[HN Gopher] Cystic fibrosis breakthrough has given patients a ch...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Cystic fibrosis breakthrough has given patients a chance to live
       longer
        
       Author : cowboysauce
       Score  : 367 points
       Date   : 2024-03-07 13:49 UTC (3 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.theatlantic.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.theatlantic.com)
        
       | leetrout wrote:
       | I lost a cousin and a family friend to CF. Both in their 20's.
       | One after a lung transplant added some time.
       | 
       | It is such a horrible disease and the breakthroughs are amazing.
       | So many families will be much more fortunate than mine and I am
       | happy for them!
        
       | forgetfreeman wrote:
       | I had a coworker with CF that started this treatment. Over the
       | course of their first year of treatment, as it became plain to
       | them just how effective it was and what the implications for
       | their long-term survival might be, their behavior changed
       | drastically. Within 18 months of starting treatment they were
       | showing worrying indications of both budding mental health issues
       | and heavy substance abuse. Their marriage, which had been stable
       | for years, was in shambles as well. I can only speculate that
       | their exuberance at being given a stay of execution lead them to
       | "oversteer" into some questionable lifestyle choices.
        
         | bane wrote:
         | This section seems to speak to your observation (edited for
         | brevity):
         | 
         |  _Doctors told me they could think of only one other comparable
         | breakthrough in recent memory: the arrival of powerful HIV
         | drugs in the 1990s. Like Trikafta, those drugs were not a cure,
         | but they transformed AIDS from a terminal illness into a
         | manageable chronic one. Young men got up from their deathbed,
         | newly strong and hale. ... This was a remarkable turn of
         | events. But it elicited a complicated mix of emotions, not all
         | of them joyful. Some patients who were no longer dying grew
         | depressed, anxious, and even suicidal at the thought of living.
         | This phenomenon became known as "Lazarus syndrome."
         | 
         | Death is an end, after all. Life comes with problems...the
         | writer Andrew Sullivan, who is HIV-positive, described life
         | after the advent of the HIV drugs in his essay "When Plagues
         | End":_                  When you have spent several years
         | girding yourself for the possibility of death, it is not so
         | easy to gird yourself instead for the possibility of life. What
         | you expect to greet with the euphoria of victory comes instead
         | like the slow withdrawal of an excuse. And you resist it.
         | The intensity with which you had learned to approach each day
         | turns into a banality, a banality that refuses to understand or
         | even appreciate the experience you have just gone through.
         | 
         | _For some HIV patients, their reversal of fortune seemed
         | unreal. "He doesn't trust what's happening to him," one doctor
         | said about a patient who had made a dramatic recovery, yet
         | found himself in psychological distress. "_
        
         | gfodor wrote:
         | I have CF, and my whole life I avoided things like CF
         | communities explicitly because I felt these ties to the disease
         | would lead to a crisis in my life if it was ever something I
         | could stop centering my life around.
        
           | Aurornis wrote:
           | Chronic illness forums are almost universally terrible. I try
           | to navigate the online communities for a family member's
           | disease to keep up with new developments. A decade ago I
           | found some value in the way they presented news and research
           | and anecdotes.
           | 
           | Now, the forums are overrun by small numbers of constantly
           | online members who feel the need to dominate every
           | conversation. The content has become almost entirely venting
           | and memes, with an unreasonable amount of alternative
           | medicine being pushed as fact. It's understandable that
           | they're frustrated, to say the least, but the way their
           | frustration gives way to a communal rage against doctors has
           | weirdly opened doors to alternative medicine peddlers. It's
           | disgusting to me to see how the alternative medicine pushers
           | have arrived with open arms and comforting smiles for
           | vulnerable communities, which slowly becomes a sales pitch
           | for their products.
           | 
           | I've seen everting from people peddling custom diet
           | consulting based on your 23andMe results to invitations to
           | private, paid Telegram channels where they supposedly share
           | their secret cures, to doctors from Eastern Europe who claim
           | to have cured the condition (which has eluded many
           | researchers and pharmaceutical companies) with a custom
           | treatment made from the patients' own urine. The way these
           | communities set themselves up to rage together at modern
           | medicine opens the door for friendly alternative medicine
           | scams.
           | 
           | It's depressing.
        
             | spondylosaurus wrote:
             | IME one reason (out of many) why chronic illness forums
             | tend to be terrible is that people who are managing their
             | conditions reasonably well don't participate much. Which
             | makes sense--the better you're doing, the less time you
             | spend thinking about it and the less time you're inclined
             | to spend discussing it--but that creates an environment
             | where the most miserable voices become the loudest.
             | 
             | And so (1) there's often a disproportionate focus on doom
             | and gloom rather than success stories, which paints a
             | pessimistic picture for anyone joining after a recent
             | diagnosis, and (2) the most prominent voices have a
             | wounded-cornered-animal mentality that makes them defensive
             | and/or prone to lashing out. And I can't totally blame
             | them, given how hard it is to live with a treatment-
             | resistant chronic condition, but it's not the most
             | constructive environment for everyone else.
        
             | krooj wrote:
             | I'll echo this - I have had two left leg DVTs, spaced about
             | 7 years apart, and after the second event, really started
             | diving into medical publications - surgical journals,
             | medical textbooks, clinical trials - as a means to better
             | understand the condition, it's pathology, etc. I ultimately
             | submitted to testing and discovered a congenital stenosis
             | of the left iliac vein with heavy retroperitoneal
             | collateralization that necessitated a stent to keep that
             | iliac vein open.
             | 
             | I also had a quick look into the social media (primarily
             | reddit) aspect of these vascular conditions, and it's a
             | pile of dogshit. Most of these patient communities bill
             | themselves as "support groups", but there's never any real
             | discussion on meaningful research, drug, or device
             | advancements. They places serve primarily as "pity pits"
             | for chronic moaners and scammers selling alternative
             | medicine.
        
               | gcanyon wrote:
               | This is interesting -- I have Factor V Leiden
               | (heterozygous) and have had one DVT. It _never_ would
               | have occurred to me to seek out a support group.
        
               | krooj wrote:
               | I also have the same mutation, as does my wife. From what
               | I've been told by various hematologists, vascular
               | surgeons, and interventional radiologists, it's a very
               | weak clotting disorder, but you do have to keep an eye on
               | certain environmental factors: smoking, hydration,
               | movement, and trauma/surgery. To put it another way, FVL
               | is fairly benign until you're already way into Virchow's
               | danger done, and at that point it's gonna work against
               | you. When it comes to VTE in the presence of ONLY FVL, I
               | would shoot serious side-eye at a doc that chalked it up
               | to the mutation - there's usually something else going
               | on.
        
