[HN Gopher] Cosmic Desktop Is Slated to Debut with Pop _OS 24.04...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Cosmic Desktop Is Slated to Debut with Pop _OS 24.04 LTS
        
       Author : tuananh
       Score  : 60 points
       Date   : 2024-02-18 13:23 UTC (9 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (linuxiac.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (linuxiac.com)
        
       | tuananh wrote:
       | this is their own DE written in Rust.
        
         | deaddodo wrote:
         | Honestly, I just wish COSMIC was less ugly.
         | 
         | But that's just a personal preference thing. If it helps
         | productivity and shaking up the Linux environment, that's
         | always a plus.
        
           | fbdab103 wrote:
           | I don't know about ugly, but the padding in those screenshots
           | is insanely large. Hopefully that is customizable.
        
             | ahmedfromtunis wrote:
             | I was thinking the same thing!
             | 
             | The huge padding is the thing I hate the most about Gnome,
             | and if Cosmic will have the same issue, well, then that's a
             | bammer.
             | 
             | With Gnome, however, there are extensions and themes that
             | allow to alleviate the problem, even if partially. And I
             | don't think Cosmic will have any of those on day one (if
             | they there's no customization built-in, that is).
        
               | panick21_ wrote:
               | With Cosmic they very much want customization. That was
               | one of their primary goals. The very reason they build
               | Cosmic in the first place was because Gnome made it much
               | harder to costumize and broke all their existing plugins.
               | They are talking about Cosmic being able to serve as a
               | great base for costume experiences.
               | 
               | I am not sure if they have reach that goal, but that is
               | their goal.
               | 
               | With Gnome, they are very willing to break all plugins at
               | all times. They simply do not care for stability of
               | plugins, its a nonissue for them.
               | 
               | In Gnome plugins are JS application all running in the
               | same namespace, a single crash of those can take down
               | everything. In Cosmic these are Rust application running
               | in different namespaces.
        
       | aNoob7000 wrote:
       | Honest question - What does Cosmic have over Gnome desktop? I'm
       | relatively new to Linux.
       | 
       | I'm running Ubuntu 22.04 and find it meets my computing needs.
        
         | Inityx wrote:
         | Paragraph 2 of the article describes why.
         | 
         | Supplemental reading: https://medium.com/@fulalas/gnome-mess-
         | is-not-an-accident-4e...
        
           | aNoob7000 wrote:
           | I agree with some of the performance issues mentioned by the
           | writer, but nothing mentioned stops me from doing my work.
           | 
           | I hope Cosmic helps improve the Linux desktop ecosystem.
        
             | BadHumans wrote:
             | If Cosmic creates a more cohesive Linux experience with
             | fewer bugs then I'm glad they are doing it. Nothing stops
             | me from doing my work but many bugs slow me down and
             | otherwise ruin my experience.
        
             | petepete wrote:
             | It's worth mentioning that GNOME receives an enormous
             | amount of hate but it's still the most widely used DE on
             | Linux by a mile and the vast, vast, vast majority of people
             | get along just fine.
        
               | yjftsjthsd-h wrote:
               | > it's still the most widely used DE on Linux by a mile
               | 
               | How would we be able to tell that?
        
               | a_vanderbilt wrote:
               | It's the default on Ubuntu and RHEL, which are the two
               | most popular enterprise distros. Ubuntu is also the most
               | popular consumer Linux distro.
        
               | yjftsjthsd-h wrote:
               | > It's the default on Ubuntu and RHEL, which are the two
               | most popular enterprise distros.
               | 
               | For servers; that's not super compelling.
               | 
               | > Ubuntu is also the most popular consumer Linux distro.
               | 
               | That's a much stronger argument, though I'd point out
               | that Linux distros are disproportionally used by people
               | given to customization, so the default may not be _as_
               | important.
        
               | a_vanderbilt wrote:
               | GNOME is very opinionated in its design, it's bound to
               | draw ire. It's the more stable DE out of it and KDE, and
               | the way they handle releases is more friendly to the
               | enterprisey types.
        
               | zdragnar wrote:
               | Say what? Half the reason cosmic even became a project at
               | all was the gnome releases constantly breaking plugins
               | and extensions.
               | 
               | It seems reasonably stable and usually just works (except
               | the files app), but only if you do absolutely nothing to
               | it. Try to change anything and it becomes nightmarish.
        
               | pjmlp wrote:
               | Defaults have a great power, and Red-Hat sponsoring most
               | of its development as well.
        
           | DwnVoteHoneyPot wrote:
           | Wow, the first 3 sentences are scathing lol (in the
           | supplemental reading)
        
           | MattPalmer1086 wrote:
           | Maybe I'm not a demanding user, but I have no major issues
           | with Gnome. I also liked Unity. Willing to give Cosmic a try,
           | as I use PopOS and like their approach.
           | 
           | Mostly I just want a desktop environment to find and launch
           | apps, do some basic window management, and get out of the
           | way. I got more important things to do than worry about
           | tweaking things endlessly...
        
             | netule wrote:
             | I upgraded to Ubuntu 23 a few weeks ago, in which GNOME
             | decided to remove app menus requiring me to install a wonky
             | extension to reclaim functionality. The top horizontal menu
             | is still there taking up screen real estate, mind you, it's
             | just less useful.
             | 
             | These changes are annoying enough with each upgrade to make
             | me consider switching DEs.
        
