[HN Gopher] How to Replace Your CPAP in Only 666 Days
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       How to Replace Your CPAP in Only 666 Days
        
       Author : tl
       Score  : 314 points
       Date   : 2024-02-04 08:36 UTC (14 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (aphyr.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (aphyr.com)
        
       | ch33zer wrote:
       | This made me furious. I would have given up long ago, which of
       | course is what anthem wants. Congrats to the author for sticking
       | with it.
        
       | pockybum522 wrote:
       | This feels like every health insurance endeavor I have ever
       | attempted.
       | 
       | In any other industry, this would be called "fraud."
        
         | legutierr wrote:
         | In any other industry he would have switched to a company that
         | was better run.
        
       | gotbeans wrote:
       | Congrats on triggering my chronic anxiety.
       | 
       | I dread the day I require anything complicated that requires
       | medical/insurance bureocracy in this country. I've had already
       | ungodly share of issues with Aetna because they capitalized my
       | surname.
        
         | chromakode wrote:
         | I had my first serious medical procedure a year and a half ago,
         | which required a rare specialist. My insurance, Anthem Blue
         | Cross, covered everything, and called and mailed me ahead of
         | time confirming my hospital stay at UCSF was approved and in
         | network. So, YMMV.
        
       | joatmon-snoo wrote:
       | Another avenue of escalation is also via your state congressional
       | rep / federal congressional rep. Their offices should always have
       | a constituent services function whose very purpose is to help
       | their constituents navigate these bureaucratic mazes.
       | 
       | (Disclaimer: I've never had to exercise this personally.)
        
       | LegitShady wrote:
       | 'don't buy anthem products, period, for any reason"
        
         | spondylosaurus wrote:
         | What's crazy is that Anthem is genuinely one of the least-bad
         | insurance giants in America right now. The bar is _incredibly_
         | fucking low.
        
           | vertis wrote:
           | I'll take the issues with Medicare (Australia) and the NHS
           | (UK), both of which I have dealings with, over US healthcare
           | problems any day of the week.
           | 
           | Every healthcare system has issues, but universal healthcare
           | beats the pants off the US system any day of the week.
        
             | Ekaros wrote:
             | I take resource constrained over purposefully obtuse
             | system. I can understand that people and medicine is
             | expensive and inefficient(compared to farming and factories
             | or tech). But at least these public systems seem to attempt
             | to do stuff. And not be piled with bureaucracy to avoid
             | paying out or increasing the prices.
        
               | vertis wrote:
               | Indeed. The incentives are all in the wrong place in the
               | American system.
        
               | p_l wrote:
               | An important metric in efficiency of systems is overhead.
               | For health system, it would be how much money is spent on
               | purposes other than the stated purpose of the system.
               | Private insurance is never going to optimise for that,
               | because low overhead means high utilisation of funds paid
               | in, and low profits.
               | 
               | Commonly complained about polish NFZ (which, unlike NHS,
               | operates through contracting to semi-private and private
               | providers), has overhead IIRC of around 1%.
               | 
               | I don't have links on hand (maybe someone more recently
               | versed on US insurance can check?), but I heard of common
               | overhead levels in private insurers in USA being in range
               | of 30%, mainly for claim acceptors/adjusters.
        
               | hyperpape wrote:
               | I believe insurers are required to spend 85% of premiums
               | directly on medical care:
               | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37977842.
               | 
               | (Not saying that's the right number, health care in the
               | US is out of control).
        
         | gorbachev wrote:
         | These days I am screening potential employers with who they use
         | for their medical insurance plan. There's absolutely no way I'm
         | ever going with United Healthcare Group ever again.
        
           | astura wrote:
           | Problem is, insurance contracts are only for a few years then
           | employers shop around and it's usually cheaper to switch than
           | to renew.
        
           | spondylosaurus wrote:
           | LOL, I had a phone screener three days ago and did the exact
           | same thing. Asked which health plan they offered with the
           | explicit purpose of filtering out UHC. They're the lowest of
           | the low and even doctors hate them. (At least one of mine
           | audibly groaned when I mentioned being on a UHC plan and then
           | he said "Guess there's no point in trying <drug>."
        
       | spondylosaurus wrote:
       | Ha, I know Carelon! It's their pharmacy division for specialty
       | (read: expensive) medication. Not a clue as to why they'd be
       | involved in a CPAP claim, but this story does ring far too close
       | to home.
       | 
       | I once spent months fighting United Healthcare to stop hounding
       | me for a $2k bill that I categorically did not owe. Countless
       | phone reps were unable to remove it from my account; I only
       | solved the problem by making a big enough stink on Twitter for
       | someone from corporate to get involved. Good times!
        
         | logbiscuitswave wrote:
         | Carelon also does preauthorizations for various expensive
         | procedures and such. I've had the displeasure of having to try
         | to coordinate between my insurance provider and PCP's insurance
         | coordinator for authorizing some expensive blood tests.
         | Insurance wanted the PCP to use Carelon, Carelon automatically
         | denied it, the appeals process was designed to be as
         | frustrating and opaque as possible.
         | 
         | (Unlike the OP, I didn't have the patience to spend two years
         | navigating the kafkaesque nightmare they did. I finally gave up
         | after a couple months of being stonewalled by all the parties
         | who would refuse to talk to one another and me trying to be the
         | middle man. I never did get the blood work done. So much for
         | preventative medicine.)
        
       | mikigraf wrote:
       | It's surprising to me that not only in my home country is the
       | process of having a CPAP machine covered by insurance a long and
       | complicated one.
       | 
       | In my case, it took almost 12 months to receive my first CPAP
       | machine, which then turned out to be refurbished. Initially, I
       | had to visit a doctor, who had an available appointment in two
       | months. He then referred me to a sleep laboratory (another two-
       | month wait). After my sleep study, they sent me back to the
       | doctor, who confirmed I had sleep apnea and said I needed to
       | return to the sleep lab to test some settings--a further two
       | months' wait.
       | 
       | Then, after more than a month waiting for the next appointment,
       | the doctor informed me that the settings they had tried were too
       | low and wanted to send me back to the lab. I disagreed, but he
       | gave me the prescription, and two months later, I received a CPAP
       | machine with incorrect settings that didn't help much.
       | 
       | Eventually, I purchased my own Philips Dreamstation Go because it
       | automatically adjusts the pressure, and I've been sleeping well
       | ever since.
        
         | mdekkers wrote:
         | After an initial round of bullshit with the local government
         | insurance agency to get my CPAP including the multiple "two
         | month wait for x", then a 6 month wait to get the machine, and
         | subsequently struggling to get it serviced, I bought my own for
         | a few hundred EUR and been doing that for nearly 10 years now.
        
           | ThePowerOfFuet wrote:
           | At least people who don't have your means have another
           | option.
        
             | mdekkers wrote:
             | I don't have much in the way of "Means", I just enjoy
             | breathing and set my priorities accordingly. Also, where I
             | live the most expensive CPAP costs like 1800 EUR. Mine
             | costs 900 EUR
        
         | waltwalther wrote:
         | Sounds like you are in the US.
        
           | mikigraf wrote:
           | Haha, I'm in Germany
        
         | dendrite9 wrote:
         | Just in case you missed the news about the recall and issues
         | with Philips CPAP machines. You might want to check if there is
         | anything that you can or need to do. The disintegrating foam
         | seems like an unpleasant flaw in production.
         | 
         | https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/safety-communications/up...
        
           | mikigraf wrote:
           | Thank you, I appreciate it. Luckily my machine is not under
           | recall and was produced in March of 2023
        
       | thih9 wrote:
       | CPAP = Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ventillation - a mask,
       | a hose and a flow generator. Treatment for obstructive sleep
       | apnea.
       | 
       | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_positive_airway_p...
        
       | CaliforniaKarl wrote:
       | Reading this depressed me: I imagined the title being "How to get
       | your GMail/XBox/PlayStation account back in only 666 days."
       | 
       | I worry that, some day, tech companies will be under a regulating
       | agency like insurance is today. If that happens, we'll probably
       | deserve it.
        
       | quickthrower2 wrote:
       | Met someone coming from US to Australia to visit and was nicely
       | surprised you can just go buy a CPAP, cheaply with no referral.
       | Just like buying a dishwasher or something.
       | 
       | Makes me wonder if in the US a trip to mexico or canada or
       | somewhere could make this easier.
        
