | As I grow older, i think the human experience is more complex
       | than can be captured by a few "hacks" like this.
        
         | card_zero wrote:
         | Did you know, the brain is hard-wired to be suckered by self-
         | help books? One trick that I personally find very liberating
         | and enlightening is to make a big pile of such material and
         | burn it. It gives me a sense of warmth and inner joy.
        
           | noufalibrahim wrote:
           | Isn't the combustion external? Why would the warmth be
           | internal?
        
             | ufocia wrote:
             | Semantics dear Watson: it's the inner joy that's internal.
        
               | noufalibrahim wrote:
               | Never let an explanation ruin a terrible pun.
        
             | gumby wrote:
             | "Burn" is a commonplace synonym for oxidization, that is,
             | adding an electron. Likely the GP is " _eating_ the books,
             | and thus is warmed as a consequence of the Krebs cycle.
             | 
             | We can be glad for GP that these days it is uncommon to
             | encounter a book with a CD or DVD attached. I'm not sure
             | those are safe to eat.
        
           | jrm4 wrote:
           | I so believe the opposite of this IF you come at the right
           | ones the right way?
           | 
           | Which is to say, once you read (or skimmed) enough of them,
           | it's easy to get a sixth sense of the "intelligence" and
           | "motivation" of the writer, and the sincere ones, even if not
           | smart, are still pretty enjoyable if taken with many salt
           | grains, and I'm a sucker for them (again, not in terms of
           | following exactly what they say to do, but appreciating the
           | motivation and good-intent of the author and possibly picking
           | up something along the way.)
           | 
           | They'll have names like PSYCHO-CYBERNETICS and just be like
           | "try to be nice to people and sit down and be quite a few
           | times a day."
           | 
           | A sort of perfect example would be the fictional "The You You
           | Are" from the TV Show Severance. I hope they actually write
           | it, I know I'd LOVE it.
           | 
           | https://severance.wiki/the_you_you_are_book
        
           | nefrix wrote:
           | Your advice is superb. You can start writing self help books
           | learning people how to make the fire in order for them to
           | achieve the inner joy.
        
           | knallfrosch wrote:
           | I enjoy reading them, thinking I'll change myself. Then I'm
           | done, I don't apply anything and put the book on the shelf.
           | 
           | It's its own kind of horror for these books.
        
             | maxverse wrote:
             | This is an interesting topic of its own, but there have
             | been a _few_ books /ideas that have made a significant
             | difference on how I operate day-to-day. There are many more
             | books and ideas I nod along to and never implement.
        
               | benoitmalige wrote:
               | You've touched on something profound here--our
               | interaction with knowledge is dynamic, not static. A book
               | that speaks to us today might whisper different wisdom 5
               | years from now, as we grow and our perspectives shift.
        
         | hartator wrote:
         | Yes, it's very like meditate your way out of pain to point you
         | don't feel when you are actually burning. Which actually
         | happens IRL more often then what you would assume.
        
