[HN Gopher] "I Miss My Liver." Nonmedical Sources in the History...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       "I Miss My Liver." Nonmedical Sources in the History of
       Hepatocentrism (2018)
        
       Author : bryanrasmussen
       Score  : 42 points
       Date   : 2024-03-09 14:43 UTC (8 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
        
       | simpletone wrote:
       | "Hepatocentrism was a medical doctrine that considered the liver
       | the center of the whole human being."
       | 
       | Puts a different light on prometheus's punishment. His liver
       | devoured by eagle and then grown back to be devoured again. It's
       | like his soul/essence is reborn or reincarnated daily to be
       | destroyed again.
        
         | adrian_b wrote:
         | What is interesting is that the liver is one of the few human
         | organs which are really able to regrow after an injury.
         | 
         | Therefore even if this may be just a coincidence that the
         | legend of Prometheus includes the periodic regrowth of his
         | liver after being wounded, there is also the possibility that
         | some ancient people were aware of some cases of liver
         | regeneration, though it is not clear how they could have
         | discovered that.
        
           | marci wrote:
           | Warfare may have helped. When you see often enough some
           | injuries and how people recover (or not) from them, some may
           | see patterns and intuit recovery mechanism:
           | 
           | - Injuries to the lungs aren't always fatal but patients tend
           | to have lasting breathing problems.
           | 
           | - Liver injuries... hmmm, make your eyes turn yellowish, and
           | it seems like those who come from the region where they drink
           | hot water with some plant inside tend to fare better than
           | those who don't, and if you survive, eyes return to normal
           | and you can make a full recovery.
        
             | mohaba wrote:
             | To me, it is clear you are referencing jaundice for the
             | second one, but I am not sure what plants are good for
             | that.
        
               | sincerely wrote:
               | I think they're talking about coffee, iirc there are some
               | studies that show it helps with liver cirrhosis which can
               | cause jaundice
        
           | kragen wrote:
           | the article claims that this was impossible
        
       | bmer wrote:
       | Was the heart still considered the seat of "emotion", in such a
       | doctrine?
        
         | bgnn wrote:
         | It depends I think.
         | 
         | In more old folk belief in middle east for example; heart,
         | liver and stomach have different emotions associated with them.
         | Liver is attachment and grief, heart is excitement and love,
         | stomach is contentment, frustration, anger. Growing up in the
         | region I have these associations too. These are often from old
         | medicine like the works of Ibn Sina, who mostly recited ancient
         | Greek, Egyptian, Indian and Chinese doctrins.
        
       | ofcrpls wrote:
       | In Hindi/Urdu, one phrase to describe a beloved is jigar/kaleja
       | ka tukra/jigr kaa ttukdd'aa/[?][?][?]jgarkh ttkhrr
       | 
       | meaning "a piece of my liver".
        
         | pySSK wrote:
         | Same in Persian. I didn't know the difference between _jigar_
         | and _kaleja_. Looks like _kaleja_ is of Sanskrit origin while
         | _jigar_ is of Persian origin.
        
         | kelipso wrote:
         | Similar in Malayalam. Lots of romantic songs translated
         | literally would have "my liver" (kr[?], karal), instead of "my
         | heart" for example.
        
         | fooker wrote:
         | When you use kaleja in that phrase, it means heart.
        
       | datameta wrote:
       | I wonder if this was due to the liver being the largest organ? Or
       | perhaps liver disease is the most visible?
        
       | ladon86 wrote:
       | It's pretty surprising that they believed this. The heart is very
       | obviously thumping in your chest, and it's very easy to notice
       | that the (visible) veins in your wrists, neck and thighs are
       | pulsing at the same rate.
       | 
       | It just seems like a more obvious "center" for an ancient person;
       | the mechanics are so easily detectable from the outside, while
       | the liver sits silently.
        
         | some_random wrote:
         | I think that's at least partially a view that's obvious because
         | we now consider the heart the "center" of the body. The lungs
         | are obviously expanding as you breath, your stomach obviously
         | digests your food into what becomes you, blows to the head
         | cause mental issues so it's obvious that the brain is used to
         | think.
         | 
         | Meanwhile there's this huge organ in your chest with a non-
         | obvious purpose, I don't think it's that unreasonable for
         | someone to claim it holds your soul or something.
        
           | __MatrixMan__ wrote:
           | Agreed. We put the things we want to believe, but don't have
           | evidence for, in places where we have the least evidence
           | lying around to contradict them. It's why there's a woo woo
           | subculture that uses words like "quantum" in dubious ways.
        
         | asveikau wrote:
         | Not only that but the heart rate changes with your breathing,
         | physical activity, thoughts, emotions ... I want to say it "has
         | the pulse" but that sounds like a corny literal use of the
         | expression.
        
