[HN Gopher] Launch HN: Greptile (YC W24) - RAG on codebases that...
___________________________________________________________________
Launch HN: Greptile (YC W24) - RAG on codebases that actually works
Hi HN, we're the co-founders of Greptile, a tool that can
accurately answer questions about complex codebases. Developers use
us to spend less time wrestling with codebases and more time
actually writing code. Here's a demo: https://youtu.be/qI24eKO1YX0.
You can try it on 100 popular repos here:
https://app.greptile.com/repo, and on your own repo (if you give
permission - more on that below) here: https://app.greptile.com.
We are far from the first people to try "RAG on your codebase". We
focus on full codebase comprehension: using LLMs to accurately
answer difficult questions with full context of large, complex, and
even multi-repo codebases. Simple RAG alone is not sufficient for
this task. Codebases aren't like most PDFs, docs, or other similar
data types. They are graphs--complex puzzles where each piece is
interlinked. So Greptile does a few things past simple RAG: (1)
Instead of directly embedding code, we parse the AST of the
codebase, recursively generate docstrings for each node in the
tree, and then embed the docstrings. (2) Alongside vector
similarity search and keyword search, we do "agentic search" where
an agent reviews the relevance of the search results, and scans the
source code to follow references that might lead to something
important. Then it returns the relevant sources. For example, here
are a couple questions that this system is able to answer in our
test repo that simple RAG couldn't (in our experience): " _Where
are the auth providers configured?_ " (They are in an array inside
of an options.ts file, where looking at the file it's not obvious
it's an auth related file. However, because that array is imported
into the auth/route.ts file, Greptile's agent traces and find it)
" _How would I add a postgres connector?_ " (The best way to answer
this is to see how the Redis connector is set up and mirror it.
Simple RAG sometimes retrieves some of the code for the Redis
connector, but Greptile's agent follows the connections to retrieve
all the code that the redis connector touches, and uses that to
write instructions.) Developers (including at Stripe and
Microsoft) are using Greptile for things like: Debugging--you can
paste in an error message and it does a pretty good job of
diagnosing the root cause and suggesting fixes. Grokking OSS repos
--for example, if you're forking a repo, modifying it for your
usecase, or just integrating it, Greptile lets you add multiple
repos and dependencies in the same chat session so it has full
context. Parsing legacy code at work--especially if original
engineers have left the company. Since we're accessing your
private code, we're very careful with security. We don't store any
code on our servers after initial processing, and just pull
snippets as needed from the GitHub API. Quick note: when you sign
in with GH, it might ask for permission to "act on your behalf".
This is a quirk of GitHub's wording--our permissions are read-only
and the only thing we do "on your behalf" is read code, so we can
index the repo. We came up with this idea while working at AWS--
the codebase was super complicated, the docs were sparse and out of
date, and our team was remote so it was slow to get answers to
questions. We picked "greptile" because of "grep" and also we just
wanted a somewhat silly name. Try it out! It's a work in progress,
so any feedback is appreciated. Here are the links again: for
popular open source repos see https://app.greptile.com/repo, and to
get it working on your own repo, start at https://app.greptile.com.
If you have experience working with a complex codebase at work or
for a project, I'd love to hear about it. It really helps us
educate our product direction. Looking forward to comments! edit.
For those who want to try this on large or private repos, here is a
promo code for a free month: HACKERNEWS100
Author : dakshgupta
Score : 159 points
Date : 2024-03-05 15:48 UTC (7 hours ago)
| moritonal wrote:
| Works well. Today I was working with how Rail's works with
| BigDecimals, so (knowing the answer) I asked:
|
| "When using "as_json" in a controller to return the JSON of a
| model, how are BigDecimal's encoded?"
|
| Answer: "When using as_json in a controller to return the JSON of
| a model, BigDecimal values are encoded as strings. This behavior
| is defined in the active_support/core_ext/object/json.rb file,
| specifically in the BigDecimal class extension for JSON encoding.
| The rationale behind this approach is that most..." which is
| exactly the case as I learnt through various PR's, Issues and
| code review.
|
| This would have saved me about 30mins of work. I wonder if it
| takes into account the metadata, such as authors, related
| comments, issues and PRs?
| dakshgupta wrote:
| Thanks for checking it out! Currently no metadata, just code.
| Were adding commit messages and PRs next. Issues and comments
| makes a lot of sense, adding that to the list.
| soohoonchoi wrote:
| We don't do direct look up/indexing for authors (although the
| authors file is usually somewhere in the repo for larger
| projects), comments, issues, or PRs just yet but that is
| definitely something we are looking to add.
