[HN Gopher] Certain dogs are capable of learning the names for m...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Certain dogs are capable of learning the names for more than 100
       different toys
        
       Author : Capstanlqc
       Score  : 122 points
       Date   : 2024-02-23 15:31 UTC (7 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.scientificamerican.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.scientificamerican.com)
        
       | UniverseHacker wrote:
       | I adopted an older obese dog many years ago that seemed to
       | understand hundreds of words, including the brand names of junk
       | food. He would listen closely to human conversations. For example
       | if someone mentioned socks, shoes, leash, walk or synonyms of
       | those he would immediately go wait by the door for a walk.
        
         | silverquiet wrote:
         | Dogs can pick up on a lot of human things that aren't spoken;
         | they're actually very good at body language. That and their
         | ability to eat starch/more omnivorous diets are probably the
         | biggest differences between them and wolves.
        
           | InitialLastName wrote:
           | I once visited a wolf rescue where a wolf pup was being
           | raised in a pen with two Great Pyrenees puppies (to socialize
           | it with them). The biggest behavioral difference I noticed
           | between the two was that while the wolf was willing to be
           | (and perhaps even enjoyed being) pet and handled, it
           | absolutely did not care that we were in the pen. It wandered
           | off after a few moments checking out the new visitors,
           | whereas the puppies (being puppies) wouldn't leave us alone.
        
             | Loughla wrote:
             | There is nothing in this world like a Great Pyrenees puppy
             | at about 8 months. They're SO big, but SO dumb and cuddly.
             | They're the perfect thing, and the embodiment of joy.
        
       | airbreather wrote:
       | I have owned six dogs in my life, most recently getting a 7 week
       | old pup staffy x ridgeback, now 16 weeks old. He goes with our 9
       | year old girl staffy, who can follow conversations, eg planning
       | to go to the park or beach without directly mentioning it in any
       | way.
       | 
       | All my dogs have understood a lot of words, some more than
       | others, but all way more than 20.
       | 
       | The aspects that promote this, I believe, are this:
       | 
       | 1. They are treated as companion animals. They live in the house
       | with the humans and generally have full access thru the house.
       | 
       | 2. No crating. Maybe if it is some kind of working dog, but a
       | companion animal is a companion, and would you put a companion in
       | a crate 22 hours a day? I don't care if you think that a dog
       | comes to like the crate, I would say don't confuse familiarity
       | with liking it. In what evolutionary precept is crating a thing
       | that ever had any parallel in the wild?
       | 
       | 3. You talk to the dog, like it is a human that can't speak. You
       | tell it what you are doing using consistent language. Example,
       | when leaving the house, we tell the dogs what we are doing and
       | how long we will be. eg I am taking J to school, I'll be back
       | soon. Or, I am going to work. Very quickly they learn and know
       | what to expect and anxiety is reduced. I can tell because if I
       | say I'm going to work, they immediately head to their favourite
       | long term day resting spots.if I say I am going to the shops,
       | they know I will be 30-90 minutes and there is a chance I will be
       | returning with treats and hang around the door. Also just a few
       | times now and then, especially early on, the dog will come with
       | me to, say, drop the child at school, or visit work, so they can
       | see where we go and understand a little better what goes on.
       | 
       | Having the dogs live with as part of the family means sometimes
       | there are problems, eg our pup is currently teething and just
       | can't help himself with items of certain texture. We keep
       | important things out of reach, close bedroom doors when not home
       | and use mistakes a chance to teach. The older dog has never once
       | got into the bin or any other such misdemeanours when
       | unsupervised at home.
       | 
       | I see a lot of people ignore their dogs most of the time, I
       | wouldn't expect such dogs to have strong language skills, but try
       | might. If they are around and a wake, ours are constantly talked
       | to, just telling them what we are doing or what is going on. They
       | learn to associate, often quite quickly.
       | 
       | Also many owners seem to make little effort for language
       | consistency, outside of obedience commands like sit etc.
       | 
       | Living in the house, it's important the dogs are consistently
       | treated in accordance with their position in the pack. What many
       | people think is being kind, is people kind and dog mean. A dog is
       | happiest when it knows its place. The happiness is not related to
       | the level of that place, more the consistency of treatment. A dog
       | confused about its place might instinctively feel the need to
       | challenge for leadership of the pack, that's when people get
       | eaten.
       | 
       | If your dog is looking stressed and uncertain of its place, by
       | challenging you in little ways, you need to do the little things
       | to reinforce its position eg it does not go thru the door before
       | you, it does not eat before you. Maybe you eat and leave a very
       | small amount if food on your plate, which you then give the
       | dog.you admonish any challenge for control, not meanly, but
       | firmly.grasping the muzzle with your hand, not hard, can be
       | enough. When just weeks old, that is what the mother does with
       | her mouth, it is a powerful gesture ingrained almost
       | instinctively.
       | 
       | Pampering a dog is being mean to a dog, treats should be earned
       | not given randomly, that is just confusing.
       | 
       | Just like people, dogs behave the way you treat them.
       | 
       | I learned from an ex military dog trainer who went way further in
       | his work training, but those were special animals trained to cope
       | with crowds etc and in that environment might be called upon to
       | save someone's life one day. But many of the techniques used
       | would shock most people, but make perfect sense when considered
       | in the context of training a pack animal to be a working animal.
        
         | detourdog wrote:
         | Interesting my dogs have had the same lifestyle. My current dog
         | I'm sure is a genius but we let him be a dog. He has an amazing
         | vocabulary and after watching a Nova show regarding dog
         | language we performed similar tests on him and he was able to
         | complete the tasks.
         | 
         | He is a good boy.
        
         | dj_mc_merlin wrote:
         | Wow, amazing rundown. I have a friend who is a dog trainer and
         | she's explained a lot of these things to me before but you've
         | made them click.
        
         | everly wrote:
         | While I fully agree with you that crating is to be avoided and
         | I'd never do it - I _can_ see some evolutionary parallel. My
         | husky loves to settle in corners /L-shapes, and a crate is not
         | so different than a small cave/den which offers certainty that
         | no predator can sneak up behind you.
        