       | baryphonic wrote:
       | When I was in high school, we read the Canterbury Tales. In "The
       | Wife of Bath's Tale," a knight violates a young woman. He is
       | described as having a "lusty liver."
        
         | meindnoch wrote:
         | "White liver refers to a condition characterized by sexual
         | excess and a wasting to death of sexual partners."
         | 
         | White liver: a cultural disorder resembling AIDS
         | (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8456330/)
        
       | chimpanzee wrote:
       | Moderns tend to focus on mechanics and abstractions, leading to a
       | focus on the heart and the head/brain. We denigrate emotions and
       | try to ignore them, but if we attend to them we notice that they
       | primarily arise, or are felt, in the gut.
       | 
       | Ancients, without all the distractions and knowledge we have now,
       | might have been much more attuned to their emotions. They'd
       | likely need to be in order to survive by following intuitions and
       | responding to low-level feelings of fear.
       | 
       | This alone would be reason enough for hepatocentrism.
       | 
       | That reasoning would only be bolstered by knowledge of the
       | liver's regenerative abilities, its high-desirability to meat-
       | eating predators, its size and weight, its mysterious structural
       | homogeneity (at a macroscopic level), and its visible response
       | (upon inspection) to a life of health or sickness and abuse.
        
         | bluesky19 wrote:
         | Yeah. "fundamental discoveries irrefutably demonstrated the
         | central role of the heart in human physiology" seems like an
         | awfully narrow perspective.
        
         | jdietrich wrote:
         | _> if we attend to them we notice that they primarily arise, or
         | are felt, in the gut_
         | 
         | Some emotions are experienced in the gut, for reasons we now
         | understand quite well.
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gut%E2%80%93brain_axis
        
         | swatcoder wrote:
         | You're right that we have a different web of concepts and
         | emphasize different abstractions than other cultures did, but
         | this bit paints a really misleading picture of who we're
         | talking about and how sophisticated their ideas were:
         | 
         | > Ancients, without all the distractions and knowledge we have
         | now, might have been much more attuned to their emotions.
         | They'd likely need to be in order to survive by following
         | intuitions and responding to low-level feelings of fear.
         | 
         | There's very little difference in the amount of "knowledge"
         | between any two cultures, or really even between any two
         | people. One culture's collective knowledge may be more reliable
         | or more demonstrated or more productive (by some measure), but
         | everybody's always walking around with a head 100% full of
         | knowledge.
         | 
         | It's a mistake to think that Mesopotamians, Babylonians, and
         | Greeks were "surviving by intuition" under "some low-level
         | feeling of fear". Like us, they were building huge cities with
         | complex trade networks and economies, with obscene bureaucratic
         | processes and people so specialized in craft and work that
         | their whole lives were committed to studying or teaching or
         | keeping account balances in order.
         | 
         | They had rich, interwoven systems of knowledge, and the ancient
         | Greeks in particular fancied mechanics and abstractions much
         | the way we do -- a similarity that exists largely because we
         | openly modeled much of modernity on their culture.
         | 
         | When hepatocentrism prevailed among the Greeks, it wasn't in
         | the context of some scared, emotionally volatile people making
         | do in caves beset by tigers and lions or something. It was in
         | the context of highly educated urbanized people drawing
         | sensible conclusions based on what their culture happened to
         | emphasize in its own web of thoroughly mechanical and abstract
         | concepts.
         | 
         | Some of your suggestions about what facts they were integrating
         | are probably right and many of them are fun to speculate about,
         | but whatever they were, they were being fit into a much more
         | elaborate and abstract schema than you're giving credit to.
         | These were not inbred bumpkins or wild primates making cute
         | guesses and enshrining them in mysterious lore. They were
         | scientists and physicians living and studying in ways not all
         | that differently than our own, and their discoveries were being
         | encoded into myth by the esteemed, committed poets among their
         | aristocracy in much the same way that screenwriters and
         | novelists work modern knowledge into their stories.
        
