[HN Gopher] Africa is building a Great Green Wall to prevent exp...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Africa is building a Great Green Wall to prevent expansion of the
       Sahara
        
       Author : girafffe_i
       Score  : 92 points
       Date   : 2024-02-22 13:38 UTC (9 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.youtube.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.youtube.com)
        
       | lancetipton wrote:
       | Thanks for sharing. Super interesting video. Never spent a lot of
       | time with it, but I've always been curious how people could
       | rebuild an ecosystem.
       | 
       | I think it was the dune series, that I read a number of years
       | back that touched on this idea a bit in the second or third book?
       | It was not something I ever really thought about before that.
       | It's cool to see a real life example of it.
        
         | kadoban wrote:
         | Yeah there's a lot of that even in the first Dune book. The
         | Fremen's leader is an ecologist and they're explicitly
         | collecting water and preparing to change the entire world to be
         | greener and more livable.
        
         | sophacles wrote:
         | The linked channel has a lot of good videos it, and Mossy Earth
         | is another. They aren't going to make you an expert by any
         | means, but they provide good introductions to various projects
         | that are underway doing ecological restoration. They're nice
         | introductions to the topic.
        
         | bluGill wrote:
         | Universities all over the world are asking that question - and
         | have been for centuries. They have come up with some great
         | answers over time. It takes years for farmers to learn -
         | agriculture (like science) advances on the death of old people
         | who continue their unsustainable practices to the grave - but
         | things are overall much better than the past and getting
         | better.
        
       | legitster wrote:
       | Fascinating video, but still it worries me how sustainable this
       | is. This isn't a "rewilding" process - there is a LOT of manual
       | human labor going into supporting very low yield agriculture.
       | 
       | It seems like this idea relies on a long term low wage workforce
       | willing to live on subsistence agriculture.
        
         | jermaustin1 wrote:
         | > It seems like this idea relies on a long term low wage
         | workforce willing to live on subsistence agriculture.
         | 
         | I think that is already the population. What the attempt seems
         | to be is to create a green belt that prevents further
         | desertification of semi-arable land that they are already
         | subsistence farming on, because if the desert keeps moving,
         | these people will cease to exist.
         | 
         | Captialistically/economically, there is questions as to whether
         | these people should continue to subsistence farm, but if they
         | want to, and it can help keep the desert at bay, then I say
         | more power to them.
        
           | bluGill wrote:
           | These people right now don't have good options. Get them
           | enough food locally and they no longer need to chase all over
           | trying to find enough work to afford food. In turn that means
           | they can send their kids to school and those now educated
           | kids can in turn apply modern things. Some of that is those
           | kids - the ones who don't love farming - leave to better jobs
           | in the city, while others - those who love farming - apply
           | modern farming techniques (which is sustainable, contrary to
           | popular myth) and produce a lot more food while building up
           | the soil even more.
           | 
           | But if you don't have enough food it all fails. History has
           | taught us that in every corner.
        
           | legitster wrote:
           | I just have strong doubts that people will want to. The video
           | already highlights that the problem in the first place was
           | young people wanting to move to cities or other countries. I
           | would suspect it would revert to the pattern when the UN
           | grant money dries up.
        
         | Nux wrote:
         | They could perhaps send there criminals, prisoners.. this kind
         | of people.. have them man the green wall.
        
           | alephnerd wrote:
           | Or, you know, pay locals a consistent salary, thus helping
           | the environment and also mitigating extreme poverty (<$1.25 a
           | day) - which is what they are doing.
        
             | bluGill wrote:
             | More importantly, these green spaces are sustainable. So
             | even if you run out of budget in 5 years, the people no
             | longer need you to pay them as they now get everything they
             | need from the work you paid them to do in the past and so
             | they can live without subsidy. Or if you do have budget you
             | can move to some other village and pay them to become
             | sustainable.
        
               | alephnerd wrote:
               | Yep!
        
           | protomolecule wrote:
           | And when they would need more workers... What could possibly
           | go wrong.
        
         | macspoofing wrote:
         | >Fascinating video, but still it worries me how sustainable
         | this is.
         | 
         | What was shown in the video looks like a "mickey mouse"
         | operation, akin to a local tree planting effort to combat
         | climate change. For this to make any difference you can't have
         | people digging "half-moons" at a rate of 1 person/1 half-moon/1
         | day - that does not scale in any meaningful way. You need to do
         | this kind of project at an industrial scale, with large amounts
         | of heavy machinery and thousands of skilled professional
         | workers - especially since they are discussing creating a
         | "Green Wall" across thousands of kilometers at a width of
         | hundreds of kilometers.
        
