[HN Gopher] When Armor Met Lips
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       When Armor Met Lips
        
       Author : akkartik
       Score  : 457 points
       Date   : 2024-03-17 16:44 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (crookedtimber.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (crookedtimber.org)
        
       | jimkleiber wrote:
       | I thoroughly enjoyed the author's writing style. Anyone know
       | where I can find more by him, Doug Muir?
        
         | HankB99 wrote:
         | Google knows: https://crookedtimber.org/2024/01/03/welcome-to-
         | doug-muir/
        
           | jimkleiber wrote:
           | Normally a blog just lets me click the author's name and see
           | more by them, and even the link you posted doesn't really
           | show more essays.
           | 
           | This one did though: https://crookedtimber.org/author/doug-
           | muir/
        
             | daemonologist wrote:
             | Thanks for the link, that's a worthwhile click - their
             | previous article is great too:
             | https://crookedtimber.org/2024/03/08/occasional-paper-the-
             | ir...
        
         | pizzalife wrote:
         | Personally I can't stand it, yeah?
        
       | HankB99 wrote:
       | > geology nerd
       | 
       | Shouldn't that be "paleontology nerd?"
        
         | skavi wrote:
         | See footnote 1
        
           | HankB99 wrote:
           | Where is footnote 1?
           | 
           | I just looked up the authors of the article from their links
           | at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363885520_Seals_w
           | ha... and none mentions geology, though they did mention
           | paleobiology, paleontology and fossils.
           | 
           | What did I miss?
        
             | nearbuy wrote:
             | The footnotes for the article are in the first comment. The
             | author put a humorous footnote about being pedantic.
        
               | jjtheblunt wrote:
               | And, in doing so, was pedantic!
        
               | ahazred8ta wrote:
               | https://www.google.com/search?q=pedants+revolt
               | 
               | "I'd expected there to be less of you." "FEWER!!"
        
         | angiosperm wrote:
         | Paleontology used to be a subspecialty of geology, for a long
         | time after they proved fossils had once been animals. Which the
         | geologists had to do.
        
       | mannykannot wrote:
       | "Pinnipeds evolved about thirty million years ago. They showed up
       | first in the colder parts of the northern hemisphere, _then in
       | the Antarctic_ , then in temperate zones."
       | 
       | That's an interesting sequence, given that the continents then
       | were about where they are now.
        
         | ricardobeat wrote:
         | Maybe they evolved in both places independently, or maybe it
         | took a couple million years for a pod of seals to make the
         | journey from north to south, and then start dominating the
         | local ecosystem.
        
           | ivanbakel wrote:
           | Wikipedia says pinnipeds are monophyletic, so there's only a
           | single evolutionary branch they originated from.
           | 
           | The travel question is much more interesting. Napkin math
           | puts the distance between the polar circles at 12500 miles,
           | the max swim speed of a seal at 25mph, giving a travel time
           | of ~3 weeks of nonstop swimming as the crow flies. How does
           | that happen? What would a pod of Arctic seals have eaten
           | along the way, and what would have compelled them to make the
           | trip out of familiar territory? How and why did they cross
           | the temperate equatorial seas with a load of blubber?
        
             | ekanes wrote:
             | Agree, this stuff is fun to imagine. Check out the many
             | species that landed (and then kept evolving in isolation)
             | in Hawaii. Seals, many birds, etc.
        
             | DabbyDabberson wrote:
             | Look up monkey raft theory. How did monkeys from Africa get
             | to South America? Also roughly 30 MYA.
        
               | jasonwatkinspdx wrote:
               | Life travels on the ocean a lot farther than people
               | realize, and often species you'd find improbably.
               | 
               | Ants spread around the world by hitching rides on
               | coconuts or waterbirds. This now means there's something
               | like a global war among various ant colonies that invade
               | each other this way.
        