         | at_a_remove wrote:
         | I've always tied "orders" to a specific gesture, performed
         | simultaneously, and I use a specific intonation, a "command
         | voice." It comes from a different place in the chest, is lower,
         | and is easier to precisely reproduce than my usual wittering
         | on.
        
         | kemayo wrote:
         | The argument I've seen made for crating from an evolutionary-
         | history perspective is that dogs are den animals -- they
         | actively like having a small nook that they can feel safe in,
         | where they're comfortable and nothing can sneak up on them.
         | 
         | I have a crate for my dog. The door stays open all the time, it
         | has a comfy mat on its floor, and sometimes he goes there to
         | take a nap. He's only ever shut in it when there's a reason --
         | a contractor in the house, or I need to keep the front door
         | propped open for a while, or similar. (When he was a _puppy_ it
         | was incredibly useful, though, because it was a way to teach
         | him to settle down.)
        
       | soperj wrote:
       | They should breed them... I'm sure we could select for language
       | geniuses.
        
         | whatsakandr wrote:
         | That's a new breed I could support. Just throw together a bunch
         | of different breeds of smart dogs. They'll be much mror healthy
         | than most breeds of dog.
        
           | sandworm101 wrote:
           | But creating any new breed, as in an actual breed rather than
           | crossing mutts that will produce a variety of offspring,
           | usually involved significant inbreeding. You need to weed out
           | the genes that you don't want and concentrate on the few that
           | define the breed in order to create a homogenous stock.
           | Otherwise, in a couple generations the new offspring may pick
           | start expressing the recessive genes and be nothing like the
           | originals.
        
           | bongodongobob wrote:
           | Afaik working breeds are the smartest and are already the
           | most genetically diverse. Not sure if correlation or
           | causation though.
        
           | spike021 wrote:
           | On the other hand, smart dogs can be much more difficult to
           | train.
           | 
           | They can easily pick up what you're training them to do, but
           | when you want them to actually do it the results can be far
           | more mixed. This is because they're so smart that they seem
           | to know whether doing the thing they were trained to do is
           | worth it to them.
           | 
           | Source: I have a Shiba Inu, which is simultaneously one of
           | the smartest and most primitive of dog breeds. From the
           | beginning he picked up tricks and other training extremely
           | quickly, usually within a handful of repetitions. But he can
           | be very independent and stubborn. He seems to know whether
           | something is worth doing or not. Almost.....too smart.
        
             | cj wrote:
             | > whether doing the thing they were trained to do is worth
             | it to them.
             | 
             | Also have a Shiba and 100% observe the same. I recently
             | thought that he forgot certain commands, until I went on a
             | trip and boarded him (which he hates), and the day I get
             | back he's super excited and suddenly "remembers" how to do
             | everything I thought he forgot how to do.
             | 
             | Quirks like this is why I definitely don't recommend them
             | as a first dog. They are great dogs but aren't the easiest
             | breed to train.
        
             | ozim wrote:
             | Same with my dog, it is a mixed breed and intelligent
             | enough to learn quickly, but also intelligent enough to
             | have "you want me to sit, out of the blue? nah I don't
             | care".
             | 
             | So we had to build loads of trust with it. Now it trusts me
             | and my partner that if we ask it to do stuff we mean it and
             | there is some reason for the behavior like watch out for a
             | stranger or other dog or it something interesting will
             | follow.
        
         | w0de0 wrote:
         | The article suggests that we already have, as all of the found
         | clever dogs are (at least part) a (formerly) working breed. One
         | suspects nurture has a significant role, though, as it also
         | does with human language development. Were we actually to
         | pursue a program like this we'd need also and perhaps more
         | importantly research dog pedagogy (skylogogy? dogagogy?).
        
         | GeoAtreides wrote:
         | hm, is it ethical to breed for sapience? It's interesting how
         | literally building a new sapient being (i.e. AGI) _might_ be
         | widely accepted and uncontroversial, yet the idea of
         | selectively breeding dogs until they reach sapience feels wrong
         | and yucky
        
       | treflop wrote:
       | I know I've seen videos of animals where I thought "damn, this
       | one must be above the bell curve."
       | 
       | And you know, there are individual humans vastly smarter than us
       | so I figure there gotta be the same in the animal kingdom too.
        
         | seunosewa wrote:
         | And you can legally breed them.
        
         | ahazred8ta wrote:
         | Canadian author Spider Robinson had a cat that spontaneously
         | used a tool. The cat selected a narrow wedge shaped piece from
         | a woodpile, carried it to the other side of the house, jammed
         | the small end into a door crack, and levered open a locked
         | bathroom door.
        
       | whatsakandr wrote:
       | If you haven't seen "What About Bunny" on YouTube, I highly
       | recommend it. The dog has learned to use buttons to communicate
       | her thoughts quite effectively. My favorite is "Why bunny dog?"
        
         | kelvie wrote:
         | There's a massive sampling and confirmation bias with Bunny,
         | though admittedly as a sheepdog owner the videos are very cute.
         | 
         | Whenever I talk to e.g. coworkers about an impressive ML demo
         | that was sped up and pre-recorded, I point to Bunny the dog to
         | show how impressive a talking dog is.
        
         | tigerlily wrote:
         | Yes! And the one about the stranger in the paw (my memory is
         | sketchy on the exact words). Mindblowing.
        
         | cal85 wrote:
         | I just watched a few videos and it's seems obvious it's all
         | down to cherry picking and confirmation bias on the part of the
         | owner. I've no doubt the owner believes the dog is deliberately
         | constructing sentences, but that isn't what's happening.
        
           | ksenzee wrote:
           | There are some where I think you're right, and some where
           | there is pretty clearly some genuine communication going on.
           | You might want to watch a few more.
        
