[HN Gopher] Carl Griffith's 1847 Oregon Trail Sourdough Starter
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Carl Griffith's 1847 Oregon Trail Sourdough Starter
        
       Author : axiomdata316
       Score  : 85 points
       Date   : 2024-02-10 02:09 UTC (20 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (carlsfriends.net)
 (TXT) w3m dump (carlsfriends.net)
        
       | voisin wrote:
       | I understand that the microbes in a starter change quite quickly
       | to the microbes in the surrounding environment. I.e. that buying
       | a starter from a distant place doesn't mean you are getting the
       | terroir of that location. I cannot at the moment find where I
       | read this but I think I've come across it several times and that
       | it is sort of common knowledge.
        
         | taylorfinley wrote:
         | From the FAQ: "Could local environmental organisms change the
         | starter? Possibly. Some microbiologists did a study on how
         | stable established strong and healthy starters are and they
         | found that essentially, a strong starter out-competes other
         | organisms in the environment and keeps its characteristics.
         | This is what we have found with our starter. It continues with
         | its characteristics since we have been providing it."
        
           | darkerside wrote:
           | Wouldn't it then outcompetes those microbes outside of the
           | starter itself, and change the local terroir over time?
        
           | irrational wrote:
           | Of course the ones wanting you to pay them money would say
           | that.
        
             | mrb wrote:
             | Ah yes, the corruption power of all the money they must be
             | making with that extra $0.05 when they ask to mail $2.00
             | for an international stamp that costs $1.95...
        
             | 0ct4via wrote:
             | Let's take (over) 65,000 starts distributed since 2000 on
             | the Carl's friends site[1] - and call it 65k for rounding.
             | 
             | That's 65k starters, with your negative unhelpful comment
             | assuming $0.05 / 5C/ "profit" per starter.
             | 
             | That's 325,000C/ - or $3250 USD "made" in nearly a quarter
             | of a century.
             | 
             | That "profit" discounts 24 years of:
             | 
             | - PO Box rental - web hosting - domain fees - labels and
             | bags for starters to go out in - envelopes, if the one
             | provided isn't suitable or sufficient - electricity for
             | refrigeration and freezing of starters - ingredients for
             | feeding and maintaining the starters
             | 
             | $3250 over 24 years gives a mean of $135 per year --
             | obviously this will fluctuate from year to year, and costs
             | have risen since the early 00's -- likewise there have
             | probably been more requests as the internet has grown more
             | popular, and the word of Carl's friend spread further.
             | 
             | If you think ~$135 (or even ~$100 on a slow year) is
             | sufficient for everything above -- never mind the time and
             | work donated by the growers and keeper of the mail box --
             | then you're very much mistaken.
             | 
             | Furthermore, if you think they're being "paid" for their
             | work out of that, your misanthropic and "negative nancy"
             | response, is sorely mistaken.
             | 
             | Of course, all of this presumes that every item is
             | international shipping, and paid for in the "substituted"
             | two $1 bills, or IRC.
             | 
             | 1. For US domestic shipping, they just ask for a 63C/ self-
             | addressed and stamped envelope [2]
             | 
             | 2. For your profit-implying "they want you to pay them"
             | comment, see:
             | 
             | "Requests sent outside the US require $1.55 US postage *or*
             | substitute two U.S. one-dollar bills or an IRC
             | (International Reply Coupon)" [2]
             | 
             | Note the "or" part -- it's a choice, not a mandate.
             | 
             | Firstly, you can send them what it costs, $1.55, as you
             | like - via PayPal, cash in an envelope, whatever. Their
             | "two $1 bills" option is handy for places like Canada which
             | may have US note currency -- and the IRC is useful in
             | places that don't have US currency in regular circulation.
             | 
             | Secondly, many places don't actually sell international
             | reply coupons any more. While the UPU mandates their
             | acceptance and swapping for postage, they don't mandate the
             | sale of IRCs [3]. For example, Royal Mail (in the UK)
             | hasn't sold them since December 2011 -- therefore requiring
             | the use of PayPal, finding $2 in bills somehow, or sending
             | the $1.95 in change.
             | 
             | If you think Carl's friends have somehow become massively
             | rich over the past quarter-century by _checks notes_
             | mailing out carefully-maintained 1847 sourdough starter,
             | likely at a loss... please let us know how you 've worked
             | that one out.
             | 
             | [1] http://carlsfriends.net [2]
             | http://carlsfriends.net/source.html [3]
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_reply_coupon
        
