[HN Gopher] IBM 360's are searching for a new home
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       IBM 360's are searching for a new home
        
       Author : ngcc_hk
       Score  : 187 points
       Date   : 2024-03-16 20:00 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.ibm360.co.uk)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.ibm360.co.uk)
        
       | spzb wrote:
       | https://archive.is/5Uqf8
        
       | chasil wrote:
       | Does the Hercules emulator have all the firmware from these
       | systems (and peripherals) in their collection already?
       | 
       | http://www.hercules-390.eu/
       | 
       | I know there was specific microcode here:
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30073973
        
         | pinewurst wrote:
         | Hercules doesn't emulate at the microcode level. It implements
         | the appropriate instruction set(s).
        
           | chasil wrote:
           | Reading a little deeper into the previous HN post, this one
           | does:
           | 
           | https://static.righto.com/360/
        
             | kens wrote:
             | To clarify, that is an emulator specific for the IBM 360/50
             | that runs the microcode. It is a demo, not a useful system.
             | It has nothing to do with Hercules.
        
               | chasil wrote:
               | And thank you for writing it.
        
         | monocasa wrote:
         | The 360 model 20 isn't actually a 360 compatible system. It's a
         | 16 bit subset 'inspired by' the 360.
        
           | ngcc_hk wrote:
           | You are right it is a subset. Not sure it is totally true it
           | is incompatible though, but do have some incompatible
           | instruction.
           | 
           | It is the most numerous 360 computer installed, more than
           | 7000. See
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_System/360_Model_20 .
           | 
           | It is sad to let these go as part of computer history.
        
             | monocasa wrote:
             | It is incompatible. For one example, it doesn't have
             | registers R0-R7, using those as encodings as additional
             | address bits. It also doesn't have the top half of
             | registers R8-R15.
        
             | KerrAvon wrote:
             | The original intent IIRC was the programs for the model 20
             | would be upwards compatible with the rest of the series,
             | but that the higher level models would not be downward
             | compatible with the 20. No idea if that ended up being
             | achieved.
        
       | _V_ wrote:
       | I would love to take atleast one of these & try to restore it...
       | Such a beatiful piece of engineering (and history)!
        
         | neom wrote:
         | Looks like they ran a Puma factory/office of some descriptions,
         | would be very interesting to see what the software they made
         | for them does.
         | 
         | https://www.ibm360.co.uk/?page_id=22
        
       | FLT8 wrote:
       | I wonder if Sam of "look mum no computer" fame from YouTube might
       | be interested for his museum ("this museum is not obsolete").
       | He's shown a fascination with and aptitude for all kinds of old
       | tech, although he does tend to focus a bit more on equipment that
       | he can make music with.
        
         | timthorn wrote:
         | His museum doesn't have enough floor space for even one of the
         | mainframes without evicting lots of other interesting stuff.
         | It's actually just a few yards from a computer museum though.
        
       | tivert wrote:
       | > 1x 2152 System Console (possibly the last remaining example of
       | this in the world, though in poor condition)
       | 
       | > 2x 2415 II Tape Drives (One master, one slave) (Possibly only
       | remaining examples of this model globally)
       | 
       | Any pictures/info on those things? "Last example in the world" is
       | pretty interesting and I guess urgent to see.
       | 
       | I hope the Computer History Museum buys it, and fixes it up for
       | live demos. The IBM 1401 they have is cool, but I kind of think
       | an IBM 360 would be cooler, given its historical importance.
        
         | darreninthenet wrote:
         | In case they hadn't seen the article, I sent it to the senior
         | curator... fingers crossed
        
       | qwerty456127 wrote:
       | I wonder what if someone could reproduce this kind of ancient
       | high-tech using modern precision production technologies and
       | durable materials. Could we build those huge size low density
       | hard drives and other components with orders of magnitude higher
       | quality so they would last forever and never need anything
       | replaced?
        
         | nottorp wrote:
         | Define forever. Especially because you mentioned hard drives -
         | moving parts. Which will definitely wear out in time.
        
           | accrual wrote:
           | I suppose the modern equivalent of what GP is asking for
           | would be SLC flash. Each bit has its own dedicated cell,
           | compared to the denser and more common MLC/TLC/QLC flash
           | where cells are shared. I would trust data stored in SLC to
           | last unpowered for a lot longer than your average QLC disk.
           | 
           | Or maybe core memory would be more stable over time?
           | 
           | If we're going for ultimate durability, maybe the laser
           | inscribed glass would be the way to go, but not sure it's
           | practical as typical computer memory. [0]
           | 
           | [0] https://www.sciencealert.com/this-new-5d-data-storage-
           | disc-c...
        
             | qwerty456127 wrote:
             | As far as I know hard drives are more and more prone to
             | have bad blocks as you travel back in time. An old man who
             | had access to computers before I have even been born told
             | me every HDD in production had some. However, nowadays as
             | HDDs density went insane and each block is so tiny, a
             | single bad block usually means a red alert suggesting more
             | are coming and the whole drive is dying, nevertheless this
             | is a rare thing to happen as we now can produce all the
             | parts with extreme precision making it a "swiss clockwork"
             | sort of reliable. This way, can't we produce a flawlessly
             | perfect HDD of the old kind so its huge blocks would never
             | turn bad?
        
               | nottorp wrote:
               | I don't think modern hdd bad blocks work this way.
               | 
               | Look at the SMART property "reallocated sector count",
               | which was there before SSDs.
               | 
               | They have firmware and spare capacity just like SSDs.
               | When you do get a bad block it means they ran out of
               | spare space.
        
           | Borg3 wrote:
           | I have HDDs (spining rust) in my desktop that are 10+ years
           | and still running fine. I had older SCSI UW-320 disks that
           | were running 20+ years until well, started to give I/O
           | errors. Workloads are low here (mostly read). So I imagine it
           | is doable to do HDD with low density and high grade
           | components that would last 100 years. Interesting challenge
           | imo.
        
         | vitiral wrote:
         | http://civboot.org is basically trying to answer exactly this
         | question
        
       | daetnyr wrote:
       | I remember donating to help them transport the 360 out of
       | Germany. Hope some obtainsit who will document its restoration.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-03-17 23:01 UTC)