         | haswell wrote:
         | My perspective on this is one of a person who underwent years
         | of complex trauma in childhood and my stuck-ness was a series
         | of overly sensitive protective mechanisms that had been built
         | up by the experience.
         | 
         | "The illusion of being stuck" also sounds a lot like "Learned
         | Helplessness", which is a maladaptive conditioning of the brain
         | to strongly believe that not doing something is the best option
         | because doing something won't make a difference anyway, despite
         | this not being true at all. Like drowning in two feet of water
         | because it didn't occur to the person to just stand up.
         | 
         | The reason I'm pointing at trauma is that we all come from a
         | wide spectrum of experiences, which result in a wide spectrum
         | of stuckness (or lack thereof).
         | 
         | The book "Learned Optimism" (written by Martin Seligman, one of
         | the original researchers who discovered the learned
         | helplessness phenomenon) first describes how animals (not just
         | humans) arrive in these maladaptive states, and then provides
         | worksheets to help people who are currently deeply biased
         | towards a pessimistic world view learn techniques to reframe
         | and ultimately rewire these biases, and I can attest to the
         | life changing improvements this kind of work can bring without
         | my brain falling out.
         | 
         | More broadly, it's worth considering the fact that we're all
         | running firmware that evolved during a very different era of
         | human existence, and is often poorly tuned for modern reality.
         | 
         | Using what we know about the brain and how it is conditioned to
         | adapt ourselves to modern situations seems pretty critical.
         | 
         | > _I 'm not convinced that this is generally a good idea. It
         | makes a person unmoored and open to anything ("so open minded
         | that your brains fall out"). It's also often amoral. The only
         | metric that's maximised is utility regardless of other more
         | subtle consequences._
         | 
         | This seems like a pretty major jump to a conclusion that would
         | require far more to back it up.
         | 
         | I don't think this is about mucking with firmware as much as it
         | is about correcting model weights. Our firmware seems to be
         | what it is. Our environment and conditioning is what embeds
         | certain biases and resulting behaviors.
         | 
         | Human experience is certainly more complex than just a few
         | hacks, but I don't think that discounts the value that certain
         | kinds of exercises can bring.
         | 
         | We're continually working against our default modes of
         | operation when we adhere to principles of rational thought and
         | logic. Emotional responses like anger discard these higher
         | modes of thinking. I see these "hacks" as something similar:
         | methods of helping us move beyond the less adaptive parts of
         | our brains based on a growing understanding of the world around
         | us.
        
           | noufalibrahim wrote:
           | That's a very nuanced take. I dont take offense to using
           | "techniques" to fix "problems".
           | 
           | I'm more annoyed by the usual phrasing of these things as
           | life changing and revelatory.
        
             | ufocia wrote:
             | > I'm more annoyed by the usual phrasing of these things as
             | life changing and revelatory.
             | 
             | Maybe it's time to unstick yourself from these patterns.
             | Life changing and revelatory can be as much evolutionary as
             | revolutionary. There's no need to narrow them down to their
             | extremes.
        
               | dylnuge wrote:
               | I suspect they're taking issue with the implication that
               | these things are _universally_ life changing, not that
               | they can be meaningful at all. I have no doubt the author
               | of this article uncovered personal truths, but the whole
               | thing is framed as if they become an expert on everyone
               | else 's mental health by breaking free from their own
               | depression.
               | 
               | Personally for navel-gazy articles like this I think it's
               | more useful to focus on telling one's own story instead
               | of making broad edicts and sprinkling in some science in
               | an effort to lend legitimacy to them. What works for one
               | person won't work for everyone, but "I was in X situation
               | and did Y and it helped me" is far more likely to be
               | helpful for someone else than simply "Do Y", especially
               | when you're writing for a wide audience.
        
               | benoitmalige wrote:
               | Thank you for your insight. I completely agree--my
               | journey and the lessons I've learned are deeply personal
               | and not one-size-fits-all solutions. Embracing imperfect
               | action has been a significant step for me, far better
               | than letting procrastination have control. Sharing my
               | experiences and receiving feedback is how I hope to grow
               | and refine my understanding over time. And truly, when I
               | write, I'm mainly holding a mirror to myself, navigating
               | my thoughts and discoveries. Your feedback is invaluable
               | in this process.
        
             | try_the_bass wrote:
             | > I'm more annoyed by the usual phrasing of these things as
             | life changing and revelatory.
             | 
             | But when they work for someone, they can and do lead to
             | important revelations and/or life changes.
             | 
             | I'm a firm believer in one's ability to "reprogram"
             | themselves, having done it to varying degrees across the
             | span of my life. Perhaps it doesn't work for everyone. It
             | doesn't always work for myself, especially when life makes
             | the required self-discipline hard to maintain.
             | 
             | I'm biased by my own success, obviously.
        
           | axchizhov wrote:
           | Learned helplessness was disproved, by the way. If I remember
           | correctly, there is even a recent paper from the original
           | authors confirming this.
           | 
           | Helplessness isn't learned, it's a result of not knowing how
           | to deal with the situation. So, try new things, search for
           | the solutions and don't give up -- that's the recipe.
        