         | araes wrote:
         | The huskies Mishka and K'eyush have also been pretty popular
         | over the last years. Videos of 10M+ upvotes, so obviously
         | somebody's been watching. A lot are kind of painfully viewing
         | owners poke their canines for likes, yet there are a few that
         | are rather clear human language use such as Miska singing
         | "Jingle Bells". Very obvious human word use and response to
         | human communication for a task.
         | 
         | Youtube, Mishka,
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtDFxm4Wupo&t=84s
        
       | leot wrote:
       | It's unclear why the researchers believe that when a dog doesn't
       | learn the names of a bunch of toys it means that they can't.
       | 
       | There are lots of things people are able to learn today that they
       | "couldn't" a few years ago (programming, math, reading). How are
       | the researchers able to tell that the limitation lies with the
       | dog and not with the trainer/household?
        
         | swatcoder wrote:
         | Indeed! The article talks about some kind of rare "genius"
         | trait, but the findings just seem to demonstrate that there
         | exists some dogs that were able to demonstrate a big vocabulary
         | in their tests. Many people with dogs already knew that, but
         | it's a sound finding to have citable anyway (especially since
         | some people still hold weirdly dismissive beliefs about
         | everyday animal intelligence).
         | 
         | But it doesn't say anything _scientific_ about whether this is
         | an inherent trait rather than a contextual outcome, what the
         | frequency of any such trait might be, whether the dogs that
         | failed the tests were incapable rather than indifferent, etc.
         | Of course, the exact same pattern of ovverstatement shows up in
         | human behavioral and psychological research, so we shouldn 't
         | be surprised to see it here :)
        
           | detourdog wrote:
           | I agree just like any learning it involves engagement of some
           | type>
        
       | binarymax wrote:
       | If a dog can learn 100 toys, then they can learn 52 cards, and
       | maybe play some poker.
        
       | sandworm101 wrote:
       | Memorizing 100 names for things might seem like a big deal, but I
       | guarantee that _all_ dogs have memory for 100+ smells associated
       | with things. They would call us stupid for not being able to
       | remember the smell of more than a few dozen objects. My point:
       | don 't judge intelligence based on how well an animal can
       | replicate human behavior. Each of them can do things that make us
       | look like the idiots.
        
         | xeonmc wrote:
         | What do you mean fish are not stupid for being unable to climb
         | trees?
        
         | newman8r wrote:
         | Birds are able to do it as well, this popular bird on youtube
         | seems to know at least that many words
         | https://www.youtube.com/@ApolloandFrens
        
         | nicklecompte wrote:
         | It wasn't clear to me from this that these dogs had any special
         | _cognitive_ abilities, as opposed to _neurosensory_ abilities,
         | e.g. maybe most dogs can 't audibly distinguish human vowels
         | and consonants well enough for this to work.
        
           | RoyalHenOil wrote:
           | I wonder this as well. In my experience, dogs have a MUCH
           | easier time learning hand signals than learning verbal cues.
           | I wonder if dogs would generally be capable of learning many
           | more words if they were taught in sign language.
        
         | rashkov wrote:
         | I wonder if something like synesthesia could help them map
         | language to smells
        
         | pazimzadeh wrote:
         | Who can't remember the smell of more than a few dozen objects?
        
           | kevinmchugh wrote:
           | Yeah, and humans can identify different hops or chocolate or
           | coffee beans by smell. We can't track very well but still
           | have pretty sophisticated noses
        
           | sandworm101 wrote:
           | We remember scents. We remember how chocolate smells. We do
           | not smell well enough to associate smell with a particular
           | object. Then, in turn, our brains are not hardwired to
           | associate specific smells to specific objects.
           | 
           | Look at our memory for faces. It isn't all about eyesight.
           | Our brains have specific circuitry for faces. Dogs have the
           | same for smell. Sensitivity is one thing, how the brain is
           | wired is another.
        
             | robocat wrote:
             | > Then, in turn, our brains are not hardwired to associate
             | specific smells to specific objects.
             | 
             | I think you are speculating cause.
             | 
             | Culturally we tend not to communicate much about smells -
             | it could just as easily be that most of us have the ability
             | but it is never trained because it isn't much use to us.
             | 
             | Anecdotally I know people with a wide range of different
             | olfactory abilities.
             | 
             | It is interesting to try and think of how we could test for
             | the ability. Perhaps not testing for my pencil, but
             | something else - a child - a dog - shoes - urine.
        
         | dj_mc_merlin wrote:
         | > They would call us stupid for not being able to remember the
         | smell of more than a few dozen objects.
         | 
         | Dogs obviously have incredibly more advanced olfactory systems
         | but I feel like you're downplaying humans here. I'm pretty sure
         | there's hundreds of very specific smells I could identify
         | pretty well. Smell of home, pencil rubbers, chalk clouds,
         | rotten bananas, denim.. things do have quite specific smells
         | and there's a lot of things.
        
           | BytesAndGears wrote:
           | Plus the whole feeling of "I just smelled this thing and it
           | reminds me of my aunt's house, who died 35 years ago".
           | 
           | I think it's pretty established that humans are _very_ good
           | with smell. We just aren't very sensitive compared to dogs
        
             | aqfamnzc wrote:
             | I recently started swimming for fitness after not doing so
             | since 10 years ago in high school. I get a rush of
             | nostalgia and a good feeling whenever I catch a whiff of
             | chlorine on my hands or hair throughout the day.
        
           | tapland wrote:
           | Just yesterday i experienced the smell that was just like the
           | apples from a tree in our yard 25 years ago. There are easily
           | many hundreds of unique smells we can identify.
        
           | thfuran wrote:
           | The ability to remember specific sensory impressions just is
           | not the same thing as sensory acuity. People can remember a
           | bunch of things, but our noses aren't nearly as sensitive as
           | dogs'.
        
