[HN Gopher] Spnec fast-tracks [?]200B solar farm in Central Luzon
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Spnec fast-tracks [?]200B solar farm in Central Luzon
        
       Author : doener
       Score  : 84 points
       Date   : 2024-02-17 10:06 UTC (12 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (businessmirror.com.ph)
 (TXT) w3m dump (businessmirror.com.ph)
        
       | bandergirl wrote:
       | [?]200B is 11.7 billion USD. That's an insane investment in the
       | Philippines, which has a GDP only 35 times bigger.
        
         | hiddencost wrote:
         | Wow. 1/20th of their grid volume.
         | 
         | I suppose the cost per kw/h really hit a tipping point for
         | them.
        
           | hackerlight wrote:
           | That, plus they don't have energy sovereignty. Similar to
           | China, they want energy sovereignty and want to derisk from
           | global political instability. So they're turning to
           | renewables. It's smart. The cost curve pushed the decision
           | over the edge.
           | 
           | Also being near the equator, the sun is stable. Countries
           | like Denmark who are far from the equator will probably keep
           | pursuing wind more aggressively than solar, unless the solar
           | cost curve continues down.
        
             | lawgimenez wrote:
             | This is correct. I am from the Philippines, we have only
             | two types of seasons, sunny and rainy.
             | 
             | But we also have several wind farms operating since early
             | 2000s.
        
               | metaphor wrote:
               | > _I am from the Philippines, we have only two types of
               | seasons, sunny and rainy._
               | 
               | There's a buried third in there: "typhoon season"[1].
               | 
               | I do wonder how they intend to both lean into and protect
               | such a massive, fragile investment when all it'll take is
               | the debris from a single tropical storm to wreck some
               | serious infrastructure carnage, let alone a full-blown
               | super typhoon.
               | 
               | [1] https://www.pagasa.dost.gov.ph/climate/tropical-
               | cyclone-info...
        
               | IndrekR wrote:
               | PV panels will be protected the same way as buildings.
               | Not much difference there. If you can build a house, you
               | can build a PV-farm.
        
               | rasz wrote:
               | Im not aware of any houses with flat structures sticking
               | over the roof being successfully protected from
               | hurricanes.
        
             | jillesvangurp wrote:
             | Both are popular in Denmark. Denmark has about 3.5GW of
             | solar, mostly on people's houses. So, about the same as
             | this project is installing. Of course the grid is dominated
             | by wind power. Especially offshore wind.
             | 
             | Being further north makes a little bit of difference but
             | not as much as people think. Winters are darker, obviously.
             | So, that means solar isn't great then. But summers have
             | much more daylight. Those long summer days are awesome for
             | solar energy. From early morning until late at night
             | basically. And obviously, Danish consumers like cutting a
             | bit off their electricity bills just like people elsewhere.
             | 
             | Another issue is the angle of the sun. The light loses some
             | energy having to pass through more of our atmosphere
             | compared to blasting straight down at the equator. But
             | otherwise, the difference in distance to the sun is
             | negligible.
             | 
             | And of course heat pumps are pretty popular in Denmark as
             | well. As are EVs. People that have those, would benefit a
             | lot from solar panels.
        
               | standeven wrote:
               | Is there seasonal storage in Denmark, so excess solar in
               | summer can be used in the winter?
        
         | creshal wrote:
         | On the other hand, still much cheaper both to build and operate
         | than the equivalent in conventional power plants. But I do
         | wonder where all that money is coming from. Foreign investors?
        
           | diggan wrote:
           | Seems it was funded by the IPO of "SP New energy Corp"
           | 
           | > Funded by proceeds from its P2.7-billion initial public
           | offering, the first 50 megawatts are targeted to start
           | delivering power to the grid by the end of 2022, driving
           | profitability for the firm - https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/
           | money/companies/815990/spnec...
           | 
           | > Mr Leandro Leviste, 28, will seek to raise as much as 2.7
           | billion pesos (S$74 million) by selling shares in Solar
           | Philippines Nueva Ecija, a unit of his Solar Philippines
           | Power Project Holdings. The funds will go towards
           | constructing the first phase of a 500MW plant in a province
           | about 130km north of Manila -
           | https://www.straitstimes.com/business/economy/a-28-year-
           | old-...
           | 
           | Interesting enough, seems the founder initially got the funds
           | by selling their Tesla and SolarCity shares:
           | 
           | > Mr Leviste founded Solar Philippines in 2013 after selling
           | the shares in Tesla Motors and SolarCity he bought while
           | attending Yale University in the United States -
           | https://www.straitstimes.com/business/economy/a-28-year-
           | old-...
        
