[HN Gopher] Most people with addiction simply grow out of it (2014)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Most people with addiction simply grow out of it (2014)
        
       Author : jseliger
       Score  : 77 points
       Date   : 2024-02-17 03:17 UTC (19 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (psmag.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (psmag.com)
        
       | anonzzzies wrote:
       | You can be addicted to mostly anything; 'healthy' (veg, sports
       | etc) and unhealthy. I have seen many people 'grow out of it'
       | which meant they replaced one addiction by another (or more than
       | one), but the new ones are acceptable in society so now you are
       | not an addict anymore (...). For instance, I know more than a few
       | ex harddrug addicts who are now addicted to gaming, work, sports,
       | alcohol (also a hard drug but somehow accepted and cheap), sex
       | etc.
        
         | ghuroo1 wrote:
         | I would say almost everything is acceptable once you understand
         | the balance and how it impacts you if you do/over do it.
         | 
         | I agree there are a lot of normalised addictions, including the
         | modern trend of counting every step, heart rate beat, times you
         | go in the bathroom and even sleep analysis so you can compare
         | to your friends.
        
           | lkdfjlkdfjlg wrote:
           | Can you show us a single example of someone who destroyed
           | their life because they couldn't stop counting their steps?
           | 
           | No? So maybe don't call it an "addiction" if you want words
           | to have any meaning.
        
             | d1sxeyes wrote:
             | Addictions do not have to be life destroying. Plenty of
             | people are addicted to various things but are fully
             | functional and live fulfilled lives.
             | 
             | It's a bit unfair to ask whether OP wants words to have any
             | meaning when it seems you're a bit fuzzy on the definition
             | of "addiction" yourself.
        
               | andsoitis wrote:
               | > Addictions do not have to be life destroying. Plenty of
               | people are addicted to various things but are fully
               | functional and live fulfilled lives. It's a bit unfair to
               | ask whether OP wants words to have any meaning when it
               | seems you're a bit fuzzy on the definition of "addiction"
               | yourself.
               | 
               | Wikipedia: Addiction is a neuropsychological disorder
               | characterized by a persistent and intense urge to use a
               | drug or engage in a behaviour that produces natural
               | reward, despite substantial harm and other negative
               | consequences.
               | 
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Addiction
        
               | jjulius wrote:
               | Wikipedia isn't really an authority on words,
               | specifically, though. If one goes to Merriam-Webster, an
               | actual dictionary, one sees:
               | 
               | > a: exhibiting a compulsive, chronic, physiological or
               | psychological need for a habit-forming substance,
               | behavior, or activity
               | 
               | > b: strongly inclined to do, use, or indulge in
               | something repeatedly
               | 
               | If one looks at the Oxford English Dictionary, one sees:
               | 
               | > a state of dependence produced either by the habitual
               | taking of drugs or by regularly engaging in certain
               | behaviours (e.g. gambling).
               | 
               | No specific requirement for negative consequences, just a
               | habit.
        
               | lkdfjlkdfjlg wrote:
               | No, I'm not fuzzy on the definition of addiction. If a
               | behavior has little negative effects, then it's not an
               | addiction.
        
               | rysertio wrote:
               | Most mildly addictive drugs don't have that many negative
               | effects.
        
               | bluefirebrand wrote:
               | It can be a negative effect like "I decided to skip work
               | to do the drug instead and lost my job"
        
               | jjulius wrote:
               | I dunno how else to say that not having negative effects
               | doesn't mean one isn't addicted to something. It simply
               | isn't a requirement.
        
             | jdietrich wrote:
             | Counting your steps is unlikely to destroy your life, but a
             | lot of people do suffer serious harms due to behaviours
             | like compulsive exercise and orthorexia. Obsessive-
             | compulsive behaviour around exercise often overlaps with
             | anorexia nervosa, which has the highest risk of mortality
             | of any mental disorder (~5% at 10 years). There is a
             | surprisingly fine line between compulsive health tracking
             | and a life-threatening eating disorder.
        
             | throw18376 wrote:
             | here's an interesting account of someone's advice that they
             | devised after having and recovering from an eating
             | disorder.
             | 
             | i don't know enough to endorse all their medical claims,
             | but you can get a sense of their experience.
             | 
             | you can see that for them and others, an addiction-like
             | compulsion to exercise (including literally counting steps)
             | was a big part of it.
             | 
             | https://sites.google.com/view/the-no-nonsense-guide/guide
        
             | Riseed wrote:
             | > Can you show us a single example of someone who destroyed
             | their life because they couldn't stop counting their steps?
             | 
             | 'I Am Obsessed With Taking 100,000 Steps A Day,' Woman Says
             | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OkhD0Lo-fxk
        
           | lebean wrote:
           | It's true, when I started counting my steps, I just couldn't
           | stop. Then I had to have data about my sleep and bowel
           | movements, so that I could have data-driven insights about my
           | body. My friends and family got annoyed at my compulsion to
           | gather data about mundane activities. It got so bad, I
           | started doing sexual favors to feed my habit, and I am
           | ashamed to admit I was gathering data while I did it to
           | improve my performance. Folks, be careful when you count
           | steps! It's easy to get hooked and you may end up like me!
        
             | khazhoux wrote:
             | There is help available. PM me.
        
         | BobaFloutist wrote:
         | Not every form of disordered behavior is best understood as an
         | addiction.
        