           | sandworm101 wrote:
           | >> I could identify pretty well. Smell of home, pencil
           | rubbers, chalk clouds, rotten bananas, denim.. things do have
           | quite specific smells
           | 
           | Those are classes of things, not specific objects. We all
           | know the smell of erasers, but can we identify the smell of a
           | specific eraser? Part of it is sensitivity but it is also
           | largely that our brains are not designed to associate smells
           | with individual objects. Think of how we handle faces, which
           | we can spot even if at a different orientation than we have
           | seen before. Or how we can hear a specific voice amongst a
           | crowd. Dogs do that with scent profiles.
        
             | dj_mc_merlin wrote:
             | This is a really good way to frame it that would indeed
             | mean we only remember dozens of individual things, if that.
             | The smell of home remains, as well as the smells of close
             | relatives.. but I can't think of much else.
        
             | ProfessorLayton wrote:
             | Not sure how to word this without getting too weird, but
             | It's certainly possible to identify well over a dozen
             | people by smell alone -- not just friends/family that one
             | spends a lot of time with, but also attractive people.
        
         | ghshephard wrote:
         | This was an interesting article:
         | https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/you-actually-s...
         | 
         | "According to McGann, our olfactory inferiority is nothing but
         | a 150-year-old myth born of erroneous assumptions and faulty
         | science."
        
           | fnordpiglet wrote:
           | Why do we have K9 search and rescue dogs and drug sniffers
           | instead of just having police officers sniffing everyone's
           | luggage?
           | 
           | The answer from the article is, essentially, because dogs are
           | much better at odor detection than us. It weirdly seems to
           | say because we have the ability to sense odors we are better
           | than we think we are, which implies we think we can't smell
           | at all or something. But dogs are much much better than us.
        
             | ghshephard wrote:
             | The article made a quite different argument than "dogs are
             | much better at odor detection than us" - that is contrary
             | to what the research shows. Humans have much better ability
             | to smell some things than dogs do, but, dogs are (as you
             | noted) capable of smelling some things better than humans.
        
               | fnordpiglet wrote:
               | They make some squinty suppositions from some limited
               | studies that suggest dogs (which can smell cannabis
               | flowers) can't smell flowers better humans etc. But then
               | they conclude with this statement that sort of refutes
               | the entire premise:
               | 
               | """ Besides having more olfactory receptor cells than
               | humans, dogs also boast a specialized snout adapted to
               | methods of breathing that deliver a steadier stream of
               | information-rich scent. Dogs and some other animals even
               | experience scent differently. Their olfactory system
               | allows them to smell liquid phase chemicals that aren't
               | airborne--think of layers of urine and other liquids on
               | your neighborhood fire hydrant--by working like a pump to
               | deliver them to a specialized nasal organ. """
               | 
               | Which is pretty indicative that as everyone knows from
               | daily experience with dogs, dogs are better at smelling
               | things than humans. There may be a range over which that
               | superiority falters at some chemicals but I saw nothing
               | other than headlines and pop science supposition that
               | indicates humans are superior at smelling than dogs.
        
         | samatman wrote:
         | While it is of course true that humans can smell less acutely
         | than dogs, I'm fairly confident that the number of odors I can
         | remember is somewhere in the low thousands.
        
         | araes wrote:
         | A quick search to WP Dog Intelligence [1] will quickly note
         | that there have been cases of 1,000 words and this is actually
         | fairly well known. It's perhaps interesting that researches are
         | confirming anecdotal reports online, although as noted in
         | another comment below, there are 10M+ videos from multiple
         | channels all on the same subject. I donno, it's like humans are
         | just realizing animals might not be that less intelligent.
         | Parrots ask existential questions. Prior research on dog
         | language:
         | 
         | "2008, Betsy, a Border Collie, knew over 345 words by the
         | retrieval test, and she was also able to connect an object with
         | a photographic image of the object, despite having seen neither
         | before."
         | 
         | (mentioned in article) "Rico initially knew the labels of over
         | 200 items [and] inferred the names of novel items by exclusion"
         | 
         | "2013, a Border Collie, "Chaser", who had learned the names and
         | could associate by verbal command over 1,000 words[...], and
         | [was] capable of linking nouns to verbs"
         | 
         | [1]
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog_intelligence#Learning_and_...
        
       | at_a_remove wrote:
       | I've seen a few videos on YouTube of cats trained on these push-
       | down language buttons, mounted in a hexagonal pattern, on a mat
       | laying on the floor. The cats press a button and the button plays
       | back a word which the owner has recorded.
       | 
       | I'd like to see more testing out of it but the cats seem to be
       | rather expressive. They pick the same button, so at least they
       | are consistent in their wants. They have a few verbs in the mix,
       | it seems, not just nouns.
       | 
       | I wonder how dogs would do on these buttons.
        
         | _whiteCaps_ wrote:
         | You should check out Bunny the dog on Youtube / Tiktok.
        
         | gs17 wrote:
         | I've watched a few in the past and I'm not convinced the more
         | complex interactions are "real" language use instead of operant
         | conditioning combined with confirmation bias. Too many of the
         | videos will have button sequences that seem random get assigned
         | a meaning, and even non-request button presses will get
         | attention.
         | 
         | Buttons for "food", "water", "pet me", "play with me",
         | "outside" almost definitely work. Before I lived with a cat
         | again, I was skeptical of those as "well, duh, any of those
         | buttons get a reward, they don't care what it is", but our cats
         | ask for those specific things without buttons.
        
           | at_a_remove wrote:
           | I've been on the lookout for that, but I was struck by some
           | particular "conversations" that involved re-direction.
           | "Sorry" "How about something else" "Mommy - Sick" and so on.
           | There was some back and forth there that I could not quite
           | discount.
        
           | deathanatos wrote:
           | I know a dog that, if you've not paid attention to her water
           | bowl and it's empty, and she wants water, will simply paw the
           | rim of the bowl to cause it to overturn, which makes a loud
           | clatter on the hard floor.
           | 
           | Once she then has your attention, she'll give you a look, as
           | if it say "water, let's go."
           | 
           | I dare say she trained _us_ -- after all, we didn 't teach
           | her to do that. And sure, it's simple ... but she's still
           | purposefully communicating a desire/intent.
           | 
           | (She's a good girl, too.)
        