           | legitster wrote:
           | Yeah, I suspect that if the UN is actually serious about a
           | Green Wall in the near future, they are engaging in mass
           | industrialized planting. But it's not very expensive to have
           | some marginal community projects here and there
        
           | bluGill wrote:
           | There is plenty of labor in Africa, that scales very well.
           | Just give the people reason to keep trees and they will plant
           | and water them. There are many local advantages to trees so
           | it isn't hard to get locals to take care of them with small
           | incentives.
        
           | silverquiet wrote:
           | If the Titanic is going down, it's going down, but if
           | rearranging the deck chairs gives you something to do to
           | relieve the anxiety, then I guess you might as well (my life
           | may resemble this particular metaphor).
           | 
           | I read William Langewiesche's travelogue where he crossed the
           | Sahara overland after being a pilot who flew over for a few
           | years. He said that the locals are rather fatalistic about
           | living in such a massive and unforgiving place (people
           | frequently die there); they say that when god decides it's
           | your time, then it's your time. Langewiesche added that if
           | you don't believe in god, then you can replace that with "The
           | Sahara" and it still works quite well.
           | 
           | I cannot imagine that there is much humans can do to hold
           | back the desert. I'm quite sure that the only thing that
           | would matter, a rapid drawdown of carbon emissions, is not
           | possible at this point. I know it sucks, sorry.
        
             | autoexec wrote:
             | Yeah, the video pretty much says outright that this is a
             | delay tactic to keep the poors from storming into the
             | cities and overwhelming them. Ultimately these people, and
             | even those in the cities, will likely end up as climate
             | refugees and need to relocate elsewhere. Much of the
             | western US is also facing a growing desertification problem
             | and dust and dust storms have been increasing. On the plus
             | side, all the increased atmospheric dust has a cooling
             | effect on the planet.
        
           | autoexec wrote:
           | > you can't have people digging "half-moons" at a rate of 1
           | person/1 half-moon/1 day - that does not scale in any
           | meaningful way.
           | 
           | It'll get harder to maintain that pace as heat increases too.
           | There'll be fewer and fewer hours that people can work
           | outside. Rising temperatures will bring more heat-related
           | illnesses and injuries. Considering the amount of ground they
           | want to cover bringing in machinery to speed things up does
           | sound like a good idea.
        
             | bluGill wrote:
             | You don't need to dig them constantly. In a few years your
             | village has enough, and now you just need to maintain them
             | which takes less time and so can be done in the cooler
             | parts of the day. And these green places will be cooler
             | than the desert so even in the heat of the day the whole is
             | cooler.
             | 
             | Of course as the village population grows you send the
             | "young men" out to the edge and have them dig a few more
             | half-moons at a rate of one/day. However they are building
             | next to previous green areas which are already lowering the
             | local temperature, and if sometimes it takes 2 days to
             | build one - who cares, there is no hurry.
        
           | girafffe_i wrote:
           | Or utilize metric tonnes of cheap labor.
        
         | bluGill wrote:
         | There is no particular reason to expect Africa to do better in
         | the near future. Russia and Iran are making large plays and
         | helping dictators kick out the western supported governments
         | (which were already corrupt, but making small strides to less
         | corruption). I see no hope for most of Africa to do better.
         | (note that I said most - There are 54 countries in Africa -
         | several of them are doing very well - I hope this trend
         | continues and spreads)
         | 
         | edit: looking closer, it looks like this might be in one of the
         | few countries that might actually do better. Though that also
         | helps as people who are doing better have time to invest in
         | this. time will tell.
        
         | vidarh wrote:
         | Senegal has one of the worlds highest fertility rates. They
         | have a surplus of labour, and slowing desertification is a way
         | of improving their ability to both subsist and grow their
         | economy until they can drive wages up.
         | 
         | Note how the video points out how it is causing more people to
         | have reasons to stay in villages that's otherwise get depleted
         | of young people. If that continues, it will have a significant
         | long term benefit for the growth of Senegals economy.
        
         | ww520 wrote:
         | Land improvement is the easiest value creation. Turning
         | unusable desert land into arable land creates huge long lasting
         | benefits. The land has huge value increase. If the people doing
         | the work are deeded the land, they become well off. They are
         | incentivized to maintain the land.
        
         | zokier wrote:
         | I believe the intent is that the local climate and soil will be
         | sufficiently altered that no laborious long-term upkeep is
         | needed. So its not rewilding per se, but its also not purely
         | agricultural project and parts of green wall afaik are
         | completely non-agricultural. That also highlights the fact that
         | the implementations of green wall projects have been very
         | varied, there is no single formula that is applied everywhere.
         | 
         | But yes, it is ambitious project and there indeed are lot of
         | questions on both short-term feasibility and long-term outlook.
         | As is natural for a project of this kind, the financial aspect
         | is especially messy.
         | 
         | https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/sep/07/africa-g...
        
