[HN Gopher] The Good Soldier Svejk (2018)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Good Soldier Svejk (2018)
        
       Author : palmfacehn
       Score  : 263 points
       Date   : 2024-03-14 11:23 UTC (11 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (blogs.loc.gov)
 (TXT) w3m dump (blogs.loc.gov)
        
       | hilbert42 wrote:
       | Hasek's _The Good Soldier Svejk_ is an absolutely essential read,
       | it has to be in the list of the top 100 books to read before one
       | departs this planet!
       | 
       | Not only is it hilariously funny it's also full of the
       | tribulations of life and how the system--bureaucracies--here the
       | army--lands one in absurd and unexpected situations.
       | 
       | It's a great shame Hasek died so young (he was a great observer
       | of human nature).
       | 
       | Do yourself a real favor, read it or get an audio book.
        
         | mooreds wrote:
         | How does it compare to Catch-22?
        
           | Lariscus wrote:
           | Joseph Heller claimed he would have never written it had he
           | never read The Good Soldier Svejk.
        
             | mooreds wrote:
             | Hmm. A quick Google didn't find that.
             | 
             | From https://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/17/theater/newsandfeat
             | ures/t...
             | 
             | "Heller, who died in 1999, told various interviewers that
             | Celine and Kafka were his most powerful influences and that
             | "Svejk" was "just a funny book.""
        
               | Zircom wrote:
               | Found a quote, had to use the anglicized spelling though.
               | 
               | https://www.vanityfair.com/culture/2011/08/heller-201108
               | 
               | "The Czech writer Arnost Lustig claimed that Heller had
               | told him at a New York party for Milos Forman in the late
               | 1960s that he couldn't have written Catch-22 without
               | first reading Jaroslav Hasek's unfinished World War I
               | satire, The Good Soldier Schweik. "
        
               | malermeister wrote:
               | Germanized, really.
        
               | _visgean wrote:
               | there are some references in catch-22 and its follow up
               | Closing time.
        
               | bee_rider wrote:
               | I was really surprised by Closing Time. I forget all the
               | details of it, but I remember finding it just
               | relentlessly depressing. The only degree to which I
               | thought it worked was, it really emphasized the extent to
               | which we really don't need to know what happens to
               | characters after the story is done, it is better if we
               | just imagine they go on to have their lives.
        
           | rightbyte wrote:
           | I think if you like one, you like the other. I think the
           | Svejk book have a more innocent tone and is less cynical. But
           | I was way to young when I read them to have a "deep"
           | understanding of the contexts.
        
           | imjonse wrote:
           | I found Catch-22 much more hilarious than Svejk.
        
             | ufocia wrote:
             | I thought Svejk was more available to a younger reader.
             | However, like someone already mentioned, it has enough
             | layers for a reader of almost any age to enjoy. I'd read
             | them both.
        
           | watwut wrote:
           | It makes sense unlike Catch-22 that does not make sense.
        
             | soperj wrote:
             | it only makes sense once you've already read it once.
        
           | sireat wrote:
           | I thought Svejk to be much funnier.
           | 
           | Rather I thought Catch-22 to be a so-so imitation of Svejk.
           | 
           | Then again I've been re-reading Svejk since childhood.
           | 
           | Similarly, how you can tell when Hasek dies before finishing
           | Svejk and his friend takes over with the ending, the jokes
           | just fall off a bit.
        
           | red-iron-pine wrote:
           | Catch-22 is funny during the read but after the end, and in
           | reflection, is pretty dark.
           | 
           | Svejk is generally funnier, IMO
        
             | mcepl wrote:
             | Svejk is too much slanted by the expectations of "just
             | funny" and by (absolutely awesome, but too nice)
             | illustrations by Josef Lada. When listening to the audio
             | version of the book, I was shocked how actually horrific
             | story it is. I have mentioned elsewhere in this thread a
             | Czech literary historian (M. C. Putna) who called "The Good
             | Solider Svejk" as "Kafka's 'Trial' by other means". I think
             | he is quite correct.
        
         | poloniculmov wrote:
         | His short stories are also hilarious and in the same vein as
         | Svejk's adventures.
        
           | weinzierl wrote:
           | I've enjoyed Svejk's adventures, but never read any Hasek's
           | short stories. Can you recommend a particular one you like?
        
           | mcepl wrote:
           | Yes, they are only hilarious. Svejk on the other hand is in
           | my opinion much more serious. One Czech literary critic call
           | it even "Kafka by other means". Yes, Hasek was a satiric
           | writer, so that's how he wrote, but Svejk is IMHO actually a
           | serious book about the horror of a human being liquidated by
           | the impersonal power of modern society.
        
         | The_Colonel wrote:
         | Svejk is what I call a "scalable" book. It works for readers of
         | almost any level. The first time I read it I was maybe 8 years
         | old and had a lot of fun, even though I completely missed most
         | of the nuance.
        
           | hilbert42 wrote:
           | Very true, I wouldn't have recognized many of the nuances had
           | I not had military training and having worked in government
           | bureaucracies.
        
           | lukan wrote:
           | More examples of "scalable" books please?
        