               | gcanyon wrote:
               | Possibly true, but don't sleep on it -- I happened to be
               | transitioning insurance when it happened, so I dragged it
               | out for several days before ending up at the ER. They
               | sent me home later that day, but with strict warnings
               | about calling 911 _immediately_ for any sign of stroke,
               | heart attack or pulmonary embolism. Fortunately all I
               | have to show for it is weakened vein flow in the affected
               | leg.
        
           | bdcravens wrote:
           | I also have CF, and my diagnosis was different than most: I
           | grew up dirt poor and wasn't diagnosed until I was almost 14.
           | Even after diagnosis, it pretty much became incumbent on me
           | to manage my care. I feel that not being put in a bubble and
           | not being told I was going to die kept CF from shaping my
           | perspective (today I'm 47 and have all the boring problems
           | people my age have. My health is tolerable, sitting at about
           | 50-60% lung capacity)
        
         | bdcravens wrote:
         | Many have reported severe anxiety due to Trikafta. As I
         | mentioned in another comment, I believe I experienced the same,
         | but I also started Lexapro around the same time for other non-
         | CF reasons, so independent test variables and all that.
        
         | qgin wrote:
         | Imagine if tomorrow, it was announced there had been a
         | discovery that doubled average human life expectancy to 150.
         | There would be happiness, but there would also be chaos. How
         | many people would quit all the things they'd told themselves
         | they were too old to change? The job they were grinding out
         | until retirement. The marriage they'd resigned themselves to?
         | Imagine billions of people getting pulled backwards back across
         | the midlife crisis line, realizing that yes, maybe there IS
         | more to life than "this". The days and weeks after that
         | announcement would be some of the most chaotic the world has
         | ever seen.
        
       | bdcravens wrote:
       | I have CF, and I take Trikafta. Before Trikafta, I usually had a
       | 5+ day stay in the hospital every year, and sometimes I have
       | would very stubborn respiratory infections that just wouldn't go
       | away. I was mentally preparing myself for inevitable decline and
       | eventual death.
       | 
       | Trikafta changed my situation dramatically. I've had no
       | hospitalizations, and most the classic CF symptoms are either
       | gone or extremely diminished. It can't undo a life of damage to
       | things like my pancreas, vas deferens, etc, and I still take
       | medicine to digest my food, but overall, it's as close to
       | "normal" as I could hope for at this point.
       | 
       | The only real downside: weight gain. With CF the pancreas is
       | blocked, so you lack in digestive enzymes, and it's a struggle to
       | maintain a healthy enough weight to battle respiratory
       | infections. After Trikafta, I gained some 30 pounds, and have a
       | big belly on my small frame, and went up some 6 inches in the
       | waist. To add insult to injury, it happened during the spring and
       | summer of 2020, when buying clothes was a challenge due to the
       | pandemic.
       | 
       | Speaking of the pandemic, the timing of Trikafta was amazing: it
       | kept the normally full "CF floors" of hospitals empty, opening up
       | those beds for those with COVID and keeping CF patients less
       | exposed.
       | 
       | One side effect I should mention: many report extreme anxiety.
       | However, I was starting an anxiety medication for the first time
       | (something I should have done 20 years ago, but alas ...) and so
       | those effects were muted or hidden to me.
       | 
       | (copied from the last time Trikafta was mentioned here:
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37540731)
        
         | COGlory wrote:
         | Sorry for the potentially insensitive question, but I really am
         | wondering about this:
         | 
         | >One side effect I should mention: many report extreme anxiety.
         | However, I was starting an anxiety medication for the first
         | time (something I should have done 20 years ago, but alas ...)
         | and so those effects were muted or hidden to me.
         | 
         | I would have imagined that most people with CF already _had_
         | extreme anxiety - wondering when the infection that is going to
         | end one 's life will arrive. Is it really possible that
         | Trikafta is causing noticeably worse anxiety?
        
           | therein wrote:
           | Just an anecdotal experience so doesn't necessarily mean
           | anything but the only person I knew that had CF had
           | absolutely no anxiety from his condition.
           | 
           | If anything he was a very mature guy for his age, having
           | realized he has limited time but of course I wouldn't know
           | the internal struggles he might have kept from us.
        
           | mason55 wrote:
           | > _I would have imagined that most people with CF already had
           | extreme anxiety - wondering when the infection that is going
           | to end one 's life will arrive. Is it really possible that
           | Trikafta is causing noticeably worse anxiety?_
           | 
           | There's a discussion of this in the article. Essentially, a
           | bunch of people have said that they started experiencing
           | extreme anxiety when they started Trikafta, and that stopping
           | or lowering the dose helped immensely. However, clinicians
           | have said that there's no actual evidence that the Trikafta
           | is causal.
           | 
           | So it seems to be a bit of an open question and I'm sure an
           | emotional one on both sides.
        
             | ipaddr wrote:
             | Clinicians are always a day late and a dollar short. The
             | evidence comes from these people reporting. These
             | clinicians need a 50 million dollar grant to get that
             | proof.
        
               | TechnicalVault wrote:
               | If you've ever had to organise a scientific study you'll
               | understand why. Privacy and ethics are important but they
               | make recruitment of a large and representative sample for
               | any medical study a nightmare. First you'll need to run
               | your protocol past an ethics board and do back and forth
               | until it's agree. Once you have that done you'll send out
               | an invite (often blind) in hopes of getting people who
               | fit your study aims and you will get who you get. There
               | are often costs associated with this.
               | 
               | So now you have some willing participants you have to
               | screen your initial group to filter it down to people who
               | actually meet your recruiting criteria and consent them
               | for your study. Finally you actually get to gather your
               | data, if you need people to come in for sampling and have
               | to cover their expenses.
               | 
               | Next you'll look at your data and realise there's some
               | confounding effect which reduces your powers to infer
               | anything (e.g. somehow you overrecruited a particular
               | group and they turn out to do something which correlates
               | with the thing you're studying). You'll cry a little and
               | realise you need to recruit more people to have any
               | statistical power to draw a conclusion.
               | 
               | tldr; medical and scientific studies are hard if you want
               | them to actually have any validity.
        
           | vkou wrote:
           | People generally get acclimated to the situation they are in.
           | 
           | If you have anxiety over money, for instance, you'd probably
           | still have it, regardless of whether you had $15,000 in your
           | bank account, or $15,000,000.
        
             | pfannkuchen wrote:
             | You might even have more with 15M! It's much harder to
             | replace if you lose it.
        