       | jdietrich wrote:
       | This is why harm reduction is absolutely crucial. A lot of people
       | will recover on their own given time, but you can't recover if
       | you're dead. A moralistic model based primarily or solely on
       | abstinence-based recovery fails addicts, their families and
       | society.
        
       | Remnant44 wrote:
       | I don't have a lot of personal experience dealing with addiction
       | in either myself or others, but TFA lays out to me a pretty
       | compelling claim that addiction is a developmental disorder. The
       | current mainstream belief of addiction as disease has always
       | seemed to me like it had a great number of holes; it's main
       | purpose was to make people stop stigmatizing addicts for moral
       | failing.
       | 
       | The comparison to ADHD made in the article is an interesting one:
       | although for sure many ADHD kids do age out of the diagnosis, I
       | know many ADHD adults who still have it significantly impact
       | their lives. What do we do with addiction if you've made it past
       | your brain developmental point and you're still addicted?
        
         | hn72774 wrote:
         | I've heard the first-time heroin experience described as
         | feeling like "being wrapped in a warm, wet blanket." What else
         | feels like that?
         | 
         | A lot of addiction is trying to get back to the comfort of the
         | womb to escape from early childhood traumas and abuses.
         | 
         | You get a taste of that with the use but never get close to it
         | again after.
        
           | curtisblaine wrote:
           | > What else feels like that?
           | 
           | Probably being wrapped in an actual warm, wet blanket.
        
       | Viliam1234 wrote:
       | Even if after a few years you grow out of an addiction, it can
       | destroy your health in the meanwhile. Or maybe you won't survive
       | those years. How many do successfully grow out of the "crocodile"
       | addiction?
       | 
       | Perhaps the actual lesson should be that addition is not a yes-
       | or-no thing, but rather a scale. For each addictive thing, it
       | would be nice to know (1) the half-time of growing out of it, and
       | (2) the distribution of health impacts during that half-time.
        
       | dang wrote:
       | Related:
       | 
       |  _Most People with Addiction Simply Grow Out of It. Why Is This
       | Widely Denied?_ - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34167068 -
       | Dec 2022 (7 comments)
       | 
       |  _Most People With Addiction Grow Out of It (2014)_ -
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19013480 - Jan 2019 (125
       | comments)
       | 
       |  _Most People with Addiction Simply Grow Out of It_ -
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8396375 - Oct 2014 (156
       | comments)
        
       | iammjm wrote:
       | I wonder about where habits end and addictions begin. I think
       | once a ball is rolling it's not easy to stop it, as it kinda does
       | it on itself
        
         | baxtr wrote:
         | The best definition I've read somewhere was along the lines:
         | addiction is something you do repeatedly even though you know
         | it's harmful for you.
        
           | dylan604 wrote:
           | This makes it sound like you trying to say addiction is a
           | mental thing. When your body is physically addicted so that
           | you are sick and in pain because you didn't dose, that's not
           | mental. At that point, it could be more harmful to not fix
           | regardless if you know it or not.
        
       | rysertio wrote:
       | This article confuses drug use with addiction. Addiction is a
       | state where a patient wants to quit a drug, but can't. And that
       | is when you want to intervene as a psychiatrist.
        
         | frereubu wrote:
         | Can you say where the article does this? It seems pretty
         | explicit to me, with the key word being _diagnosable_ : "I quit
         | at around the age when, according to large epidemiological
         | studies, most people who have diagnosable addiction problems do
         | so -- without treatment."
        
       | LAC-Tech wrote:
       | Alternately, you just execute people for drug trafficking. A
       | total win in terms of net human suffering.
        
         | rpmisms wrote:
         | El Salvador seems to be quite happy these days...
        
           | LAC-Tech wrote:
           | The murder rate of the USA is now almost 3 times higher than
           | that of El Salvadors.
           | 
           | New Zealand now has more murder than El Salvador.
        
             | rpmisms wrote:
             | Sometimes it's really amazing how simple, first-principles
             | solutions are mind-bogglingly effective.
        
         | nurumaik wrote:
         | In terms of net human suffering we can execute everyone. No
         | people -- no suffering
        
           | LAC-Tech wrote:
           | That would increase total suffering, as people condemned to
           | be executed will under go a great deal of suffering.
        
       | fons wrote:
       | > ONLY A QUARTER OF PEOPLE WHO RECOVER HAVE EVER SOUGHT
       | ASSISTANCE IN DOING SO (INCLUDING VIA 12-STEP PROGRAMS). THIS
       | ACTUALLY MAKES ADDICTIONS THE PSYCHIATRIC DISORDER WITH THE
       | HIGHEST ODDS OF RECOVERY.
       | 
       | Confirmation bias at its best.
        
       | marifjeren wrote:
       | this is a lot more hopeful messaging than I'm used to hearing
       | about addiction but I also think it's worth noting this
       | limitation from the study:
       | 
       | """ institutionalized individuals or those who experienced fatal
       | or severe consequences due to their SUD may have not been sampled
       | """
       | 
       | And also.. the average remission times for these addictions are
       | still very long, e.g. roughly 15 years for heroin or alcohol
        
       | AtlasBarfed wrote:
       | What was the followup to the "Vietnam vets addicted to heroin
       | that stopped when they came back"? That was a hot internet topic
       | about, what 5-10 years ago that was basically alleging addiction
       | was strongly tied to surroundings/social graph?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-02-17 23:00 UTC)