             | lawgimenez wrote:
             | SPNEC is owned (bought it from Leviste) by MVP which also
             | owned several digital, electric, mining, hospital companies
             | here. Totally rich nonetheless.
        
               | diggan wrote:
               | Yeah, I imagined. Also guessing Leandro Leviste had help
               | to acquire their shares in the first place, as it's not
               | super common for people to have funds available for
               | stocks when they join university, unless someone help
               | them afford it.
        
               | lawgimenez wrote:
               | He's the son of one of the largest political clans here
               | too. If you know what I mean.
        
               | alephnerd wrote:
               | From Batangas right?
        
             | dmurray wrote:
             | That accounts for 2.7 billion pesos - a good start but
             | hardly a dent in the 200 billion figure.
        
         | anovikov wrote:
         | 200B philippine peso is, thank God, 3.58B USD, not 11.7. Looks
         | dirt cheap for 3.5GW and a lot of storage too.
        
           | hackerlight wrote:
           | $1k USD and you get 1KW of solar and storage. I don't know
           | how this compares to alternative grid-scale solutions over a
           | ~15-25 year lifetime but that's ballpark how much you'd pay
           | for retail solar _without_ the storage.
        
             | oezi wrote:
             | 1kwp panels cost <200 USD at the moment.
        
               | pxeger1 wrote:
               | So $1k total including installation labour and
               | maintenance seems reasonable
        
               | danielheath wrote:
               | Sure, but it's not like they mount themselves on a frame,
               | or wire themselves in.
        
       | ipsum2 wrote:
       | Are there solar farms that are utilizing the space underneath the
       | panels for any productive use, like growing plants that need
       | shade?
        
         | maltmaster wrote:
         | I think not in large scale yet, but there are experiments.
         | 
         | > "Solar panels in a field will necessarily cast a shadow. This
         | can be beneficial for some crops, for others not. In Northern
         | Europe, agrivoltaic production seems to be suitable for crops
         | such as onions, grains, potatoes, and root vegetables, perhaps
         | also strawberries or raspberries. In areas where the sunshine
         | is more intense, solar panels can reduce evaporation and lay
         | the foundation for higher production than otherwise. In
         | southern Europe, solar panels can probably be combined with
         | vines or olive bushes," says van der Pouw.
         | 
         | https://www.statkraft.com/newsroom/news-and-stories/2022/agr...
         | 
         | https://www.npr.org/2021/11/14/1054942590/solar-energy-color...
        
         | defrost wrote:
         | _Solar farm trial shows improved fleece on merino sheep grazed
         | under panels_
         | 
         | https://www.abc.net.au/news/rural/2022-05-30/solar-farm-graz...
        
         | doctorhandshake wrote:
         | If you're keyword foraging, the term for this is 'agrovoltaics'
        
           | IndrekR wrote:
           | `agrivoltaics' seems to be common.
        
         | jillesvangurp wrote:
         | That is a big topic. There are plenty of farmers doing that.
         | Especially further south, a bit of shade is actually helpful to
         | protect plants. And farmers get more revenue out of their land
         | this way too.
        
         | pandemic_region wrote:
         | Interesting, how does harvesting work then? Or they mount the
         | panels high enjoy so it's easy to get underneath?
         | 
         | Edit: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agrivoltaics It's
         | actually more straightforward than I thought.
        
         | konschubert wrote:
         | Having sheep graze under solar panels is pretty standard here
         | in Germany and it's a win for all sides.
        
         | tpm wrote:
         | Yes: https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20230424-how-
         | agrivoltaics...
        
       | xattt wrote:
       | Not to be confused with symbol for roubles, [?].
        
       | cbmuser wrote:
       | The Philippines are also considering to startup their mothballed
       | nuclear power plant.
        
       | metaphor wrote:
       | Anyone have an idea of how existing solar farms in the
       | Philippines have weathered typhoon season over the past decade?
       | 
       | The country is a proverbial magnet for typhoons, and it seems
       | like a major disaster strikes every year; wiki[1] claims half of
       | the top 10 deadliest were within the past 2 decades, and the top
       | 10 most destructive were all in the past 15 years!
       | 
       | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typhoons_in_the_Philippines
        
         | lawgimenez wrote:
         | I lived here my whole life, I experienced 2 major typhoons
         | (almost 40 years old). Not sure if major disaster strikes every
         | year is accurate.
         | 
         | Flooding is the primary concern for us during typhoons,
         | majority of the lands here are agricultural and mountainous. So
         | debris are not a concern.
        
         | ajross wrote:
         | Solar arrays are low to the ground and comparatively sturdy
         | relative to construction like housing. Are they particularly at
         | risk? This seems like an argument you could apply to any
         | industry in the coastal tropics. Yet there is industry in the
         | coastal tropics nonetheless.
        