             | gumby wrote:
             | The lord of the rings is a good one, especially if you skip
             | the songs. Then it's simply an adventure story.
             | 
             | The Sword in the Stone is pretty good in this regard. Apart
             | from that first book (which is published as a standalone
             | book) the entire Once and Future King is too complex for a
             | child, I think (instead it would come off as boring and
             | obscure).
             | 
             | But in general almost any book a kid wants to try to read
             | will be fine.
             | 
             | Also: back in the day when small towns had a single cinema
             | screen, movies would travel around as physical media and
             | play for a week or two. So they had to be appropriate for
             | anyone in town else the cinema owner wouldn't take them.
             | 
             | My kid loved those Fred Astaire musicals. I do too. For him
             | they were just fun. To me, many of them were quite racy and
             | quite explicit! But all that just went over his head.
        
             | tsc wrote:
             | The Little Prince
        
             | j_french wrote:
             | My older brother gave me Animal Farm to read as a child, I
             | enjoyed it as a (somewhat depressing) story about animals
             | taking over a farm.
        
               | HanClinto wrote:
               | I was probably 7 or 8 my first time through Animal Farm.
               | I cried so hard when Boxer died.
        
             | willismichael wrote:
             | My neighbor gave me a great tip: check out anything by
             | Terry Pratchett that I can find in the youth fiction
             | section of the library. My wife and I are reading them to
             | children ages 9 - 16, and all of them are liking the books.
        
             | jamonserrano wrote:
             | I remember enjoying these as a child without understanding
             | any of the subtext or satire:
             | 
             | Jonathan Swift: Gulliver's Travels
             | 
             | Umberto Eco: The Name of the Rose
             | 
             | Bohumil Hrabal: Cutting it Short
             | 
             | Antal Szerb: The Pendragon Legend
        
             | HanClinto wrote:
             | Young Adult fiction is my "go-to" place for this. Nearly
             | anything that has won the Newberry Award is great for the
             | whole family. Some standouts in my mind:
             | 
             | * Island of the Blue Dolphins
             | 
             | * Chronicles of Prydain (Book of Three, The Black Cauldron,
             | etc)
             | 
             | Chronicles of Narnia aren't Newberry winners, but are good
             | regardless (if you don't mind the religious subtext).
             | 
             | +1 for other people mentioning The Hobbit and Lord of the
             | Rings.
             | 
             | Our whole family has enjoyed classics like Pride and
             | Prejudice and Dracula -- such books are called "classics"
             | for a reason.
             | 
             | Modern YA fiction has some very good books as well -- we
             | all enjoyed Hole by Louis Sachar.
             | 
             | Some good modern sci-fi too -- Project Hail Mary by Andy
             | Weir was well received, as was Ender's Game.
             | 
             | Brandon Sanderson's stuff is very good. Whole family
             | enjoyed The Way of Kings and the books that follow.
             | 
             | (For context, "whole family" is mix of genders, ages 10-15)
        
             | lelanthran wrote:
             | > More examples of "scalable" books please?
             | 
             | In addition to what the other replies recommended, I read
             | Tom Sharpe at a young age and enjoyed all of them with
             | sometimes uncontrollable giggles.
             | 
             | Start with Wilt, I think. Then maybe The Throwback.
        
             | mrob wrote:
             | The Wind in the Willows. As a child, I read it purely as an
             | adventure story. Re-reading it as an adult, I realized it's
             | actually two stories: one a eulogy to the British
             | countryside, and the other a comedy about the self-
             | inflicted troubles of Mr. Toad. The humor was lost on me as
             | a child.
        
               | gumby wrote:
               | As a kid, I was terrified by Mr Toad and stopped reading
               | the book because of him.
        
             | croisillon wrote:
             | the little Prince, i'd say
        
             | smoldesu wrote:
             | Every Gary Larson collection you can find.
        
             | bookofjoe wrote:
             | "The Little Prince"
        
             | thesz wrote:
             | Karel Capek: R.U.R.
             | 
             | His short stories are beyond fascinating and adorable, BTW.
             | One, for example, equates accounting to hunting and
             | detective work.
             | 
             | The Stars My Destination by Alfred Bester.
             | 
             | Works of James Herriot.
        
               | UncleSlacky wrote:
               | Capek's "War With The Newts" is good too.
        
             | Nition wrote:
             | The Earthsea trilogy by Ursula Le Guin is another one
             | (there are also books beyond the first three now, but
             | they're more targeted at older readers).
        
             | flipthefrog wrote:
             | The Moomin books by Tove Jansson
        
             | mcepl wrote:
             | "The Little Prince" by Antoine de Saint-Exupery. Whatever
             | age I read it, I am always surprised how much it deals with
             | the actual problems I have.
        
         | sigma5 wrote:
         | what's the other books that are on your 100 books list to read
         | before one departs this planet ?
        
           | niccl wrote:
           | Not the original commenter but I'd include:
           | 
           | Vanity Fair by Thackeray
           | 
           | Mr Johnson by Joyce Cary
           | 
           | Lavengro and Romany Rye by George Borrow
           | 
           | The Descent of Woman by Elaine Morgan
           | 
           | Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies by Douglas Hofstadter
           | et al.
           | 
           | Identity Crisis by Ben Elton
        
         | scandox wrote:
         | The audio version read by David Horovitch is incredible.
        