             | fnordpiglet wrote:
             | I grew up with a lot of money insecurity, was homeless for
             | a while and started my career with nothing - one change of
             | clothes and a floor to sleep on. I've since done very well
             | for myself and have a considerable amount of net worth at
             | this point and a lucrative forward for as long as I want to
             | keep working at it.
             | 
             | I've lost most of my money anxiety, but it took a lot of
             | purposeful work inside myself to achieve that including
             | years of daily meditation and intentional study of
             | Buddhism. Before that my money anxiety was unbearable. It
             | didn't matter how little or how much I had, because it
             | wasn't about money in truth. It was a fear of losing
             | control and other things like self worth and identity
             | issues as a result of my earlier life. As I learned to let
             | go of the self and my identity and live life as it is
             | rather than what I'm afraid it might be I've lost my fears,
             | not just about money but all of them. In my experience lack
             | of money instigated my anxieties but once they started it
             | didn't matter how little or much I had.
             | 
             | That said it drove me to get more and more, and I enjoy
             | having more than when I had none. But even if I lost it all
             | I would be ok now.
        
               | TotalCrackpot wrote:
               | That's interesting - does your career require any formal
               | education? Or were you able to develop some crucial skill
               | on your own? Can you share what is your career about and
               | where you started and where are you now? For example - do
               | you hire employees or are you a landlord now, or are you
               | an employee?
        
               | fnordpiglet wrote:
               | No, I'm a software engineer. I barely graduated high
               | school because I was too busy smoking pot and programming
               | at a time when you needed a degree to get a good job so
               | didn't have much opportunities despite being pretty
               | skilled at programming. I got a job at Netscape tho as
               | one of the first tech companies that didn't look at
               | credentials before skill. I did well there and did my own
               | companies. But before I had nothing and move to
               | California with $5 and a change of clothes, slept on the
               | floor of someone I randomly met on irc (I was lucky it
               | didn't turn out worse than it did don't try this at
               | home!) until I found a job. Anyway, after Netscape and my
               | startups I became a quant on Wall Street, finished my cs
               | degree, and have had a successful career since. Now I'm
               | the top IC at a late stage startup.
        
               | TotalCrackpot wrote:
               | I don't really see how you become a quant on Wall Street
               | before you finish the CS degree, they I think look at
               | credentials a lot, can you at least give the name of the
               | prop shop that hired you without a formal education? Did
               | you have any good results in algorithmic competitions or
               | math competitions in high school? And how did you learn
               | programming without an actual computer? Did your parents
               | buy you a computer when you were young?
        
               | dan-robertson wrote:
               | Some shops care more than others. Going to a target
               | school also matters a lot more for interns/new grads than
               | for more experienced hires.
        
               | TotalCrackpot wrote:
               | How do you practice for becoming a quant outside of the
               | academic system?
        
               | fnordpiglet wrote:
               | You do things because you love it and couldn't do
               | anything other than that. You build and study not because
               | you want a job but because when you wake up in the
               | morning everything else you have to do is a chore and the
               | reason you live is to learn and see things work. If
               | that's who you are, you will struggle with the chores of
               | life like shelter and food for a while but you'll learn
               | and do so much of value people can't ignore it.
        
               | currymj wrote:
               | early 2000s was a different time also. nerd career paths
               | hadn't yet become prestigious and formalized.
               | 
               | there were no middle schoolers optimizing their resumes
               | for how to get a Jane Street internship in 8 years bc
               | Jane Street was only a few years old. same for a lot of
               | other firms.
        
               | fnordpiglet wrote:
               | It really started around 1994 with Netscape and then the
               | dotcom cultural mindset that valued ability over
               | credentials.
               | 
               | Also at that time, as you say, there wasn't a broad
               | cultural awareness of the money to be made in
               | quantitative fields. In fact this was the era of Revenge
               | Of the Nerds movies and glorification of the idiot jock
               | getting a business degree and the passionate nerd being
               | the butt of the joke. You really only went my route if
               | you were a total fuck up loser. Now the social view of
               | things has completely pivoted.
               | 
               | I would say interestingly the middle school kids
               | optimizing their resume only make it so far in industry.
               | They're never really passionate about what they're doing
               | they're just laddering. At some point they shift to
               | management or product or something. At the top firms
               | though the people who really make the money and whose
               | opinion has ultimate power are the fuck up losers who
               | live and breathe their passion and would do it for free
               | if that's all there was.
        
               | fnordpiglet wrote:
               | A lot of quants didn't go to college. On my team at a top
               | trading desk at a top bank we had about 15 people, 4 of
               | which never went to college. I actually got an internship
               | due to a person on the desk having worked for me prior
               | and went full time then finished my degree, so was
               | already in school. But many folks took an alternate
               | route. They were usually well experienced when they were
               | hired. But in an arms race where what you can do is more
               | important than nominal credentials a degree simply makes
               | it easier.
               | 
               | No, I was a total loser in high school. I barely
               | graduated and had awful test scores and did no
               | extracurricular activities other than smoke pot.
               | 
               | My grandparents bought me a computer when I was young, I
               | think because my mom saw how much I was interested in
               | them. It was a c64, but had no storage devices so I had
               | to type in programs from scratch each time which was a
               | tall order for a 6yo, but I did it anyway. At some point
               | someone gave me a 486dx2 board that was an extra and I
               | built my first Linux box running 0.96. My schools also
               | had an internet connection and I could get dialup access
               | to some sunos boxes and some NeXT boxes in the library
               | when I was in high school. One of my greatest wishes
               | growing up was to have enough money to have the best
               | monitor since my monitors were always garbage. My house
               | now has nice TVs and monitors everywhere LOL, but they'll
               | never hold a candle to my first VGA monochrome monitor I
               | delivered papers for a year to buy.
        
           | cbeach wrote:
           | On the subject of correlation/causation, I once took a drug
           | called Accutane to cure my teenage acne. Listed side effects
           | included: "Mental health issues depression, psychosis,
           | aggressive behaviour and suicide ideation and attempts"
           | 
           | Accutane was the best medicine I ever took. It resolved my
           | acne (permanently) in a matter of weeks. I felt elated
           | afterwards and never experienced mental side effects.
           | 
           | However, prior to the drug, I'd experienced several of the
           | listed side effects, due to the acne itself and its devasting
           | effect on my self-esteem.
           | 
           | For many teenagers suffering from serious acne, they'd also
           | have mental side effects due to the skin disorder, meaning
           | there would be a strong correlation between Accutane use and
           | people suffering mental episodes. And if the wonder drug
           | didn't cure the acne, as promised, I can imagine that failure
           | might push some acne sufferers over the edge.
           | 
           | So, Accutane itself could be harmless, but the circumstances
           | of its use might suggest causal link to mental side effects
           | which are not causal at all.
        
             | ipaddr wrote:
             | It takes a lot including many suicides to get that side
             | effect listed. You are lucky it didn't reach that point for
             | you. With a little more time or repeated usage it probably
             | would have got you as well.
        
