[HN Gopher] A Stabilizing Robotic Tail for Floating Astronauts
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       A Stabilizing Robotic Tail for Floating Astronauts
        
       Author : sizzle
       Score  : 82 points
       Date   : 2024-03-19 21:27 UTC (4 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.core77.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.core77.com)
        
       | dreen wrote:
       | A cool device. Seems like its completely autonomous. Seeing as we
       | used to have tails in our evolutionary past, I wonder if this
       | could be fitted like a myoelectric prosthesis around the coccyx
       | or something and function like a biological tail.
        
         | Zenzero wrote:
         | Attempting to replicate a tail seems tangential to the purpose
         | of the device. The human coccyx is a poor location to anchor
         | anything given how the vertebrae are not equipped to handle
         | force, and there is effectively zero musculature to support it.
         | The harness on the back appears much more practical.
        
           | barfbagginus wrote:
           | Let's assume that for some reason attaching
           | sensors/stimulatirs to the coccyx area lets us control tail
           | like robots. Then the sensors could be attached in that area,
           | and the actual tail could be mounted anywhere else, perhaps
           | even remote to the astronaut's body.
           | 
           | I'm not sure that I buy that first assumption though.
           | Measuring signals might be possible, and it might be possible
           | to learn how to move the tail based on signals produced
           | during conscious attempt to move the tail. But I don't see
           | how it would be possible to send signals back to the brain.
        
             | Zenzero wrote:
             | That's an assumption that isn't rooted in anatomy. You need
             | nerves to measure signals on. Look up the comparative
             | anatomy of the human cauda equina vs that of a dog. Where
             | you're thinking of plugging into the body, in a human you'd
             | be left with the filum terminale, which is going to sorely
             | disappoint if you are looking for nerve signals.
             | 
             | To get any meaningful spinal communication in this
             | hypothetical scenario, you'd be looking higher up in the
             | sacral region. Unless this hypothetical also includes some
             | magic star trek technology, you'd be invasively implanting
             | electrodes there, which sounds like a fantastic way to
             | trigger fecal incontinence and chronic pain.
             | 
             | I get the fun idea of returning humans to our primate
             | origins, but modern human anatomy has left us effectively
             | nothing to work with. It's an anatomical dead end.
        
               | dreen wrote:
               | Right, thanks for the proper information. I guess you
               | need to go pretty far into our past to get to a tailed
               | ancestor, quick google says its 25-30myam, pre-hominid
               | monkeys. Back scratcher manufacturers aren't going out of
               | business anytime soon.
        
         | alanbernstein wrote:
         | Then it could be prehensile, with space tool attachments...
        
       | uoaei wrote:
       | The string control is ingenious! Way more appropriate than a
       | bunch of stepper motors.
        
         | amelius wrote:
         | I remember seeing inflatable designs too.
        
         | barelyauser wrote:
         | Perhaps your assumption that stepper motors are the first
         | solution to any motion problem speaks more about your lack of
         | resourcefulness than the ingenuity of another solution.
        
           | uoaei wrote:
           | It was a comment on the overengineering that is rampant in
           | tech nowadays. What's with your attitude?
        
       | aaron695 wrote:
       | I assumed it'd be about automated angular momentum rather than
       | gripping things.
       | 
       | Like how animals in real life use tails.
       | 
       | Just rather than on earth it's balance, it'd be consistent
       | direction.
        
         | usrusr wrote:
         | I had the same expectations. Would be a super difficult control
         | problem I think, with stuff like the end of the tails motion
         | range, collisions, lack of ability to predict the motions of
         | actual limbs and so on. Perhaps a 2D model could be a useful
         | approach to this problem, with super low friction swivel chairs
         | too high for the feet to interact with the ground?
         | 
         | Might even be an interesting playground for Neuralink. Robotic
         | tails with a diffuse control from the brain, now _that_ would
         | put the  "furries" comments elsewhere in the thread on the next
         | level!
        
       | ano-ther wrote:
       | Cool. The demos see. To be mostly about grabbing.
       | 
       | Would be great if it also helps to maintain flight direction,
       | like a squirrel tail.
       | 
       | But probably difficult to test in weightless conditions on a
       | student project budget.
        