         | RecycledEle wrote:
         | Bingo!
         | 
         | As someone with multiple "pre-existing conditions" who cares
         | for a stroke survivor (my wife) and a stage 4 chronic kidney
         | disease patient (my mother-in-law,) I suggest we do the
         | following: 1. make private health insurance illegal 2. pass a
         | Constitutional amendment allowing every human the unlimited and
         | absolute right to buy, make, modify, and sell medical things
         | including importing and exporting those items.
         | 
         | It is cheaper just to buy things than to use insurance. The
         | stock holders need to loose all of their equity then go to
         | prison.
        
           | ThrowawayTestr wrote:
           | Is step 3 to eliminate the FDA? The idea of letting randos
           | modify and sell medical devices is terrifying.
        
             | RecycledEle wrote:
             | A CPAP is a simple device. It is a fan that generates
             | constant air pressure, with a heater and a bit of water to
             | humidify the air.
             | 
             | The idea that the law prevents me from pulling defective
             | foam out of a device I own is terrifying.
        
               | elteto wrote:
               | Typical libertarian strawman. You can pull all the foam
               | you want out of _your_ device. No one cares. The
               | government least of everybody. You are free to hurt
               | yourself due to the consequences of your own actions.
               | 
               | You can't go modifying some types of medical devices and
               | then sell them to _others_ without going through some
               | sort regulatory process. Simple as that.
        
             | elteto wrote:
             | This is the typical libertarian insanity: "Regulations are
             | bad, ergo there should be no regulations. And once we get
             | rid of them everything will just work because somehow
             | everyone will still abide by _some_ rules, although they
             | are not required."
        
           | GiorgioG wrote:
           | The problem is most Americans don't have these types of
           | chronic health issues, so it's not an issue for them. I have
           | a type 1 diabetic son, the amount of money we have spent on
           | health insurance and medical equipment/supples is criminal.
        
             | wwilim wrote:
             | I feel sorry for you, man. I have T1D as well, but pump
             | supplies + CGM work out to something on the order of $200 a
             | month in Poland. I am not even sure how much exactly,
             | because I don't bother to count since it's not big money
             | for me. Still a lot given the median pay, and you still
             | have to buy the pump out of pocket, but nowhere near what's
             | going on in the States.
        
               | GiorgioG wrote:
               | Yep, I have a cousin in France who is also a T1D, he pays
               | effectively nothing for his supplies (he tried pump+CGM
               | but he's been doing injections for so long he found the
               | pump to be a hassle.)
        
           | thfuran wrote:
           | >pass a Constitutional amendment allowing every human the
           | unlimited and absolute right to buy, make, modify, and sell
           | medical things including importing and exporting those items.
           | 
           | I'm pretty sure I've never heard of a worse idea for a law.
           | Removing any possibility of regulating the quality or
           | efficacy of medicines and medical devices will injure and
           | kill far more people than any resulting improved access would
           | help.
        
             | dangus wrote:
             | Funnily enough, we have a constitutional amendment
             | guaranteeing the right to own machines that are designed
             | with the singular purpose of killing people. How could a
             | "medical device second amendment" be worse?
        
               | j16sdiz wrote:
               | People owns and uses a gun know what can be done with it.
               | 
               | People uses faulty medical device, however....
        
               | dangus wrote:
               | If you say so!
               | 
               | https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/toddler
               | -sh...
               | 
               | https://apnews.com/article/toddler-shot-kenton-county-
               | parent...
        
               | thfuran wrote:
               | The second amendment doesn't guarantee an unrestricted
               | right to sell guns and isn't even really interpreted as
               | an absolute and unlimited ability to own then these days.
               | Furthermore, the abusive ways to use guns to the
               | detriment of others are inherently illegal and don't
               | scale. If the right to sell medicine were absolute,
               | thalidomide couldn't have been barred from the US market
               | or subsequently pulled and probably would've been laced
               | with nicotine or heroin to make sure people keep buying
               | it. But maybe that wouldn't have been a problem because
               | it would be lost in a sea of snake oil.
        
               | xboxnolifes wrote:
               | The right to bear arms doesn't stipulate the right to buy
               | any possible configuration of arms. The equal comparison
               | is the right to _use_ medical equipment as seen fit, not
               | the right to purchase.
        
           | hn_throwaway_99 wrote:
           | > pass a Constitutional amendment allowing every human the
           | unlimited and absolute right to buy, make, modify, and sell
           | medical things including importing and exporting those items.
           | 
           | The ironically terrifying evidence about what a horrible idea
           | this is is that it was _just_ in the news that the FDA said
           | that recalled CPAP machines made by Philips killed 561
           | people: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fda-sleep-apnea-philips-
           | recall-...
        
             | cabaalis wrote:
             | I also have experienced various delays related to my cpap
             | machine. I wonder how much of this debacle is because
             | people in the know knew that this was coming, and therefore
             | intentionally delayed anything to do with cpaps.
        
             | Karunamon wrote:
             | How does that not demonstrate the ineffectiveness of the
             | regulations?
             | 
             | Plain old consumer device safety stuff would apply here.
        
               | snakeyjake wrote:
               | >How does that not demonstrate the ineffectiveness of the
               | regulations?
               | 
               | The only reason there was a recall was because of the
               | regulations and the gargantuan and slow bureaucratic
               | apparatus surrounding Philips.
               | 
               | Philips tried, and would have succeeded without the
               | regulations, to brush this off. They stalled, delated,
               | cajoled, and lied.
               | 
               | Consumer protection laws (i.e. just sue after someone
               | dies) are almost worthless in this case. No amount of
               | rationally acting rational actor's next of kins bringing
               | individual actions after the death of a loved one would
               | have gotten Philips to move. Those wouldn't have even
               | occurred because the only reason the link was made was
               | because of a medical device monitoring system put in
               | place by the FDA and government medical researchers
               | looking into anomalous death statistics whose only common
               | factor was Philips CPAP machines and the ensuing
               | technical evaluation. Numerous deaths occurred, were
               | attributed by some other cause because dissecting a
               | deceased person and examining their alveoli for
               | microscopic particles isn't an action typically performed
               | after someone dies of what appears to be a stroke in
               | their sleep.
               | 
               | Indeed, when this whole mess first started Philips
               | deflected and delayed for years and their teams of
               | lawyers would have annihilated each individually
               | rationally acting rational actor's lawyers one by one to
               | protect their bottom line drowning each litigant in
               | delays, appeals, and litigation by financial attrition as
               | the cases popped up one-by-one.
               | 
               | "Duh gubmint" is slow and often ineffective, but in this
               | case the only reason anything happened at all and Philips
               | CPAP machines aren't still out there literally and
               | actually killing people is because of "a fat cat gubmint
               | parasite" enforcing "onerous and burdensome" laws.
               | 
               | Of course I could be wrong. We all remember how
               | magnanimous and ethical corporations were prior to all of
               | these systems being put into place, don't we?
               | 
               | Wait. We don't?
        
             | quickthrower2 wrote:
             | They went too extreme. Maybe let people buy the device but
             | it still needs to be manufactured to regulations.
             | 
             | However I don't know enough about CPAP to judge whether you
             | should need a doctors cert or some kind of training cert on
             | the device. Can a CPAP harm you if you incorrectly use it /
             | use incorrect settings?
        
               | thfuran wrote:
               | If a CPAP just did nothing, the users would be harmed.
               | That's why they're using a CPAP machine in the first
               | place. Or do you mean can the wrong settings be _even
               | more harmful_?
        
       | verytrivial wrote:
       | You can now understand why the UK is holding on the its NHS with
       | white knuckles despite the Conservative push to dissolve it by
       | stealth.
        
         | vertis wrote:
         | Yes, Australia too. You can take my medicare system (NHS equiv)
         | from my cold dead hands. It's the only way you're going to.
        
         | klabetron wrote:
         | Though it'd probably take 666 days to see a sleep specialist
         | and get your first CPAP machine... (which I suspect you'd agree
         | is part of the stealth dissolution plan)
        
           | p_l wrote:
           | Depending on how defunding worked so far in one's area, but
           | NHS generally prioritised potentially dangerous issues.
           | 
           | Means it's easier to be frustrated waiting and then getting a
           | 10 minute talk when it's flu or something similar, but get
           | seen to in 10 minutes after arriving at a walk-in centre
           | because you're worried of bine fissure in leg (turned out to
           | be inflammation fortunately)
        
             | stavros wrote:
             | I went to A&E with symptoms of appendicitis. They took me
             | in, put me in a bed, next day I was operated on, stayed one
             | night and out the door. Everyone was great and seemed very
             | competent.
             | 
             | This was on a three-day business trip to the UK, which was
             | extremely unlucky, but the NHS was fantastic.
        