       | angiosperm wrote:
       | It seems these are going onto existing pastureland, which should
       | be able to continue present production.
       | 
       | The Philippines has a great deal of sheltered water that could
       | host floatovoltaic installations that can opoerate more
       | efficiently than on land.
       | 
       | One of the great advantages of solar is that many small
       | installations, close to where power is needed, are better than
       | one big one. We may hope they are taking advantage of this
       | capability, too often ignored.
        
         | konschubert wrote:
         | You can still have sheep grazing under solar panels! They keep
         | the grass down and they're happy about the shade.
         | 
         | It's a win for all sides and I've seen it used extensively here
         | in Germany.
        
           | cm2187 wrote:
           | Doesn't grass need photosynthesis?
        
             | konschubert wrote:
             | Grass doesn't need direct sunlight to grow. Since the sun
             | moves, only a very small percentage of the area is in
             | shadow all day anyways.
             | 
             | I am passing by a solar farm as I am writing this. And The
             | grass below and beside the panels looks the same.
             | 
             | Here is a pic I found on the internet:
             | 
             | https://cals.ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Sheep-
             | Solar...
        
               | whatshisface wrote:
               | But there is no such thing as a free lunch, although the
               | grass will transpire less water in a solar farm, it also
               | doesn't grow as fast.
        
               | konschubert wrote:
               | Maybe. Maybe!
               | 
               | But you get a ton of electricity
        
               | bigbillheck wrote:
               | There's a lot of things that go into plant yield, and
               | it's not just as simple as "less sunlight, less grass".
        
             | margalabargala wrote:
             | There is sufficient indirect light underneath ground mount
             | solar that many plants can grow happily. Lots of plants
             | prefer shade over direct sun.
             | 
             | This is also why bifacial solar panels are so much more
             | efficient.
        
         | swores wrote:
         | > _One of the great advantages of solar is that many small
         | installations, close to where power is needed, are better than
         | one big one._
         | 
         | I'm sure it's definitely true when using the same technology in
         | both sides of the comparison (solar panels), but is it so cut
         | and dry compared to current and/or future iterations of
         | alternatives like this?
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_power_tower
        
           | pjc50 wrote:
           | The cost decreases in solar panels have basically killed all
           | the more complicated technologies in favor of Really Big
           | Photodiode.
        
       | louwrentius wrote:
       | To me, most noteworthy is the 4GWh? Of battery storage.
        
         | cbmuser wrote:
         | That's the amount of electricity that the four units at Vogtle
         | nuclear power plant produce in one hour.
        
           | louwrentius wrote:
           | You try to make the capacity sound small but for battery
           | storage it's quite large.
           | 
           | Also, comparing it to nuclear is deliberate ofcourse, but
           | nuclear energy has no future.
           | 
           | Wind, solar and battery storage is so insanely cheap, new
           | nuclear power plants are not economically viable.
        
       | mrb wrote:
       | 200 billion PHP is 3.58 billion USD. The farm is 3500 MW and has
       | 4000 MWh of battery storage. As of today 1 Wp (peak watt) of
       | mainstream solar panels costs about 0.16 USD [1], and 1 kWh of
       | li-ion battery costs about 140 USD [2]. Which means the panels
       | alone cost 560M USD, and the batteries also cost 560M USD, so
       | combined they represent 31% of the total 3.58B USD budget. It
       | seems to be not very cost-efficient, as the overhead for
       | everything else (2.46B USD) is quite large: inverters, mounting
       | hardware, grid connection, installation, inspection, etc.
       | 
       | Edit: I was basing my "not very cost-efficient" remark on the
       | fact that this solar plant is basically $1.00/W however the best
       | utility-scale solar plants achieve about $0.80/W, or 20% less.
       | However I forgot to account for the fact this plant has
       | batteries, so a higher overhead is expected. So, after all, the
       | capex is in line with what I'd expect.
       | 
       | [1] https://www.pvxchange.com/Price-Index [2]
       | https://about.bnef.com/blog/lithium-ion-battery-pack-prices-...
        
       | bfrog wrote:
       | The Philippines are beautiful, though truly all the small motor
       | vehicles going 15-20MPh everywhere are a bit ridiculous and
       | especially in Manila choke out the air.
       | 
       | It's awesome they are building solar. Soon hopefully lots of
       | small electrics or even more bicycles take the place of the
       | jeepneys, trikes, and motorbikes. The motor traffic was about the
       | worst part of being there. The countryside is beautiful.
        
         | kiba wrote:
         | The motor traffic will still be bad, just less polluting.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-02-17 23:01 UTC)