[HN Gopher] Norwegian Consumer Council files complaint against M...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Norwegian Consumer Council files complaint against Meta for GDPR
       violations
        
       Author : huftis
       Score  : 38 points
       Date   : 2024-02-29 20:58 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.forbrukerradet.no)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.forbrukerradet.no)
        
       | elevatortrim wrote:
       | It is funny that there are lots of "consent" discussions, entire
       | companies to capture and manage user "consent", consent standards
       | like "TCF v2.2" or "act"s like "GMA" when the whole thing boils
       | down to designing a UI where a user will think they can't use the
       | app or the site if they click "reject", or the "accept" button
       | was simply more convenient.
       | 
       | I did not meet or came to know of existence of any one person who
       | willingly gives consent for companies to use their data.
        
         | avgcorrection wrote:
         | > I did not meet or came to know of existence of any one person
         | who willingly gives consent for companies to use their data.
         | 
         | Get ready to be lectured on users being
         | freeloaders/hypothetical users who would love to give away all
         | their privacy for run of the mill blogspam.
        
         | interroboink wrote:
         | I get your overall point, but certainly there are some cases
         | where it makes sense: eg: when I input some text into a search
         | engine -- I expect them to use that input ("my data"), and it
         | seems reasonable that they might retain it for a while and use
         | it to improve their service, etc.
         | 
         | One way to draw the line is in which data is actively given
         | versus implicitly obtained. We actively give search text, but
         | our browsing history not so much.
        
           | flowerbreeze wrote:
           | I think the line is well enough drawn in this particular
           | case. It's not "my data", but PII (Personally Identifiable
           | Information) that most of the legislation is concerned with.
           | 
           | Firstly, the search engine does not require a person's name,
           | address, gender, mother's maiden name, person's dog's name,
           | all people the person is associated with etc to perform a
           | search. If someone inputs these to the search input, it's
           | just a search parameter not something that the search engine
           | can reliable use to identify and track the person. So, a
           | search is fine to perform, using the text for improving the
           | service is fine, using it to do anything at all is basically
           | fine, but collecting personally identifiable information that
           | would allow identification of the user that entered the
           | search parameters and using it for whatever the company deems
           | useful for their own purposes, is not. Not ok without
           | explicit consent of the user that is or if required to
           | provide the service. Or a number of other cases as listed in
           | the appropriate legislation, including the following.
           | 
           | Secondly, (most?) legislation, as far as I know, exempts
           | businesses from the requirement of obtaining explicit
           | consent, if the PII containing inputs, are required to
           | perform the service. That could include for example using IP
           | address logging for security purposes against DDOS attacks.
           | It could be PII, but if its processing is necessary to
           | provide the service, that's ok. No extra consent required.
           | 
           | Another example, if you need an email address from a person
           | to send an "email verification email" for a "forgot my
           | password" feature, there is no need to obtain additional
           | consent beyond stating why the email address is collected and
           | then use it only for that purpose.
           | 
           | Basically, no funny business with the data, use it for what
           | it's given and it's all fine. No need for extra poopups
           | asking, "may I plz stalk you/sell all your dataz?", if that's
           | not what is being done.
           | 
           | Note: This is my limited understanding, not an official or
           | legal interpretation or anything.
        
           | avgcorrection wrote:
           | I don't get it. I give the search engine a string. Who is
           | arguing against them searching for the string? They're
           | arguing against using location tracking and third party
           | tracking in order to figure out that, actually, you're not
           | searching for a specific type of tree trunk but for viagra
           | pills.
           | 
           | I also might not want my previous searches to impact my later
           | ones. (Just give good results again, Google Search...)
        
         | nerdponx wrote:
         | I occasionally leave the "analytics" and "performance" boxes
         | checked. It's the 3rd-party tracking that always get unchecked,
         | and blocked (by uBlock) for good measure.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-02-29 23:02 UTC)