               | nvm0n2 wrote:
               | You got lucky. My father went to a&e recently with
               | breathing problems due to some non COVID respiratory
               | virus. He was struggling to breathe. They had zero free
               | beds and he stayed overnight on the chairs waiting to be
               | admitted. Eventually they found him a recliner.
               | 
               | And then of course you have the constant strikes and
               | inability to even see a doctor at all unless you win the
               | game of phone lottery.
               | 
               | The NHS may have a simple user interface, but it doesn't
               | actually work when you need it so that's not very
               | helpful. And the idea this is a Tory problem is
               | propaganda. The NHS budget only ever goes higher yet
               | service gets worse. Dumping ever more money into this
               | third world system is never going to work.
        
               | p_l wrote:
               | Part of it is a Tory problem - when they changed how the
               | funding gets distributed, so that overall bigger fund is
               | divided now into smaller pieces that still have to cover
               | the same population, but without the scaling benefits
               | that previous allocation provided.
               | 
               | It's visible in other systems too, where for example you
               | end up with local government politicians fighting for
               | "prestige" or even perceived need to have a specific kind
               | of hospital in their area, but they don't have a way to
               | bring enough patients to support it, so you get a system
               | too fragmented to sustain despite spending more and more
               | money.
        
           | robmccoll wrote:
           | I have terrible news about systems built on private health
           | insurance (USA): it will still take 666 days to see a
           | specialist, and you will need a referral from your PCP who
           | may also decide they want to see you in person first. This
           | may be its own scheduling nightmare. Then you may find out
           | that your preferred specialist is out of network for your
           | private insurance. The waits are a generally a supply and
           | demand issue more than a beurocracies issue, but I can assure
           | you that multiplying the number of beurocracies involved in
           | getting healthcare doesn't speed anything up.
        
             | dralley wrote:
             | I've never had to wait more than a month to see a
             | specialist in the US
        
               | bentt wrote:
               | LOLOLOL
               | 
               | that is not typical
        
               | coldtea wrote:
               | LOLOLOL depends on the area.
        
               | ceejayoz wrote:
               | That'll depend heavily on location and specialty.
               | Neurology and dermatology book 3-5 months out for new
               | patient visits in my area, from personal experience.
        
               | 15155 wrote:
               | This is my experience as well.
        
               | Brybry wrote:
               | I don't know about 666 days but my senior citizen parents
               | complain about specialists where the earliest (non-
               | emergency) appointment is 6+ months out.
               | 
               | They _have_ figured out the right time in the morning to
               | call every day to try to grab a canceled appointment slot
               | but it takes dedication.
        
               | SamoyedFurFluff wrote:
               | I think it heavily depends. I know a friend who can only
               | see her neurologist with a 3 month wait. Rheumatologists
               | and specialized cardiologists are about the same issues.
               | As an adult, trying to speak to a neurologist for an
               | autism, ADHD, or learning disability evaluation is also a
               | nightmare time-wise.
        
               | ericjmorey wrote:
               | Last month, I tried to make an appointment with an
               | endocrinologist. The first one I called had the earliest
               | availability in July. The earliest one I could schedule
               | was in March. and it's an hour and 15 minutes away from
               | my home.
        
               | gorbachev wrote:
               | I couldn't find a single specialist who were taking new
               | patients within 100 miles for my chronic condition when
               | it was first diagnosed.
               | 
               | This sort of thing depends heavily on where you live,
               | what your insurance coverage is, and the specific
               | condition you're seeking care for.
        
               | y-c-o-m-b wrote:
               | In the Pacific NW for me:
               | 
               | - Dermatologist: 5 months
               | 
               | - Cardiologist: 3 months
               | 
               | - ENT: 8 months (turned out to be a useless appointment
               | too sadly)
               | 
               | According to my PCP last week, endocrinologists have
               | stopped taking in patients that do not have urgent issues
               | and even then it's a 6+ month wait. He said 9/10 of his
               | referrals to endocrinologists in the last year have been
               | denied.
        
               | diob wrote:
               | When was the last time you went? Nearly everything, even
               | non-specialist, are booked out a month or more.
        
               | WarOnPrivacy wrote:
               | Mine are booked out forever because usable health
               | insurance is far out of reach.
        
           | hnlmorg wrote:
           | My sleep apnea went from initial visit to an NHS GP to a
           | working CPAP machine in under 3 months.
           | 
           | This includes multiple consultations with sleep specialists
           | and zero chasing from me.
        
         | hnlmorg wrote:
         | I completely agree.
         | 
         | I suffer from sleep apnea and I too had an issue with my CPAP
         | machine. The NHS fixed it within a week.
         | 
         | I can't imagine spending 2 years chasing different health
         | providers to sort a simple repair.
        
         | MrBuddyCasino wrote:
         | The NHS is a failed system that absolutely nobody is envious
         | of, except brits because for some weird reason, they seem to
         | think that the alternative is poor people dying in the streets.
         | 
         | Similar systems as the NHS have been introduced and
         | subsequently canned in favor of more sane approaches in other
         | European countries, which now have better (but still
         | socialized) healthcare as a consequence.
         | 
         | There is no central european country with a similar amount of
         | health care horror stories than the UK, and none where it plays
         | a similarly important role in its identity. It boggles the
         | mind.
        
           | dhc02 wrote:
           | "The NHS is a failed system that absolutely nobody is envious
           | of"
           | 
           | ...except people in the US.
        
             | MrBuddyCasino wrote:
             | If you think the problems of US healthcare are caused by
             | too much ,,free market" and could be solved or even
             | marginally improved by an NHS-style socialized replacement
             | with even more government interference, you have never
             | seriously investigated the issue.
        
             | bigstrat2003 wrote:
             | People in the US, by and large, aren't envious of the NHS.
             | For most people, if they've even heard of the NHS they have
             | a negative opinion of it.
        
         | petesergeant wrote:
         | I dunno, I've just spent 18 months in Dubai, where I had
         | private insurance, and it was a breeze. See a UK-trained
         | specialist for almost anything within a day or two, and
         | hospital direct billing meant I almost never had to interact
         | with the insurer directly.
         | 
         | I guess my point is that as reassuring (as a Brit) as it is to
         | know the NHS is there, private insurance isn't necessarily bad
         | if regulated well (and that matches my experience of having
         | private insurance in the UK too), it's just America's seems
         | incredibly poorly regulated.
        
           | jameshart wrote:
           | A consistent theme in responses here is that how long you
           | just wait for a doctor depends on location, and the
           | preponderance of evidence suggests that the differentiating
           | factor between locations where it is easy to see a doctor vs
           | waiting a long time is _how many golf courses are around_.
           | 
           | Correlation isn't causation of course. Not suggesting golf
           | courses cause doctors. But in general in this thread I see
           | people from heavily golfed areas saying 'I found a doctor
           | really quickly' and people from golf deserts talking about
           | long waits.
        
           | eszed wrote:
           | I think the critical element in the UK hasn't been
           | regulation, so much as the NHS putting a hard price floor
           | under everything that private providers offer. The two
           | systems worked symbiotically. As / if the NHS is killed,
           | private medicine will enshittify as well.
        
         | humanrebar wrote:
         | I'd rather go the other way and not require a prescription for
         | a breathing machine. They're not habit forming and you won't OD
         | on breathing.
        
           | jrockway wrote:
           | I agree with this. The sleep apnea world is kind of a weird
           | racket; in order to buy $150 worth of electronics, you need
           | to pay a doctor $5000 to interpret the results of a sleep
           | test. Insurance companies require this because they don't
           | want to waste money on electronics if there is no disease
           | that needs to be treated. But of course, the testing costs
           | them more than the devices. (And the devices aren't $150,
           | because they aren't marketed directly to consumers, they're
           | marketed towards insurance companies. That means you get to
           | jack up the price because people aren't using real money to
           | buy them.)
           | 
           | There was probably some argument for requiring a prescription
           | when someone needed to adjust the pressure, but now that the
           | machines do that themselves, they should probably just be
           | available at Wal-Mart next to the reading glasses.
        