         | rors wrote:
         | Over the last few months I've been experimenting with Buddhist
         | meditation, which leans heavily into this metaphor. They phrase
         | the metaphor differently, with a focus on flattening of the
         | grooves in your mind.
         | 
         | I've found these ideas helpful, but they're hardly novel. The
         | Buddha lived over 2000 years ago. One big difference the
         | objective. Most of these blogs are about hacking your mind to
         | be more successful, whereas religions aim to make you more
         | comfortable with your life as it currently is.
         | 
         | I think if you're going to experiment with upgrading your
         | wetware, then you could do worse than look at Buddhism, or any
         | other practice that encourages deep contemplation and promotes
         | kindness. I have my issues with organised religion, but why not
         | at least consider the thousands of years of prior art?
        
           | noufalibrahim wrote:
           | I appreciate the point you're trying to make. However, my
           | general experience of attempts to take "useful" parts of of
           | religion and then sanitise them for secular mass consumption
           | is that they're at best useless and at worst harmful.
           | 
           | Sure, there might be some proximal benefits to (say)
           | meditation but these are things that were done in a larger
           | (often spiritual) context and I'm not sure that pulling them
           | out of that is wise.
        
             | ufocia wrote:
             | Don't kill and don't steal seem pretty useful and are
             | embedded within many if not all secular laws.
        
             | praptak wrote:
             | Effects of meditation are there regardless of the religious
             | context.
             | 
             | Although you are right in that the deeper stages (say as
             | described in "The Mind Illuminated") may not make much
             | sense without at least some spiritual foundation.
        
           | FlyingSnake wrote:
           | It is also a folly to equate Buddhist traditions with Self
           | help book sellers. Siddhartha Gautam Buddha was just one of
           | the 6 other prevalent Dharmic masters and there enough
           | original material from many of those traditions. The Dharmic
           | traditions arose over centuries through a healthy
           | collaboration of diverse set of people over a vast geography.
        
             | ufocia wrote:
             | True, the Dharmic masters didn't have printing presses.
        
               | gchamonlive wrote:
               | Or late stage capitalism
        
         | rdsubhas wrote:
         | You seem to have experience in this. Could you recommend or
         | share any alternative approaches?
        
         | anon373839 wrote:
         | Honestly, the centerpiece of the article is this:
         | 
         | > In plain, simple terms, you need to: do the uncomfortable
         | thing.
         | 
         | That's what the advice boils down to, and it works, and it's
         | not a hack. It's growth. There are lots of sophisticated
         | techniques to help you actually do "the thing," but if your
         | best judgment is that the thing is the right course of action,
         | then you ultimately do need to violate your _feeling_ that it
         | is wrong /dangerous/scary and let your feelings catch up later.
        
           | charles_f wrote:
           | I think that's fair, but there's also value in describing
           | what is being stuck. It's important being able to identify
           | feelings and put words on it. It also helps to see this is
           | something other people go through, so as to feel less alone
        
         | maxverse wrote:
         | The difference between medicine in poison is the dose ("the
         | dose makes the poison.") Good ideas taken to extreme are often
         | Very Bad, but sometimes a little bit of the idea is exactly
         | what you need.
         | 
         | If you have social anxiety, talking to people through
         | discomfort, or initially treating interactions as a game can
         | help take the pressure off. Treating people as NPCs is
         | unhealthy. Routine exercise is good. Becoming obsessed with how
         | your body looks, living in the gym, taking steroids is bad. A
         | sense of humility, purpose, and devotion in life is generally
         | good. Religious fanaticism is bad. Confidence, which often
         | involves a touch of self-deception, generally is good.
         | Unchecked arrogance is bad.
         | 
         | If I tell you to go for a run or do some push-ups, there's a
         | risk that you'll become totally obsessed with exercise. But
         | going for that run will also help. You need a moderate amount
         | of my advice, not an extreme amount.
         | 
         | This piece resonated with me. When you're stuck in a routine
         | you dislike, being aware that your brain is optimized to stay
         | in its current state (according to the cited research) is good.
         | Going bananas and being "unmoored and open to anything", living
         | every day without any sense of habit or purpose is bad. The
         | dose makes the poison.
        