| shw1n wrote:
| This is super cool, my co-founder and I were brainstorming how to
| essentially expand the context window via first-order concepts
| for this exact purpose last night
|
| Excited to try it out
| dakshgupta wrote:
| Thank you! Let me know how it goes.
| nico wrote:
| Cool, will check it out
|
| Does it integrate with Visual Studio, does it provide code
| suggestions?
|
| Been doing a lot of back and forth iteration with ChatGPT to
| build a python project from scratch
|
| It's been a really good experience although frustratingly slow at
| times (from going back and forth between the browser and code and
| having to wait for gpt's answers)
|
| Can more documentation be automatically added? For example, it
| might be useful in a rails project to be able to get answers
| about the ruby and rails documentations
| dakshgupta wrote:
| We have a VS code extension in the store (also called
| "greptile"), feel free to check it out!
|
| Docs is a good idea but we haven't found a reliable enough
| scraper to add docs from a website. We were thinking it would
| be cool if you could drop in like "docs.stripe.com" and it
| automatically adds stripe docs to the context.
| andybak wrote:
| A JetBrains plugin might be worth looking at too. They are
| pretty popular in several language communities and still
| resisting the juggernaut that is VS Code.
| dakshgupta wrote:
| Definitely, we currently have that on our roadmap for
| April, been cautious because IMO a bad IDE extension is way
| worse than no IDE extension.
| sidcool wrote:
| Congrats on launching. However I don't like the 'Act on your
| behalf' permission this needs.
| dakshgupta wrote:
| Thanks! Yeah, it's strangely worded for what it is. We've
| emailed GitHub about it. Our permissions are read-only but
| since we read "on your behalf" this is technically true.
| sidcool wrote:
| https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/37117
| injidup wrote:
| Why don't you read on your own behalf. You don't need this
| permission at all. It's just to harvest email addresses
| right?
| adamtaylor_13 wrote:
| Presumably if you have a private repo, they need permission
| to read it.
| vaishant wrote:
| Private repos are one reason we'd need it, and this also
| gives us higher rate limits so that lots of people can use
| it concurrently.
| alchemist1e9 wrote:
| Does it use tree-sitter for all the AST parsing?
| dakshgupta wrote:
| Yup
| sourabh03agr wrote:
| Congrats on the launch! Do you need Github permissions to answer
| questions on open-source repos as well?
| soohoonchoi wrote:
| There are about a hundred open source repos you can talk to for
| free over at https://app.greptile.com/repo, we are looking to
| add more repositories as well. The permissions we get on login
| are from the Github App flow, you will still have to grant
| Greptile access specific organization/repositories for it to
| work with your own private repos.
| toomuchtodo wrote:
| Best way to get in touch if a maintainer who wants to provide
| public repo access?
| dakshgupta wrote:
| You can email me -> daksh [at] greptile.com
| dakshgupta wrote:
| No, and for the ones in app.greptile.com/repo you don't need to
| log in at all.
| alalani1 wrote:
| I like clever project names :)
|
| This looks great - I just tried to generate sample code in the
| react repo and was pleasantly surprised. Do you have a sense of
| whether this works well to generate code in general, i.e.
| generate an API route to return X data that works similar to the
| other API routes.
| soohoonchoi wrote:
| We love the name as well.
|
| We haven't built it for code gen in particular, but a lot of
| our users seem to be using it for that. We want to really nail
| down people getting to understand what is going on in the
| codebase itself.
| dakshgupta wrote:
| Thanks! This should work. The closest thing I tried was with
| quary.dev, where I had it generate a postgres connector and it
| referred to existing db connectors to generate the changes.
| Conscat wrote:
| I've tried it on my own C++ codebase. It's fun, and I'm impressed
| that it could tell me which C++ standard is used (a question
| which is often difficult to find an answer to on random
| codebases), but it's really bad at analyzing templates. The
| answers it gives me are always incomplete and usually at least
| partly or mostly incorrect. I'm surprised by this in some cases,
| because my questions are answered by comments in the source code.
|
| https://app.greptile.com/share/4953cbff-13ec-4427-b0af-02889...
| dakshgupta wrote:
| Examining now and looks like we've been heavily discounting the
| comments in our search. Going to look into fixing it this week.
|
| Thanks for pointing that out!
| iknownthing wrote:
| Looks good, but there are many competitors that do exactly the
| same thing (even opensource ones)
| dakshgupta wrote:
| 100% there are many. Hopefully we can build one of the better
| ones.