         | maxglute wrote:
         | >It seems like this idea relies on a long term low wage
         | workforce willing to live on subsistence agriculture.
         | 
         | It's a labour intensive, make work program that accepts the
         | reality that there's going to be 100s of millions to billions
         | of Africans who will be stuck in subsistence agriculture for
         | the rest of their lives. You can incrementally improve new
         | workforce over time as society develops, but people who get
         | left behind generally get left behind. Ultimately, their labour
         | is cheap, and need something to do. Maybe you can replace 1000
         | workers with a piece of specialized heavy machinery that's
         | cheaper, but then you'll have 999 idle hands.
        
         | singularity2001 wrote:
         | >> there is a LOT of manual human labor
         | 
         | same reaction. someone bring power shovel diggers.
         | 
         | Also it should be combined with the other Great Green Wall
         | projects, the most successful being "just plant trees" to shade
         | the crops and keep the area cool and humid.
        
           | vidarh wrote:
           | How much do they cost compared to the labour cost that also
           | provides additional employment options and boost the local
           | economy?
           | 
           | "Just plant trees" without doing anything to ensure the trees
           | can survive is not meaningful in all conditions. What they're
           | doing here is effectively "just planting trees" in a way that
           | ensures the area stays moist enough for the trees to survive,
           | and leveraging the same space to grow crops.
        
       | animal_spirits wrote:
       | I've been following Andrew Millison's work for a while, he's got
       | a lot of really wonderful introductory lessons on permaculture.
       | He's got an online course at the University of Oregon, I'm
       | planning on taking it sometime soon
        
         | fuzztester wrote:
         | First saw this a few years ago.
         | 
         | Permaculture - from forest to farm | Clea Chandmal
         | 
         | https://youtu.be/KI3haUOkP-I?si=v_z8xCOKzwLO-May
         | 
         | IMO this is one of the most succint and clear explanations of
         | why permaculture is so important - because it _tries to mimic
         | nature_ , which has had (m|b)illions more years to evolve and
         | create much more intelligent and efficient growth, energy
         | conversion, creation and destruction processes than we stupid
         | and arrogant humans have had in the few tens of thousands of
         | years (at most) that we have been doing agriculture, or should
         | I say, monoculture or even better, stupidiculture.
        
         | fuzztester wrote:
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39472378
        
       | sparrowInHand wrote:
       | I abhor these projects, because they are seasonal- as in
       | dependent on outside funds and thus hyper-fragile. Also usually
       | propped up by colonizers, to detract from some ressource
       | extraction destruction.
       | 
       | Same with wildlife preserves. One bad coup with corrupt
       | politicians, one recession in the west - and its all gone,
       | poached and ruins. Its worthless feel good photo OP, monetary
       | potemkin zoos and forrests, providing the worst kind of hope, the
       | one that has no chance to last in a storm.
       | 
       | What is their solution against nomads and there goat herds which
       | are still a status symbol and in conflict with the farmers of the
       | region? Poisonous plants? Guards? Landmines? How does it prevent
       | building up resentment, when obviously a green landscape is more
       | important to the foreigners, then the starving locals?
       | 
       | How does it solve the hard problem of exponential mankind vs
       | civilizational allmende protection?
       | 
       | How do the plants survive in the climate change storms yet to
       | come?
        
         | alephnerd wrote:
         | > I abhor these projects, because they are seasonal- as in
         | dependent on outside funds and thus hyper-fragile. Also usually
         | propped up by colonizers, to detract from some ressource
         | extraction destruction.
         | 
         | It depends on the institutional experience of each country.
         | There's a reason this initiative is being done in Senegal
         | instead of neighboring Mali.
         | 
         | WFP funding is fairly consistent and less whimsical ime. It's
         | private donors like the Gates Foundation that tend to be flaky,
         | as they only answer to the whims of the Gates family.
         | 
         | Programs like the WFP, WB, IMF, ADB, USAID, etc need to be
         | auditable as significant amounts of public and private money
         | are invested, leading to demands from multiple donors, compared
         | to family foundations or smaller non-profits.
        
         | TheRealPomax wrote:
         | I dunno, maybe watch the video and get your answers from the
         | people who literally answers them in the video? They're not
         | "planting trees", they're basically just running the normal
         | progression of how sand forests develop at a faster, but still
         | slow enough to take years, rate. Nothing particularly "it'll
         | never work" or "it won't survive" about that.
        