             | dan-robertson wrote:
             | Yeah a lot of the side effects you listed sound a bit like
             | they could be within normal expectations for teenagers, or
             | just slightly heightened. Reminds me of an SSRI that
             | happened to also massively reduce caffeine metabolisation
             | without anyone noticing, and loads of the known side
             | effects were really just effects of caffeine overdose -
             | insomnia, jitters, headaches, etc.
        
           | bdcravens wrote:
           | Most of us, especially adults, are pretty much settled in
           | with the state of our condition - we've had it our entire
           | lives. Anecdotal, but many CF patients (including in online
           | communities I'm a part of) have reported a lot of increased
           | anxiety.
        
           | junon wrote:
           | Just an anecdote.
           | 
           | My best friend died of CF just a few years ago. He talked
           | candidly about his eventual death, to the extent it was
           | uncomfortable at first (but we ended up being to the level of
           | making jokes about it, which I think was a positive thing for
           | both of us).
           | 
           | He changed his WhatsApp status to a coffin and skull-and-
           | bones emoji right before he went, just as a joke.
           | 
           | He didn't live with a shred of anxiety - least anxious person
           | I've ever met. Dude was down for anything and everything, and
           | could have probably fought off a bear despite being comically
           | short and concerningly skinny. Easily one of the most kind
           | and relaxed souls I've ever met.
        
           | matthewtse wrote:
           | (I left a previous comment as a similar sufferer of a
           | lifelong genetic disease that was cured by a breakthrough
           | medicine: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37541222)
           | 
           | Funnily enough, although in practical terms my life is
           | infinitely better than it was before the drug in, I would
           | rate my anxiety as higher than it was before.
           | 
           | A lot more options open in the world, a lot more to hope/pine
           | for, a lot more to lose. Back in the days when my expected
           | future was to just hang out in bed, there wasn't much else to
           | do than to just chill and read a book.
        
         | therein wrote:
         | One of the first friends I made in college was a friend with
         | CF. I didn't know what CF was. He was very mature for our age
         | and generally a very nice, happy, caring person. Got
         | internships, studied with us. Went to bars with us but never
         | drank because he couldn't. He had stories about how Make-a-Wish
         | foundation has been dragging their feet not to give him his
         | wish since his childhood.
         | 
         | He would take his enzymes, do the vibrating jacket treatment.
         | He graduated and got a full time offer from a nice company. As
         | he was relocating, he picked up some infection and passed away
         | in a few weeks. None of us expected it. This was months before
         | I heard of the approval of Trikafta.
        
           | bdcravens wrote:
           | Never had a problem drinking. (So much so that I had to quit
           | a few years ago)
        
             | therein wrote:
             | It was more of an I don't want to risk it kind of thing. He
             | did taste it a few times towards the last few years of
             | college.
        
         | paulpauper wrote:
         | _weight gain. With CF the pancreas is blocked, so you lack in
         | digestive enzymes, and it 's a struggle to maintain a healthy
         | enough weight to battle respiratory infections. After Trikafta,
         | I gained some 30 pounds, and have a big belly on my small
         | frame_
         | 
         | This seems like a no-brainer way to treat obesity, by
         | restricting or blocking such enzymes. Obviously the downside is
         | diarrhea and other malabsorption symptoms, but obese people
         | have too much nutrition. Blocking absorption seems easier than
         | dieting, as no willpower required. You shit out the undigested
         | food.
        
           | derefr wrote:
           | They sort of tried this in the '90s -- not in the form of
           | suppressing the required enzymes for nutrient absorption, but
           | rather in the form of diet foods that contained inherently
           | non-absorbable nutrients. The downsides were basically the
           | same -- the non-absorbed nutrients had to come out. People
           | didn't generally respond well to these products. See e.g. htt
           | ps://web.archive.org/web/20060113084223/http://www.zug.co...
        
             | vrc wrote:
             | Olestra! I ate a whole bag of the Lay's with Olean as a
             | kid. They had the audacity to say that they assumed that
             | people would only eat a handful at a time. Of near zero
             | calorie potato chips that taste like potato chips...
        
           | bdcravens wrote:
           | I've played with my enzyme dosage, and there are a lot of
           | unpleasant side effects as you've mentioned. Overall, the
           | best approach has been what everyone else has to do: watch
           | carbs and sugar, reasonable exercise, etc.
        
           | patmorgan23 wrote:
           | Appetite suppression/regulation seems like a much better
           | route to pursue than intentionally inducing malabsorption.
        
           | vrc wrote:
           | Orlistat. Look at Alli -- very available to buy. A very
           | common side effect is steatorrhea. Oily leakage/poops. But
           | not like, "oops I gotta run to the bathroom" but like, a tiny
           | bear down and oil shoots out your bum. There is a clear
           | warning on it about malabsorption as well of fat soluble
           | vitamins.
        
             | Scoundreller wrote:
             | Having taken orlistat in low/intermittent doses, I can say
             | it really matters what you eat fatty stuff _with_ , on top
             | of quantity. A regular "balanced" low-mid fat diet, and
             | you're (well, I've been) okay.
             | 
             | If you eat a tub of ice cream as dinner, you're going to
             | have a bad time.
        
         | pedalpete wrote:
         | Can you elaborate on the weight gain? I'm curious why that is a
         | downside of the Trikafta? You say with CF the pancreas is
         | blocked, so why did the weight come as a side-effect of the
         | drug, and not with the disease initially?
        
           | bdcravens wrote:
           | Some of the blockage of the pancreas is due to scarring, some
           | of it to thick mucus. The scarring can't be undone, but with
           | a reduction of mucus blockage, food may be digested better.
           | That said, I think that there's other causes, given how fast
           | most who start Trikafta gain weight.
        
           | abhisuri97 wrote:
           | Med student here. My guess is the following: So with CF your
           | pancreas can't secrete many of the enzymes that are necessary
           | to actually digest food. You can take medications to help
           | with that digestion, but regardless, you aren't actually
           | getting all the calories in your food with CF because it
           | isn't making its way into your body (notably patients with CF
           | have steatorrhea which is fat in their stool because they
           | can't absorb a lot of fat from their foods like a non-CF
           | patient). The med helps the pancreas recover some of its
           | ability to secrete digestive enzymes and so patients can now
           | eat and get more from their food. The issue is that there
           | needs to be a recalibration in terms of how much patients are
           | eating. Previously a 2000 calorie diet may not have gotten
           | them so far because they didn't absorb much of it, but now
           | they're absorbing a lot more of it. Plus increased work of
           | breathing with CF expends more calories compared to a non-CF
           | patient (and patients on this drug).
        
             | joney_baloney wrote:
             | This is exactly right.
             | 
             | Source: have CF.
        