       | KingOfCoders wrote:
       | Loved watching Svejk films as a kid.
        
       | weinzierl wrote:
       | _" When the war is over, let's see each other_", said Svejk. _"
       | You will find me every day after six o'clock in the 'U Kalicha'"_
       | 
       |  _" Then, see you after the war, at six o'clock in the evening."_
       | Vodicka said.
       | 
       |  _" Better come at six-thirty to be safe if I'm late,"_ Svejk
       | replied.
       | 
       | https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:U_Kalicha_(Pra...
        
         | chalst wrote:
         | You've linked to a Wikimedia category of pictures. I assume
         | this is not intended.
        
           | romanhn wrote:
           | It takes me, on mobile, to a picture of what looks to be the
           | real-world "U Kalicha" establishment.
        
             | projektfu wrote:
             | From Mobile Wikipedia, always use the browser's share
             | button to get the canonical URL.
             | 
             | https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:U_Kalicha_(Prag
             | u...
        
         | bitsinthesky wrote:
         | Wenn die Leute auseinandergehen, da sagen sie "Auf Wiedersehen"
        
       | isolli wrote:
       | Glad to see this book promoted here!
       | 
       | However, having compared the French translation to the original
       | in Czech, I have to warn French-language readers that the
       | translation was atrocious. As in, completely making up words and
       | sentences that were not in the original. (Unfortunately, I know
       | nothing about translations into English, and cannot recommend a
       | good one.)
       | 
       | Interestingly, Milan Kundera wrote a book (in French) that I
       | highly recommend [0]. He draws examples from many different
       | artistic works to weave a fascinating story discussing to what
       | extent we can or should stay faithful to the original intention
       | of an artist or creator.
       | 
       | [0]
       | https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/44382.Testaments_Betraye...
        
         | isolli wrote:
         | This prompted me to check, and the first translation in French
         | was in fact the translation of a translation of a translation
         | [1]. No wonder it strayed from the original!
         | 
         | The English translation went through similar ordeals [2]. The
         | more recent ones are presumably more faithful:
         | 
         | > The first translation by Paul Selver was heavily abridged,
         | reducing the novel to about two thirds of its original length.
         | Selver's translation also bowdlerized the original text,
         | omitting paragraphs and occasionally pages that may have seemed
         | offensive; despite this he has been praised for preserving some
         | of the tension in the work between Literary and Common Czech.
         | 
         | [1]
         | https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Les_Aventures_du_brave_soldat_...
         | 
         | [2]
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Good_Soldier_%C5%A0vejk#Tr...
        
           | dmurray wrote:
           | The second comment on the article - worth reading in itself -
           | is signed by Svejk himself, with a detailed criticism of the
           | Parrott translation, recommending instead a 2000 translation
           | by Sadlon. Anyone else have insight on which translation I
           | should read?
        
             | bitsinthesky wrote:
             | Sadlon sells books in parts, i read the first book of his
             | translation. Thought it was good, but given the needing to
             | buy multiple books and the ugly cover art, I'm happy with
             | Penguin. If it is true Penguin is an inferior translation
             | or too flowery, it still reads as a very entertaining book.
        
       | lioeters wrote:
       | From all the books I've read, the good soldier Svejk stands out
       | as one of the most memorable characters. I love the style of the
       | writing, how it shows the absurdity of bureaucracy, war, and
       | society through the person of Svejk, perpetually drinking and
       | getting into trouble, innocent like a dove and wise as a serpent,
       | he always finds his way out of any predicament, while having his
       | fun. He represents an aspect of the indomitable spirit of
       | humanity and humor.
       | 
       | The illustrations by Josef Lada are wonderful too, they are
       | essential to the reading experience and imaginary world of the
       | book.
        
         | isolli wrote:
         | Did you read it in Czech? Apparently, finding a good
         | translation is a bit of a minefield.
        
           | lioeters wrote:
           | I read it in English, but some knowledge of Czech culture and
           | geography (towns and Prague neighborhoods) added to the
           | enjoyment of the book.
           | 
           | The one I read was translated by Cecil Parrott (in 1973), but
           | I learned there's a new translation (1997~) by a native Czech
           | speaker: The Fateful Adventures of the Good Soldier Svejk
           | During the World War, translated by Zdenek "Zenny" Sadlon, in
           | three volumes.
        
       | jiripospisil wrote:
       | A classic. The movie versions are available on YouTube with
       | English subtitles but it's not the same. A part of the charm of
       | Svejk played by Rudolf Hrusinsky is the way he talks and that
       | gets lost if you don't speak Czech.
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LI9OKaz6yQ0
        
         | yread wrote:
         | The czech audiobook read by Jan Werich
         | https://youtu.be/JaNO4ZG3zn8?si=oc2YRdNurUNcX9LQ is also great!
        
         | flipthefrog wrote:
         | Removed for copyright reasons, it says. Theres also a 1950s
         | puppet film version directed by Jiri Trnka
        
           | jiripospisil wrote:
           | Hah, some ahole must have reported it. It was working fine a
           | few hours ago. Can you even claim copyright of a 70 years old
           | movie? Oh well.
        