         | NaOH wrote:
         | The typical changeover in a sourdough culture moving locations
         | is about one month, assuming regular feeding. As a professional
         | bread baker I am disappointed that this fact is often
         | withheld/obscured by people selling portions of their starters.
         | If there weren't significant location-based differences then,
         | for example, the distinctive San Francisco sourdough flavor
         | could be replicated by sourdough bakers anywhere. Likewise,
         | Puratos--a company generally known for its manufacture and
         | sales of baking mixes--wouldn't maintain a sourdough library,
         | akin to the Svalbard seed vault.
         | 
         | The best reason to acquire an existing sourdough culture would
         | be to start with a healthy, vibrant culture. I think the gain
         | is minimal, both in time and labor. And the person who will
         | typically have a lasting interest in sourdough bread baking is
         | someone who is drawn to the whole process and not after that
         | type of shortcut, especially during the initial learning
         | stages.
        
           | echelon wrote:
           | Another way to look at this is that your existing cultures
           | can be invaded, colonized, and replaced over time.
           | 
           | The thing you think is constant and unchanging might be
           | metamorphosing just as much as your hometown in the face of
           | real estate development.
           | 
           | Nobody keeps these in labs or -40 C and below freezers, so
           | they'll absolutely face invasive evolutionary pressures.
        
           | geokon wrote:
           | I heard that "the distinctive San Francisco sourdough flavor"
           | was due to the water. The Hetchhetchy water in SF has a very
           | distinctive taste. One of the only cities I go to regularly
           | where the tap water tastes amazing
        
             | taveras wrote:
             | http://carlsfriends.net/SourdoughFAQ/32-San-Francisco-
             | Sourdo...
        
               | sndean wrote:
               | You can buy some of that Lactobacillus species from ATCC:
               | https://www.atcc.org/products/27651 They also sell
               | bacterial pathogens and other things useful for
               | researchers, so that's pretty interesting (at least to
               | me). I never really think about the overlap of food and
               | microbes.
               | 
               | It's also called Fructilactobacillus sanfranciscensis in
               | some places. I can't quickly tell which is the more
               | recent naming and what lead to that change. It's lactic
               | acid bacteria regardless.
        
         | bongodongobob wrote:
         | I think the idea would be that you only use small portions of
         | the starter, not the whole thing. I'm familiar with keeping
         | yeast cultures for brewing and this seems to be the technique
         | if you are keeping live cultures.
         | 
         | Get your sample, split it up, and keep track of the
         | generations.
        
           | deaddodo wrote:
           | The only way you can keep a "pure" influence would be to use
           | the entire sample donated to you by the company (and even
           | then, there will be local influence).
           | 
           | Bread doesn't pick up a ton of bacteria during it's
           | fermentation period, it's the feeding cycle where it will. If
           | you split the culture into many small ones, you're just
           | guaranteeing all of them will be supplanted the moment
           | they're fed.
        
             | bongodongobob wrote:
             | Can't you sterilize what you're feeding it? I don't get it.
        
         | plorg wrote:
         | Ken Forkish says basically this in Flour Salt Yeast, but I also
         | assume it is relatively well known among the more empirically-
         | minded bakers. In any case the flavors developed in the bread
         | will have much more to do with both the hydration of the dough
         | and the temperature it rises at (as I understand it these will
         | affect the balance of acetic and lactic acid development as
         | well as the CO2 and trace ethanol production in the starter).
         | In Ken's book he asserts that the difference in flavor between
         | sourdough in different places has more to do with local(ly-
         | developed) tastes, recipes, and practices.
         | 
         | My sense is that you would have to be a very practiced (that
         | is, consistent) baker to notice the difference imparted by the
         | possibility culture in your own bread.
        
           | carlmr wrote:
           | >Ken Forkish says basically this in Flour Salt Yeast
           | 
           | To anybody reading this. I can not recommend this book
           | enough. It takes you from making so so bread to amazing bread
           | if you read it for a day or two.
        
             | barsonme wrote:
             | My only complaint is that his sourdough starter chapter has
             | you make buckets of the stuff. Maybe it's supposed to make
             | it more difficult to screw up, I dunno.
        
               | deaddodo wrote:
               | He makes everything at industrial yields and doesn't
               | bother to adjust for home use/yields.
        