         | jMyles wrote:
         | Reading your comment, I was certain I remembered it - and I see
         | that you've now added a link to its previous home.
         | 
         | So I just wanted to say: it was an impactful piece of writing,
         | enough so that I remembered it quite clearly after a single
         | read these few months ago.
        
           | bdcravens wrote:
           | Thank you. My aim isn't to wax poetic or elicit sympathy, but
           | to provide insight for others.
        
         | cogman10 wrote:
         | > The only real downside: weight gain.
         | 
         | Interesting. I'm an uncle to a family member with CF (and I'm a
         | carrier) and one of their long battles has actually been
         | weight. To the point of doing things like downing olive oil to
         | try and keep up the weight. They've eventually had to take the
         | fairly drastic measure of getting a feeding tube installed.
         | Getting enough calories in just hasn't been possible until the
         | feeding tube.
        
           | bdcravens wrote:
           | Yeah, it's been quite a shock trying to reverse the first 40+
           | years of my life where I was told to eat eat eat. Not just
           | for the weight, which is really a vanity thing, but also to
           | counteract the diabetes that most with CF develop, since that
           | can directly impact overall health and the ability to fight
           | off infection.
        
         | joney_baloney wrote:
         | My younger brother has CF and takes Trikafta and it's
         | absolutely made all the difference in the world, it's wonderful
         | to see. Watching all the years of research and CFF funding
         | finally pay off is really something.
         | 
         | My personal situation is probably pretty unique, in that I have
         | CF as well, but had a double lung tx many years ago. A couple
         | years ago my transplant team (actually it may have been the CF
         | people.. fuzzy memory) asked me if I was interested in getting
         | on Trikafta and after thinking it over for about 30 seconds I
         | told them I'd probably pass. It seemed like it wouldn't have
         | any beneficial effect on my lungs, as they no longer "have CF",
         | and that I assumed it would just make extra weight for my
         | decently healthy but still under par lungs to have to drag
         | around. They didn't disagree.
        
           | Sammi wrote:
           | Yes but CF affects all liquids in your whole body. You can
           | get diffuse long term damage anywhere and everywhere in your
           | body. Having to eat calorie amounts like someone without CF
           | sounds like a good tradeoff in order to not risk this damage.
        
             | joney_baloney wrote:
             | Yeah and it'd help my sinuses too but at my age I'm used to
             | taking the enzymes when I eat and they work well enough.
             | Long term damage is basically my personality at this point,
             | lol.
        
           | abdulhaq wrote:
           | I'm in a similar situation so it's funny to see someone else
           | here with the same. I had my transplant in 1988. There's also
           | Steve Rasmussen (you can google him) who AFAIK also does not
           | take Trikafta.
        
       | bdcravens wrote:
       | Interesting note about Trikafta and other advancements in cystic
       | fibrosis: the Make a Wish Foundation announced that children with
       | CF now no longer automatically qualify for their program due to
       | the advancements in care.
       | 
       | https://wish.org/cf-update
        
         | therein wrote:
         | My friend that had CF was eligible. He was asked by the
         | foundation what he wanted when he was 5-6 years old. He said he
         | wanted to go Zorbing in Australia.
         | 
         | They dragged it until he was 18. He always jokingly said "make
         | a wish foundation is waiting, hoping I'll die".
         | 
         | He finally got to go Zorbing when he was 19. Passed away a few
         | years later.
         | 
         | Not surprised the foundation jumped on Trikafta to remove
         | eligibility.
        
         | ForHackernews wrote:
         | This is also mentioned in the article:
         | 
         | > Recently, Make-A-Wish announced that children with CF would
         | no longer automatically be eligible for the program, because
         | "life-changing advances" had radically improved the outlook for
         | them.
         | 
         | I know this is a long piece, but half the comments in this
         | thread seem like people didn't even bother to read it before
         | commenting...
        
           | tnias23 wrote:
           | There's a sign-up process required.
        
             | ForHackernews wrote:
             | Ah! Fair enough. I assumed HN links bypassed the paywall.
        
           | bdcravens wrote:
           | Fair enough. As someone who takes Trikafta, I skimmed the
           | article since it wasn't news to me :-)
        
       | bane wrote:
       | Oh wow. I remember a kid in elementary school with CF. I didn't
       | understand at the time what he and his family was going through.
       | I remember his personality and intelligence, his skill on the
       | soccer team. He was unusually driven for an 8-9 year old.
       | 
       | As I got older and into my 20s, I thought about him a lot -- it
       | was understood that most CF patients don't make it out of their
       | early 20s and I knew even if he were particularly lucky, as time
       | went on and I aged, he was probably gone.
       | 
       | My father also recently died from lung cancer, and had a few
       | months where he was effectively drowning in his own lung fluids,
       | requiring doctors to drain his lungs with long needles through
       | his back. That experience also brought me back to that
       | schoolmate, considering what he had had to endure.
       | 
       | Recently, I was reorganizing my personal library and came across
       | my elementary school yearbook and flipping through, saw his
       | picture. It's been decades since he's likely passed on. It gave
       | me pause to contemplate certain priorities in my life and try to
       | cultivate greater compassion.
       | 
       | It's a particularly cruel disease, and this news is wonderful.
        
         | jhoechtl wrote:
         | Those were wonderful words and moved me a lot.
        
         | dclowd9901 wrote:
         | My brother passed about a decade ago from complications from a
         | double lung transplant, which he needed because of CF.
         | 
         | It seems like something every day reminds me of him. I'm really
         | glad there's hope for people with it. It's a particularly
         | shitty disease and he was the nicest most thoughtful person
         | I've ever known. I miss him dearly.
         | 
         | Bittersweet. Glad there's progress, wish it were earlier.
        
         | speedylight wrote:
         | Have you tried looking him up? He could still be alive.
        
       | dotnet00 wrote:
       | I remember studying about how CF was an agonizing death sentence
       | just 10 years ago in highschool. It's both interesting to learn
       | that even at that time the life expectancy info was outdated, and
       | even cooler to hear this news.
        
       | varjag wrote:
       | It appeared too late to make a difference for my dear friend and
       | the kindest human being I knew. The manifestation of life's
       | injustice drives me mad ngl.
        
       | alleycat5000 wrote:
       | Breath From Salt is a great book on CF and it's history in
       | medicine.
       | 
       | https://benbellabooks.com/shop/breath-from-salt/
        
       | yalok wrote:
       | I wonder if this applies to kidneys cystic fibrosis?
       | 
       | I friend of mine passed away a few years ago from it, and it was
       | painful to watch slow degradation in his health over the years.
        
       | josefrichter wrote:
       | Around the time Trikafta became widely available I used to work
       | for a clinical trials company. I remember one guy with CF telling
       | us the full story of his life, how plenty of his friends with CF
       | died in their 20s, and how, after taking the new meds, he felt
       | effects within the first hour. It was like a miracle. If I
       | remember correctly, there's still some 10% of CF patients for
       | whom it doesn't work but I hope we will soon eradicate this
       | horrendous disease altogether.
        
