[HN Gopher] Boston built a ton of lab buildings. Now many are empty
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Boston built a ton of lab buildings. Now many are empty
        
       Author : ilamont
       Score  : 19 points
       Date   : 2024-03-24 13:17 UTC (9 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.boston.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.boston.com)
        
       | black_13 wrote:
       | Turn to housing
        
         | ssl-3 wrote:
         | That sounds easy, but it's expensive and difficult. The
         | infrastructure (plumbing, HVAC, electric, egress) needs of
         | office and other commercial spaces are very different compared
         | to what residential units need.
         | 
         | So, for example: Bathrooms. While there may have been one or
         | two [sets of] bathrooms per section of floor in commercial use,
         | and this worked fine, residential tenants want at least one
         | full bathroom all for themselves in their relatively small 1,
         | 2, or 3-bedroom spread.
         | 
         | Or kitchens: What might have been a few limited break-room-type
         | kitchenettes per floor needs to be a full kitchen, per-unit.
         | 
         | Those pipes need to live somewhere. (And this can be
         | accomplished, but it's a somewhat monumental task to design and
         | implement.)
        
       | alephnerd wrote:
       | A similar issue is happening in San Francisco in Mission Bay,
       | who's builders are the exact same as those in Kendall Square
        
       | GenerWork wrote:
       | Commercial real estate is still getting absolutely destroyed by
       | Covid repercussions. I honestly don't know how things will turn
       | around unless we get a bad recession where employers say "Hey, if
       | you want a job, come into the office 5 days a week".
        
         | djohnston wrote:
         | In commercial real estate in general it's unsurprising, but you
         | can't do lab work from home. The article indicates that labs
         | are suffering from an industry slowdown, which is a bit
         | different than everyone wfh.
        
       | mlazos wrote:
       | Honestly I'm tired of landlords expecting good returns, I'm glad
       | they had this wake up call that yes, in fact there is risk in
       | every investment. What really irks me is when they prefer vacancy
       | to lowering rents.
        
       | lsllc wrote:
       | I don' think it's a bad gamble, it'll just take longer then
       | expected to lease all of this. IMHO, I think the Boston "tech
       | hub" has pivoted in the last 20 years to biotech/life sciences.
       | Kendall in particular seems to have more and more biotech,
       | multiple new buildings around the Science Museum and Assembly Sq.
       | Even Rt 128 "the computer commute" is ... well is far less techy
       | these days (no more DEC, Prime). Who are the big s/w companies
       | still based in Boston? EMC, Akamai? ...?
       | 
       | My opinion is that the pivot is driven by non-competes [without a
       | much needed CA style prohibition]. Long ago you needed expensive
       | computer time or pricy tools to write software, but these days
       | you don't need a VAX to write software or an expensive MSDN
       | subscription provided by your employer. You can do it on your
       | personal laptop at home with open source tools -- your employer's
       | non-competes significantly stifle this sort of innovation.
       | However, Biotech and life sciences needs expensive lab space,
       | specialized plumbing and infrastructure and complex equipment --
       | you can't really cook up a new drug in your kitchen on the
       | weekends as you might with some new software idea.
       | 
       | So I think there's still a ton of super-smart people coming out
       | of the universities in the Boston area, but the software folks
       | are being drawn elsewhere (Silicon Valley), whilst the biotech
       | ones stay because of the inertia here.
        
       | screye wrote:
       | Boston is in a mildly risky position right now. Boston's main
       | draws are slowly becoming less appealing.
       | 
       | We seem to have reached peak education a few years ago, and I
       | don't see it growing much more in the next decade. Their public
       | k12 schools are still amazing, but that's more so a testament to
       | the outer suburbs than the core urban area. Public transportation
       | was a huge draw, and it's in dire straits. The 'next tech hub'
       | thing never took off, with Austin, LIC, NJ & Atlanta growing
       | faster than Boston. Biotech is doing great, but as it moves from
       | academia to industry....I'm seeing a slow siphoning of biotech
       | talent into the bay area.
       | 
       | The biggest issue is how well NYC is doing. Boston was always a
       | great way to experience NYC-lite. But the mass gentrification of
       | LIC, Brooklyn and Jersey City has now made it possible to have
       | NYC-lite within NYC itself. So it makes Boston less appealing.
       | 
       | As far as cities go, Boston is still doing amazing. But I am
       | going to change my optimism around it from 'best positioned to
       | see massive growth' to 'good city that does 1 or 2 things well'.
       | 
       | Thankfully for Boston their problems seem solvable. Give
       | incentives to MIT/Harvard grads to set up startups locally. Make
       | it easier to build housing and fix public transport....the city
       | will be back to #1 on my highest growth potential list.
       | 
       | P.S: I say this in jest, but make DeSantis ship a few more
       | migrants up to new england. The Mexican food scene is trash and
       | needs help.
        
         | alephknoll wrote:
         | > Boston was always a great way to experience NYC-lite.
         | 
         | Since when? Who goes to boston for the 'nyc-lite' experience?
         | 
         | > But the mass gentrification of LIC, Brooklyn and Jersey City
         | has now made it possible to have NYC-lite within NYC itself.
         | 
         | What are you talking about? LIC and Brooklyn are part of NYC.
         | It is the NYC experience. Are you confusing NYC with Manhattan?
         | 
         | > So it makes Boston less appealing.
         | 
         | Nobody moves to boston for a NYC-lite experience. Have you ever
         | been to NYC or Boston?
         | 
         | > P.S: I say this in jest, but make DeSantis ship a few more
         | migrants up to new england. The Mexican food scene is trash and
         | needs help.
         | 
         | What?
        
           | vineyardmike wrote:
           | > Since when? Who goes to boston for the 'nyc-lite'
           | experience?
           | 
           | I've lived in both. This is a thing. NYC fans will say that
           | nothing compares and only NYC is NYC, but people outside it
           | do think of Boston as a baby NYC.
           | 
           | It has a ton of similarities to their urban fabric, but it's
           | just saw smaller. It has similar architecture, people,
           | weather, etc. it's a very walkable city, with a vibrant
           | cultural scene.
           | 
           | It's just... less than NYC. Less food choice, less cultural
           | options, smaller, less transit, less jobs, less people, etc.
        
       | mc32 wrote:
       | Once rates go down and borrowing becomes easy again, I think they
       | will see Biotech tenants move in. I think lots of people who
       | would start something are staying put because they can't raise
       | money at reasonable terms now. Same As SSF.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-03-24 23:02 UTC)