[HN Gopher] Not Without Us - Joseph Weizenbaum (1986)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Not Without Us - Joseph Weizenbaum (1986)
        
       Author : drcwpl
       Score  : 36 points
       Date   : 2024-02-15 12:08 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (dl.acm.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (dl.acm.org)
        
       | nonrandomstring wrote:
       | This has been floating around HN for two days and hasn't received
       | any comments, but it's an insanely prescient paper much apropos
       | the 1800+ comments in threads on "video AI".
        
       | ebcode wrote:
       | Thanks for posting this. For those unaware, Weizenbaum wrote one
       | of the first chatbots, ELIZA.
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Weizenbaum
        
       | dyoo1979 wrote:
       | Thank you for bringing this up. I had not read this before, but
       | it speaks to my deep concerns.
        
       | neilv wrote:
       | > _[...] the building next to the one in which I work, the world
       | famous Draper Laboratory. [...] devoted almost entirely to
       | missile guidance and submarine navigation._
       | 
       | In front of that Draper building, there was a strange pillar,
       | which I liked to imagine housed a geo-positioning reference point
       | -- perhaps even the origin of a coordinate system. Then, if ever
       | there were an ICBM guidance failure, on that fateful day, Draper
       | might be ground (0,0,0). Like an engineer standing under the
       | bridge they built, as the first trucks drive over it.
       | 
       | I was thinking of that as intentional/conscious by the engineers.
       | 
       | (BTW, I'm not criticizing; only a little dark humor reflection
       | upon a grave, world-ending responsibility. Given that nuclear
       | weapons were inevitable, I'm glad my country has some, that
       | apparently MAD has worked thus far, and that there hasn't yet
       | been an apocalyptic incident. I also hope that certain autocratic
       | world leaders are taking their vitamins, and won't get even
       | nuttier.)
        
         | RCitronsBroker wrote:
         | considering how close to the edge of extermination we already
         | have been brought, calling MAD successful leaves a real bad
         | taste in my mouth.
        
           | neilv wrote:
           | I had left it at "apparently MAD has worked thus far", not
           | getting into the _almost didn 't_. It still might end us.
           | 
           | Also, think of all the past plausible/likely bad scenarios
           | that MAD averted, such as involving the Soviets.
           | 
           | I sometimes joke about a utopian future of humanity, all
           | peace and love, for thousands of years... until we encounter
           | malevolent space aliens. Humanity had lost the ability to
           | even reason about such a conflict, unable to imagine many
           | options. Fortunately, humanity had maintained the cryogenic
           | suspension of Kissinger and other historical figures capable
           | of cold-blooded ruthlessness. And there was a Thaw button.
           | (In some versions of the story, as soon as the anti-dream
           | team wakes up and starts talking, we decide they're even
           | worse than the space aliens.)
        
             | kwhitefoot wrote:
             | Not quite the same but you have reminded me of Clarke's The
             | City and The Stars.
        
             | flir wrote:
             | This is the plot to Demolition Man :D
        
       | RCitronsBroker wrote:
       | this paper, without failing, makes me cry.
        
       | neilv wrote:
       | A couple decades ago, when I was talking with the inventor of
       | some aviation safety stuff, about working with them, he said some
       | of their work involves the military, and asked whether I'd be OK
       | with that.
       | 
       | I (thinking of some of the better ideals) said something
       | favorable about the sense of honor/duty/etc., and that I just
       | didn't work on weapons systems nor domestic surveillance. I'd
       | actually thought of it before, and those two spaces seemed
       | problematic.
       | 
       | Earlier, I'd actually worked (on non-mil things) with someone who
       | at previous company had been a manager for a defensive military
       | system. Which system everyone had seen on CNN, shooting down
       | conventional missiles that some aggressor was launching at
       | civilians. Which was great (albeit, CNN sometimes strayed into
       | propaganda, and maybe not all the great stories were true).
       | 
       | But, thinking of that great defensive use, I also thought that I
       | wouldn't want to someday see on CNN something I worked on being
       | used for something terrible. It wouldn't be sufficient to claim
       | that I thought the Slaughtertron 3000 would only ever be used for
       | good. Even a purely defensive system (Shieldtron 4000) could be
       | used to shield an aggressor -- leaving the victims less able to
       | defend themselves, and making aggression more viable.
       | 
       | We'd all do well to read things like this article, and think
       | about what we choose to work on, and how we do it. Then follow
       | through on our better thoughts, in our behavior.
       | 
       | In particular, the tech industry overall has become a festival of
       | sociopathy. With many techbros, in moments of reflection,
       | rationalizing, "but I gotta feed my family", while pulling down
       | quite a lot more money than we need to do that.
       | 
       | That wasn't very defensible when coders were regularly hopping
       | jobs with 5-6 figure pay bumps each time, or doing startups that
       | essentially involved selling out users and oftentimes later
       | investors, ignoring regulations, etc. Even now that jobs are
       | looking a lot less certain for most people, we still need to be
       | very skeptical of ourselves every time we grasp for rationale.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-02-16 23:00 UTC)