       | bruce511 wrote:
       | Trikafta is a real breakthrough for CF patients. What's not
       | mentioned is the cost - about $300 000 per person per year. [1]
       | 
       | In 2037 the patent will run out, and the generic price will
       | likely be 90% less.
       | 
       | Fortunately, for Americans with good-enough health insurance,
       | it's covered, so ... yay? For those without insurance, or in
       | other countries where $300k is basically unaffordable, well
       | bummer for you, you'll be the last generation to die of it.
       | 
       | I get the insane costs, and risks, of developing these things. I
       | get that the profit motive is what drives there to be any
       | research at all in pharma. I get that the price has to be high
       | for everyone, or insurance companies will balk.
       | 
       | And yet, even knowing all that, there's a sour taste when we
       | -could- (literally) save lives, but, well, money first ya-know...
       | 
       | I don't have an answer to this issue- there are downsides to all
       | proposals I've heard. But this approach seems, well, pretty
       | harsh.
       | 
       | [1] https://www.statnews.com/2023/11/03/trikafta-cystic-
       | fibrosis....
        
         | elektor wrote:
         | "In 2037 the patent will run out, and the generic price will
         | likely be 90% less."
         | 
         | Unfortunately, that's not guaranteed to bring a price drop.
         | Humira is a good example of that; it recently went generic but
         | much of the savings went to higher rebates to pharmacy benefits
         | managers.
         | 
         | Some reading for anyone curious:
         | 
         | https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/...
        
           | amplicons4ever wrote:
           | You're talking apples and oranges...
           | 
           | Humira is a monoclonal antibody (a biologic drug), not a
           | small molecule. Biologics require cell culture systems and a
           | completely different manufacturing process than small
           | molecules, and are very complex drugs. The "generics" (called
           | biosimilars) aren't significantly cheaper because they're
           | simply very expensive to manufacture at scale. Humira or its
           | "generics/biosimilars" will never be cheap. It's physically
           | impossible with today's bio processing technology.
           | 
           | Trikafta is a mix of three small molecules, which are
           | manufactured in large chemical batches and are the more
           | traditional class of drugs. Many even have total synthesis
           | pathways known which means you can basically make them by the
           | train car scale for cheap.
           | 
           | When the patent on Trikafta runs out, it'll be very cheap.
           | 
           | I'll note that vanishingly few patients ever pay the full
           | list price in the US--if you have insurance, the copay is
           | small.
           | 
           | Your insurance pays (as they should, that's why you pay them
           | premiums!). The company even pays the co-pay in most cases so
           | the actual cost to patients in many cases is $0.
           | 
           | If you truly need it and don't have insurance, the company
           | provides it for basically free with a patient assistance
           | program, it's there on their website.
           | 
           | Kudos to the scientists who invented this, I don't feel bad
           | for the insurance companies really, they charge their
           | premiums and it's their responsibility to the policyholders
           | to pay the applicable fees for care.
           | 
           | *edit: typo
        
             | Scoundreller wrote:
             | What I like to say about pharma, especially small-molecule,
             | is that the first dose costs $billions, and the rest a few
             | cents.
        
             | maxerickson wrote:
             | I don't feel bad for the insurance companies either, but it
             | is the case that they get their money from the people they
             | cover, expensive treatments will drive up overall premiums.
        
         | xenospn wrote:
         | In other countries this will be covered by the social safety
         | net (that doesn't exist in the US, hence the need for "good-
         | enough health insurance").
        
           | ploika wrote:
           | Not necessarily. I don't know about other countries, but I
           | remember there being a campaign here in Ireland (with one of
           | the highest rates of cystic fibrosis in the world) to get
           | Orkambi covered under the Drug Payment Scheme when it was
           | new.
        
           | BurningFrog wrote:
           | Or the country decides to not import the medicine due to the
           | cost.
        
           | paulpauper wrote:
           | 'other countries' would not even developed the drug...Vertex,
           | a US pharma company, developed Trikafta. No one is paying the
           | 300k out of pocket. The high price incentivizes research.
           | Expensive drugs seems like a tradeoff for more innovation.
        
             | bdcravens wrote:
             | I literally just received a box of Trikafta on Wednesday.
             | My copay was $150 on a $31,855 retail price. (I actually
             | don't pay the $150, due to Vertex's copay assistance)
        
           | astrange wrote:
           | The socialized medicine systems don't have infinite money
           | just like private health systems don't; if they can't
           | negotiate a cheaper price for the medicine they won't
           | purchase it.
           | 
           | (It's not "health insurance". Insurance covers unpredictable
           | outcomes; needing a medicine every month for the rest of your
           | life is not unpredictable.)
        
           | refurb wrote:
           | It's not. That's what a lot of people don't understand.
           | 
           | These drugs from Vertex started being approved in 2014. US
           | insurers pretty much covered them from approval. Even
           | Medicaid (health insurance for low income) started paying for
           | it.
           | 
           | Other countries? The UK just started in 2020.
           | 
           | In Canada? Last I checked only 5 of the 10 provinces paid for
           | it and only if you're under 18.
           | 
           | The US healthcare is expensive for a lot of reasons, and one
           | of them is new technology gets paid for really quickly.
        
             | Scoundreller wrote:
             | Looks like every province pays for Trikafta now:
             | https://www.cysticfibrosis.ca/our-
             | programs/advocacy/access-t...
             | 
             | Of course, it's Canada, so you may have private drug
             | coverage and then it depends on province whether you fall
             | back to the public coverage if the private payor doesn't
             | cover it.
             | 
             | > The third-generation of modulators, Trikafta, is a new
             | transformational drug that can treat up to 90% of Canadians
             | with cystic fibrosis. _Trikafta was approved for sale in
             | Canada on Friday, June 18th, 2021_ , by Health Canada for
             | people aged 12 and up with cystic fibrosis and at least one
             | F508del mutation and on April 20, 2022 for those aged six
             | and up. _As of September 13, 2022, every province,
             | territory and federal drug program is funding this drug for
             | those six and up_. Unfortunately, it is not accessible to
             | all who can benefit from it, and therefore our advocacy
             | work continues
             | 
             | https://www.cysticfibrosis.ca/our-
             | programs/advocacy/access-t...
        
           | umanwizard wrote:
           | No country pays unlimited amounts of public money for brand
           | new drugs.
        
