[HN Gopher] Show HN: Nekoweb - a retro static web hosting
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Show HN: Nekoweb - a retro static web hosting
        
       Author : dimden
       Score  : 89 points
       Date   : 2024-02-25 21:03 UTC (1 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (nekoweb.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (nekoweb.org)
        
       | cebert wrote:
       | If this is ad free and free to publish on, what's the
       | monetization strategy? What the benefit to using Nekoweb over
       | publishing static content to S3/CloudFront?
        
         | dimden wrote:
         | You can donate to receive perks: https://nekoweb.org/donate
         | Benefit is participating in cool community of old web
         | enthusiasts :)
        
         | doublerabbit wrote:
         | > If this is ad free and free to publish on, what's the
         | monetization strategy?
         | 
         | Why does this matter? If they can provide 99% uptime for the
         | service they provide, I don't care.
         | 
         | > What the benefit to using Nekoweb over publishing static
         | content to S3/CloudFront?
         | 
         | This is the attitude that kills the net. Sends of the vibe
         | "It's not on AWS so it must not be used, don't you dare".
         | 
         | What the benefit of to using S3/CloudFront?
         | 
         | I suppose it all boils down to that folk not knowing the old
         | internet. The understanding where you relied on hosting
         | companies to provide webspace with an banner, or paid-so
         | webspace that's now lost in today "innovative" world.
         | 
         | One day the clouds will fall, and your site will be with it.
        
           | gazook89 wrote:
           | I guess the reason to ask about monetization is because you
           | want to know how long a host is going to exist. Knowing how
           | they plan to make money is a part of knowing the answer to
           | that. As you say, it used to be good enough to have a space
           | and accept there was an ad banner...but if no banner, then
           | how?
        
             | woofcat wrote:
             | What's funny is when you ask that same question of a tech
             | startup they simply say growth is what matters not revenue.
             | 
             | CloudFlare has been losing money for ages. I use it but
             | seemingly everyone is sure it'll last forever.
        
             | doublerabbit wrote:
             | That's the beauty of static websites, you don't need to
             | care. If it was full fledged stack-enabled apps for an
             | important function then yeah, sure.
             | 
             | With static, if it dies tomorrow you take the raw html
             | files and move it elsewhere. Sure, it's an inconvenience,
             | but it's the same as to why you don't use a second hand
             | eBay server for commercial piece of kit. I learnt that the
             | hard-way.
        
           | Klonoar wrote:
           | _> One day the clouds will fall, and your site will be with
           | it._
           | 
           | ...what?
           | 
           | S3 launched in '06 and is coming up on 20 years of being a
           | thing. At this point it's had a stronger/longer lifespan -
           | and will likely continue to do so - than pretty much any of
           | the old net hosting sites.
           | 
           | OP was clearly just asking why bother using something like
           | this over <insert your choice of host here>. The only real
           | answer is that you want to do something different - and
           | that's totally fine.
        
             | doublerabbit wrote:
             | > S3 launched in '06 and is coming up on 20 years of being
             | a thing. At this point it's had a stronger/longer lifespan
             | - and will likely continue to do so - than pretty much any
             | of the old net hosting sites.
             | 
             | Many providers nowadays have existed long before S3, 1&1
             | (now know as ionos) are another.
             | 
             | So? My server has had just four years uptime that's not
             | including all my other servers I've been hosting since the
             | age of 13. I can service exactly the same as to what S3 can
             | do. I just don't have PSLOL fund where I can invest in
             | providing back-end infrastructure like the corp can do.
             | 
             | I foresee it to likely continue to do so in to the future,
             | I even have strategy plans for it when I pass away.
        
               | Klonoar wrote:
               | ...yeah, the point wasn't that you have a server that's
               | been alive that long. The point is that your bit about
               | "the clouds will fall" is needlessly hyperbolic. S3's
               | been around just as long and has no signs of just dying
               | off.
        
         | giancarlostoro wrote:
         | Or even neocities for that matter...
        
         | OsrsNeedsf2P wrote:
         | Why do people on HN always assume people create projects for
         | capital? Lots of cool projects are simply hobbies (and they
         | avoid the enshittification cycle that way, too)
        
         | kome wrote:
         | dude... is that satire?
        
       | shantnutiwari wrote:
       | Like neocities? Whats the difference?
        
         | dimden wrote:
         | It is pretty similar to Neocities. A little bit of differences
         | are: - you can style your site box for discovery page - no
         | limit for file types
         | 
         | and some paid plan differences: - ftp support - up to 5 custom
         | domains - cheaper (you can get 1 custom domain for $1 or 5 and
         | all perks for $3 vs neocities' $5)
        
           | gnramires wrote:
           | This is pretty cool! If I may suggest something, on the
           | explore view, avoid showing most popular (I think it can lead
           | to rote behavior!)
           | 
           | If I may suggest another algorithm, something like picking
           | from most popular to least with probability ~1/(rank+k)^p,
           | where p is any number >1, for example p=1.5, k=10.
           | 
           | It can be implemented the following way (by computing the
           | integral of the probability distribution):
           | 
           | (1) Have sorted index by popularity with n items
           | 
           | (2) Pick a random (double) r between 0 and 1
           | 
           | (3) The chosen index is (if I did my integrals right;round to
           | nearest integer):
           | 
           | i = ( k^(p-1)*(n-1+k)^(p-1) / ( (r+1)*(n-1+k)^(p-1) -
           | r*k^(p-1) ) ) ^ 1/(p-1) - k
        
             | dimden wrote:
             | sorry im too dumb to comprehend this math
        
         | signaru wrote:
         | It also reminded me of neocities which has a cat (neko) mascot.
        
       | zeroCalories wrote:
       | I'm always surprised by the creativity of these personal
       | websites. The web is so utilitarian and marketing oriented that I
       | forget that a web page is a blank canvas ready for artistic
       | expression.
        
         | echelon wrote:
         | If Neocities captured the Geocities / Angelfire vibes of 1995 -
         | 2001, then Nekoweb captures the budding anime / early
         | Millennial vibe of 2000 - 2006. This was right around the time
         | that Xanga, LiveJournal, and the rest started peeling apart the
         | indie web.
         | 
         | And by the time Facebook started growing, it was game over.
        
       | chriscjcj wrote:
       | I was a little disappointed not to see an "under construction"
       | banner on any of the websites I surfed.
        
       | meowtimemania wrote:
       | I signed up, how do I update my website?
       | 
       | edit: go to https://nekoweb.org/dashboard
        
       | internetguy wrote:
       | oh dimden! i love your neocities site! great to see you here
        
         | dimden wrote:
         | oh hi, people keep recognizing me in random places lol
        
       | 101008 wrote:
       | Found this one, I love the "affiliates" buttons
       | https://lexiqqq.com/
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-02-25 23:00 UTC)