         | brrrrrm wrote:
         | The wings are doing a lot more work than the tail in that
         | situation. For quick rotations in 3D, gyroscopic forces would
         | probably be better to utilize than a tail
        
       | throwup238 wrote:
       | Dr. Otto Gunther Octavius, I presume?
        
       | dymk wrote:
       | Furries been making tail cores like this for years
        
         | wiredfool wrote:
         | Furries! In! Space!
        
       | freddydumont wrote:
       | I wonder if this is inspired by the Ousters from Dan Simmons'
       | Hyperion, who're described as using a prosthetic tail to move
       | around in zero-g environments.
        
       | Simon_ORourke wrote:
       | > there is going to be a whole generation of humans living their
       | lives in zero-gravity
       | 
       | No there isn't, although you might have some cosmonauts doing a
       | few years of it, it's now a long term liveable condition.
        
         | Terr_ wrote:
         | Yeah, right now we can't even get a couple years without
         | serious health effects in adults.
        
       | KennyBlanken wrote:
       | Ugh, another site that fucks with scrolling.
       | 
       | I don't know what's going on with that site but it partially
       | loads and a few seconds later I get a warning that JS is slowing
       | Firefox down. Clicking stop does nothing, hitting the back arrow
       | does nothing, etc. I had to close the tab completely.
       | 
       | Here's an alternative link: https://www.hackster.io/news/mit-s-
       | robotic-tail-could-aid-cr...
       | 
       | ...and the MIT media lab page about it:
       | https://www.media.mit.edu/articles/mit-s-robotic-tail-could-...
       | 
       | It's a really cool idea that I don't think I've seen in the scifi
       | I've watched/read. But given this is a Media Lab project I expect
       | the claims and capabilities to be wildly overstated and the
       | project to go nowhere.
        
         | nsodhk wrote:
         | It's not the Media Lab project. It is a project by an RCA
         | student in London https://2022.rca.ac.uk/students/cheng-chang/
        
       | xg15 wrote:
       | Very cool! Though I'm not convinced this isn't just some covert
       | furry sneaking his gear into the mainstream.
        
       | scotty79 wrote:
       | I love when engineering outpaces SF.
        
         | thorum wrote:
         | My first thought on seeing this was, I can't believe the
         | Belters never thought of this in The Expanse.
        
       | throw1234651234 wrote:
       | All I hear is "tails are useful in space". Monkeys have tails.
       | Monkeys descended from space. What if it was aliens?!
        
       | bloopernova wrote:
       | For moving in zero-G, I wonder if a Batman-style grapple-gun
       | might be useful. Make the grapple slow and maneuverable so that
       | once you fire it, it will always grab on to a loop or bulkhead or
       | whatever.
       | 
       | But for floating in place, that tail feels like the right
       | solution. Although if you did have a magical automatic grapple
       | gun, maybe using 3 of them at once would also keep you in place
       | very well. (although the cables might get annoying!)
        
       | serf wrote:
       | in the anime Mobile Suit Gundam it's an established concept that
       | the suits used 'AMBAC' to coordinate in space[0], which is really
       | just a computer coordinated method of flailing the limbs on the
       | robot to get inertia and mass to do its' thing to move the robot
       | without thrusters, similar to a mass wheel but without the needed
       | additional weight of a flywheel.
       | 
       | I always sort of wished that they had animated the little
       | micromovements into the suits to show this feature more readily
       | ,but production costs and weird looking movement generally
       | prevented AMBAC from ever being demonstrated visually.
       | 
       | This concept reminds me a lot of that.
       | 
       | [0]: https://gundam.fandom.com/wiki/Active_Mass_Balance_Auto-
       | Cont...
        
       | ChrisMarshallNY wrote:
       | Reminds me of Ardent, from Alice Grove:
       | https://www.questionablecontent.net/alice1.html
        
       | Vecr wrote:
       | A lot more impressive than I expected, with a combination of
       | Kevlar/Carbon black filled UHMWPE/PEEK and radiation shielding it
       | might actually be able to do the work asked of it.
        
       | wigster wrote:
       | one day we'll all be space monkeys!
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-03-23 23:01 UTC)