         | ForHackernews wrote:
         | It is mentioned. Quoting directly from this piece...
         | 
         | > Or stopped being covered by insurance? Trikafta's sticker
         | price is more than $300,000 a year. Insurance typically covers
         | most of that cost--minus what can be significant co-pays and
         | deductibles--and Vertex offers co-pay assistance. But patients'
         | lives ultimately depend on decisions made by nameless
         | bureaucrats in rooms far away: Insurance plans can suddenly
         | change what they cover, and in 2022, Vertex announced that it
         | would substantially reduce its financial assistance.
        
           | Aloha wrote:
           | I suspect very strongly at 300k a year, its still cheaper
           | than treating CF via existing means.
        
             | bdcravens wrote:
             | Yes, I (CF patient) just had a one-week hospital stay, and
             | right now the (retail) price of that vacation is around
             | $100k the last time I looked at all of the bills.
             | (fortunately I have amazing insurance)
        
               | Aloha wrote:
               | When I saw you mention multiple hospital stays a year, I
               | went "well a single admission runs about 20k" and
               | extrapolated from there.
        
             | Sammi wrote:
             | Of course. All medicine producers know to price their
             | product just below the alternative.
        
         | nwiswell wrote:
         | In many other countries, patents do not apply to personal use,
         | where there is no sale.
         | 
         | Since Trikafta is a blend of 3 small-molecule drugs, is it
         | possibly feasible to publish a do-it-yourself synthesis
         | process?
         | 
         | Or perhaps the community could even come together to set up a
         | lab, where individuals could travel and go through the motions
         | to produce their own?
         | 
         | I recognize this isn't ideal, but it might be legal...
        
           | deadbabe wrote:
           | If you're going to do all that why bother with legality, just
           | push pills on a black market.
        
             | A_D_E_P_T wrote:
             | Yeah.
             | 
             | In all seriousness, you can buy the APIs directly from
             | China/India and compound them yourself. It's easy and dirt
             | cheap, in most cases. This is typically how underground
             | steroid labs and other illicit pharmacies work. It's in
             | some cases how legitimate compounding pharmacies work.
             | 
             | So how do you know what you're getting is pure, or even
             | real? Simple, before shipping it to the US, you send it
             | over to an analytical lab in China and have them run GC/MS
             | or LC/MS on the chemical raw material. Since it's
             | supposedly a pure compound, that should be easy, and
             | there's very rarely any ambiguity as to the results. This
             | also ensures that you're not inadvertently importing
             | anything on the DEA's scheduled list.
        
               | nwiswell wrote:
               | This feels very Dallas Buyer's Club.
               | 
               | I assume communities exist on the Internet for this kind
               | of "drug piracy"?
        
               | A_D_E_P_T wrote:
               | Yeah, IRL too. 5-10 years ago there were some biohacking
               | collectives around the Bay Area that did everything from
               | pharmaceuticals to experiments with CRISPR. I don't know
               | if they're still around -- I left that scene when I left
               | the USA a few years ago -- but if you're in the area you
               | might want to give it a look. (As an aside, I heard that
               | a few scene-adjacent people have recently gotten gene-mod
               | therapy; Patri Friedman, for instance, received
               | follistatin therapy.)
               | 
               | Nootropics were a pretty popular trend around the same
               | time, and I knew a lot of guys who would import weird
               | drugs and peptides from Russia and China. It's the same
               | sort of procedure I outlined in my last post, in that
               | you're ordering drugs or drug-active-ingredient-powder
               | from abroad... And then hopefully testing it.
               | 
               | Roughly 10 years ago, when [redacted breakthrough drug]
               | was released, I helped some friends set up a pirate
               | pharmacy. Those were good times.
        
               | nwiswell wrote:
               | That's really cool. I don't have a bio/pharma technical
               | background but I'm very sympathetic to the scene and the
               | ethos so I'll have to check it out.
        
         | 0xB31B1B wrote:
         | drugs are priced differently country to country and the price
         | has nothing to do with the unit cost to manufacture. The US is
         | the least regulated pharmaceuticals market in the world and
         | drugs here usually cost significantly more than drugs in other
         | locals. For example semaglutide/ozempic costs like 1300/month
         | in the US, but only 100-200/month in European countries. Also,
         | the "1300/month" cost in the US is only paid by people who are
         | paying cash and not covered by insurance, if the drug is
         | covered by the patients insurance than the Pharmacy benefits
         | manager usually pays a fraction of the 1300/month price as it
         | is a "bulk negotiated discount, so they often pay 200-300 USD,
         | the actuall price in these deals is a closely guarded trade
         | secret.
        
           | glp1guide wrote:
           | So note that although Semaglutide/Ozempic cost that amount
           | retail, most are absolutely not paying that price.
           | 
           | https://glp1.guide/content/glp1-pricing-2024-02
           | 
           | Of course, insurers are struggling to not cover the bill, and
           | although it's in the medicaid list it's up to states to
           | choose whether to cover it or not
        
         | bdcravens wrote:
         | Vertex is very good about providing programs to put it in the
         | hands of those who need it. I have great insurance and a great
         | income, and they even apply deductible assistance to me.
         | 
         | In the online CF communities I'm a part of, I've never heard of
         | anyone who couldn't get access to the medication (aside from
         | the country they're in not approving it) (I'm in the US so my
         | perspective is probably skewed)
        
         | cbeach wrote:
         | I've seen conversations like this before, regarding the heavy
         | cost that Big Pharma levies on treatments for major diseases.
         | And US companies frequently come up in these discussions.
         | 
         | But the alternative, without the massive cashflows, is a world
         | where the research never happens, and the diseases haunt us
         | forever.
         | 
         | The Big Pharma treatments will eventually become public domain,
         | and may inspire other cheaper treatments prior to that.
         | 
         | The fact that these conversations come up frequently is a
         | symptom of the fact that Big Pharma is frequently doing
         | fantastic things. Curing diseases that have plagued humanity
         | for millenia and killed millions.
         | 
         | We have a very bright future. But the future is not free of
         | charge, as we'll continue to require a lot of medical research,
         | and medical researchers have families to feed, like the rest of
         | us. Medicine costs money - there's no escaping it.
         | 
         | In the UK, we sometimes mistakenly imagine that our socialised
         | healthcare system is "free." It's not. It's one of the most
         | expensive in the world, and employs over 2 million people. The
         | component of tax that I paid to fund the National Health
         | Service was PS8919 last year - the largest single expenditure
         | of my taxes, and vastly more than I'd need to spend to get
         | private healthcare.
         | 
         | So while American medical pricing is scary and sometimes
         | ruthless, I think we need to put things in perspective and
         | recognise their leadership in medical research - without which,
         | we'd all be in a worse situation.
        
           | kelnos wrote:
           | What about direct government funding? Isn't that a reasonable
           | alternative? Maybe not a politically-popular one, but I
           | wouldn't be surprised if health care overall would be cheaper
           | under a system where pharma research is done with public
           | money, and then isn't allowed to be patented. Might even in
           | save enough money to avoid much in the way of extra taxes to
           | fund it.
           | 
           | Hell, a lot of medical research is funded (in part) by public
           | dollars, and then the results get locked up behind patents
           | for years, which is gross.
        