       | arethuza wrote:
       | I learned of The Good Soldier Svejk from Alexei Sayle's
       | autobiography "Stalin ate my homework" - which I can _strongly_
       | recommend, particularly the audiobook narrated by the author.
        
       | pdimitar wrote:
       | One of the very few books that literally had me rolling on the
       | floor laughing -- not exaggerating for effect here, I have in
       | fact fell from the sofa on the floor and started laughing until I
       | wheezed and couldn't breathe. Especially the segment with the
       | military preacher whom Svejk was an assistant of -- and when he
       | had to get him home after he got dead-drunk. My gods, I can
       | almost remember how much my tummy hurt back then!
       | 
       | That being said, all the stuff about censorship and getting
       | arrested for "treason" (basically for a political joke at the
       | bar) hit too close to home for me, and I am from a former Soviet
       | block country, and I found those pieces very depressing. Still, I
       | went through all books -- several times -- and enjoyed them a
       | lot. The author really captured a lot of absurdities very well.
        
         | hilbert42 wrote:
         | _"...had me rolling on the floor laughing... "_
         | 
         | Same here, I was in tears I was laughing that much. I found it
         | funny because I recognized those silly maddening situations
         | from my own life. We all experience them but it takes a master
         | like Hasek to remind us about how absurd they really are.
        
         | avodonosov wrote:
         | > all the stuff about censorship and getting arrested for
         | "treason" (basically for a political joke at the bar) hit too
         | close to home for me, and I am from a former Soviet block
         | country, and I found those pieces very depressing.
         | 
         | You may probably find it curious that Hashek ended up being a
         | bolshevik and a red army commissar.
        
           | pdimitar wrote:
           | I would never endorse this but I also kind of understand:
           | it's very easy to switch sides when you're seeing your own
           | government face-plant all the time and never get anything
           | meaningful done. That's one of the ways the ruling class
           | wins: a new "promising" system gets promoted, it points at
           | the mistakes of the current system and the people, tired of
           | all the crap, end up voting for the new stuff, only to
           | discover it's even worse... :(
           | 
           | That has happened quite a lot in history, sadly (also I am
           | aware that in the case of the USSR there was no voting
           | involved, it was just a figure of speech).
        
             | avodonosov wrote:
             | In case of USSR the people were choosing sides of the civil
             | war and fighting voluntarily - a more serious commitment
             | than simply casting a ballot.
        
               | FpUser wrote:
               | Most of the people were not involved in fight. They were
               | busy growing food for example. But sure the ones that
               | actually fought did choose their sides voluntarily.
               | Sometimes they flipped.
        
               | dragandj wrote:
               | In vast many cases they were either forcefully
               | conscripted by whomever was holding power in the
               | particular area, or were simply choosing to enter armies
               | because they were very young people who lost everything
               | and did not have many options. Do not also discount that
               | during the post-revolution civil war, food shortages were
               | the norm, and the place to eat is army.
        
               | ihaveajob wrote:
               | If it was anything like the Spanish Civil War, lots of
               | people just happened to live in an area that was
               | controlled by one or another side. Those who were
               | committed to their cause probably did their best to
               | escape or take arms. Most were simply recruited and
               | complied to avoid further trouble. Both my grandfathers
               | happened to live on the side they disagreed with when
               | hostilities started, so they had no choice.
        
           | duxup wrote:
           | It's unfortunate but it's often the case when someone talks
           | about a given ideal such as being critical of censorship,
           | authoritarianism, etc. They often mean:
           | 
           | "I don't like THAT censorship. Mine is fine."
        
         | Anotheroneagain wrote:
         | _That being said, all the stuff about censorship and getting
         | arrested for "treason" (basically for a political joke at the
         | bar)_
         | 
         | I think you didn't get it right. The joke is that they _go out
         | of their way_ to not say anything offensive, knowing that the
         | situation is tense, but they get arrested anyway.
        
           | pdimitar wrote:
           | Strange that you're saying this because that's exactly how I
           | understood it: people were extremely mindful of what they're
           | saying but even with that you had "agents" in disguise who
           | really stretched the definition of "treason", many times
           | over, just to be able to do a few arrests daily. In the books
           | it was also shown that the mere fact of singing along a song
           | that praised their emperor was also grounds for being
           | arrested (which was quite absurd because praising that guy
           | was a requirement anyway).
        
       | talkingtab wrote:
       | One must wonder about the Czechs. There is the language for one
       | thing. There is the resilience - Nazis, Communists and the Velvet
       | Revolution. Then Closely Watched Trains, Zelary, Divided We Fall,
       | The Unbearable Lightness of Being. And this. Maybe having an
       | singular language does something?
        
         | Toutouxc wrote:
         | > There is the language for one thing.
         | 
         | > having an singular language
         | 
         | What's that?
        
           | ufocia wrote:
           | Czecho-Slovakia was a multicultural country with more than
           | one language in common use. This was arguably one of the
           | shortcomings that led to its WWII era capitulation.
        