       | antisthenes wrote:
       | Knowing what we know about the variability within species, why
       | would anyone NOT think that there is immense variations in
       | intelligence in other mammalian species?
       | 
       | Especially a species that we've been selectively breeding for
       | specific traits, some of which include independence and the
       | ability to problem-solve?
        
       | _whiteCaps_ wrote:
       | I surprised that poodles were called out as a less obvious smart
       | dog.
       | 
       | My dog learned on her own that me holding keys + wearing glasses
       | = car ride, while keys + no glasses = walk. It took _me_ a while
       | to learn how she knew what we were going to do.
        
         | TaylorAlexander wrote:
         | Curious how you determined what she had determined.
        
           | bongodongobob wrote:
           | For mine, when I have my keys he runs right to the car.
           | Without them, he'll run past to the sidewalk. If I grab my
           | keys and laptop (to go to work) he'll walk away and lay down.
        
           | _whiteCaps_ wrote:
           | She hates car rides, so she'd run and hide when she saw me
           | with glasses on. I finally clued in the day I forgot to put
           | my glasses on before going to the car, and she was happy to
           | go outside.
        
         | knodi123 wrote:
         | My dog recognizes different cars by their noise profile. So
         | he'll wake up from a nap and get excited whenever my wife pulls
         | onto our street, but stay down for any other car.
         | 
         | It probably helps that we're the only prius on the block, but
         | still impressive!
        
           | _whiteCaps_ wrote:
           | Oh yeah, had some dogs like that when I was a teenager. They
           | could recognize my Firebird from a few blocks away. :-)
        
           | alamortsubite wrote:
           | Our last cat did this, too (though in our case the car was a
           | Mazda 3). It took me a while to realize what was going on.
        
           | LandR wrote:
           | My parents dog knows where she is going in the car. On the
           | way to the beach where she goes for her runs there are 3
           | rumble strips on the road, she always starts getting excited
           | as soon as the car goes over them. Even though she's probably
           | still 6-8 miles from beach!
           | 
           | They also take her to a local pub that is dog friendly and
           | she has friends there. She knows when she is going there as
           | she starts getting excited when the car turns right at a
           | certain roundabout. Go left or straight on, nothing, but turn
           | right and she's right up all excited!
        
             | RussianCow wrote:
             | My dog is like this. She knows (without looking out the
             | window) when we are close to home or some other exciting
             | places, and I can only imagine that she has memorized the
             | turns we take to get to those destinations. It blows my
             | mind because there are no obvious indications, and I highly
             | doubt I would pick up on them if blindfolded in the car.
        
           | lostlogin wrote:
           | EVs have a high pitched whine and our dog can hear the car
           | from a long way out.
        
           | 1letterunixname wrote:
           | Yep, mine does too. Their hearing is amazing.
        
           | ta8645 wrote:
           | I heard about a test someone did, after wondering how their
           | dog was always standing in the window at the end of each
           | workday, anticipating their owners arrival home. After
           | casting about, a theory was developed that the dog "smelled
           | time". That is, as the day wore on, the scent of their owner,
           | decreased in the air; at a low-enough concentration, the dog
           | knew it was about time for the front door to open and their
           | owner to arrive home.
           | 
           | To prove the theory, someone went to the owner's work at
           | noon-time, and gave him a new shirt, collecting the one he'd
           | been wearing for half a day. They took that worn shirt, and
           | swirled it through the air back at the house; recharging the
           | owner's scent in the air. The dog was asleep and away from
           | the front door, and surprised when its owner arrived home at
           | the normal time.
        
             | bbarnett wrote:
             | Certainly interesting enough to do another test, but
             | instead without another human entering the house.
             | 
             | Maybe a sealed box that opens to vent the scent. You'd need
             | to have the same box do the same, with no scent too.
        
         | drcongo wrote:
         | I love this kind of cause and effect linking that dogs do -
         | mine has noticed that I often go in the downstairs restroom
         | before walkies and now I regularly find her sitting expectantly
         | on the bottom of the stairs when I come out. She only seems to
         | be able to remember about 4 words though.
        
         | alamortsubite wrote:
         | It's a bit weird, but I think our animals spend far more time
         | observing us than we realize.
        
         | tlavoie wrote:
         | Our dogs are also also very good at picking up other cues. Not
         | only can we not say "walk," but the "well..." as in, "well,
         | time to take the dogs" gets the same reaction now.
         | 
         | Our SPCA-special (shepherd / husky / other?) learned after
         | _one_ event that the tub running with the bathroom door open
         | means that it's bath-time, and time to head out through the pet
         | flap to the safety of the outdoors.
        
           | bentcorner wrote:
           | This is not a difficult task but my dog absolutely recognizes
           | the various ways I end meetings during work or discord chats
           | while gaming and always starts bothering me for pets when I'm
           | done.
        
         | 1letterunixname wrote:
         | My first dog was a 3/4 poodle 1/4 cocker spaniel. She knew
         | where the car was going; anticipated events from objects
         | including leashes, combs, toys, and food; and deduced ever
         | changing codewords for activities before moving a muscle.
        
         | galenlynch wrote:
         | I interpreted that sentence to mean poodles were a less obvious
         | working dog:
         | 
         | "Yet almost all gifted word learners are working breeds. Those
         | include the obvious breeds such as ... but also less obvious
         | ones such as poodles"
        
       | genman wrote:
       | Our dog is not particularly smart but once we counted that she
       | knows at least about 20 words, one of those being "cat", so we
       | use "that furry animal" instead when we talk to not agitate her
       | for no reason.
        
       | bongodongobob wrote:
       | I adopted an Australian Shepherd from a friend a year ago and I'm
       | absolutely blown away by how smart he is. He even knows the
       | neighbor dogs' names. I can say "go get spot!" and he'll run
       | after the right dog. He knows all my family members names. He
       | knows that "you've arrived" on Google maps means we are there. He
       | knows that "power on" coming from my Bluetooth headphones means
       | we are going for a walk. He gets the concept for new tricks in
       | about a half hour. I do have to practice them daily, but he gets
       | the gist almost immediately.
       | 
       | I knew Aussies were smart and I'm not sure where he is on the
       | bell curve, but yeah, some dogs really have a knack for language.
        