           | soneca wrote:
           | I on the side that the complexity is even larger than this.
           | There a lot of other analogies that could apply here, not
           | just the dose/poison one.
           | 
           | Some things are good in small doses on some occasions and in
           | large doses on others. Some things are poison for some people
           | but food for others. Some things are only medicine in very
           | specific circumstances. Some things are placebo.
           | 
           | Anyone can decide if a piece of advice is beneficial to them
           | in what dose. But I agree with the GP that we are too complex
           | for these hacks
        
         | faeriechangling wrote:
         | >It makes a person unmoored and open to anything ("so open
         | minded that your brains fall out")
         | 
         | I agree with your assumptions, but not your conclusion. When I
         | was at my very lowest I took pretty high doses of acid for my
         | first time on psychedelics. The point was that I was starting
         | from a long time experiencing daily mental anguish and physical
         | pain being treatment resistant, ideating suicide but not
         | completing it. I thought if I became more "open minded", either
         | I'd get better or I'd off myself and I really preferred both
         | over the status quo. The former happened.
         | 
         | Being open minded is a bad thing only if you like how your mind
         | how it is.
        
         | mistermann wrote:
         | > I've come across these kinds of articles before and they
         | always seem to suggest that you rewrite the metaphorical
         | firmware of your brain so that it operates in a way that is
         | advantageous to you. There's some notion of self discovery from
         | first principles.
         | 
         | > I'm not convinced that this is generally a good idea. It
         | makes a person unmoored and open to anything ("so open minded
         | that your brains fall out"). It's also often amoral. The only
         | metric that's maximised is utility regardless of other more
         | subtle consequences.
         | 
         | I'd say you could benefit from a firmware rewrite yourself,
         | because it isn't possible for you to know these things,
         | _because they are unknowable_.
         | 
         | > As I grow older, i think the human experience is more complex
         | than can be captured by a few "hacks" like this.
         | 
         | Or yours.
         | 
         | As Terence McKenna liked to say:
         | 
         | - Reality is not only stranger than we imagine, it's stranger
         | than we CAN imagine.
         | 
         | - What we call reality is in fact nothing more than a
         | culturally sanctioned and linguistically reinforced
         | hallucination. (A bit off, _but close enough_.)
        
       | richrichie wrote:
       | Any time i see an article that talks in definitive terms what
       | parts of the human brain do and extrapolate that to tactics to
       | mold behavior patterns, i take a ritual bath and open a bottle of
       | whiskey.
        
         | benoitmalige wrote:
         | I appreciate your perspective -- it's always good to approach
         | definitive statements with a healthy dose of skepticism. My
         | articles are really personal reflections, a way for me to
         | process and sort through my own thoughts. When I'm offering
         | advice or insights, I'm often speaking to myself, hoping to
         | uncover a bit more clarity in the complex web of human
         | behavior.
        
       | navane wrote:
       | So this guy had all the opportunities, choose to spend his time
       | to herd clicks for some big corps, finds out it's an empty life
       | and suggests to do things like "but a plane ticket to Panama" to
       | get unstuck.
       | 
       | Sometimes your therapist asks you to write a letter but you're
       | supposed to keep those in your drawer.
        
         | benoitmalige wrote:
         | Thank you for sharing your thoughts. My writing is a method for
         | me to navigate and clarify my own journey of introspection and
         | growth. "You" is often a reflection of myself in the mirror of
         | words. Whether it strikes a chord with others is a welcome
         | bonus, but not the end goal.
         | 
         | The essence of my message stems from a personal revelation:
         | after dedicating six years to a company I built from the ground
         | up, I realized I was losing myself in the pursuit of success.
         | 
         | It's not about wandering aimlessly for profit; it's about the
         | quest for meaningful work and rediscovering the parts of myself
         | that got buried in the hustle.
        
       | mikewarot wrote:
       | Knowledge of the illusion can be enough to help you route around
       | it. You can not escape from a prison you don't know you're in.
        