               | dredmorbius wrote:
               | And, protip: the secret is _bakers ' percentages_.
               | 
               | That is, to scale a recipe up or down, hold the
               | relationships of ingredients proportionate to that of
               | flour, by mass.
               | 
               | E.g., a typical starter is fed at a 100% ratio: 1 unit of
               | flour to one unit of water. So, 100g, 1,000g, 200g,
               | whatevs. Similarly for your dough, which is often
               | described in terms of _hydration_. A very low hydration
               | might be 50%, a typical novice dough about 60--65%
               | (excellent for pizza crusts and rolls in my experience),
               | 80% should start giving a very _open crumb_ (with large
               | voids and bubbles), and 100%+ used for high whole-grain
               | flour, or _very_ open-crumb breads. Higher hydration
               | makes for more challenging handling, though with time
               | most bakers develop a feel for this.
               | 
               | There are of course a myriad of other factors, and one of
               | the joys (or frustrations) of sourdough baking is
               | exploring those parameters. My experience is that even my
               | disasters taste amazing, though visual appearances may be
               | less impressive. Amongst those: temperature (hugely
               | significant for both starter and sponge/dough/proofing),
               | proofing time (warm and cold/retarded), types of flour,
               | age of flour, oven temperatures, humidity, and probably a
               | whole lot more. Again, even when things don't go to plan,
               | the results are almost always rewarding. When you do
               | happen to hit the magic balance, it's amazing. My bad
               | batches are still amongst the best bread I've ever eaten.
               | 
               | Good baking books and online guides will discuss this.
        
               | garof wrote:
               | His follow up 'Evolutions in Bread' is scaled down for
               | single loaves, either the round or in a bread pan.
               | Including the starter. Also the discard problem is
               | addressed.
        
             | i_am_proteus wrote:
             | I found Forkish's book to be skippable. A lot of that
             | flufftype "writing about thoughts about food" content to
             | increase the length, similar to what you might find on a
             | web log.
             | 
             | A good book on bread is called _Bread_ and it is by Jeffrey
             | Hamelman, published by Wiley.
             | 
             | He understands you might not know anything about bread. All
             | recipes are well-explained and scaled to both the home
             | kitchen and the professional bakery. No web log style
             | writing to waste the reader's time.
        
           | deaddodo wrote:
           | > My sense is that you would have to be a very practiced
           | (that is, consistent) baker to notice the difference imparted
           | by the possibility culture in your own bread.
           | 
           | The difference that San Francisco lactic bacteria impart on
           | bread flavoring is obvious and pronounced. It does not take
           | an expert or particularly trained taster to taste. It is a
           | literal mutant strain of the bacteria.
           | 
           | I do agree, however, that this statement is probably true of
           | other regional varieties of naturally leavened breads.
           | Assuming everything else is equal.
        
         | irrational wrote:
         | This is true. Just make your own. If you buy one and start
         | feeding it, soon it will be identical to the one you could have
         | made on your own. All it requires is flour and water and time.
        
           | dredmorbius wrote:
           | And by "time", to clarify, a week or two of regular (1x to 2x
           | daily) feedings.
        
             | deaddodo wrote:
             | Unless you're baking 3+ times a week, it doesn't make sense
             | to keep a constant fresh culture. This is the biggest
             | deterrent to many people getting into it, in fact.
             | 
             | If you want to bake occasionally, you can just refeed after
             | using a portion, letting revitalize to between 70% and peak
             | and tossing in the fridge for 1-2 weeks.
             | 
             | Also, as a side addendum, if you're worried about using
             | your culture at "peak strength", then just avoid the
             | question altogether and just make an overnight preferment
             | of some sort (sponge, poolish) from the culture.
        
               | bluGill wrote:
               | I make sourdough pancakes several times per week. This
               | keeps my starter fresh. I don't measure, just an egg, a
               | bit of oil (50-75ml) beat well then add starter until my
               | bowel is around half full (500-600ml) and mix some more.
               | Then disolve a couble scoups (10 ml) of baking soda in
               | water (50-70ml) and mix in. Cook fast.
        
               | dredmorbius wrote:
               | These are delish, and you can absolutely play with the
               | recipe.
        
               | amluto wrote:
               | I use baking powder for this. It works about as well
               | (although you need more of it), but it minimizes the risk
               | of localized areas of too much baking soda, which tastes
               | quite nasty.
        