         | sophacles wrote:
         | A good friend of mine had an Aussie who was really smart. My
         | friend was a dog trainer, and she once told me "the secret is
         | Grace (the dog) does most of it - the puppies learn better by
         | watching her demonstrate, and she keeps them in line".
         | 
         | One day a mutual friend of ours died in a car wreck. I went to
         | see my friend and we were sitting there telling stories and
         | grieving... Grace read the room and brought my friend her
         | favorite movie on dvd - something she watched when she was
         | feeling blue. Grace wasn't quite sure what to do for me, but
         | she brought me the cup I usually drank from when I was
         | visiting.
         | 
         | I don't know how much of that to attribute to smarts, training,
         | and/or natural empathy, but that was an impressive dog, and its
         | an impressive breed for sure!
        
           | bongodongobob wrote:
           | I believe it. Apparently that's how herding dogs train on
           | farms. You just buy a puppy and it literally shadows the
           | adult. They train themselves.
        
             | RoyalHenOil wrote:
             | I have two koolies (an Australian herding breed that is
             | very closely related to Australian shepherds, border
             | collies, and kelpies). I got my older dog during the
             | lockdowns when I had a lot of free time to train him, and I
             | got my younger dog a couple years later, when I had much
             | less time to train her.
             | 
             | The younger one has taught herself almost everything the
             | older one knows, mostly by observing him, but sometimes by
             | him actively trying to teach her. When she doesn't know
             | something, he shows obvious signs of frustration and
             | urging: I give a command, he does the thing I'm asking for,
             | she doesn't react because she doesn't know the command, and
             | then he starts growling and harumphing (and sometimes even
             | air snaps near her face to get her attention) until she
             | follows his lead.
        
         | spike021 wrote:
         | I have a Shiba Inu and he's very much the same. If I say "look
         | there's your friend Bella!" He goes nuts because that's his
         | favorite friend to play with. He can even recognize the sound
         | of their owner from multiple apartment buildings away. Not
         | kidding at all. He'll go frantic begging to go outside and as
         | soon as we're out he'll perk his ears, figure out the direction
         | to go, and take off. And then after five or so mins heading
         | that way he finds his best bud.
        
           | bongodongobob wrote:
           | Cool! Mine can hear my neighbors garage door open when they
           | get home from work and goes nuts because his bestie is about
           | to be let outside. Took me a while to figure that one out,
           | haha. "How the hell are you predicting when the neighbors dog
           | gets let out??"
        
           | cj wrote:
           | My Shiba has learned the days of the week. I have a family
           | member that visits every Thursday, and he sits by the door
           | waiting for them (only on Thursdays).
           | 
           | And god forbid I work a weekend or do something off schedule,
           | he gets stressed out thinking something is wrong.
           | 
           | I often joke he would be a more normal dog if he had a
           | lobotomy. Sometimes I wish he were a bit dumber :)
        
         | legohead wrote:
         | I had a dumb labrador that was hard to train. Now I have a
         | kokoni who knows 20 commands & words, and she is super easy to
         | train. We haven't tried to test the limit of her abilities, we
         | just ran out of things to teach her (that we cared about, at
         | least). She never cared for toys though.
         | 
         | I noticed while teaching her to "speak" that she would sneeze a
         | lot, I guess it's kind of a reflex for her when she tries to
         | speak. So I wondered, can I teach a dog to sneeze? And sure
         | enough, after a bit of training, she will now sneeze on
         | command.
        
           | user_7832 wrote:
           | > she would sneeze a lot
           | 
           | Btw dogs often do this to indicate they're playing/mean no
           | harm :)
        
           | qup wrote:
           | She sounds like my dog, who has sneezing fits a lot. The
           | shelter said she was a shepherd/boxer mix when I adopted her,
           | but I believe she's a mountain cur.
           | 
           | Either way, she's wonderful, and learned every trick I taught
           | her in the first couple of months. She still knows them all 9
           | years later. She's learned a lot about me without my
           | instruction, we just fit like a glove.
           | 
           | I don't have an exact count, but she knows at least 30
           | commands (some are for the same thing, like "wait for me" and
           | "slow down"). I use natural language. I'm not sure how many
           | other things she's picked up. I always tell her "be right
           | back" if it's true, but I'm not sure if she understands it or
           | not, because she's not an anxious dog.
           | 
           | She's never been that interested in food or toys. She's a
           | farm dog. The best.
           | 
           | I wish they'd speed up that research on dog longevity. She's
           | 9.
        
             | cogman10 wrote:
             | > who has sneezing fits a lot
             | 
             | Sneezing is a way dogs say they want to play. That's
             | adorable that she loves sneezing for you. [1]
             | 
             | [1] https://www.thekennelclub.org.uk/health-and-dog-
             | care/health/...
        
         | deergomoo wrote:
         | My dog occasionally forgets our house has an upstairs. He's
         | still a good boy though.
        
           | RussianCow wrote:
           | Nice to meet you, fellow labrador owner!
        
         | cush wrote:
         | I did this with my Aussie as well. I'd hide all of her toys
         | throughout the house then instruct her "go get your hamburger!"
         | and in a few minutes, she'd come back with her hamburger. It
         | was wild that she'd remember what toy she was looking for
         | during that time. More impressive still, was she would be able
         | to learn new toy names through inference. I'd come home with a
         | new toy turtle, hide all her toys, say "go get your Turtle!",
         | and she'd come back with the new toy. And from then on she'd
         | know which one was Turtle. She had an insatiable appetite for
         | training and learning!
        