             | FireBeyond wrote:
             | > And the devices aren't $150, because they aren't marketed
             | directly to consumers, they're marketed towards insurance
             | companies
             | 
             | Apropos of anything else, the newest CPAP machines are
             | relatively sophisticated. They may not be worth the $1,100
             | they sell for, but definitely more than $150. $500, maybe.
             | 
             | > The sleep apnea world is kind of a weird racket; in order
             | to buy $150 worth of electronics, you need to pay a doctor
             | $5000 to interpret the results of a sleep test.
             | 
             | ENT too. I had a deviated septum. Most (all?) of my life.
             | Finally did something about it when I was 40. Went to an
             | ENT, who was great. "Yup, right nostril, 90% occluded".
             | "Makes sense. So when do we schedule the surgery?"
             | 
             | He sighs, and with a roll of his eyes (at the process, not
             | me), "Welllll.... first I'm going to prescribe you these
             | two nasal sprays so that you can come back in 30 days and
             | tell me that, to our mutual shock, they didn't realign the
             | cartilage in your nasal septum. At that point, insurance
             | will approve the surgery and I can have it done within 3
             | days of getting that approval back."
             | 
             | Thankfully, that went like clockwork. I saw him on day 30,
             | and they had an approval and 34 days after seeing him for
             | the first time, it was taken care of.
             | 
             | But what a fuckshow.
        
         | FireBeyond wrote:
         | > despite the Conservative push to dissolve it by stealth
         | 
         | I'd question the "by stealth" part of this.
        
       | thegrizzlyking wrote:
       | Are there any studies estimating the cost of this kafakasque
       | nightmare? End of the day users pay for this via higher premiums.
       | I am sure doctor's offices also face something similar.
        
         | onetoo wrote:
         | No, but, you see, the system is privatized, therefore it must
         | be more efficient. /s
        
           | eastbound wrote:
           | The upside of inefficient privatized process is that you can
           | replace them.
        
             | genocidicbunny wrote:
             | Well the kicker here, is that the process is not
             | inefficient. It's just efficient for someone other than
             | your average person. If anything, for the people that care
             | and can do something about it, the process is inefficient
             | in the opposite direction -- it's not bleeding as much
             | money from the consumer as it could be.
        
             | ericjmorey wrote:
             | LOL
             | 
             | If only.
        
         | hyperpape wrote:
         | I don't know of anything like a comprehensive estimate, but
         | there are people working on documenting and quantifying these
         | costs: https://springboardpolicy.medium.com/getting-to-know-
         | the-tim....
        
         | kevincox wrote:
         | Not to mention Aphyr spent lots of (expensive) time on the
         | other side. I think Anthem should have to compensate him for
         | all the time that he had to waste.
        
         | lolc wrote:
         | Clearly it leads to lower premiums (or higher profits) because
         | many claims are abandoned.
        
       | geekpondering wrote:
       | I move around a lot and have run into all kinds of weirdness when
       | it comes to CPAP stuff. Any time you establish a new doc, if your
       | CPAP prescription is more than 1-2 years old you need to do
       | another sleep study, so I think I've done 6 different sleep
       | studies over the years.
       | 
       | The other thing to remember about CPAP is that it's not just the
       | machine, you have to get replaceable supplies - masks, air tubes,
       | etc every so often.
       | 
       | While not nearly as bad as linked blog entry, my worst situation
       | was with Kaiser in the SF Bay Area. I had gotten a CPAP through
       | them and then a few years later moved to a different part of the
       | Bay. I set up a new doc also with Kaiser, but the records don't
       | easily transfer and since it's a different Kaiser respiratory
       | team, I had to (of course) do another sleep study AND go through
       | a CPAP orientation on how to use a CPAP despite me already owning
       | and using a CPAP and just needing a new mask, etc.
        
         | eek2121 wrote:
         | I get my supplies from illegitimate sellers on amazon precisely
         | because of this.
         | 
         | I also learned how to adjust my machine manually because it was
         | taking way too long to schedule new sleep doctor appointments
         | and then appointments with the DME provider...I shouldn't have
         | to wait 6 months to a year in order to to get quality sleep.
         | 
         | I will never understand why a prescription for my BiPAP or my
         | glasses is required. It is all pointless bureaucracy.
        
           | anjel wrote:
           | Moats are gonna do what moats are designed to do.
        
       | RecycledEle wrote:
       | This is too common. The author of the article asked for the wrong
       | thing from the wrong people. He should have asked his sleep
       | doctor (which he calls the sleep center) for a new CPAP. By
       | asking for a repair from his insurance company, he caused himself
       | lots of grief.
       | 
       | I doubt he has a list if his doctors that his insurance companies
       | or doctors would agree with.
        
       | RecycledEle wrote:
       | From the article: > Listen, gobsmacked, as they explain that they
       | decided your claim was in fact an appeal, and transferred it
       | immediately to the appeals department. The appeals department
       | examined the appeal and looked for the claim it was appealing.
       | Finding none, they decided the appeal was moot, and rejected it.
       | 
       | Tell me why this is not fraud. Tell me why insurance company
       | employees are not facing prison time.
        
       | woodruffw wrote:
       | This was a nightmarish read. I'm glad he was eventually able to
       | get the replacement paid for.
       | 
       | On top of your state's DOI, there are a few agencies that can
       | (typically) be used to bring insurance and other companies more
       | swiftly into compliance with the laws they're meant to
       | proactively follow:
       | 
       | * Many state AGs are responsive to well-documented problems and
       | will send a warning on official letterhead.
       | 
       | * This won't work for insurance, but the CFPB[1] has a relatively
       | smooth complaint process for financial issues, and (anecdotally)
       | generally produces a rapid outcome.
       | 
       | [1]: https://www.consumerfinance.gov/
        
       | londons_explore wrote:
       | Please folks remember that it isn't compulsory to use a companies
       | byzantine process.
       | 
       | Instead, check your insurance policy wording that you are
       | covered, spend the money on a new machine, send a single letter
       | to the insurer asking to be reimbursed, and when they don't
       | reimburse within 30 days file in small claims court.
       | 
       | They'll pay. They don't want to physically show up in court or
       | have you send bailiffs to their HQ over $3000 that they probably
       | owe you anyway.
        
         | genocidicbunny wrote:
         | Unfortunate that you cannot get additional damages against
         | them. That sort of behaviour really needs to be heavily
         | punished -- say, forcing them to cover every single CPAP
         | prescribed for the next year for free, with the executives
         | having to personally pay if the company can't afford to.
         | 
         | Byzantine processes when dealing with medical issues should be
         | punished with Byzantine punishments.
        
           | thfuran wrote:
           | Byzantine punishments were more along the lines of castration
           | and facial amputation.
        
             | genocidicbunny wrote:
             | Who's to say we can't get a little retro?
             | 
             | Little late for the new year's stuff, but let's party like
             | it's 499!
        
               | spacecadet wrote:
               | Anthem CEO here we come! lolol
        
             | philwelch wrote:
             | Reminds me of the funniest Crusader Kings bug of all time--
             | a performance issue where the game laboriously calculated
             | over and over again whether or not every character in the
             | Byzantine Empire wanted to blind every other character in
             | the Byzantine Empire.
        
           | londons_explore wrote:
           | In most places you can at least get back the court fees
           | (which are typically a few hundred bucks).
           | 
           | Unfortunately sometimes you can't get back the court fees,
           | and in situations like that, rather than spending $3000 on
           | some new medical gear and battling insurance I would be very
           | tempted to go to eBay, buy it 2nd hand from someone for $150,
           | and just use that. Better time/effort/money/result tradeoff
           | IMO.
        
             | patja wrote:
             | eBay is pretty good at enforcing their policy banning sales
             | of medical equipment requiring a prescription. They yank
             | any listing for a CPAP very quickly.
        
               | londons_explore wrote:
               | Took me literally 30 seconds to find one:
               | 
               | https://www.ebay.com/itm/404778680293
               | 
               | They even have a category for "Medical equipment >
               | ventilators". If they do have such a policy, they enforce
               | it very poorly.
        
               | patja wrote:
               | I guess it varies by country. In the US they pull CPAP
               | listings very quickly.
               | 
               | Policy: https://www.ebay.com/help/policies/prohibited-
               | restricted-ite...
        