             | imp0cat wrote:
             | First, he OP specifically mentions "the Czechs", as in the
             | Czech part of Czechoslovakia.
             | 
             | Second, languages had nothing to do with it. There was an
             | idea that sacrificing a part of Czechoslovakia will be
             | enough to keep Hitler at bay
             | (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munich_Agreement).
        
               | ufocia wrote:
               | Which Czech part, Bohemia, Moravia, Czech Silesia, or
               | ...? Was it the "regions with German-speaking majority"?
               | 
               | Languages had everything to do with it. "Bohemia became a
               | part of Czechoslovakia, defying claims of the German-
               | speaking inhabitants that regions with German-speaking
               | majority should be included in the Republic of German-
               | Austria."
        
               | imp0cat wrote:
               | But German, the language, was spoken pretty much
               | everywhere (thanks to the Austro-Hungarian legacy).
               | 
               | The German-speaking inhabitants, that is a whole
               | different story.
        
             | rightbyte wrote:
             | Shortcomings? What is up with these military strategic
             | analysis that imply that Chechoslovakia could do anything
             | but getting different degrees of crushed between Germany,
             | Hungary and Poland?
        
               | asveikau wrote:
               | I've noticed an uptick in recent years of people who
               | believe the multiculturalism is harmful to a society's
               | survival. This is extremely popular with American right
               | wingers who would like to limit immigration or segregate
               | people by races.
               | 
               | One of my favorite examples of a multi-ethnic state in
               | Europe (kind of biased since I have some ancestry from
               | there) is the Polish-Lithuanian commonwealth. That lasted
               | a good long while with a mix of Balts, West Slavs, and
               | East Slavs.
        
           | NeoTar wrote:
           | Yeah - If singular means distinct, and even setting aside
           | Slovak, then Czech is part of the West Slavic language family
           | and my Polish-speaking partner says there is a degree of
           | mutual intelligibility.
        
             | imp0cat wrote:
             | Yes, they sound very similar, but (because of historical
             | reasons) the spelling is quite different (multiple letters
             | in Polish vs accents/diacritics in Czech).
        
         | ufocia wrote:
         | You're whitewashing at least the WWII era. The Czecho-Slovak
         | government capitulated pretty quickly after Germany's demands,
         | ..., and the country was used to support Germany's was efforts.
         | TBH, they did not receive a whole lot of support from their
         | prior allies, to say the least, ahead of the capitulation.
         | 
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Czechoslovak_Republic
         | 
         | As an aside, hopefully the relative lack of support for Ukraine
         | does not have similar outcomes. There are some significant
         | similarities between the two.
        
           | The_Colonel wrote:
           | > TBH, they did not receive a whole lot of support from their
           | prior allies, to say the least, ahead of the capitulation.
           | 
           | The "support" Czechoslovakia received from the western allies
           | was an order to capitulate to German demands.
           | 
           | As a reminder, this was the situation in 1938: https://hostin
           | g.photobucket.com/images/u314/erding/Cz_map_15...
           | 
           | The situation was much more hopeless than e.g. Ukraine was/is
           | in. The Czech part was almost completely surrounded by
           | Germany (controlling Austria and Silesia). Slovak part had a
           | long border with Nazi-allied Hungary. Poland was not friendly
           | at the time (taking part in the partition). The only kinda
           | friendly neighbor was the tiny sliver of border in the east
           | with Romania.
           | 
           | If the Czechoslovakia decided to fight, it would be accused
           | of aggression by the western powers (who basically declared
           | Germany is in the right in Munich).
        
             | ufocia wrote:
             | The claim of "participation" in the so called partition is
             | inflammatory. You make it sound like Poland was a party to
             | some kind of an agreement to dissolve Czechoslovakia, when
             | there is no evidence of that, especially in retrospect.
             | 
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish%E2%80%93Czechoslovak_b
             | o...
             | 
             | I agree that the Czechoslovakian situation was less hopeful
             | than that of Ukraine, at least for the moment.
        
           | confidantlake wrote:
           | This does not seem like a fair criticism or framing of the
           | situation. Every country Germany occupied was used to support
           | Germany's war efforts. The country had little choice but to
           | surrender, they were hung out to dry by their allies.
           | 
           | Despite this, they still resisted at great personal cost.
           | Heydrich was assassinated in Prague by Czech resistance
           | fighters. The reprisals were brutal, with thousands killed in
           | response. My grandmother who is still alive lived through
           | this time. Every day at school they announced the names of
           | those executed by the Natzis in order to intimidate the
           | populace.
        
             | ufocia wrote:
             | In my criticism I made a conscious effort to single out the
             | Czechoslovak government (I should've probably narrowed it
             | down to Benes and Hacha in particular), as opposed to the
             | citizenry. Perhaps surprisingly, after the outbreak of
             | WWII, Benes went on to be a leader of the resistance,
             | though from exile.
        
           | aba_cz wrote:
           | That's no whitewashing. Not sure where you got this idea from
           | but if you read the link to
           | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munich_Agreement you'd
           | realize that what you wrote is completely incorrect and
           | almost a lie. Czechia was not invited to that meeting and
           | European superpowers decided that it should cede to Germany.
           | Plus Germany invaded Czechia in 1939. Czechs would go to war
           | and lost it in days (just look at the size and position) and
           | would be a pariah in Europe if they didn't listen.
        