               | MattPalmer1086 wrote:
               | I tend to stick to LTS releases, but that certainly
               | doesn't stop gnome's endless quest to remove everything!
        
             | graemep wrote:
             | Fine, if its suits you. Then again, if that is all you do,
             | why use Gnome: XFCE or even LXDE will do all that fine and
             | they are lighter than Gnome and change less.
             | 
             | I quite like XFCE, but I use KDE for a few reasons. It has
             | tiling extensions and with a large monitor tiling works
             | better for me.I like a lot of KDE applications (Dolphin and
             | Kate in particular) and they integrate a bit better with
             | KDE (widgets in panels, KRunner).
             | 
             | YMMV.
        
           | dansalvato wrote:
           | That post you linked was a crazy read, it just kept going and
           | going. I've never really had issues with GNOME, but knowing
           | so many users share the sentiment of it being a hostile
           | developer environment makes me want to check out other
           | options next time I install a Linux distro.
        
           | PufPufPuf wrote:
           | I am completely happy with GNOME. Sure, it needs a few add-
           | ons to improve the UX around the dock and workspaces (most of
           | which are pre-installed in PopOS), but I believe that
           | customizability is a good thing. I'll most likely miss quite
           | a few GNOME add-ons on COSMIC.
        
       | kylecazar wrote:
       | The official release with 24.04 is what they are considering an
       | alpha, I believe.
       | 
       | It'll be quite some time before it's "stable".
        
         | Vinnl wrote:
         | Huh, I'd swear I'd seen that too, but looking at the alpha blog
         | post [1], they do indeed say:
         | 
         | > The official release of COSMIC DE will debut on Pop!_OS 24.04
         | LTS, which will be based on Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. Running and
         | testing on 24.04 gets us closer to a final, polished release.
         | 
         | I'm assuming, but not sure, that 24.04 will be released in
         | April, 24, though its version might just be a reference to the
         | Ubuntu version it's based on - it would be pretty quickly after
         | the Ubuntu release.
         | 
         | Although the distinction between "official release" and "final,
         | polished release" might indeed mean that the 24.04 release
         | would still be alpha?
         | 
         | [1] https://blog.system76.com/post/closing-in-on-a-cosmic-alpha
        
           | e12e wrote:
           | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble
        
       | indigodaddy wrote:
       | Geezus H the ads on that site
        
       | dartharva wrote:
       | Geo-blocked for India.
       | 
       | Blanket-banning an entire country's IP ranges is such a lazy and
       | obnoxious practice, the webmasters should be ashamed of this.
        
         | gkbrk wrote:
         | If the ISPs do their job and handle abuse emails, less people
         | would be blocking IP ranges like this.
         | 
         | There's a reason in IP abuse or spam databases, certain
         | countries light up like a christmas tree and others are not
         | used for these purposes. If you do nothing to be a good citizen
         | of the Internet, all the bad citizens are attracted to you as
         | an ISP.
         | 
         | You shouldn't even need to email the ISP for abuse, they should
         | just detect it themselves. But even taking actions on the
         | emails seems too difficult for them, so I doubt we'll see
         | anything pro-active.
        
           | moonscape68 wrote:
           | My guess is that India has been blocked so that the website
           | owner is able to join a particular ad network (in this case
           | Mediavine) which pays well but requires primarily US traffic.
           | So it's easier to just block the visitors that are preventing
           | you from joining. Ruthless but commercial decision.
        
           | betaby wrote:
           | ... and yet most of the spam is originated from US IP
           | addresses.
        
             | gkbrk wrote:
             | Checking the revenue analytics for my blog.
             | 
             | US visitors made up 66.13% of my revenue, with 14% of spam
             | coming from US IPs.
             | 
             | India made up 0.14% of my revenue, with 5% of spam coming
             | from Indian IPs.
             | 
             | Russia made up 0% of my revenue, with 21% of spam coming
             | from Russian IPs.
             | 
             | I don't do geo-blocking on my website since my spam filter
             | catches pretty much everything these bots are spewing out,
             | but I can certainly see why someone might want to do it.
             | Especially if they're wasting time/money dealing with spam
             | or automated attacks.
        
           | graemep wrote:
           | How does geoblocking a website help with spam email?
        
       | dartharva wrote:
       | Better source: https://blog.system76.com/post/closing-in-on-a-
       | cosmic-alpha
        
       | vlod wrote:
       | I'm hopeful that everyone here that loves rust will have an
       | outlet to start creating GUI apps for linux (that isn't gnome).
        
         | cocoa19 wrote:
         | Make them with what GUI library?
         | 
         | GPUI is not mature yet, so I wouldn't use it for anything
         | serious, and Qt bindings support is not great.
        
           | karthikiyengar wrote:
           | https://iced.rs/
           | 
           | This is what Cosmic is written in.
        
             | cocoa19 wrote:
             | Wow. Iced is also not mature, but being backed by an
             | important project such as Pop OS gives me hope it will
             | stick around.
             | 
             | Maybe it's time to dive into Rust with Iced, and port over
             | a Qt project I've been working on.
        
             | vlod wrote:
             | One of the things I find interesting is that it won't
             | necessarily be tied just to popos. I believe other distros
             | are looking into it. (Can't find references now)
             | 
             | If anyone is interested in the 'why', here's an old (1 year
             | ago) thread [0] explaining why they are moving away from
             | GTK.
             | 
             | [0]: https://www.reddit.com/r/pop_os/comments/xs87ed/is_ice
             | d_repl...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-02-18 23:01 UTC)