             | genocidicbunny wrote:
             | I don't want to get back just my court fees. If I could
             | have it, heads would roll, but in lieu of that, I will take
             | severe personal penalties to all those involved. Their
             | tunes will change really frakking quick if the consequence
             | is being put out on the street (or worse) for frakking
             | around with people's medical coverage.
        
         | q7xvh97o2pDhNrh wrote:
         | Someone should start a SaaS that just automates this process.
         | 
         | Thinking about it, the only moderately difficult part would be
         | compiling a list of small-claims courts and understanding the
         | different paperwork each one requires.
         | 
         | After that, the whole thing could just be a single page with a
         | few form fields (email, insurance company info, upload purchase
         | receipt), a credit card form for the SaaS to collect its fee,
         | and an API integration that uses one of those physical-mail
         | APIs to send out the paperwork.
        
           | jasonjayr wrote:
           | A use of AI/LMM I could support: read the policy documents
           | and produce (or execute) the exact steps to get the insurance
           | company to honor their obligations.
        
             | danuker wrote:
             | Hell, even reading the policies and responding whether I'm
             | covered (and where it says so/hints towards) would be a
             | worthwhile service.
        
             | ericjmorey wrote:
             | The policy is largely written in code that will not be
             | released to a policy holder.
        
           | nojs wrote:
           | > the only moderately difficult part would be compiling a
           | list of small-claims courts and understanding the different
           | paperwork each one requires.
           | 
           | In reality the difficult part would actually be getting your
           | service in front of people like OP at the right time. How do
           | you imagine the guy in this post finds you and pays for your
           | service? Have you ever looked for a similar service yourself
           | when you faced similar issues?
        
             | lolc wrote:
             | I think this is where search engine ads would work. The
             | keyword is Anthem. The message is "File Anthem claims
             | through us. Get paid in no more than 60 days or we waive
             | your $10 fee."
        
         | epgui wrote:
         | That would be great if more than 0.2% of the population had a
         | vague idea of how to access the legal system.
        
           | silverlyra wrote:
           | and this gets me wondering; what could we accomplish if we
           | took 0.2% of the time we spent writing (let alone reading)
           | internet comments, and instead used that time to engage in
           | our state democratic processes, and help update our public
           | school education standards to build a robust civil society!
           | 
           | my high school made sure I knew how to use both a band saw
           | and a stand mixer; why not a courtroom? that's a systemic
           | failure we could yet address
        
         | xrd wrote:
         | Does small claims court work in some states and not other ones?
         | I'm assuming you are us based? And my understanding was that
         | small claims courts are very different in each state.
        
           | londons_explore wrote:
           | They are, but the basic idea works pretty much everywhere.
           | 
           | In general, small claims courts aren't very strict on the
           | correct procedure being followed - they are explicitly
           | designed to be accessible to non-experts.
        
         | chrisandchris wrote:
         | Thinking about that I really start to love the Swiss version of
         | health insurance where (with most providers) you'll just
         | provide your insurance card and they'll pay first and then
         | decide whether to get reimbursement from you.
         | 
         | Much more easier to fight than if you'll have to bring them to
         | pay something you paid first.
        
           | from-nibly wrote:
           | That's generally how it works in the US as well.
        
         | Waterluvian wrote:
         | > and when they don't reimburse within 30 days file in small
         | claims court
         | 
         | The very nature of having to be adversarial and "guard up" on
         | everything is what exhausts people and sours a culture. It's
         | also inaccessible to many who are already exhausted and just
         | don't have another manual process and battle in them.
        
         | Moto7451 wrote:
         | We lost my wife's CPAP while traveling. Through insurance it
         | would have been a month of paperwork, an exception made, and
         | $600. Without insurance it was no wait and $650.
         | 
         | Guess which way we went...
         | 
         | I'm sorry the author had to deal with any of this. A lot of
         | pandemic scarcity and multiple recalls made it hard to get
         | supplies for a long time. My wife's first CPAP is out of
         | commission because the parts will simply never be made again.
         | In between the pandemic start and the "well we all gave up"
         | point three new models, recalls, and various mergers happened
         | but not one replacement set of filters were delivered.
         | 
         | If it was any sort of other filter I'd just buy a replacement
         | from Amazon and call it a day, but that doesn't seem
         | appropriate for this situation. Some people did and apparently
         | (per doctors not my own research or anything I can verify) old
         | OEM and new but improperly made third party filters can start
         | flaking off while the machine runs due to how CPAPs work.
         | 
         | Now though? Apparently it's easy to get a new model and all the
         | components from a supplier... at least if you skip insurance.
        
           | syndicatedjelly wrote:
           | If you need repairs done in the future, see if the local
           | university's biomedical engineering department has a student
           | chapter of Project C.U.R.E. Students may volunteer to fix the
           | device (off warranty of course). They work for free for needy
           | families, and if you're not in the former category, consider
           | donating to their organization
           | 
           | https://projectcure.org/
        
         | jedberg wrote:
         | They'll pay and then drop you at the next anniversary. Can only
         | use that trick a few times.
        
         | dmvdoug wrote:
         | However, your policy might also contain (more likely) an
         | arbitration clause, requiring you to submit any dispute to
         | arbitration or (sometimes) a form selection clause, requiring
         | you to submit a dispute in a particular legal forum other than
         | arbitration.
         | 
         | Note: some states do not allow forum selection clauses in
         | insurance contracts, by statute or by case law. However, that
         | will not stop a company from boilerplating it in. so, just
         | because the policy might have the clause does not mean it's
         | necessarily enforceable.
         | 
         | On the other hand, I get the point that they may just pay the
         | money rather than send it to legal to handle. YMMV.
        
       | 867-5309 wrote:
       | Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
        
       | jawngee wrote:
       | Yeah try importing a CPAP from the states into Vietnam if you
       | want a real adventure.
       | 
       | A $650 cpap machine costs well over $2K here. So I thought I'd
       | import one. Apparently you need a prescription in the states? Ok,
       | get a "prescription" from an online service that basically just
       | asks you if you snore over a video call. Amazing.
       | 
       | Buy machine and have it sent to a freight forwarding service.
       | They fuck up the paperwork.
       | 
       | It gets held in Vietnamese customs for almost 4 months. Go down
       | to customs once a week to argue with the guy. One week you can't
       | have it because it looks used. It doesn't look used.
       | 
       | Next week you can't have it because they think I'm importing to
       | resell it. Yes it's a very hot market right now.
       | 
       | Repeat same processes with different people next successive
       | weeks.
       | 
       | Finally someone says to bring prescription. But they don't write
       | prescriptions for CPAPs here. A lot of hand waving when you tell
       | them that. Go back to cardiologist who told me to get the CPAP
       | and ask for a prescription. Oh no, he says, we don't write
       | prescriptions for that. Can you write a letter saying that you
       | don't write prescriptions and that I need the machine? Oh no, he
       | says, I can't do that.
       | 
       | A couple of weeks later finally get someone at customs to agree
       | that my sleep apnea test is proof enough. Bring the test in.
       | Nobody looks at it. They still release the machine to me.
       | 
       | I would still take this random bureaucracy over American
       | insurance any day of the week though.
        
         | forinti wrote:
         | I don't know Vietnam, but to my South American sensibility, it
         | looks like they were fishing for a bribe.
        
           | lolc wrote:
           | Fishing is not the phrase I'd used. Insisting on, maybe.
        
             | bethekind wrote:
             | I think "searching for a bribe" or "seeking a bribe" might
             | be closer
        
         | EdwardDiego wrote:
         | I feel like you were expected to pay a gratuity several times
         | in that process and they were baffled you didn't.
        
           | samstave wrote:
           | Who's an expat who knows sliding some cheese? Not this guy.
        
             | Roritharr wrote:
             | I learned recently that you want a fixer that knows and
             | bribes people where it's customary and expected. Going
             | through lengthy processes deaf to the trigger phrases will
             | make your life, which could be incredibly easy, unbearably
             | hard in many countries.
        
               | nimos wrote:
               | Honestly I don't think most people need a "fixer" - just
               | any local friend. Either they will know the expected
               | bribe amount or they can figure it out. Also you might be
               | able to get them to do stuff for you where all of the
               | sudden the bribe is 1/10 the amount because they are
               | local.
               | 
               | Maybe if you are doing more serious stuff like business
               | or real estate it makes sense.
        