             | ufocia wrote:
             | "The Czechoslovak capitulation precipitated an outburst of
             | national indignation. In demonstrations and rallies, Czechs
             | and Slovaks called for a strong military government to
             | defend the integrity of the state. A new cabinet, under
             | General Jan Syrovy, was installed, and on 23 September
             | 1938, a decree of general mobilization was issued. The
             | Czechoslovak Army was modern, had an excellent system of
             | frontier fortifications and was prepared to fight. The
             | Soviet Union announced its willingness to come to
             | Czechoslovakia's assistance. Benes, however, refused to go
             | to war without the support of the Western powers."
        
               | aba_cz wrote:
               | There's no citation for this in Wiki and Soviet Union and
               | Germany signed Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact not that long
               | after. So this quote (and Soviet Union/Russia in general
               | as it's obvious why they would "help") is really not
               | trustworthy and not based on evidence.
        
         | mikrl wrote:
         | A large part of Svejk's humor comes from the multilingual
         | nature of the Austro-Hungarian empire at that time.
         | 
         | The common soldiers speak Czech amongst themselves, German to
         | the commanding officers, and a drunken old Polish colonel
         | butchers both languages while giving them a pep talk.
         | 
         | There are also miscommunications with Hungarians and Tatars.
         | 
         | Central Europe is heavily multicultural and multilingual, even
         | in 1914, but there are still strong national identities;
         | because of, not despite.
        
           | yreg wrote:
           | Some parts of it used to be more multicultural and
           | multilingual than they are now.
           | 
           | Bratislava was 36% German, 33% Slovak and 29% Hungarian in
           | the 1919 census. Now it's ~90% Slovak.
        
         | hilbert42 wrote:
         | I think you're onto something. I don't speak Czech but I've
         | been there a number of times and I know people who live there.
         | 
         | When Hasek wrote Svejk the Czechs were surrounded and
         | influenced by vastly different nations--the crumbling remnants
         | of the Austro-Hungarian Empire--which they were part of--the
         | Russian Empire and Germany--both of which were in chaos after
         | WWI. Even today they're still surrounded but at least now
         | they're an independent nation with their own language so
         | perhaps it's not surprising what comes out of them is quite
         | unique.
         | 
         | It's quite some years since I saw _Closely Watched Trains_ with
         | English subtitles and it had a huge impact on me. It 's one of
         | those films that one cannot get out of one's mind for days. In
         | its own understated way it's a great film and it's not
         | surprising that it was a Czech production. Its ending upset me
         | greatly because whilst its story was fiction, it reminded me of
         | similar tragic scenarios that were played out for real many
         | times during WWII (it seems to me one of the purposes of the
         | film was to remind us of the fact).
         | 
         |  _BTW, when I first went to Czechoslovakia it was still under
         | communist rule and the only practical (easiest) way to get from
         | Vienna to Prague was by train from Franz-Josefs-Bahnhof and
         | Emperor Franz Joseph Railway line. For some reason seeming
         | known to the communists we had to use this single track line
         | instead of the more modern dual track line via Bruno. I mention
         | it because the Franz Joseph Railway was a once-in-a-lifetime
         | experience to travel on, the track was in such terrible
         | condition that one thought the train would derail any moment
         | and the train only did about 30km /h max. After Communism fell
         | the track via Bruno was opened up and although a much longer
         | route the trip only took half as long._
        
           | foobarian wrote:
           | When I went there first it was also still under communist
           | rule, and the thing I still remember the most is that bread
           | loaves commonly sold in the grocery stores had the price
           | embossed into the crust (IIRC "5 Kcs"). Centrally controlled
           | economies eh? So stable that it was practical to make price
           | stamps distributed to bakeries. I wish I could get my hands
           | on one of these brands...
        
             | inglor_cz wrote:
             | You reminded me of my own childhood. Yes, 5 Kcs was a
             | standard price.
             | 
             | I was not yet 13 when the no-longer-Communist Czechoslovak
             | government liberalized the prices. Back then, I was
             | profoundly unsettled by the idea that the same loaf of
             | bread could cost a different amount of money in two
             | different stores.
             | 
             | It felt as unnatural as having multiple birthdays.
        
       | rareitem wrote:
       | > Hasek ran for office as a member of his own newly founded Party
       | of Moderate and Peaceful Progress Within the Limits of the Law
       | 
       | From wikipedia > The platform of the candidate for the Vinorhady
       | election district, Jaroslav Hasek, consisted of seven points:[16]
       | The reintroduction of slavery.         The nationalization of
       | janitors ("similar to how it is in Russia [...], where every
       | janitor is simultaneously a police informer").         The
       | rehabilitation of animals.         The institutionalization of
       | feeble-minded MPs.         The reintroduction of the Inquisition.
       | Judicial immunity for priests and the Church ("In cases where a
       | schoolgirl is deflowered by a priest").         The mandatory
       | introduction of alcoholism.
        
         | ufocia wrote:
         | Yes, humor.
        