         | sokoloff wrote:
         | We got our 3/4 poodle mix during Covid and remote work.
         | 
         | To this day, he strongly associates me putting on jeans with
         | "we're about to go for a walk" (which isn't entirely wrong, for
         | sure).
        
         | jjtheblunt wrote:
         | Our shetland sheepdog as kids was super smart (and funny as a
         | consequence) in this huge vocabulary way too. Our current feral
         | ancestry central american dog (dna tests call them village
         | dogs, meaning not of a breeder created subset of the gene pool)
         | is scary smart too. She's probably got a HN account come to
         | think of it.
        
       | hackeraccount wrote:
       | I've always thought my Grandmother's dog was a genius. It wasn't
       | that the dog knew a lot of things - it was house trained of
       | course, it would sit, fetch, heel and the biggest trouble I ever
       | remember it getting into was scratching the bottom of door.
       | 
       | That said I swear it figured out all of that stuff on its own
       | because I'm pretty no one in the house invested 5 minutes trying
       | to train that dog to do anything. I honestly think it just wanted
       | to be a good dog. I would almost say the dog was mistreated
       | because benign neglect is almost cruel to a dog but it wasn't
       | that bad, the dog wasn't ignored, it just didn't get a chance to
       | really shine.
       | 
       | Poor muffin.
        
       | a_gnostic wrote:
       | My buddy swears his one year old kitten understands how to turn
       | on the A/C, but lacks the opposable thumbs to do it effectively.
        
       | paulpauper wrote:
       | is it actual learning or a Clever Hans effect or other operant
       | conditioning.
        
         | gs17 wrote:
         | They attempted to reject a Clever Hans effect.
         | 
         | >To minimize potential inadvertent cues from the owner, the
         | instructions required the owners to place the dog's toys in a
         | different room. Owners were instructed to ask for each of the
         | toys while ensuring that at least three toys were available for
         | the dog to choose from.
         | 
         | For the test they had a camera in the room with the owner and
         | another in the room with the toys (so the owner couldn't cheat
         | by removing the other toys).
        
       | oooyay wrote:
       | My greyhound/pit mix knows my names of many of her toys. She also
       | has a range of expressions she uses to disagree with me or tell
       | me I'm wrong.
       | 
       | Her favorite toy is this kevlar llama unicorn that my mother has
       | resewn for her twice. If I tell her to bring me her lobster (also
       | kevlar) sometimes she'll shake her head, bow, and then stare
       | intently at me. She understands the prompt for, "What is it?" and
       | will lead me to the thing she wants or fetch it. On multiple
       | occasions she's brought me her llama instead. I thought this was
       | a fluke for a while but if I argue with her enough she'll go get
       | her lobster. She has a really big toy bin and she plays with _a
       | lot_ of toys, so selecting these two by name has always been
       | curious.
       | 
       | She also has toys for different purposes. The remnants of a Lamb
       | Chop long lost are her snuggle toy, she doesn't play tug of war
       | with it anymore. If you try to she'll display the same expression
       | for dissatisfaction.
        
         | gottorf wrote:
         | She must get it from the greyhound. My pit shows occasional
         | flashes of intelligence, but I think she's too anxious to
         | behave smartly almost all the time...
        
       | goles wrote:
       | https://archive.is/E8PKp
        
       | 11235813213455 wrote:
       | I spend lot of time watching birds, and they are really having
       | complex conversations, definitely more than 100 "words" too. And
       | we can say the same about ants, (it's more chemical/touch
       | communication). Basically all animals are smart
        
       | Scubabear68 wrote:
       | The amazing thing to me about dogs is the tremendous range of
       | variability we have bred into them. Size, shape, color,
       | intelligence, basic body makeup, senses, hunting instincts, even
       | average life span vary by an astonishing amount.
       | 
       | And sadly, of course, the selective breeding has also caused
       | systematic weaknesses in some breeds (prone to bad hips, knee
       | injuries, relatively short life span, etc).
       | 
       | The genie is out of the bottle but I wish we could breed
       | healthier animals.
        
         | llamaLord wrote:
         | Just a quick note on this, it's not entirely appropriate to
         | blame selective breeding "in general" for those issues. Quite
         | often those issues come from specific selective breeding
         | practises designed to make the dogs more "fashionable" by
         | breeding specific aesthetic attributes over healthy dogs.
         | 
         | That being said, there is an enormous community of extremely
         | passionate breeders around the world who are absolutely
         | dedicated to breeding HEALTHIER dogs, especially in breeds that
         | are known to have issues due to poor breeding.
         | 
         | We have a Boston Terrier we got from one such breeder after
         | spending over two years looking for someone we trusted to do
         | the process right, and we are so happy we did. Not only do we
         | have an amazing pet, but we know we are activity contributing
         | to the process of improving the overall health of the breed,
         | even though it did cost us more to do.
         | 
         | A few things to look for in order to pick a "good" breeder.
         | 
         | 1. How many litters do each of their female dogs have over
         | their lives. If a breeder is expecting them to produce more
         | than two (three at the most) litters, that's a red flag.
         | 
         | 2. Do the mums deliver naturally, or via C-section. We only
         | learned through extensive research that some breeds (often
         | including Boston's) almost all have to give birth via C-section
         | because they've been so extremely bread. We specifically looked
         | for a breeder who's dogs a born naturally. If the pups are so
         | extreme in your they've been bread that the mum can't get them
         | out naturally... Something has gone too far.
         | 
         | 3. Is the breeder a "purist" when it comes to the breed. Now
         | this is going to be the opposite of what most people expect,
         | but you WANT a breeder who is 1930's levels eugenicist when it
         | comes to their breed. Fundamentally, most of the issues from
         | breeding come about through mongrelisation of the breed. Low
         | quality breeders cross-breed dogs to introduce "cool" or
         | "fashionable" new traits, without caring about the million
         | other genetic inconsistencies they're bringing into the mix at
         | the same time.
         | 
         | A great example is with Boston Terriers we learned. The breed
         | spec for them is VERY clear, they have a white base coat with a
         | black or extremely dark brown "tuxedo" style coat covering
         | their lower body and a portion of their front-legs.
         | 
         | ANYTHING that has colours other than those three, is a cross-
         | breed for fashion purposes. There is no such thing as an
         | "albino Boston", or a "patterned Boston" etc etc, these are
         | marketing names people came up with for mongrelised versions of
         | the breed which will almost always have major health issues.
        