               | mlinhares wrote:
               | In specific countries, like Brazil, "fixer" is a real job
               | (it's called "despachante" there) and it's supposedly
               | someone that knows the bureaucracy and how to navigate
               | it.
               | 
               | Most of the time when you need to deal with a government
               | agency you'd go through one of them. They don't advertise
               | that they'll bribe people to get it done but that's how
               | it works.
        
               | gwd wrote:
               | It is worth pointing out that (at least according to the
               | corporate training I have to take every year) this is
               | considered illegal _by the US government_ for a US
               | citizen to do even not on US soil; if the Feds get wind
               | of it and feel like making a point they could throw you
               | in jail, even with an intermediary  "fixer".
        
               | Roritharr wrote:
               | That's why these services are usually provided by "expat
               | services agencies" that do these things intransparently
               | to your knowledge.
        
               | brnt wrote:
               | It's amazing how based on the label, people are fooled.
               | 
               | At least people in Vietnam don't kid themselves and call
               | a bribe a bribe.
        
               | mcculley wrote:
               | Other common terms are "broker" or "agent". I pay the
               | agent. He deals with the local bureaucracy. He knows what
               | things should cost.
        
               | samstave wrote:
               | AKA; _... 'eeeeyyyyy, IgottaGuy..."_
        
               | mcculley wrote:
               | In my experience, they are more professional. I engage
               | with a firm who offers "customs brokerage" and "agent"
               | services. They take care of any local payments necessary.
               | I get a proper invoice that I pay with a wire transfer.
        
               | 15155 wrote:
               | The FCPA allows "grease payments" to officials performing
               | their official duties.
        
               | coredog64 wrote:
               | As a consultant, I have to take FCPA training an average
               | of 3 times a year. So although I'm not a lawyer, my take
               | is that it's only allowed if you can point to official
               | documentation that lays out an expedited action fee
               | schedule.
               | 
               | Paying a third party is just as illegal. However, unless
               | you're expecting to run for Congress, nobody is going to
               | care that you bribed some low level foreign customs agent
               | to get your ink cartridges released.
        
               | EdwardDiego wrote:
               | There were some massive bribery scandals in the late 70s
               | where pretty much entire governments were coopted by US
               | corporates that these laws arose in response to.
        
           | jawngee wrote:
           | I tried but they wouldn't accept it.
        
             | aniforprez wrote:
             | I've dealt with this many times as a South Asian person and
             | it is very possible they still do actually want money. Most
             | people will not ask in a straightforward manner for money
             | and when you offer to pay them, they act all offended. This
             | is a stupid game that I have no idea how it started where
             | they will pretend to not want the money but will still very
             | obviously want it. This has stumped me, being mildly
             | autistic, for the decades of my existence and also stumps
             | foreigners a lot. I cannot proffer a solution. Sometimes
             | asking works, most of the time it doesn't and the other
             | party feels unhappy about it and then when you decide
             | enough is enough and want to pay, another guessing game
             | begins where you need to gauge what amount satisfies them.
             | It's incredibly goddamn annoying and I wish they just told
             | you they want a bribe or money instead of engaging with
             | these weird, obtuse, coy behaviours and then I have to
             | obsess over whether I made a faux pas by paying/not paying
             | them
        
               | Solvency wrote:
               | It's their culture of saving face. The solution is
               | extremely simple.
               | 
               | You tell the person "I was told I had to pay this <X fee>
               | to release my package but I don't know who or where I
               | pay" while waving the cash around cluelessly. The person
               | will 100% then offer to take it and "handle it from
               | there" under the stupid guise of plausibility.
        
               | aniforprez wrote:
               | I will try this next time. Thanks for the tip
        
               | bethekind wrote:
               | Asian culture never ceases to confuse me. Nothing is ever
               | straightforward.
               | 
               | I tried giving a gift to some, as thanks for letting me
               | sleep on their couch. They told me no no no. I asked my
               | friends about it, they told me it's about face.
               | 
               | Omg, I get that honor is a big thing, but it makes normal
               | interactions way more complicated.
        
               | EdwardDiego wrote:
               | Every culture has things like this.
               | 
               | "You'll have to pop in next time you're in the area!"
               | does NOT mean "turn up at my house unannounced". Even if
               | it sounds like it.
               | 
               | Or "How are you going?" is not a prompt to actually tell
               | them how you're going.
        
           | appplication wrote:
           | My friend does export/import into SEA. You don't just have to
           | know who/when to bribe, you have to have an insider set up
           | already. They used to have a guy in customs who would take a
           | monthly payment to forward all her packages through without a
           | second look. He disappeared and then trying to find the next
           | one took months. Nothing was getting through customs, and
           | showing up at the office they would deny any attempts to
           | bribe. It is definitely a very coded art finding the right
           | person, price, and parameters to get something set up like
           | that.
        
             | Solvency wrote:
             | It's always a guy with a gun. Fact of life. Border
             | crossings? Find the guy with the biggest gun and bribe him.
             | South America, Eastern Europe, etc. Import/exports have
             | armed security too.
        
               | failingslowly wrote:
               | I love this tip, but I sincerely hope I never have to use
               | it.
        
           | BossingAround wrote:
           | "Gratuity" is an amazing euphemism for corruption in a system
           | :))
        
             | EdwardDiego wrote:
             | Haha, yeah, I was thinking air-quotes when I typed it.
        
         | xrd wrote:
         | I recently read the book "Gaming Behind the Iron Curtain." It's
         | about the former Soviet satellite states trying to play video
         | games inside the Czech Republicb in the late 80s. They had to
         | smuggle in computers hidden inside suitcases from England. This
         | feels almost like the same thing.
         | 
         | I'm stuck in thinking that someone smart could break apart
         | these CPAP machines and bring in necessary parts, then find
         | other parts from China and hand carry those in. Then reassemble
         | them inside Vietnam. A price differential of $1500 seems like
         | an interesting arbitrage opportunity, maybe better than drug
         | dealing. And there aren't chip sniffing dogs in the airport.
         | 
         | What a nightmare.
        
           | stuaxo wrote:
           | Sounds like the zx spectrum was almost built perfectly for
           | that.
        
             | bitwize wrote:
             | Russians have a significant presence on the ZX Spectrum
             | game and demo scene. There may be something to this.
        
               | stevekemp wrote:
               | There were several similar Z80-based systems made at the
               | time, locally, such as the Hobbit:
               | 
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hobbit_(computer)
        
               | bitwize wrote:
               | But to clone the Speccy they first had to obtain one (or
               | a few) :)
        
         | nimos wrote:
         | Did you not try to pay some coffee money? Do you have local
         | Vietnamese connections?
         | 
         | Seems like something you could have paid 500-1000k (20-40USD)
         | and been done with.
        
           | jawngee wrote:
           | Yes they wouldn't accept it.
        
             | natch wrote:
             | You aren't telling us how it was offered. Openly in front
             | of multiple people, discretely, etc.
        
         | petesergeant wrote:
         | If you need to do this again, fly to Bangkok, they have ResMed
         | and Philips authorised resellers with machines already in
         | country, although incredibly enough you can also just order
         | them off Lazada
        
         | methou wrote:
         | I had a similar experience but in Japan.
         | 
         | My CPAP machine was held by customs, they asked me to provide
         | some extra paperwork from another department, which boiles down
         | to a form and a "prescription". Fortunately they accept
         | american prescriptions. I emailed all of the docs to the
         | department, and they told me since I'm physically in Japan, I
         | have to do what Japanese would do - send a physical mail in an
         | envolope. A week later I got the approval mailed back to me,
         | scanned them and emailed them back to the customs, they
         | released my package.
         | 
         | Then, the shipper messed up with my address, they use a local
         | partner for delivery, but failed to pass them my phone number
         | and the second line in my address. Apparently the poor delivery
         | guy attempted to deliver for a week, I found it out in the
         | tracking page, called the customer service, they figured out
         | and eventually have it delivered.
         | 
         | I thought it was terrible, but now.
        
           | positr0n wrote:
           | Back in the day I remember reading patio11 posts on
           | navigating the Japanese bureaucracy and he described this as
           | "doing SQL JOINs" across different departments by filling out
           | forms and visiting each one.
        
           | codewench wrote:
           | Japanese customs is a special thing. I had a plastic
           | Christmas tree held in quarantine for 9 months because the
           | box said "tree", and all attempts to point out that the tree
           | was in fact fake, and probably not of serious biological
           | concern feel on deaf ears.
        