               | riffraff wrote:
               | It's my understanding the ant spreading was more related
               | with increase in navigation than birds/floating. that'd
               | be why the Argentine ant has spread everywhere in Europe
               | in the last century rather than being ubiquitous since
               | the dawn of time.
        
               | throwway120385 wrote:
               | I thought Wind, Wings and Waves to be a pretty
               | interesting description of how species made it to Hawaii.
               | Basically it either gets picked up in storms or large
               | clumps of land make it across the ocean. Life only has to
               | make the journey seldom or almost never and then take
               | hold once to get to a new place.
        
               | tetromino_ wrote:
               | Could an iceberg with a few seal families on it have
               | drifted from the Arctic to the Antarctic? Presumably in
               | the tropics the seals would have had a bad time and gone
               | hungry and overheated, but once they got to cooler waters
               | again, they would have been surrounded by food they love
               | with zero competitors.
        
             | ricardobeat wrote:
             | The distance is not surprising, animal trackers have shown
             | they routinely travel vast distances in the ocean [1, 2,
             | 3].
             | 
             | All you need is a fluke event, once in a thousand years
             | where they for some reason make, and survive, this trip (I
             | say thousand to give us some scale, could be actually once
             | in a million years).
             | 
             | [1] https://www.ocearch.org/tracker/detail/nukumi
             | 
             | [2] https://www.ocearch.org/tracker/detail/dr-brent
             | 
             | [3] https://www.wur.nl/en/show/seal-telemetry.htm
        
             | ducttapecrown wrote:
             | Well the ocean was filled with free floating ammonites, so
             | maybe food wasn't an issue. Another commenter suggests a
             | volcanic winter to lower the sea temps enough for the seals
             | to cross.
        
         | nateb2022 wrote:
         | It is possible that they fed on extremophiles which thrived in
         | really cold regions and later evolved to feed on other food
         | sources.
        
         | thriftwy wrote:
         | It takes one volcanic winter for them to cross the oceans and
         | emerge on the other side, without being fit for the warm
         | waters.
        
         | aendruk wrote:
         | That's the sequence of notable populations; individuals did who
         | knows what.
        
       | pfdietz wrote:
       | "So, you're saying the nautiloids did okay until the pinnipeds
       | sealed their fate?"
        
         | Terr_ wrote:
         | I'm nautiloid to say more about their spiral into the depths.
        
           | jagged-chisel wrote:
           | tth_tth
        
           | klipt wrote:
           | Never trust a pinnipedophile.
        
       | B1FF_PSUVM wrote:
       | Also: https://crookedtimber.org/2024/02/19/death-lonely-
       | death/#com...
       | 
       | about Voyager 1, recently in the news
        
       | vitiral wrote:
       | I really enjoyed this article, but I was really disappointed. For
       | some reason I thought it was going to evolve into a Lovecraftian
       | epic of how the grand and horrifying civilization of the ancient
       | cephalopods and their relatives was thwarted by another species,
       | one who paved the way for our own ignorant and doomed
       | civilization to thrive.
       | 
       | I kept this feeling until the very end [spoiler] even when it was
       | revealed to be seals I held out hope they could be a Lovecraftian
       | player in a grand epic saga.
        
         | csours wrote:
         | who do you think is protecting us from the lovecraftian
         | horrors?
        
           | vitiral wrote:
           | In general? Mostly ignorance. From cephalopods? I guess it's
           | the seals
        
             | leashless wrote:
             | Italian love of calamari.
        
           | Muromec wrote:
           | Paperclip counting bureaucrats of course
        
       | JKCalhoun wrote:
       | I wanted to go fossil hunting (and for ammonites in particular)
       | after watching these guys just haul them out:
       | 
       | https://youtu.be/9XWhdPL58is
        
       | Affric wrote:
       | Great photo selection with the shifty looking seal (gotta love
       | the whites of caniform eyes) and a nice little summary of the
       | article.
       | 
       | One thing about zoology and animal morphology is that we all know
       | how important feeding is for animals but only real nerds love the
       | digestive tract. Transport, skin, and reproduction are far more
       | glamorous; but the mammalian sense of smell and mouth parts gave
       | us such an advantage in the tertiary period.
       | 
       | It's interesting that this sort of feeding never arose in the
       | sea. I wonder what the ancestors of the pinnipeds who first
       | ventured back into water ate...
        