             | derivative7 wrote:
             | Most taxpayers don't have cystic fibrosis and hence don't
             | want to pay to have it cured. Not feasible. This
             | hypothetical is kind of lame.
        
           | matthewtse wrote:
           | I love this reply.
           | 
           | It's a particularly touchy subject because it involves
           | people's health and the ability/inability to pay for it.
           | 
           | But as a sufferer of a debilitating disease with a miracle
           | drug that costs an arm and a leg, I've become a convert to
           | the US pharma-industrial complex. These drugs take billions
           | of dollars and decades to research--that funding/development
           | isn't going to happen without venture capitalists who
           | shoulder that risk for the profit reward. An equal number of
           | pharma venture capitalists lose all their money, researching
           | dead-end drugs.
           | 
           | I'm incredibly blessed to have both a cure invented during my
           | lifetime and the means to pay for it. But even if I lacked
           | the means, I would still infinitely prefer a world where a
           | cure exists that I need to somehow access, as opposed to a
           | hopeless world with no cure.
        
             | elliotto wrote:
             | It feels like there's a lack of imagination here. Could you
             | conceive of a world that was successful in its research of
             | drugs, but was propped up by an economic model other than
             | pharma venture capitalism?
        
         | google234123 wrote:
         | Take away the money and watch the development go away ;)
        
       | orzig wrote:
       | I loved the book The Billion Dollar Molecule (Reviewed by Nature
       | here: https://www.nature.com/articles/nbt0594-521.pdf) about the
       | founding of Vertex Pharma. Really drives home the amount of
       | money, time and luck it takes to make a breakthrough - the author
       | needed to write an entire second book to get to the part where
       | they started making real revenue. The second book isn't as good,
       | but if you like the first enough you might try it anyway.
        
       | BenFranklin100 wrote:
       | This article gives short shrift to the role the pharmaceutical
       | industry played in making this life-changing treatment a reality.
       | It barely mentions Vertex. Vertex is the biotech company that
       | made the big bet on cystic fibrosis, a rare disease that most
       | companies wouldn't touch because of the small market and unknown
       | biology made it too risky. They were the ones that believed in
       | the science and developed multiple CF drugs and got them into the
       | hands of patients. Here's a 2019 STAT article that gives a fuller
       | account of Vertex's role:
       | 
       | https://www.statnews.com/2019/10/23/we-conquered-a-disease-h...
        
         | jeremiahbuckley wrote:
         | Thanks for this. Very cool to read these types of stories.
        
         | bdcravens wrote:
         | Yes, the CFF has partnered with companies like Vertex to take
         | an almost VC-like approach towards developing new drugs
         | (Trikafta being one of many similar drugs they've developed
         | with Vertex)
        
         | rakejake wrote:
         | The book "The Billion Dollar Molecule" is about the founding of
         | Vertex Pharma. Worth a read.
        
           | ackbar03 wrote:
           | There's a follow up book as well, The Antidote. I read both
           | to learn more about the industry
        
       | ForHackernews wrote:
       | This is the future I want to live in: one where radical advances
       | in gene therapy are curing (or nearly curing) horrible illnesses
       | humanity has suffered with for thousands of years.
        
         | Scoundreller wrote:
         | already a thing:
         | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9512634/
        
       | kouru225 wrote:
       | When I was a kid, I was told my cousins would die before they
       | turned 30 because of CF. One of them ended up dying when he was
       | 10, but other is now above 30 and seems incredibly healthy.
       | 
       | The amount of development in the treatment of CF over the last 20
       | or so years is so incredible it's insane.
        
       | clumsysmurf wrote:
       | I wasn't able to read the article (behind paywall) but this was
       | also in the news recently, related to CF & Zn.
       | 
       | https://newatlas.com/medical/zinc-lung-macrophages-anti-bact...
        
         | SEJeff wrote:
         | The internet archive has your back. Here is TFA:
         | https://archive.is/gD49J
        
       | paulpauper wrote:
       | If CF like breathing through a coffee straw, as some sources say?
       | I tried it myself, and god I hope not. I lasted a few minutes and
       | was gasping for air.
        
         | bdcravens wrote:
         | I have CF. My lung capacity is around 55% (many have lower, and
         | around 20-30% is when they tend to start talking lung
         | transplant)
         | 
         | I wouldn't use that analogy. It's more like breathing in a deep
         | swimming pool or a very humid sauna. Slight physical exertion
         | (like stairs or hills) can be like most people doing strenuous
         | exercise. Laziness tends to be a way of life :-)
        
         | joney_baloney wrote:
         | Once it gets bad, yeah. I was very end stage before my lung
         | transplant and it's an accurate description.
        
       | pedalpete wrote:
       | https://archive.is/gD49J
        
       | dm8 wrote:
       | This is incredible. I wonder if there will be medicine that cures
       | idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. New class of drugs like Ofev stop
       | worsening of the IPF but doesn't cure it.
        
       | optymizer wrote:
       | This is great news and hopefully with time there will be a
       | definitive cure. I found out about CF when we did genetic testing
       | for family planning. It turned out me and my spouse were carriers
       | of the gene. They said about 25% chance that the embryo would
       | have CF, and since I soon learnt it is a terrible disease I did
       | not want to risk bringing a child in this world with CF.
       | 
       | We did IVF instead and to my surprise, 60% of viable embryos had
       | CF, which I thought was unusually high compared to what I had
       | been told prior to the procedure.
       | 
       | We were very fortunate that we did the testing and had successful
       | IVF pregnancies, but so many other families aren't so lucky. I
       | hope advancements in CF treatment will make it a non-issue for
       | parents in the near future.
        
       | ETH_start wrote:
       | If I can be allowed a bit of sophistry:
       | 
       | It's a beautiful thing for treatments to be devised for rare
       | conditions, to give people decades more life. It would be more
       | wonderful still if we devised treatments for aging, the universal
       | condition, to grant everyone decades more life.
       | 
       | Hardly anyone deserves to die. The vast majority of people are
       | singularly incredible and worthy of life. They deserve to be
       | equally safe from murder, fatal accidents, rare diseases like
       | cystic fibrosis and the universal disease of aging.
        
         | mmustapic wrote:
         | Many incurable diseases come with an awful quality of life,
         | like CF. Even cancer, treated or not, is a terrible experience.
         | Just aging, what you call "a disease", is nothing like that.
        
       | warion wrote:
       | This sounds bad and can give edge to republicans as generally
       | rightist people have more incidence of CF
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-03-10 23:01 UTC)