| mariocesar wrote:
| Can you please share some that you consider to be good?
| bingemaker wrote:
| Can you please share the list? I'm curious
| jbellis wrote:
| [not part of greptile]
|
| I can only think of two serious competitors, neither of which
| is open source. And I don't think anyone serious at either of
| those companies would claim that they have the definitive
| solution.
| drcongo wrote:
| I've been looking for something like this, but local-only. Any
| plans to let people self-host and point at local repositories?
| dakshgupta wrote:
| We've been grappling with making it local but two
| considerations
|
| 1. Haven't figured out what should trigger updates. Every
| commit sounds crazy, every save would be perfect but too
| intensive also.
|
| 2. LLMs will not be self hosted. We haven't been able to get
| the same results with any smaller LLMs
|
| To answer your questions we definitely want to make this
| available for local repos and ideally self hosted, on a
| technical level that's probably several month away.
| adamtaylor_13 wrote:
| Anyway to sign up for newsletter updated for when that
| happens? I'd be very keen to check this out once that feature
| lands.
| dakshgupta wrote:
| We don't have a newsletter but there should be a link to
| join our discord on app.greptile.com
|
| You can also email me at daksh [at] greptile.com and I'll
| set a reminder to let you know when it's out
| drcongo wrote:
| Thanks, some interesting challenges there.
| codingdave wrote:
| > Haven't figured out what should trigger updates.
|
| What triggers updates when it is not local?
| dakshgupta wrote:
| When a commit code is pushed to that remote branch
| jbellis wrote:
| Every save would work. You just ("just") need good caching.
| Cursor nails this.
| https://twitter.com/amanrsanger/status/1750023209733464559
| Axsuul wrote:
| Also looking for something local but I feel like Apple will
| probably eventually release local LLMs for your entire
| filesystem.
| jbellis wrote:
| [not part of greptile]
|
| I've given it a fairly serious shot and my conclusion is that
| building IDE hooks is seriously depressing. IntelliJ deprecates
| APIs _constantly_ and the docs don 't really keep up.
|
| And then there's the total dumpster fire that is trying to
| support GPU acceleration on multiple platforms.
|
| Unfortunately it's easily 10x the work to do this kind of thing
| local only.
| doctorpangloss wrote:
| I tried asking a question about Porter and I see the error:
|
| > Oops
|
| > We couldn't access this repo.
|
| > You may need to log in to view this repository, or it might not
| exist.
| dakshgupta wrote:
| Ah sorry looking into it now
| soohoonchoi wrote:
| Hey looked into this error, Porter was not processed by us yet,
| it does take a while for a repo to be processed initially but
| this link should give you the progress report + you can chat
| with it when its done:
|
| https://app.greptile.com/chat/github/porter-dev/porter
| mdaniel wrote:
| I followed the link because I was curious and it still said
| processing, so I navigated to the homepage and clicked "Try a
| popular repo" leading to <https://app.greptile.com/chat/3t4qp
| efuh9eqckcdt0b8i?repo=pos...> which then said "We couldn't
| access this repo." It seems the actual syntax is
| app.greptile.com/chat/github/postgres/postgres -> https://app
| .greptile.com/chat/lfbc034nkj7w03v2kb5zp?repo=git... so
| wherever that list of "popular repos" is coming from needs to
| be updated to avoid other people having bad first experiences
|
| It also appears that the vote buttons do nothing if one is
| not logged in, so I'd recommend eliding them unless logged in
| since it's just frustrating to wonder if some JS error ate
| the vote or what
| vaishant wrote:
| Hey, looking into this now. I believe the vote buttons
| actually do always send us feedback, but the UI could
| probably be better there.
| mdaniel wrote:
| Unless you are batching them up and hiding them in the
| upteen bazillion posthog POST requests, no, they do not
|
| I shudder to think how much you must be spending on
| compute asking for that /api/poll/batch once a second,
| each one saying it is a Miss from cloudfront. It's
| especially mysterious since there's nothing on the UI
| that the user would see about the .filesProcessed
| increasing that justifies DDoSing yourself like that,
| IMHO
| dakshgupta wrote:
| These are all great points, we should probably audit the
| polling.
| Tsarp wrote:
| How does it compare with something like Bloop, which also uses a
| combination of a syntax tree, Embeddings, FTS and LLMs?