         | coldtea wrote:
         | > _Go down to customs once a week to argue with the guy. One
         | week you can 't have it because it looks used. It doesn't look
         | used. Next week you can't have it because they think I'm
         | importing to resell it._
         | 
         | Cousin Eddie: I'm real glad that things are going good for you,
         | Clark.
         | 
         | Clark: Mm-hm.
         | 
         | Cousin Eddie: I got laid off when they closed that asbestos
         | factory.
         | 
         | Clark: Ahem.
         | 
         | Cousin Eddie: And now, wouldn't you know it... ...the Army cut
         | my disability pension... ...because they said the plate in my
         | head wasn't big enough.
         | 
         | Clark: Shoo.
         | 
         | Catherine: Eddie, Clark and Ellen don't want to hear about our
         | troubles.
         | 
         | Clark: No, no. It's very interesting.
         | 
         | Aunt Edna: Why don't you just ask him for the money, Eddie? He
         | sure as hell can't take a hint.
        
         | yieldcrv wrote:
         | lol I felt that last part
         | 
         | I had a business trying to get an institutional trading
         | account, and all these compliance officers kept the application
         | in limbo for a year
         | 
         | finally the exchange's general counsel or someone maybe even
         | the CFO said I needed to show my company's AML/KYC policy.
         | 
         | I have my lawyer draft a comprehensive AML/KYC policy.
         | 
         | I told the financial institution that my legal counsel had
         | prepared our "ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING AND "KNOW YOUR CUSTOMER"
         | PROCEDURES Which should fulfill all of your company's
         | compliance goals"
         | 
         | And apparently that contained the magic words because they
         | approved the account instantly, after being in account creation
         | limbo for an entire year, they never even asked for or looked
         | at the document
        
         | verticalscaler wrote:
         | It isn't good to argue that way in this part of the world, I
         | hope you didn't raise your voice - not 100% sure about Vietnam
         | but in any of its surrounding countries - they would lose face
         | and become uncooperative.
         | 
         | I learned the hard way after a few experiences like yours to
         | telegraph as little frustration or anger as humanly possible.
         | Reasoning also only goes so far.
         | 
         | But if you appeal on some technicality, even a rule of your own
         | invention..
         | 
         | Carol Beer presents differently across cultures
         | (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pw8m_NTJ_0).
        
         | bugbuddy wrote:
         | Your mistake was not bringing an envelope full of USD as
         | evidence to be submitted to the relevant authority to expedite
         | the service. Guess why it costs over $2k? Additional
         | administrative taxes included. Also, you are supposed to do
         | this through somebody that knows somebody that works somewhere.
        
         | jevoten wrote:
         | > Next week you can't have it because they think I'm importing
         | to resell it.
         | 
         | With all the "free trade" agreements Vietnam is party to [1],
         | you'd think this would be perfectly fine. Funny how that works,
         | isn't it?
         | 
         | [1]
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_trade_agreements_of_Vietn...
        
       | genocidicbunny wrote:
       | Medical, and especially medical related insurance stuff, is one
       | of the few things that drives me up a wall enough to add to my
       | 'burn this chickenshit outfit down' list.
       | 
       | This is a great example of why.
        
       | HumblyTossed wrote:
       | Health care needs an enema.
       | 
       | I think one thing I would have done different when i switched
       | primary I would have gotten a new Rx.
       | 
       | Not sure how much trouble that would have saved in the end but
       | that is just what I tend to do.
        
       | tomohawk wrote:
       | Alternatively, try a low histamine diet. Many people who have
       | been told they need surgery to correct "deviated septum" or need
       | cpap have found their problems go away.
       | 
       | Edit: to downvoters - why the closed mind?
        
         | eesmith wrote:
         | I was not able to find any paper on Google Scholar about a
         | study on the effect of a low-histamine diet on obstructive
         | sleep apnea. How many is "many" and where is this documented?
         | 
         | The few matches for low-histamine diet and apnea come from what
         | I would consider fringe and untrustworth research, often
         | suggesting a low-histamine diet helps a large number of medical
         | issues, but not pointing to study giving numbers, describing
         | the severity of the apnea, and other things I would expect.
         | 
         | I was able to find papers which studied the effect of anti-
         | histamine drugs on obstructive sleep apnea, like
         | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.2500/ajra.2013.27.39...
         | for when people also have allergic rhinitis. "adding [anti-
         | histimines] to this treatment did not show improved effects
         | compared with placebo treatment". I presume people taking anti-
         | histamines would have a lower amount of histamines in their
         | body, so if there were a correlation it would have been seen.
         | (Alternatively, it says that a low-histamine diet is not
         | effective for CPAP when suffering from allergic rhinitis.)
         | 
         | It is apparently quite hard to identify what "low-histamine
         | diet" means. In "Low-histamine diets: is the exclusion of foods
         | justified by their histamine content?" at
         | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/5/1395 , which specifically
         | concerns "the symptomatology of histamine intolerance", notes
         | the "great heterogenicity in the type of foods that are advised
         | against for histamine intolerant individuals. Excluded foods
         | were, in most cases, different depending on the considered
         | diet. Only fermented foods were unanimously excluded."
         | 
         | > The design of a low-histamine diet is challenging due to
         | different handicaps. One of these is the lack of consensus on
         | the histamine level below which a food is said to be considered
         | low in histamine. Thus, variable histamine levels in food
         | ranging between 5-50 mg/kg have been pointed out as potential
         | thresholds, while other authors are much more demanding and
         | consider foods with low histamine concentrations to be those
         | that contain amounts below 1 mg/kg [ 12 ,26 -28 ]. Moreover,
         | there is no specific regulation for the food industry to
         | declare the occurrence or absence of histamine in food
         | labelling, which could help histamine intolerant individuals to
         | make suitable and informed choices.
         | 
         | > Overall, providing dietary recommendations and guidelines in
         | the frame of a low-histamine diet is difficult for healthcare
         | professionals.
         | 
         | If it's difficult for healthcare professionals to even
         | determine what is low-histamine - and that's for people who are
         | specifically histamine intolerance - and no studies to back up
         | your suggestion ... why should anyone think your proposal has
         | merit?
         | 
         | There is a long history of using the "why the closed mind?"
         | argument to sell snake oil treatments, so I would not advise
         | using argument and instead point to supporting evidence.
        
         | seattle_spring wrote:
         | > Edit: to downvoters - why the closed mind?
         | 
         | Unsolicited medical advice is not appropriate. It suggests that
         | the people suffering from the condition in question have put
         | literally zero effort into solving their problem, when in
         | reality they likely have already heard about and tried every
         | "trick" or "alternative treatment" you're going to suggest.
         | 
         | Other common scenarios:
         | 
         | * Telling a chronic pain sufferer to "just try cannabis, it
         | works better than pharmaceutical pain killers!"
         | 
         | * Suggesting [common behavioral quirk] is a very obvious sign
         | of ADHD, and encouraging them to take Adderall.
         | 
         | * A whole host of "x supplement fixes y chronic condition"
         | suggestions.
        
       | r2vcap wrote:
       | It is interesting to see how CPAP is used and covered by
       | insurance in different countries. In my country, South Korea,
       | CPAP is available for rent if you have certain medical
       | conditions, and the rental price is fixed. I pay 15 USD (20K
       | KRW), and the Korea NHS pays 60 USD (80K KRW) per month. I've
       | been using Lowenstein's CPAP, and it works great without any
       | problems.
        
       | mattmaroon wrote:
       | But we can't have public health insurance because the lines will
       | be too long.
        
       | ergonaught wrote:
       | Have been trying to replace my (recalled) machine for about a
       | year, now, myself.
       | 
       | Asinine.
        
       | Havoc wrote:
       | Making sick people jump through a million hoops takes a special
       | kind of evil.
        
       | bhoops wrote:
       | Why dont you just ask someone coming from India to get you one ?
       | They are available over the counter in India and there are a lot
       | of Indian people hopping on a flight to the US all the time. I am
       | sure there is someone in your office you can request, or someone
       | in your locality.
        
         | candiddevmike wrote:
         | You really need a professional to configure the CPAP, otherwise
         | it can mess up your lungs (too much airflow) or make your sleep
         | apnea worse (not enough airflow).
         | 
         | That's why these are considered a prescription--the
         | prescription is the settings on the machine.
        