       | br3d wrote:
       | I think what's way more interesting is that dogs can master class
       | inclusion: they can understand that _this_ toy is  "Mr Shakey"
       | and _this_ toy is  "Elephant" but they can also understand that
       | there is a superordinate category of "toys" that includes both Mr
       | Shakey and Elephant, and when asked "Go and get me a toy" can
       | choose either. This is mind-blowing, as children normally have to
       | reach 7 or 8 before they have a solid grasp of class inclusion
       | [0]
       | 
       | 0
       | https://www.jstor.org/stable/1129264#:~:text=showing%20relat....
        
         | grimgrin wrote:
         | I did not know what class inclusion was, but now I'm thinking
         | it's more complex than that? After a little bit of reading.
         | "all daisies are flowers" and not "all flowers are daisies",
         | this example seems more like the "solid grasp" you're referring
         | to. And not basic categorization that a 3 year old might have:
         | "foods", "toys"
        
           | br3d wrote:
           | Hmm, I'm now struggling to remember basic developmental
           | psych, but there's definitely a phase at which linguistic
           | children struggle with things having two names (it can't be
           | both "dog" and "Rex") but I think you're right - this
           | phenomenon is subtly different to class inclusion. But either
           | way, dogs can do something with language comprehension that
           | speaking children can't, which is the bit I find really
           | interesting
        
             | AeroNotix wrote:
             | I need to read up more on this because in my extremely
             | small sample size this kind of dual naming understanding
             | came in really early with my daughter.
             | 
             | I feel like it's a linguistic subtlety that us adults are
             | struggling with conveying the exact concept.
        
         | wosk wrote:
         | I did not read the paper, so I cannot comment on the "solid
         | grasp of class inclusion", but regarding the capacity that you
         | described in your comment, I have a 2-year-old and it's been a
         | long while since she has mastered this (book vs this book, toy
         | vs toy, fruit vs an apple and so on). As far as I know, most
         | two year old have already acquired this concept.
         | 
         | (EDIT I see the other comment says something similar and you
         | have replied)
        
           | AeroNotix wrote:
           | I didn't even know "class inclusion" was a thing really.
           | Though obviously the concept makes sense.
           | 
           | My daughter had a solid grasp of it definitely around 16-18
           | months. She could easily talk about books or toys, cars,
           | food, drinks etc.
           | 
           | Not sure if this is unusual but 7-8 as the other poster
           | mentioned sounds crazy late for that kind of conceptual
           | understanding to appear.
        
       | thebeardisred wrote:
       | I'm a little disappointed that there is not a single mention of
       | Psychologist John W. Pilley
       | (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_W._Pilley) nor Chaser the
       | Border Collie (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaser_(dog)).
       | Pilley did an extensive amount of work including teaching Chaser
       | over 1000 nouns. This was repeatedly verified in trials.
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGlUZWNjxPA
       | 
       | https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/27/science/chaser-border-col...
       | 
       | https://www.akc.org/expert-advice/news/remembering-chaser-th...
       | 
       | edit: Added another link to the AKC article on Chaser.
        
         | AlbertCory wrote:
         | > a little disappointed
         | 
         | that's putting it mildly. It's hard to believe SciAm could even
         | publish this.
         | 
         | Neil deGrasse Tyson went on TV with Chaser and his owner. He
         | tested Chaser by putting an unnamed toy in the pile, and then
         | said "go get Darwin." ("Darwin" being an unused name)
         | 
         | Chaser successfully figured out it must be the toy whose name
         | he didn't know.
        
       | AlbertCory wrote:
       | While Ernie is certainly smart, I've found one gap in his IQ:
       | 
       | He has some favorite houses because the person who lives there
       | gives him treats. Several times, we'll see that person on the
       | street and then pass their house, and Ernie still gets excited.
       | 
       | I tell him, "Ernie, we just saw Jan. She can't possibly be in the
       | house."
       | 
       | He never listens.
        
       | iskander wrote:
       | My dog seems to know least the names of 6 family members, 4
       | friends, and names of ~6-7 other dogs (in that she can go to
       | those individuals on command). She also knows: cat, dog, cow,
       | horse, friend, hello, "dai lapu" (Russian for give me your paw),
       | "sidi" (Russian for sit), sneak, "bang" (for playing dead),
       | dinner, breakfast, bath, outside, "go potties", and probably
       | quite a few other snippets of English.
       | 
       | She also knows how to open windows in a car and looks for the
       | buttons before pressing them with her paw.
        
       | ggm wrote:
       | Olaf Stapleton "Sirius"
        
       | fionaellie wrote:
       | How can I teach my dog the names of her toys?
        
         | throwawaaarrgh wrote:
         | Clicker training
        
       | throwawaaarrgh wrote:
       | Everybody thinks their dog and/or child is a genius. But I've had
       | a lot of dogs. Even within the same litter, some are bright, and
       | some are dumber than a box of hammers. If your dog is smart,
       | that's great, but your next one of the same breed might not be.
       | Some individual dogs also don't take well to training, while
       | others do. It's way more about the individual than the breed.
        
       | motohagiography wrote:
       | If dogs are smarter than we knew, what are some additional tasks
       | we could give them?
       | 
       | I have manuals for disability support dog training (opening
       | doors, getting medications, helping to dress, etc) but maybe we
       | could teach them to: - clean or arrange rooms or outdoor spaces
       | 
       | - find and pile firewood
       | 
       | - collect litter
       | 
       | - convey messages to named people
       | 
       | What else?
        
         | doubled112 wrote:
         | There's something very human about "hey, this thing is smart,
         | better put it to work for us"
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-02-23 23:00 UTC)