         | 082349872349872 wrote:
         | If they're related to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mustelidae
         | , probably just about any catchable animals?
        
           | Affric wrote:
           | Probably otter like to an extent. Would be interesting if the
           | first thing they ventured into shallow seas for was ammonites
           | though.
        
       | angiosperm wrote:
       | Do not neglect the Paper Nautilus, a kind of Mediterranean
       | octopus.
       | 
       | https://www.sciencefriday.com/articles/the-seamstress-and-th...
       | 
       | https://www.themarginalian.org/2022/12/26/jeanne-villepreux-...
       | 
       | Jeanne Villepreux-Power invented marine biology, single-handed in
       | the early 19th century.
       | 
       | She observed them repairing a hole in their shell by gluing on a
       | found patch.
        
         | teruakohatu wrote:
         | That is interesting. I looked it up on wikipedia and the
         | Argonaut / Paper Nautilus "shell" is a thin walled eggcase and
         | that males do not have. It does not provide protection.
        
           | angiosperm wrote:
           | Female argonauts have the shell their whole life long, and do
           | not only construct it when they have eggs to put in it. We
           | may reasonably assume that it has survival value even when
           | there are no eggs. We know, for example, that they carry
           | bubbles in it to tune their buoyancy.
        
       | readyplayernull wrote:
       | > If you're inclined to be pedantic about the nautilus' limbs and
       | say that /actually/ they are "arms" and not "tentacles" because
       | tentacles have suckers on them, then (a) congratulations on
       | remembering that long-ago biology class, and (b) see Footnote 1,
       | above.
       | 
       | Something tells me an arm is a mechanical limb composed of
       | connected poles that turn at their joints. And a hose-like limb
       | without suckers should have its own name. A foot is an "arm", a
       | penis is something else.
        
         | nehal3m wrote:
         | Hey, speak for yourself!
        
         | pineaux wrote:
         | Penis is definitely something else because it contains (almost)
         | no muscles, while your other examples do (contain muscles).
        
         | Karellen wrote:
         | Also, tails
        
         | zem wrote:
         | you don't need a new name, "tentacle" is fine and does not
         | imply suckers. see hydra e.g.
        
       | jrflowers wrote:
       | It is a shame that this is not about when Armour Meats perfected
       | their hot dog formulation
        
       | alexey-salmin wrote:
       | "Ah! Love! The only thing my armor can't withstand!"
        
       | a3w wrote:
       | So the ideal tank buster is a carnivorous unicorn: penetrate that
       | armor, then schlorp out the crew! Genetics will go too far, if we
       | ever get these.
        
         | h2odragon wrote:
         | That's why the graceful, horse shaped unicorns of classical
         | times died out; and what we have now is the up-armored,
         | heavyweight rhinoceros version.
         | 
         | Evolution is amazing innit.
        
           | throwway120385 wrote:
           | A fascinating case of how gunpowder has shaped biology.
        
         | mec31 wrote:
         | Reminds me of one of my favorite Far Side cartoons
         | https://www.reddit.com/r/TheFarSide/s/g5y9E0ZlmI
        
       | CoolGuySteve wrote:
       | If you find this evolutionary history interesting then I can't
       | recommend PBS Eons enough. It's a great youtube series on the
       | subject: well researched, a dense but breezy pace, and the paleo
       | art + fossil images help convey information without being overly
       | dry.
       | 
       | Here's the one about this subject:
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3vQ55ToQeWI
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-03-18 23:01 UTC)