           | chimpanzee wrote:
           | Edit/tldr: my original comment concerned the foundation of or
           | the seed of the historic belief of hepatocentrism rather than
           | the reasoning or knowledge held by those whose writings were
           | influenced by or regarding hepatocentrism once it was already
           | established.
           | 
           | ------
           | 
           | I don't particularly disagree with your response, but I think
           | you've really read into what I was saying and so misrepresent
           | my points. That's probably my fault since I wrote it quickly.
           | 
           | To hopefully help clarify (but again quickly, since I'm only
           | here to procrastinate and my low-level feelings of fear are
           | growing unpleasant.):
           | 
           | In regard to their distractions and knowledge, I'm simply
           | pointing out that they did not have today's specific
           | knowledge of human physiology and functioning. This would
           | allow them to speculate further in other directions beyond
           | the interests and areas of focus we have today that have been
           | deemed logical and correct. And they did not have as many
           | ready sources of information to distract them or to assure
           | them that there was nothing more to learn. Sure, perhaps they
           | were blind to this as we are, and so the relative effect
           | would be much the same. But, there was still a quantitative
           | difference in information and sources. And there were
           | certainly branches of the knowledge or paths of specualtion
           | that had not yet been cut off as some are today.
           | 
           | By "ancients", I include prehistoric man, whose feeling and
           | thoughts would serve as the foundation for historical man's
           | own ideas and writings. I don't mean to suggest that they
           | were dumb or anything like that; only that they, without
           | written word, would be more sense-oriented rather than
           | concept-oriented.
           | 
           | And in regard to "low-level feelings of fear", I do not mean
           | this to be inferior to overt conscious thought and reasoning.
           | In fact, I think we fail all too often to attend to these
           | feelings today and it harms us. These low-level feelings,
           | fear or otherwise, still guide us today. We just don't notice
           | it as much and prefer to believe we move forward with logical
           | plans rather than intuitive drives.
        
       | snarkconjecture wrote:
       | > All of these terms, including the Anglo-Saxon word "lifere,"
       | seem to closely resemble the English verb "to live," underscoring
       | the relation of the liver to life in populations influenced by
       | the Celtic culture.
       | 
       | Except that "liver" (etc) and "life" have no etymological
       | relationship, so this coincidence can't have anything to do with
       | Germanic culture, much less Celtic(?!) culture.
        
       | xkcd-sucks wrote:
       | Tbh after a neuropharm PhD - Hepatocentrism makes more sense than
       | cardiocentrism at the very least. _Everything_ happens in the
       | liver to some degree, more than the  "toxin remediation" metaphor
       | its closer to "the entire chemicals and materials industry"
       | 
       | Catch 22 put it better of course,                   >  "... But
       | come to us with a liver complaint and you can fool us for weeks.
       | The liver, you see, is a large, ugly mystery to us. If you've
       | ever eaten liver you know what I mean. We're pretty sure today
       | that the liver exists and we have a fairly good idea of what it
       | does whenever it's doing what it's supposed to be doing. Beyond
       | that, we're really in the dark. After all, what is a liver?"
       | 
       | Like if we have to choose some Centrism at all,
       | - heart and lung are important to maintain continuous service,
       | but can be replaced with a dumb pump and sparger basically
       | - brains tend to overhype their own importance but the rest of
       | the body can keep running *okay* for a while with lots of the
       | brain removed (I.e "brain dead but still living")              -
       | kidneys, replace w dialysis, OK enough              - liver,
       | cannot be substituted except for transplants, body just doesn't
       | work with it gone
       | 
       | Personally I'd go for a digestive centric view:
       | - in principle it kind of separates multicellular animals ... You
       | have to be 3d to contain a double ended open tube              -
       | the intestine/stomach is our daily bargain with death so to
       | speak, to prolong our own life by devouring other life
       | - *digestion is highly responsive to autonomic arousal*, I.e.
       | emotional qualia. Think of the stomach feeling metaphors of love,
       | fear, rage, anticipation ...              - in fact many emotions
       | are best described *in terms of* their digegstive qualia
       | - Digestive stuff is quite highly innervated, read about the
       | neurobiology of guts for a great rabbit hole              - etc.
       | - and finally "guts" is already culturally establishrd, "gut
       | feeling" "trust your gut" "has guts" etc
        
       | zetazzed wrote:
       | Hercule Poirot (in "The Cornish Mystery"): "Hein, the pancreas is
       | nothing. Of the digestive organs, the liver is the key. Look
       | after the liver and life will take care of itself."
       | 
       | (I have cut my alcohol to 2 drinks per week to look after my
       | liver - still looking forward to life taking care of itself!)
        
       | canjobear wrote:
       | I don't buy it. The word "heart" is literally cognate to "core".
       | This suggests a very old view that the heart is central.
        
         | TheGeminon wrote:
         | According to Wiktionary in English that didn't appear until the
         | 14th century (although that is earlier than the article
         | suggests)
         | 
         | https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/heart
        
           | martinjacobd wrote:
           | meh the OED has this from early old English (albeit in the
           | form of 'heortan') in the mid-tenth century from Bald's
           | Leechbook.
        
       | dghughes wrote:
       | I still recall when my sister worked as a medical secretary for a
       | gastroenterologist she brought home a pamphlet "Be Kind To Your
       | Liver". It's crazy how little people know of their liver; fatty
       | liver, acetaminophen toxicity, ethanol processing via
       | dehydrogenase of males vs females.
       | 
       | Gastroenterologist are a funny and good natured bunch my sister's
       | boss would say "Poop is my bread and butter".
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-03-09 23:00 UTC)