           | frantathefranta wrote:
           | Well his Soviet escapades seem to suggest that not all of
           | them were wholly humorous.
        
             | The_Colonel wrote:
             | Can you be more specific? Which ones do you believe were
             | serious?
        
             | thriftwy wrote:
             | I believe these refer to the pre-Soviet state of affairs
             | when the yard keeper (dvornik) of an apartment block was
             | basically subordinate to the city police - at least in the
             | capital of St. Petersburg.
        
               | ufocia wrote:
               | That was probably the case also during the Soviet era. It
               | may well be the case even today.
        
               | thriftwy wrote:
               | I believe that during the Soviet era, almost every
               | position will be "on the guard" not just the yard keeper
               | (as depicted in "The Diamond Arm" of 1968). After the
               | Soviet era, yard-keeping services are way understaffed to
               | be useful for that, and also mostly rely on immigrant
               | labor lately. Still, you can never be sure.
        
               | ufocia wrote:
               | I wasn't aware that Russia has immigrant labor, though I
               | shouldn't have been surprised given their relative
               | economic strength.
        
               | 082349872349872 wrote:
               | Some music video commentary on russian immigrant labour:
               | 
               | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Fix7P6aGXQ (Uzbek
               | artist)
               | 
               | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7pSztJFomE (Circassian
               | artist)
               | 
               | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ugivNRYfjc (Russian
               | artist -- for the taxi driving character introduced at
               | 3:30)
               | 
               | these are all from about a decade back; there's no doubt
               | been much more since...
        
               | thriftwy wrote:
               | Notes from the Underground Internets.
        
             | some_random wrote:
             | Reading this article and expecting him to be a prototypical
             | anti-war writer only to see that he was at one point a
             | COMMISSAR IN THE RED ARMY caused quite a bit of whiplash
        
               | ufocia wrote:
               | Central Europe was the place of a lot of complex
               | belligerence at the time. Given his penchant for humor,
               | I'm not surprised that he was a commissar. 'The Bolshevik
               | Party established political commissars in 1918 to control
               | and improve morale in the military forces." For all I
               | know it could've been for self-preservation.
               | 
               | I'm not trying to be an apologist for him. Rather, I'd
               | like to encourage people to learn a bit more about him
               | and his environment before jumping to conclusions based
               | on a single point in his life.
        
             | ufocia wrote:
             | "In 1911, he founded The Party of Moderate Progress Within
             | the Bounds of the Law. He founded it with his friends in
             | the Vinohrady pub called U zlateho litru (The Golden Liter)
             | to parody the political life of that time."
             | 
             | He didn't become a Communist until about 1918.
             | 
             | The most you can say is that he had a complex life.
        
       | maciekpaprocki wrote:
       | For those that loved the book. Hasek also wrote an autobiography,
       | which is even funnier than the life of Svejk. It's definitely
       | made up quite a bit, but the stories in it are great. I cannot
       | find english title ( it might have been not printed ), but
       | transleting from polish it's called "3.5 beer".
       | 
       | Spoilers!!! Stories include:
       | 
       | - One time he wrote to paper called animals and unfortunately run
       | out of animals to write, so he just started inventing them. It
       | ended up in year long trip to Australia paid by some wealthy
       | women who really wanted to get her own "Tasmanian Vampire"
       | 
       | - Russian general invades city. Hasek knows the best way to stay
       | alive is to have a drink with him. They get very drunk and
       | general ask Hasek what's his biggest problem. Hasek says that the
       | fact that people cannot read. Next day he wakes up to bunch of
       | posters around the city saying that whoever will not be able to
       | read by noon tomorrow will be executed.
        
       | wly_cdgr wrote:
       | Wow, what? How is my favorite novel the top result on HN right
       | now.
        
       | chalst wrote:
       | Is the sense of humour comparable to the Flashman series?
        
         | mikrl wrote:
         | It's like catch 22 but more crude, and more brutal.
         | 
         | Lots of drinking, stealing, fist fighting, long winded
         | anecdotes (with plenty of embellishments) telling lies to get
         | into / out of trouble, and ethnic humour reflecting the
         | attitudes which were typical of the imperial period:
         | Germans/Austrians look down on Czechs, Czechs resent the
         | Germans and are unfriendly with Hungarians, the imperial
         | soldiers harass Jews (who get them back in various ways) and
         | there is a scene where the Czechs in military jail are
         | practicing their Russian: for an assumed surrender at the
         | front.
        
       | MichaelRo wrote:
       | I tried to read the book as a kid when I was maybe 6h or 7th
       | grade, along with Jules Verne and what else. Didn't finish it,
       | heck, I abandoned it quickly.
       | 
       | Maybe it's one of those things that you need to be an adult to
       | appreciate. Unfortunately there's no lack of content nowadays, so
       | I'm not sure I'll give the book another try.
        
       | coredog64 wrote:
       | There's an American version of this called "No Time For
       | Sergeants" [0]. One of my favorites bits is when he takes color-
       | blindness to the extreme.
       | 
       | [0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Time_for_Sergeants
        
       | limaoscarjuliet wrote:
       | I was raised in Eastern Bloc in 70 and 80s. Svejk was the classic
       | we all read as teenagers. We have seen that as parody of
       | communism and always wondered how is that book not censored or
       | forbidden?
       | 
       | Now I realize it describes any sufficient evolved (i.e. broken)
       | system, which might have been good enough excuse for the soviets
       | not to make it verbotten.
        