         | benoitmalige wrote:
         | Absolutely, awareness is the first step towards change.Thanks
         | for that insight, it's a valuable addition to the idea of
         | mental barriers and personal growth.
        
       | ericmcer wrote:
       | Don't people have partners, kids, aging parents, hell even pets
       | that depend on them?
       | 
       | The authors version of being stuck seems like a luxury, an inward
       | exploration to find out how you are holding yourself back. To
       | even approach it from that angle you need to have no one
       | depending on you. I can't "shake things up" by trying a new
       | career or taking impulsive vacations because other human beings
       | rely on me being "stuck".
        
         | benoitmalige wrote:
         | You raise an excellent point, and it's true that everyone's
         | circumstances are unique. In my case, my family is in another
         | country, and my pursuit of the American dream led me to work so
         | intensely that I overlooked the simple act of living. While I
         | understand that not everyone has the flexibility to make
         | drastic changes due to their responsibilities, I believe we all
         | have our own paths to feeling unstuck. My writing is a personal
         | tool to help me navigate my path and make sense of my
         | experiences. Thank you for sharing your perspective--it's a
         | vital reminder of the diverse lives we all lead.
        
       | mlhpdx wrote:
       | > do the uncomfortable thing.
       | 
       | I've done this ever since learning about "brain plasticity" as a
       | child. My logic was/is simple: if I didn't want something to feel
       | uncomfortable I had to do it regularly. To me, building physical
       | strength/ability and mental strength/ability were the same.
       | Sitting on a moving bike was uncomfortable and now isn't, and
       | architecting distributed systems, too. Perhaps simplistic, and
       | not worth a long article, but pretty close to the truth it seems,
       | as I look back.
        
       | dclowd9901 wrote:
       | I think I'm one of those few (lucky?) people who disdains
       | stagnation. If I start to feel comfortable in my job, I start to
       | get this resonant itchiness to move on from it. I find a new job
       | and suddenly it dawns on me how much new shit I have to learn and
       | do. I learn and do and the cycle repeats!
        
       | wvh wrote:
       | This person is experiencing the same kind of existential
       | conundrum and arriving at the same conclusions as I am at this
       | not so easy point in life, and although I can't really offer them
       | more wisdom or insight as they themselves are offering in this
       | post, I wish them all the best in unlocking their brain and
       | finding better ways to feel satisfied and a better sense of
       | meaning.
        
       | nefrix wrote:
       | This article reminded me of David Mumet's character, Edmond. In
       | that play things does not end very happily for the main character
       | after he asks himself to many "whys" and starts to do lots of
       | changes on his day routines.
        
       | manmal wrote:
       | At the end of the article, it becomes clear that author went
       | abroad for a while, which might have inspired the article.
       | Changing one's environment is indeed a good way to get unstuck -
       | eg some addicts only ever get out of the vicious cycle by moving
       | away and cutting ties with everything/everyone that kept them
       | stuck.
       | 
       | Maybe the rest of the article has merit too, but I'm not sure
       | it's not a post hoc rationalization.
        
       | spxneo wrote:
       | If you feel stuck it means you need new habits because the old
       | ones are not serving you well!
       | 
       | Program your environment, set up commitment devices to lock in
       | your future behaviour that is positive and effortless.
       | 
       | Do not ever set goals, they are high-risk low pay off mental bets
       | that will eat you if you fail (odds are against you).
        
         | copperx wrote:
         | What is an example of a commitment device?
        
           | spxneo wrote:
           | addicted to smartphones? leave it behind when you go to study
           | at the library and you have no choice but to study.
           | 
           | you are not hitting the gyms for the 10 years you been
           | telling people? subscribe to a local gym on the way to or
           | back from work! (brain: "well i already spent money and its
           | too embarassing to cancel now and besides the gym is
           | literally down the same street i dont even have to drive
           | there welp guess im going")
        
           | mimischi wrote:
           | This might be cliche, but if you can afford to (time and
           | money), have a go at ,,Atomic Habits" by James Clear. It's an
           | easy and enjoyable read, that outlines a framework of how you
           | can build new habits and get rid of your old, unwanted ones.
        