| dakshgupta wrote:
| Haven't tried it personally :/
| koeng wrote:
| I'd love to try it, but pretty much all my repos are >10mb. It's
| not because there is that much code, but because I am doing
| bioinformatics and the test files (for the unit tests) inflate
| the repo size. It would be great if there was a way to test it on
| just 1 large repo for perhaps a week or something, because I balk
| at the idea of spending $20 a month on something that I don't
| even know works well.
|
| This is important because I'm not deeply familiar with public
| projects, so I can't accurately assess if the tool is worthwhile.
| Whereas with one of my repos, I'd be able to tell quality pretty
| quickly.
| dakshgupta wrote:
| Just made a checkout code so you can use for free
|
| HACKERNEWS100
| sanity wrote:
| Do I still need to provide credit card info to use the promo
| code? No bueno.
| teaearlgraycold wrote:
| Use privacy.com for a single use credit card number
| sanity wrote:
| Nice, appreciate the suggestion.
| whalesalad wrote:
| pretty easy to fork your repo and remove all the test files.
| msikora wrote:
| Maybe we need a `.greptileignore` file...
| dakshgupta wrote:
| That's funny, we actually do ignore those files but realizing
| now we don't account for that in our calculation of codebase
| size since we just get that via the GH API.
| gdcbe wrote:
| "Where we going we don't need docs". That scares me... docs are
| among other things there to provide context and info for things
| not clear from why certain choices were made or not made... no
| way your AI is going to guess that I put that restriction because
| of an explicit request from product, despite it looking wrong...
| smokel wrote:
| Indeed. Code describes _how_ something is done, and possibly
| _what_ is done, but it seldom fully describes _why_ something
| is done, or why code exists in the first place.
|
| The latter is typically the realm of requirements, design
| documentation, and possibly test plans.
|
| Generating such documentation from code seems quite impossible,
| or at least wrong.
|
| It is unfortunate that most open source software is lacking in
| such documentation, giving off bad signals to junior
| developers.
|
| Edit: not to take away from the product being discussed here,
| which seems very useful! I am merely supporting the parent
| here.
| dakshgupta wrote:
| This is a great point, and something we think about. I think
| to an extent a super smart version of our product could infer
| intent from the code but there would be definitely something
| amiss if the author's intent was just never available.
| eikenberry wrote:
| > The latter is typically the realm of requirements, design
| documentation, and possibly test plans.
|
| You forgot one of the biggest spots for "why"
| documentation... git commit messages, where the point is to
| say why you made this change. Maybe taking into account the
| commit messages around the code in question would help.
| smokel wrote:
| "Initial commit" is my goto commit message.
|
| Still a great idea, though. Ingesting all data from JIRA
| may be beneficial as well.
| eikenberry wrote:
| Yep... and the why of that message is apparent and makes
| perfect sense for the first commit. If you only ever
| start projects and never work on them again, that is all
| you need.
| soohoonchoi wrote:
| Cofounder of Greptile here, good documentation is not going
| anywhere. What we do hate is going through bad documentation to
| find the tiny bit of information we need that is more often
| than not outdated to fit our needs. We are looking for ways to
| integrate information not explicitly written in code to
| understand codebases as well.
| colordrops wrote:
| This sort of tech will just spur developers to put proper
| comments in their code, which they should have been doing in
| the first place.
| dakshgupta wrote:
| Didn't even think about that, hopefully it turns out to be
| true.
| geospatialover wrote:
| awesome! congrats on the launch
| IceDane wrote:
| Not a single repo I've tried works. A lot of them seem not to
| have finished processing, but even the ones that have finished
| don't work.
| vaishant wrote:
| This might have been related to temporary DB issues we had.
| Could you try again and let us know if you're still running
| into issues?
| anton-107 wrote:
| Getting "Error: Internal error while processing request." while
| trying on my personal public github repo. HN effect?
| vaishant wrote:
| Co-founder here, I think it might be all the traffic haha.
| Working on a fix now.
|
| Edit: chatting with processed repos should be working again now
| tom_ wrote:
| What does RAG stand for?
| layer8 wrote:
| Retrieval-augmented generation.
| jondwillis wrote:
| Retrieval augmented generation. LangChain has a video series on
| it if you want to take a peek:
| https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLfaIDFEXuae2LXbO1_PKy...
| andybak wrote:
| Retrieval Augmented Generation
|
| It's a terrible choice of acronym if you ask me.
| Beefin wrote:
| tried to explain it here: https://nux.ai/concepts/rag
| hazelnutcloud wrote:
| > This repo failed to process
|
| nice
| dakshgupta wrote:
| Hey, our DB was temporarily down from the traffic, sorry about
| that. Could you try again if you get a chance?