               | dredmorbius wrote:
               | Sure, and I've had lags of days, weeks, or even months in
               | using starter. _Too_ long and you risk mould formation,
               | which I 've recently dealt with.
               | 
               | In that case, I ended up starting over from some dried
               | starter which has been sitting in the freezer since April
               | 2020. A tablespoon of that with an otherwise typical feed
               | (100g flour, 100g water), and about six feeds before the
               | starter was back up to desired activity.
               | 
               | "Discard" is a term that's relative to your starter batch
               | itself. There are recipes for discard, one of the
               | simplest is a "starter pancake", which I realised was
               | pretty much a crumpet, and indeed adding about 1/2 tsp
               | salt and 1 tsp baking soda gives the bubbly form of a
               | familiar crumpet. Fry in butter or oil in a small frying
               | pan or using crumpet rings, about 5 minutes per side. To
               | prepare for eating, toast about 3--4 minutes.
               | 
               | These may be eaten sweet (butter and jam) or savory
               | (onions, eggs, tomatoes, etc.), as desired.
               | 
               | There are collections of starter discard recipes.
               | 
               | If you're only baking a few times weekly, storing your
               | starter in the fridge is fine. For longer downtimes, I
               | strongly recommend drying and freezing your starter once
               | established. As I wrote elsewhere in this thread, _make
               | backups_.
               | 
               | It's also possible to feed daily and store the discard
               | for a weekly batch of discard-friendly recipes (crumpets,
               | English Muffins, sourdough pancakes, and numerous
               | others).
        
               | dredmorbius wrote:
               | Also to clarify: _creating_ a starter is different from
               | _maintaining_ one.
               | 
               | In the initial stage, your goal is to cultivate yeast in
               | your source flour and/or environment (far more the former
               | than the latter AFAIU), and have them reach a state where
               | your starter is highly active 8--12 hours after a feeding
               | or so. _That_ requires frequent feeding, 1x to 2x daily,
               | for a week or two.
               | 
               |  _Once you 've achieved that goal_, your starter becomes
               | far lower maintenance, and typically requires feeding
               | only prior to use _and_ once a week or so as a
               | maintenance process. (I 've found I can feed less
               | frequently than this, while refrigerating a sealed jar of
               | starter, but you risk losing the whole batch.)
               | 
               | So, yes, you do need to go through a period of daily or
               | twice-daily feedings initially. But you don't need to
               | sustain that indefinitely.
               | 
               | And again as noted by others, the removeed "discard"
               | starter left over after a feeding can itself be used for
               | quick and simple baking recipes.
               | 
               | (When baking, that "discard" is the levain which you're
               | adding to your dough or recipe.)
        
         | dredmorbius wrote:
         | Where "local environment" is extraordinarily influenced by the
         | flour you feed your starter with.
         | 
         | Which itself is influenced by growing location and conditions,
         | storage, transport, and distribution, etc.
         | 
         | I'd be interested in seeing specific research on how much "wild
         | yeast" and lactobacilli _outside_ of the feeder flour actually
         | influences starter. My strong suspicion is that this is
         | somewhat less than is often considered, if only because of the
         | difficulty of starting one 's own sourdough from sterilised
         | flour (bleached), which is to say, being highly dependent on
         | wild yeast.
         | 
         | The other factor I suspect is the evolution of one's own
         | starter culture based on conditions (feed frequency,
         | temperature, flour, storage conditions, light/darkness, etc.)
         | in which it exists.
        
           | bluGill wrote:
           | Unpleached flour is easially available in the stores where I
           | live. That is how I started my starter this summer.
        
             | dredmorbius wrote:
             | Unbleached flour can work. It typically takes longer.
             | 
             | Whole meal, or other flours (rye and spelt notably) can
             | really "juice" the process. Rye seems to strongly encourage
             | starter activity.
             | 
             | Mixing even only 1/4 of an alternate (whole meal, rye,
             | spelt) in with unbleached flour makes new starter
             | development much faster, and can also help refresh an older
             | starter.
        
         | ycombinete wrote:
         | I moved once, out into a desert area. The microbes in the new
         | environment were so virulent and horrible that my starter was
         | instantly destroyed.
         | 
         | Every new starter I tried would flare up into great bubbles
         | after one day, and would just stink to high heavens after 3. It
         | looked like a great starter, but exuded the most revolting
         | rotten smell.
         | 
         | I tried bleaching all the containers. Changing flours. Storing
         | it in a different place. Nothing. Something out there in the
         | desert was ready each time.
        
