[HN Gopher] McDonald's Making Job Applicants Take Weird AI Perso...
___________________________________________________________________
McDonald's Making Job Applicants Take Weird AI Personality Tests
Author : hjek
Score : 20 points
Date : 2024-02-15 20:43 UTC (2 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (futurism.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (futurism.com)
| givemeethekeys wrote:
| Ah, the blue people test. There's a company thats selling these
| personality tests to large companies.
|
| Any job that requires that you be an obedient little robot will
| require that you take such a personality test.
| lp0_on_fire wrote:
| It's bad enough many companies want to run invasive background
| checks (up to and including pulling your credit) for
| milquetoast low-paying-entry-level jobs now they want people to
| take some bastardized version of Myers-Briggs which itself is
| pseudoscience?
|
| I sorta understand a company wanting to do that for some
| C-level or upper management position, or for a finance person
| responsible for the books...but for a burger flipper???
| mistrial9 wrote:
| those with the least ability to say NO will be the targets at
| first. Similar case with PTSD veterans, incarcerated
| individuals, those alone at the end of their lives, some
| family law situations etc.. IMO there is literally no bottom
| to this, and it can and does require real legislation.
| maayank wrote:
| Do you know the name of the company/other references about this
| test?
| lmz wrote:
| The company is mentioned in the article.
|
| > The aforementioned companies are all contracted with
| Paradox.ai, a "conversational recruiting software" company
| ...
| olliej wrote:
| Someone really needs to test how these "personality tests" are
| actually "testing" people. This feels very much like "let's
| launder bias by using 'algorithms' that do the discrimination
| because they're trained on existing bias"
| senkora wrote:
| > Paradox's "Traitify" product, which uses the strange slides to
| lump applicants into "Big Five" or "OCEAN" personality groups,
| rating them on how open, conscientious, extraverted, agreeable,
| and neurotic they are.
|
| For the record, the correct answer is always to be low on
| neuroticism and high on everything else. The role doesn't matter;
| that is always the "ideal" personality and any deviation is a
| defect that will only be tolerated if they are having trouble
| filling the role.
| mordechai9000 wrote:
| Many years ago, barely out of high school, I took a test for a
| temporary warehouse stock picking job. The test was primarily
| concerned with the applicants' attitude to authority and
| violence. Oh, and theft, of course. Many questions were
| repetitive, and used slight variation in wording or reversed
| meaning to ask the same things over and over again.
|
| So, on a scale of 1 to 10, how much do you agree with these
| statements? Sometimes it is ok to hit people. I feel like
| hitting my boss sometimes. Some people deserve to be punched.
| Sometimes is is necessary to use violence to solve a problem.
| Taking pens from work isn't really stealing. Etc.
|
| I suppose they must've managed to screen out at least some of
| the people who are not very smart and prone to violence and
| theft.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-02-15 23:01 UTC)