| joshka wrote:
| Still hitting this issue for the repos I tried
| mcfig wrote:
| Asking questions of any repo on "repo" fails with "Error:
| Internal error while processing request." This is pribably
| because I unlinked my Github connection after trying it out, but
| it shouldn't be trying to use that in this case.
| vaishant wrote:
| Hey, we had some database issues. Should be working again now!
|
| Edit: Some of the repos that were processing at the time might
| have failed to process. Reach out to us on Discord if you're
| seeing errors.
| fuzzythinker wrote:
| After giving permission, it asked to:
|
| "Link Your Code Hosting Providers Connect your accounts for
| seamless integration, and to access private repositories."
|
| What does this mean?
| vaishant wrote:
| If you install the GitHub app and authorize access to private
| repositories, Greptile will have access to them. If you don't
| want to do that, you can still navigate to the home page to
| start chatting.
| sanity wrote:
| I linked to my github but can't find where to use the promo code
| :-/
| vaishant wrote:
| You can upgrade to Pro and use the promo code by clicking on
| the 'Upgrade' button at the top!
| jbellis wrote:
| it's an option once you start the checkout process to upgrade
| ankit84 wrote:
| Can it answer customer support questions on API's cryptic error
| messages? E.g. Give hints on changes needed in the request
| payload.
| dakshgupta wrote:
| Assuming you can link the source code for the API's logic -
| that should work. Mileage may vary depending on exactly how
| vague the message are. For example if a single error message
| could mean 10 disjointed things, might not be able to
| exhaustively list them.
| simonw wrote:
| "We don't store any code on our servers after initial processing"
|
| Are you storing the embedding vectors you've calculated from the
| code? If so, those are likely quite easily reversible - so I
| would still consider that source code stored on your servers from
| the point of view of a security audit.
|
| As a result, I might actually prefer to have copies of my code
| stored on your servers if it resulted in faster performance.
| jaffee wrote:
| > embedding vectors you've calculated from the code? If so,
| those are likely quite easily reversible
|
| I don't think embeddings are generally reversible... you're
| usually projecting onto a lower dimensional space, and
| therefore losing information.
| yunwal wrote:
| "Quite easily" isn't true in most cases, but embeddings are
| sometimes reversible. We know this because programs like
| Stable Diffusion sometimes output near-perfect copies of
| training data when given the correct prompt, and generation
| of that image is based on word and image embeddings alone.
| dartos wrote:
| I've never heard of reversible embeddings in practice.
|
| In theory if you know the model being used you could reverse
| them.
| jncraton wrote:
| You might be interested in "Text Embeddings Reveal (Almost)
| As Much As Text":
|
| > We train our model to decode text embeddings from two
| state-of-the-art embedding models, and also show that our
| model can recover important personal information (full names)
| from a dataset of clinical notes.
|
| https://arxiv.org/pdf/2310.06816.pdf
|
| There's certainly information loss, but there is also a lot
| of information still present.
| simonw wrote:
| Yeah, that paper is what I was thinking about.
| https://simonwillison.net/2024/Jan/8/text-embeddings-
| reveal-...
|
| "a multi-step method that iteratively corrects and re-
| embeds text is able to recover 92% of 32-token text inputs
| exactly".
| soohoonchoi wrote:
| For now we are storing the embeddings of the generated
| docstrings, the intuition behind this is kinda like how HyDE
| works. I don't think the actual code itself is reversible from
| the embeddings, but yes we do want to store the actual code at
| some point and we will need the proper security measures for
| that. We are also actively developing an self-hostable version
| for enterprise.
| dvt wrote:
| Ran it on a "real" OSS project of mine
| (https://github.com/dvx/lofi/), and it was stuck at 99% loading
| for about 30 minutes. Then, when it finally parsed the codebase,
| when asked anything it always returns "Error: Internal error
| while locating sources." Specifically, I wanted to see if it can
| context switch between TypeScript (used for the front-end),
| ObjectiveC (used for a few Mac features), C++ (used for Windows
| volume features), and GLSL (used for visualizations). But alas.
|
| At one point, this random prompt popped up:
| https://imgur.com/a/mYeluaU --what's "Onboard?" Is this some kind
| of weird LLM leakage/hallucination?
|
| With all respect, this is like a pre-MVP quality product. The
| codebase isn't even particularly large and the experience is
| extremely sub-par. Charging for something like this is honestly
| highway robbery.