           | a_gnostic wrote:
           | Have you tried radiation?
           | 
           | https://hackaday.com/2018/05/12/a-vacuum-tube-and-
           | barbecue-l...
        
           | djur wrote:
           | Did you try baking with it?
        
       | poulsbohemian wrote:
       | I got some of this years ago - was a pretty good starter, but I'm
       | not sure it is really anything different from whatever starter
       | your neighbor might have available. If you don't have a neighbor
       | or friend with a starter, years ago there was a thread on HN
       | about people making their own starters with good success.
        
         | gerad wrote:
         | I've made my own starter a couple times. It's really no big
         | deal. Takes a couple weeks of waiting but maybe an hour of
         | total time over that two weeks.
        
         | taylorfinley wrote:
         | I've made my own! This was 15 years ago or so, in Los Angeles.
         | It was fun as a hobby project; I started a bunch, harvesting
         | wild yeasts from my kitchen, outdoors, etc. A couple turned out
         | pretty yummy, a couple were pretty funky. But recently I bought
         | some dried starter from a well-respected line and have been
         | blown away with how much _better_ the starter we bought is
         | compared to the wild harvested runs I tried. If a friend asked
         | I would tell them it 's really not worth it to use a wild
         | strain unless your hobby is microbiology... If your hobby is
         | baking, stick with a known-good starter.
        
           | poulsbohemian wrote:
           | > If a friend asked I would tell them it's really not worth
           | it to use a wild strain unless your hobby is microbiology...
           | If your hobby is baking, stick with a known-good starter.
           | 
           | I really agree with this, given my own experiences, but I
           | will say some of the best bread I ever had came from a chef
           | who started his own at a wilderness camp. Anyone who came out
           | to camp, he would share it, but unfortunately mine went bad
           | after a while.
        
           | yumraj wrote:
           | Which one did you buy?
        
         | dredmorbius wrote:
         | King Arthur has a recipe for those interested:
         | 
         | <https://www.kingarthurbaking.com/blog/2012/04/05/make-
         | your-o...>
         | 
         | There's now quite a sourdough ... culture ... substantially
         | invigorated after the Covid-19 pandemic (xkcd:2296), with
         | books, podcasts, websites, vloggers, etc. I picked up much of
         | my own baking knowledge through these (starting with a few YT
         | videos, and progressing through my own experimentation and
         | further research). I'm still going and just had a couple of
         | slices of my latest batch with eggs.
         | 
         | Starters are startlingly resilient, though you can kill them
         | off or spoil them, largely through heat or prolonged regret.
         | 
         | As any good sysadmin knows, good backups are essential. I'd
         | restarted my batch from a pinch of dough that was proofing in
         | the fridge after one inglorious encounter with a microwave and
         | housemate. After that I dried and froze a batch (King Arthur
         | covers this as well: <>), and a tablespoon of the frozen
         | starter plus about a half-dozen feedings has it going strong
         | again. (This differs from KA's recovery method, but worked.)
         | 
         | Drying another batch to freeze as we speak, can never be too
         | sure ;-)
         | 
         | Using someone else's starter can help bootstrap the process,
         | but your own environment's selective pressures and new sources
         | of yeast, most of whice come from whole-meal flour, which is
         | what you should use to start your own batch. Note that
         | _bleached_ white flour, whilst it can be used to bake or feed
         | however much I 'd advise against it, typically lacks any active
         | yeast. I did do some baking with unbleached flour when that was
         | all that could be obtained, and the results while poorer than
         | with unbleached / whole-meal were still quite acceptable, just
         | not my preference.
        
         | jzb wrote:
         | We got some during the pandemic. My wife went through the "make
         | your own bread" phase with great enthusiasm. (And results!)
         | We'd tend to Carl, our container of starter, and talk about how
         | well it was doing. Then it trailed off and it's gone to stater
         | heaven. Pity.
        
           | misiti3780 wrote:
           | I also started baking during COVID and now I'm obsessed. I
           | wish it paid as well as software, I would do it full-time.
        
