[HN Gopher] Researchers create AI worms that can spread from one...
___________________________________________________________________
Researchers create AI worms that can spread from one system to
another
Author : pseudolus
Score : 14 points
Date : 2024-03-02 19:59 UTC (3 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (arstechnica.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (arstechnica.com)
| jszymborski wrote:
| There are two fundamental vulnerabilities here to my mind that I
| think are worth learning from:
|
| 1. Sanitize LLM output
|
| 2. Always outline to the user and make them confirm what actions
| a chat assistant is going to do before doing it, particularly if
| they are sensitive.
|
| Edit: this is echoed in the article
|
| "Despite this, there are ways people creating generative AI
| systems can defend against potential worms, including using
| traditional security approaches. "With a lot of these issues,
| this is something that proper secure application design and
| monitoring could address parts of," says Adam Swanda, a threat
| researcher at AI enterprise security firm Robust Intelligence.
| "You typically don't want to be trusting LLM output anywhere in
| your application."
|
| Swanda also says that keeping humans in the loop--ensuring AI
| agents aren't allowed to take actions without approval--is a
| crucial mitigation that can be put in place. "You don't want an
| LLM that is reading your email to be able to turn around and send
| an email. There should be a boundary there." For Google and
| OpenAI, Swanda says that if a prompt is being repeated within its
| systems thousands of times, that will create a lot of "noise" and
| may be easy to detect."
| not2b wrote:
| Your mail processing agent says it is going to send a mail, as
| requested by your boss, to a customer. You can see the text of
| the message it proposes to send. You can see your boss's email.
| But instead it is sent to a black hat with proprietary info
| extracted from your entire inbox steganographically encoded in
| whitespace.
| jszymborski wrote:
| 1. How does it get sent to a black hat, the user was shown
| the recipient.
|
| 2. The whitespace steganography falls under a sanitization
| problem, but I concede that "hiding" messages can be a
| problem. Can't imagine the bandwidth being large at all, let
| alone encode your contacts and inbox.
| not2b wrote:
| It isn't surprising at all that this can me done; I figured that
| as soon as people started building LLM based agents that can read
| and send email we would see these. There is no solid barrier to
| having the agent see something in an email as a command; it can
| be limited with prompts and training but no one has found a
| bulletproof way to constrain the behavior.
| gnabgib wrote:
| Posted thrice already [0][1][2] (no comments, 12 points
| collectively)
|
| [0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39561118 [1]:
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39566570 [2]:
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39570922
| pvg wrote:
| [delayed]
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-03-02 23:01 UTC)