| soohoonchoi wrote:
| Hey sorry to hear that, a couple of things:
|
| - processing is usually stuck at 99% because when we order the
| components of the repository by file-directory dependency and
| ast dependency, there are a lot, LOT more leaves than the
| internal nodes + the root. Since we have to have the results of
| the dependency before we move on, moving up the dependency
| chain with llm calls take a while. This is even more pronounced
| when nearing the root for completion. We are working on
| optimizing this flow as it is very annoying for us as well.
|
| - "Error: Internal error while locating sources": this is
| embarrassing but we did experience a database outage today (I
| wonder why) some repositories have a faulty status. It should
| be back up now and we are working to recover/reprocess the
| repos that have failed during the outage (including dvx/lofi)
|
| - "Onboard" that was our previous name, this has slipped
| through the cracks, thanks for pointing it out!
|
| We are trying to parse most of the popular open source repos
| (we have processed repos like python, vscode, etc). We are
| hoping to fully process the linux kernel soon as well (a
| personal benchmark of mine).
| pitaj wrote:
| Just wanted you to know that the formatting of your quotes is
| messed up. You probably need to add some more linebreaks.
| dakshgupta wrote:
| Thanks for reporting the errors. You're right that it's _far_
| from perfect. I will say that part of this is due to higher
| than expected traffic today. We 're working hard on stability
| in general, so hopefully next time you use it you will have a
| smoother experience.
| ram417 wrote:
| Love this idea and am just signed up. Thanks for the promo code!
| Also, I really like your blog post about shipping faster:
| https://greptile.com/blog/ship-faster. Shipping code is so fun
| that we should all be looking for ways to do more of it.
| ram417 wrote:
| Btw, your service might be down right now. It just ingested my
| private repo but won't answer any questions.
| dakshgupta wrote:
| Thank you for the kind words! Yes, AWS is experiencing an
| outage and by extension, so are we :( Should be a bit more
| stable now though!
| theckel wrote:
| I just keep getting: "Error: Internal error while locating
| sources." when trying to talk to a repo that is green and "up to
| date"
| dakshgupta wrote:
| Hi! This is due to an AWS outage, sorry about that. We should
| be more stable now.
| jbellis wrote:
| Looks like some kind of bug on repos w/ many branches. Loading
| https://github.com/datastax/cassandra/, I search for `vsearch`
| and it presents me with CNDB-8708-vsearch and DSP-23946-vsearch,
| but not vsearch itself.
| dakshgupta wrote:
| Interesting, haven't seen that before. Thanks for pointing out
| - looking at it now.
| obiefernandez wrote:
| Will it work with a large Ruby on Rails codebase?
| dakshgupta wrote:
| It should, but currently because of the AWS outage things are a
| little choppy. If you submit it we'll make sure it gets
| through.
| nomoreipg wrote:
| How's this different from Adrenaline or Cursor or Bloop
| dakshgupta wrote:
| Great question, it's definitely similar to Adrenaline and Bloop
| in that it is designed to do full codebase context.
|
| Cursor is different because it's really focused on augmenting
| the code writing experience with code gen, while we're working
| on code comprehension.
|
| A good way to look at it is - Cursor replaces your IDE,
| Greptile replaces/augments your internal docs.
| luke-stanley wrote:
| It's cool to see tools like this. I ran into some issues though:
|
| 1. "We will email you"... "once the repositories have finished
| processing" Not sure you're supposed to do that without consent,
| when the intent was just to connect GitHub! Email use is supposed
| to be opt-in.
|
| 2. My tiny repo (https://github.com/lukestanley/ChillTranslator)
| won't load.
|
| 3. The UI for selecting a GitHub repo is hard to find and fiddly
| to use.
|
| 4. I couldn't see where to put the promo code.
| dakshgupta wrote:
| 1. Good point, didn't think of that. We could make it a
| checkbox
|
| 2. Sadly, AWS just went down, absolute scramble at the office
|
| 3. Fiddly is the right word, we just changed it a couple days
| ago. Will make it cleaner.
|
| 4. You should only need that if you're planning to upgrade, so
| you can click on the upgrade button and you should see a "Add
| promotion code" option on the left of checkout.
| luke-stanley wrote:
| Thanks for the response. AWS going down is really bad luck!
| joshka wrote:
| I like to use different email addresses for different
| services. Please just ask me for an email address to use
| instead of using the one on github.
| peter_d_sherman wrote:
| Related: https://greptile.com/pricing
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-03-05 23:00 UTC)