         | deaddodo wrote:
         | The only shipped starter that will ever make a difference is
         | San Francisco starter and that's because there is a literal
         | mutant bacteria in the culture that causes much higher lactic
         | activity than normal. And it'll only make a difference if you
         | use it straight.
         | 
         | All other shipped starters are just a shortcut to going to a
         | local baker and asking for a donation (I've done this dozens of
         | times, all over the world; when I've wanted a fresh/homemade
         | loaf), or just spending a week's time and ~350g of wasted flour
         | developing your own.
        
           | yumraj wrote:
           | Who ships from SF?
           | 
           | Is there a bakery that sells? Boudin doesn't as far as I
           | know.
        
       | nanolith wrote:
       | I recently introduced my wife to the process of creating a
       | sourdough starter. We created our own over two weeks. I used the
       | yeast and bacteria in the starter to jump start a crock of
       | peppers that I'm fermenting to make hot sauce.
        
       | sharphall wrote:
       | https://www.denverpost.com/2024/02/01/carl-griffith-oregon-t...
       | 
       | Apparently it has blown up on TikTok and they are overwhelmed
       | with requests.
        
       | zoky wrote:
       | I tried this once and ended up dying of dysentery...
        
         | jb1991 wrote:
         | Lucky. I caught smallpox from mine.
        
           | doodlebugging wrote:
           | Are those scars on your face from learning how to use
           | silverware?
           | 
           | Back in the early 80's when Walmart was a new thing in towns
           | across the country, I found a t-shirt with that question
           | printed on it.
        
       | petesergeant wrote:
       | > History Of The Starter? In the mid 1800's the Oregon Trail was
       | the main route west for settlers, farmers, lumbermen and
       | prospectors. The Trail started in the state of Missouri in about
       | the center of the continental US and meandered WNW for about 2000
       | miles to the Oregon Territory. Other trails branched off of the
       | main trail, SW to Santa Fe and west to California and elsewhere.
       | The Starter came West in 1847 with one of Carl's ancestors who
       | traveled the Oregon Trail to Oregon by wagon train.
        
       | kylegalbraith wrote:
       | It's always a lot of fun to see stuff like this on HN. It's a
       | reminder that there are still a lot of fun and amusing things on
       | the internet.
       | 
       | I also love seeing stupid simple HTML sites like this. It's
       | hideous to look at but it serves exactly the purpose it's there
       | to do. It's also really fast.
        
         | codazoda wrote:
         | I make a little framework for "stupid simple HTML sites" and
         | use it as a "starter" for most of my own work.
         | 
         | https://neat.joeldare.com
        
         | m0d0nne11 wrote:
         | Bah! when I requested _my_ sample way back in `96 we only had
         | USENET, and we LIKED it!
        
         | sneak wrote:
         | It's also easy to make stupid simple HTML sites that aren't
         | hideous to look at (CSS doesn't make it slow) that are fit for
         | purpose and are really, really fast. My website is one such
         | example.
         | 
         | Putting JS in the render path is a mistake.
        
       | ggm wrote:
       | "It depends"
       | 
       | https://www.agriculture.gov.au/biosecurity-trade/policy/legi...
       | 
       | (Australia)
        
       | teruakohatu wrote:
       | > NOTE: Jan 2024: We have been slammed with thousands of requests
       | (20 times the usual amount) so please be patient in the time it
       | will take to receive your starter.
        
       | m0d0nne11 wrote:
       | Wow! I sent off for a sample back in 1996 but IIRC I managed to
       | kill it before baking a decent loaf - maybe I'll try again.
       | 
       | (Being a packrat I still have the original emails...)
        
       | m0d0nne11 wrote:
       | Anybody here ever attempted to develop a Desem culture as
       | described in the Laurel's Kitchen Bread Book?
        
       | davidw wrote:
       | Burns, Oregon (Carl's home town) and Harney County do not appear
       | on Hacker News very often, but what an amazing place it is.
       | 
       | Recently, it's probably best known for the Bundy family and
       | company taking over the wildlife refuge south of Burns.
       | 
       | But it's well worth a visit for some of the natural attractions,
       | the most prominent of which is Steens Mountain and the Alvord
       | Desert just below it to the east.
       | 
       | Much of it is incredibly remote - the county is more than 10,000
       | square miles ( 26,490 km2 - more than half the size of the
       | Netherlands and twice the size of Connecticut ) and has fewer
       | than 8000 people.
       | 
       | https://harneycounty.com/
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-02-10 23:02 UTC)