         | burnte wrote:
         | You didn't watch the video, clearly. They're incredibly simple
         | projects that help permanently convert land from desert to
         | arable. They're not dependent upon the outside for anything
         | except directions, as the only tools needed are what the people
         | already have, a pickaxe and shovel. Once started it can
         | continue on with nothing but locals who want to take more land
         | back from the desert.
         | 
         | Nomads, landmines, buzzwords, you're just looking for edge
         | cases where this fails, and that's not helpful. If it works for
         | 80% of the land they look at, that's mre than good enough.
        
         | ludsan wrote:
         | > How does it prevent building up resentment, when obviously a
         | green landscape is more important to the foreigners, then the
         | starving locals? > How does it solve the hard problem of
         | exponential mankind vs civilizational allmende protection? >
         | How do the plants survive in the climate change storms yet to
         | come?
         | 
         | I plan on using this set of questions next time my girlfriend
         | says we should do something I don't want to do.
         | 
         | > I abhor these projects...
         | 
         | Jeesh.
        
       | bradleykingz wrote:
       | Africa is a country
        
         | girafffe_i wrote:
         | Lol
        
         | beezlewax wrote:
         | What?
        
       | canadiantim wrote:
       | Very amazing work. Syntropic farming, hadn't heard the term
       | before but glad to do more research into it. Also the half-moons
       | is very smart, very interesting. Interesting they went for half-
       | moons instead of swales like in permaculture design, both aimed
       | to increase water-retention. I guess in such very arid conditions
       | half-moons may work better for water retention
        
       | dappermanneke wrote:
       | who is africa
       | 
       | also, this is geoengineering. the same kind the soviets used to
       | do and the chinese do now. it would never be allowed to happen in
       | a western country because someone with deep pockets for a lawsuit
       | would find an endangered species of worm living in a dune or two
        
         | insider-trade wrote:
         | Ah, so you like authoritarian Soviet and Chinese governments?
         | And you called me fascist in another thread for wanting to
         | regulate oil companies.
         | 
         | Lol. Thanks for discrediting yourself.
        
       | fuzztester wrote:
       | Check out land imprinting.
       | 
       | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_imprinter
        
       | neontomo wrote:
       | If you're interested in the trials and tribulations of regreening
       | a desert landscape, I recommend this YouTuber with an ambitious
       | dream:
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/@dustupstexas
        
         | carapace wrote:
         | I hate to be negative, I do, but Shaun Overton is a fool. He's
         | wasting an enormous amount of money, energy, and time to
         | achieve approximately nothing when he could do so much more if
         | he expended those resources on a non-idiotic project. It's his
         | time and money to waste, but it hurts to see it when he could
         | really do a lot of good with it instead. His heart's in the
         | right place.
        
           | neontomo wrote:
           | I'm not familiar enough with the topic to know if you're
           | correct or not, but I don't watch his channel to see his
           | project work out, seeing him learn small things along the way
           | and share that journey but also him connecting with himself
           | and the community around his land in unique ways through his
           | project is intriguing and hopeful. A mad dream pushed forward
           | by a mad man, which may not come to fruition, but it's a
           | whole lot more entertaining than watching people take on
           | small projects that are guaranteed to succeed.
        
         | canadiantim wrote:
         | Very cool to see he's using prickly pear cactus. I'm currently
         | working on a project for regreening arid regions in California
         | using prickly pear on degraded water-restricted former
         | agricultural fields. The prickly pear really is optimally
         | suited for regenerating desert landscapes because they are one
         | of nature's great survivors of extreme conditions. Furthermore,
         | they can produce impressive biomass yields which helps drive
         | significant amounts of carbon underground which helps to
         | structure the soil and feed the soil microbiome / establish
         | mycorrhizal networks for other plants to be subsidized with.
         | Plus all parts of the prickly pear cactus are edible, the
         | fruits are delicious (great at reducing LDL cholesterol too).
         | They are prickly as a mfer tho, my goodness, watch your hands!
         | Plus in the America's they are native and so have natural
         | biological controls in these ecosystems that help prevent
         | unwanted runaway growth. Lots to love about prickly pear!
        
           | fuzztester wrote:
           | Very interesting, thanks for sharing.
        
         | fuzztester wrote:
         | Also a Geoff Lawton video called something like greening the
         | desert.
         | 
         | A lot of his stuff (including that desert video) can be found
         | here:
         | 
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39472378
        
       | chrsw wrote:
       | Or just wait a few thousand years
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_humid_period
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles
        
       | fuzztester wrote:
       | 3 words.
       | 
       | "Geoff Lawton videos."
       | 
       | You know, that Strine permaculture guy.
       | 
       | Watch at least 15 to 20 of them. Many are short.
       | 
       | Only then talk, people.
       | 
       | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoff_Lawton
       | 
       | https://youtube.com/@DiscoverPermaculture?si=XVjdWpJk5ZIVTnL...
       | 
       | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strine
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-02-22 23:02 UTC)