[HN Gopher] Lessons Learned from Payments Startups
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Lessons Learned from Payments Startups
        
       Author : ben_s
       Score  : 58 points
       Date   : 2024-02-07 07:52 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.pgrs.net)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.pgrs.net)
        
       | tommiegannert wrote:
       | This is a nicely varied list of lessons.
       | 
       | > Often, I will prefer the database to logging
       | 
       | Just don't start writing exception logs to the database, and not
       | tell anyone that you've created a flood gate that will make you
       | run out of production data storage at the worst possible time.
        
       | zeroxfe wrote:
       | I wrote a [1] post-mortem when I shut down my payment startup a
       | few years ago. The vast majority of our challenges were non-
       | technical: navigating regulation, high legal costs, complex
       | insurance requirements, etc. on an uneven playing field with
       | competitors with much deeper pockets than even a well-funded
       | startup.
       | 
       | [1] https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/quid-sudo-shutdown-h-now-
       | mohi...
        
         | algo_trader wrote:
         | Nice write up, and i hope you dont regret the journey
         | 
         | I am surprised you didnt mention fraud - is it because micro-
         | payments are not "fraud worthy" or because it is a manageable
         | problem ?
        
           | zeroxfe wrote:
           | We designed our systems to be resistant to certain types of
           | fraud, but never got successful enough to be a target. :-/
           | 
           | But also, yes, micropayments are far less "fraud worthy" from
           | an attackers perspective.
        
         | potamic wrote:
         | The payments platform you talk about is a piece of tech every
         | financial company ends up building. What did you do with all
         | that code after shutting down? Did you consider either selling
         | or open sourcing it?
        
       | umeshunni wrote:
       | These are great lessons from an engineering perspective. From a
       | product perspective, I've learned 3 hard lessons:
       | 
       | 1. Fraudsters will find your product and abuse it before real
       | users do. If you see a sudden spike in usage, it's probably
       | fraud.
       | 
       | 2. Real users are very emotional when it comes to their money,
       | even if it's a "low volume transaction" like $20. Anything you
       | build that introduces friction between them and their money will
       | get your support team yelled at.
       | 
       | 3. Regulators and banks are suspicious of you, for lessons they
       | have learned from 100+ years of balancing lessons 1 & 2 above.
       | 
       | Balancing 1, 2 & 3 is an art and the difference between building
       | a successful product and failure.
       | 
       | All the cute UI and funnel analysis you do breaks when it hits
       | fraud, user emotions and regulation.
        
         | user_7832 wrote:
         | I'm curious, would you say using a third party to handle
         | payments (stripe/paypal/shopify etc) would help avoid some of
         | these issues? I'm not sure I understand point 2, especially if
         | there's a "regular" checkout page by one of these companies.
        
           | PeterisP wrote:
           | It would help avoid these issues, but if you're a payments
           | startup then you probably want to actually keep some control
           | over your core business instead of just being a reseller
           | intermediary for an actual payments company which holds your
           | customer's money, has all the leverage over what features and
           | policies "your" product will have and gets most of the
           | profit.
        
           | monknomo wrote:
           | In some ways it makes it worse, because your users will not
           | understand that you aren't screwing up their transaction,
           | it's Paypal. They'll just yell at you
        
       | threeseed wrote:
       | None of this is unique to payments or the financial sector.
       | 
       | And it is bizarre to me that you could run a payments system
       | without high-availability or immutability at its core.
       | 
       | Also putting logs in a database alongside your core data is such
       | a bad idea. There are plenty of solid, proven systems for log
       | management that allow you to correlate against other databases.
       | And it avoids the issue of you wasting limited write I/O on a
       | non-priority task.
        
         | rrr_oh_man wrote:
         | > And it avoids the issue of you wasting limited write I/O on a
         | non-priority task.
         | 
         | Is it really an issue, though, in most cases?
        
         | pgr0ss wrote:
         | Hi, I'm the author of the blog post.
         | 
         | > And it is bizarre to me that you could run a payments system
         | without high-availability or immutability at its core.
         | 
         | I'm not sure what you're referring to here as my post didn't
         | really go into these topics.
         | 
         | > Also putting logs in a database alongside your core data is
         | such a bad idea.
         | 
         | I'm not suggesting putting all logs into the database. I'm
         | suggesting that for a certain type of info (that is often
         | logged), I find it more useful to put it in the database
         | instead.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-02-08 23:01 UTC)