         | 082349872349872 wrote:
         | Like the joke about Stalin's underling muttering under his
         | breath about "that bastard with the moustache", I wouldn't be
         | surprised if either (a) the original censors had said "anti
         | Austria-Hungary good" without giving a moment's thought as to
         | how well the satire fit their own system, or (b) a particularly
         | bright censor (or set of censors) realised they could always
         | fall back on (a) for plausible deniability. Compare
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39697389 (or
         | https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ru/b/ba/Sharik_Figvam...
         | ?)
        
       | analog31 wrote:
       | In English, there is at least one Bowdlerized translation, which
       | ruins it. I found the Penguin Books edition to be quite good.
       | 
       | It was my grandfather's favorite novel. He fought on the other
       | side.
        
       | maximinus_thrax wrote:
       | This is my comfort book. I've read it 6 or 7 times, first time
       | when I was around 12 years old. It's a book which still has the
       | ability to pull me out of whatever pit I am at certain times.
        
       | bitsinthesky wrote:
       | I think an entrepreneur should establish a tour in the Czech
       | lands, to walk in the footsteps of svejk as of when he drank away
       | the money for his train ticket sending his company to the front,
       | thereby forcing him to zig zag across the land in the hope of
       | rejoining them. It will be the Czech Camino de Santiago, and one
       | must carry a pipe and a bottle of slivovic as they go.
        
       | jug wrote:
       | Related, popular Czech pub in Stockholm :D
       | https://maps.app.goo.gl/GbNAjLTPCpNwkSwf9
        
       | scyzoryk_xyz wrote:
       | My underground Nazi-resistance fighter, Auschwitz survivor and
       | later staunch-idealist socialist-communist grandfather loved this
       | book and identified with it deeply.
       | 
       | Edit: I might add that this book and author had a similar sort of
       | status on this side of the iron curtain as Joseph Heller and his
       | military Catch-22 humor.
        
       | nutrie wrote:
       | Interesting. I didn't know Svejk was popular at all outside
       | Czechia. I must say, it's somewhat a bittersweet realization. The
       | way I and many other Czechs see it, Hasek did us quite a
       | disservice. Still, if you guys enjoy it, hats down.
        
         | spacechild1 wrote:
         | It is very popular in Austrian, in particular the TV series
         | from the 70s with Fritz Muliar as the main actor 1972: https://
         | de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Die_Abenteuer_des_braven_Solda.... The
         | theatre plays are also quite popular. I even read the novel as
         | a kid because my father had it in his library :)
         | 
         | Why do you think Hasek did you a disservice?
        
           | nutrie wrote:
           | In a nutshell, we did it to ourselves by excessively
           | promoting the novel over the course of many decades.
           | 
           | Starting with the avant-garde movements of the 20's, through
           | the communism era (Hasek was a socialist and a communist) to
           | this day, we've been essentially saying Svejk characterizes
           | the true nature of what it means to be a Czech. You literally
           | hear school teachers tell their students a drunk devious
           | simpleton is considered a role model.
           | 
           | The topic is quite complex, there's more history and politics
           | involved, but I'm not going there.
           | 
           | Disclaimer: By no means am I criticizing the book or people
           | who like it.
        
             | mcepl wrote:
             | I am a Czech as well, and although I know exactly what you
             | are talking about, I have found my own way towards Svejk
             | lately. I am afraid (all of them awesome artists, but too
             | much pushing the novel in the humour direction) Lada,
             | Hrusinsky, and Trnka are guilty a lot for the feeling which
             | is prevalent now. Contrary to that, I was fascinated a lot
             | by listening to M.C.Putna's discussion of Svejk in
             | https://www.mujrozhlas.cz/putnuv-jihocesky-literarni-
             | mistopi... and by listening to the novel in audio, where he
             | understands basically Svejk as "Kafka by other means", and
             | there is a lot to it.
        
       | projektfu wrote:
       | I love this book and, having read it, it gave me a new was of
       | looking at "Gomer Pyle, USMC". Probably not the intention of the
       | series creator, but imagining Pyle as much smarter than he lets
       | on and quite mischievous is a lot of fun.
        
       | troad wrote:
       | Funny story - last year I tried to buy a copy of Svejk in Prague
       | and I had the following exchange in a bookshop (in Czech).
       | 
       | Me: "Hello! Do you have a copy of Svejk?"
       | 
       | Assistant: "No."
       | 
       | M: "Uh, do you know of anyone that might?"
       | 
       | A: "No, no one has any Svejk right now!"
       | 
       | M: "I see. Is there any reason for that?"
       | 
       | A: "Everyone has already read it." _walks off in a huff_
       | 
       | It seemed somehow fitting. 'You can't read Svejk because everyone
       | has already read it, and we're insulted you'd even ask.' There's
       | a reason the Czech lands have given us both Kafka and Hasek.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-03-14 23:00 UTC)