             | spxneo wrote:
             | yeah pretty much thats where all my quotes are from
             | 
             | i recommend this book to everyone i meet
             | 
             | it is life changing
        
             | paulgerhardt wrote:
             | If "Atomic Habits" doesn't sit with you (I found the
             | endless anecdotes about the author's high school baseball
             | career detracting) I recommend "Four Thousand Weeks: Time
             | Management for Mortals" - it's slightly less targeted to
             | fans of Ryan Holiday/Tim Ferris and slightly more targeted
             | to productivity hack tooling reformed/burnt-out
             | individuals.
        
               | spxneo wrote:
               | he only talks about his experience through his
               | rehabilitation in the first chapter the rest of the book
               | he draws from real world examples from other industries
               | and history to illustrate the specific point. i think
               | they are very practical as it is easier to remember
               | stories than recalling step by step points
        
         | PartiallyTyped wrote:
         | I found that it is extremely difficult for me to set habits and
         | keep them. I used to go running 4-5 times a week for months,
         | and I couldn't make it stick.
        
           | spxneo wrote:
           | The best way to build a positive habit is to make it not
           | painful and easy.
           | 
           | Heres my advice:
           | 
           | If 4-5 times a week is not sustainable then make it 100x less
           | (whatever point you feel is not painful). If you used to run
           | 50km a week, try 500m each session. Fight the urge to
           | continue running.
           | 
           | The goal of this exercise is to build the "show up" muscle.
           | Another hack on top of this is to not tell yourself you are
           | going for a run, you just need to put on the running shoes.
           | (brain: "i put on my shoes might as well go for a run now")
           | Step further is you go to sleep in your running clothes.
           | 
           | Principle is to always reduce friction of good habits you
           | want to build and add friction to bad habits you want to
           | stop!
           | 
           | Godspeed
        
       | malkosta wrote:
       | Around a year ago I had one of those 6 months long tasks that you
       | have no idea where to start. I hitted my had on the wall a few
       | times, and had to erase first month work completely. In the end
       | what worked was: - Spend a day or two creating a fuzzy view of
       | the whole problem. Pay attention to the rabbit holes, do not fall
       | in them, be superficial. - Spend a day or two creating a detailed
       | view of the next 2 weeks. Go as deep as you can, but pay
       | attention to not prepare more than 2 weeks of work, because
       | things WILL change. And you will lose a lot of work. Minimize
       | that. - Execute. - Repeat.
       | 
       | After a couple iterations your estimation will be much better and
       | you will see the light in the end of the tunnnel.
        
       | indigoabstract wrote:
       | Every time I read about these mind hacks that are supposed to
       | transform your life and attitude, I'm reminded of the Novelty
       | effect:
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novelty_effect
       | 
       | It's the best thing ever, until you get used to it, than it
       | becomes the same old. Sometimes I think the human race is
       | completely ruled by this effect, ever chasing the next new thing
       | as it seems so much better than the boring old thing.
        
       | betimsl wrote:
       | Pretty awesome article -- rock on
        
       | 0xfedcafe wrote:
       | I fully agree with this article, based on my experience, which I
       | achieved purely empirically.
       | 
       | I was stuck for a long time and couldn't do new, challenging
       | things for myself; it felt almost impossible. The solution was to
       | get more and more challenges in life. This happened almost
       | accidentally, but a lot has changed. After all the discomfort
       | that occurred bit by bit, it has become much easier to do
       | something new. Even if it feels disgusting and you want to shout,
       | the only solution is to just do it.
       | 
       | Also, building new habits helps a lot because it takes at least
       | several weeks, so you have to accept this challenge and do it.
        
       | stevenjgarner wrote:
       | I personally found "The Neuroscience of Change" by Kelly
       | McGonigal [1] most useful in becoming "unstuck". Essentially for
       | myself it was being taken through the realization that life is
       | change, how with every breath the trillions of cells in my body
       | undergo substantive transformational change, that my self-
       | delusion of being stuck became comical.
       | 
       | [1] https://www.soundstrue.com/products/the-neuroscience-of-
       | chan...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-03-31 23:01 UTC)