           | jzig wrote:
           | Not at all. You can figure out how to configure one yourself
           | with a few hours reading on /r/CPAP or watching YouTube.
           | Source: myself after trying to acquire one and get it
           | configured for months through a similar bureaucratic
           | nightmare as the article.
        
             | exhilaration wrote:
             | I'd love to try a CPAP, any suggestions other than asking
             | an Indian coworker to bring one back? Is there a gray
             | market? Maybe Mexican mail order pharmacies?
             | 
             | I'm the US with health insurance but I bet it'll be more
             | expensive to go the legit way.
        
               | jzig wrote:
               | Buying/Selling medical devices is illegal so you won't
               | find any reliable website or marketplace. You can
               | sometimes find people trying to get rid of one (for free
               | or for sale) on /r/cpap and /r/cpap_swap
               | 
               | Most of the time you have go through a sleep study to get
               | one. I got very lucky during the pandemic and my
               | allergist ordered one (no sleep study) after explaining
               | that I was waiting months for a sleep study and having
               | suicidal ideation from weeks of waking up every ~15min.
        
       | bytearray wrote:
       | Insurance companies are just legal scams. They take your premiums
       | then come up with whatever excuses possible to avoid or delay
       | paying out on legitimate claims.
        
       | gorbachev wrote:
       | I had a similar story once on an medical insurance coverage
       | situation, which only resolved itself when I dug up the contact
       | information of an employee at the insurance company from
       | Google/LinkedIn and directly contacted the person.
       | 
       | Going through the official "process" was just handing me from one
       | department to another until it went back to the original
       | department, and the cycle started again.
        
       | xyst wrote:
       | Have had similar experiences with UHC for some very expensive
       | injectables. Fortunately, my doc's back office handled the
       | appeals process to get it approved. Keep in mind I am paying a
       | higher premium for a PPO plan vs an HMO plan offered by employer.
       | 
       | Doc's back office submitted 3-4 "appeals" to get it covered. Each
       | review was reviewed by UHC personnel. Probably someone like this
       | guy [1]
       | 
       | I fucking hate private insurance. It's a useless middleman that
       | is driving the costs of healthcare up. We can have the most
       | advanced healthcare available but it's largely inaccessible
       | because of health insurance industry. They will make it as
       | difficult as possible so you either give up or end up paying out
       | of pocket.
       | 
       | [1] https://m.youtube.com/shorts/YF6MDTvZlNA
        
       | tshirttime wrote:
       | Forget the CPAP. If you're having trouble sleeping, just read
       | this longwindedness.
        
       | wsintra2022 wrote:
       | I read how to replace your Crap and was interested briefly.. I
       | got a lot of crap laying around that needs replacing
        
       | sanarothe wrote:
       | Reimbursement is the #1 barrier to bringing a novel therapy to
       | market in the US for the company I'm working for. The technology
       | is decades old and proven (the novel part is where it's being put
       | in the body) - the clinical benefits are now proven.
       | 
       | But it's a battle to get US insurance to cover the therapy - we
       | have about 3x more patients confirmed as clinically eligible than
       | actually get the therapy. (That is to say, US insurance rejects
       | ~75%+ of claims).
       | 
       | As a result, there is an entire segment of the org dedicated to
       | reimbursement. We have a team of professional insurance-bullshit-
       | waders - they call, they file claims, they follow up, and I hear
       | them asking for Document Control Numbers and Call Reference
       | Numbers. There are 'Government Affairs' people who lobby with the
       | VA and Medica{re, aid?}.
       | 
       | The payer barriers outside of US have been much lower. (But EU
       | has it's own problems with medical device barriers... a rant for
       | another day.)
        
       | tylervigen wrote:
       | I've worked on the claims management process flow for payer like
       | Anthem before. It's probably obvious, but this story hints at
       | some serious deficiencies in the backend processes.
       | 
       | One way to look at it is that this Byzantine process helps Anthem
       | by trapping valid claims in a black hole of bureaucracy. That way
       | they don't need to pay, right?
       | 
       | It's not quite that simple. It's true that incentives are not
       | usually aligned, but in reality the payment P&L impact is often
       | far away from the claims processing administrative decisions. At
       | many payers (like Anthem), the ultimate 'payer' for most of the
       | cost may not actually be Anthem. They may be the third-party
       | administrator charging back to an employer, or the Federal
       | government. Even if it is Anthem, the owner of the cost center
       | for this broken administrative process is almost certainly
       | removed from whomever runs the actuarial accounting to decide
       | what kinds of services to cover and how much to charge customers
       | (except, as the author found, once they unite at the level of the
       | CEO).
       | 
       | Ultimately for Anthem, this claim cost them a lot more to handle
       | than if they had just paid out in the first place - even if they
       | were the ultimate payer. Consider how much time the author spent
       | on the phone with customer service representatives. Many of those
       | were almost certainly contracted out and charged to Anthem by the
       | minute. Then consider the claims processing backend, also likely
       | contracted through third-party claims processing and management
       | systems. It would have been simpler to manage the first one
       | straight through.
       | 
       | Usually what it comes down to is that it is hard to estimate the
       | ROI for investing in fixing a problem like this, because the
       | benefits are spread out over many small cases. One way to prove
       | it out is to highlight some of those small cases so that payers
       | feel the pain and recognize the need for change. Thus, I am glad
       | the author published this complete story.
        
         | pas wrote:
         | > They may be the third-party administrator charging back to an
         | employer,
         | 
         | can you please elaborate on this? does this mean that some
         | companies (employers) directly see and pay their employees
         | medical stuff on their books?
         | 
         | > Ultimately for Anthem, this claim cost them a lot more to
         | handle than if they had just paid out in the first place
         | 
         | ... well, of course, but the whole middleman game costs the US
         | many many many serious percents of each year's GDP. and
         | probably the whole culture of reimbursement despair makes a lot
         | of money to insurance companies, and even probably keeps rates
         | a bit lower than they ought to be, and keeps people sick (and
         | of course eventually leads to more serious problems that in
         | turn cost a lot more, but if those are shifted to pensioner age
         | then they might be covered federally, right? again a win for
         | the insurers)
        
           | jffry wrote:
           | Yeah companies directly running insurance is a thing:
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-funded_health_care
        
           | patja wrote:
           | This is how a lot of big companies work. They self-insure.
           | They set the rules, pay all the bills, and the insurance
           | company just administers things.
           | 
           | If you work for a company that does this, be aware that the
           | things you dislike about your insurance coverage may well
           | have been designed that way by your employer, not the
           | insurance company. Don't curse the insurance company when you
           | don't like the benefits. Ask your manager and HR department
           | why your employer chose that rule or limit.
        
       | NelsonMinar wrote:
       | "Compliance" is the other half of the US insurance nightmare with
       | CPAP. Often insurers demand access to logs of the machine to
       | verify you are actually using it before they will reimburse you.
       | CPAP machines have an elaborate tamper-proof logging mechanism
       | including a cellular modem for data uploads outside your control.
       | Largely to enable surveillance by US insurance companies.
       | 
       | In addition to the surveillance being offensive and intrusive it
       | also harms sleep apnea treatment. Some half of people who need a
       | CPAP find they have a hard time learning to use it, difficulty
       | sleeping with the mask on. It's mostly a psychological problem
       | and one stressor for it is the fear that if they can't get it to
       | work then they will be on the hook for $$$$. So they have a
       | harder time sleeping and give up on the CPAP. It's hideous.
       | 
       | All that being said, CPAP can be life-changing if you have sleep
       | apnea. If you suspect you have a problem breathing while you're
       | asleep please talk to a doctor about it. CPAP works well for a
       | lot of people but there are other treatment options too.
        
         | _qua wrote:
         | As someone who treats people with CPAP, it's absurd how many
         | people get them and then don't use them hardly at all. Yes
         | there's an adaptation period where you need to get used to
         | using it, but you do need to use it for it to do anything. It
         | doesn't seem crazy for insurance to want to not keep paying for
         | something that is sitting under a pile of clothes in the
         | corner.
        
           | elric wrote:
           | I don't know. I feel like the compliance checks are more
           | expensive than the machines at this point. They retail for
           | around $/EUR 500. I suspect that sleep centres (or whoever
           | hands out CPAP devices to patients where you are) get
           | significant volume discounts. Say they last for 5 years.
           | That's a near zero cost.
           | 
           | Of course, someone is upcharging somewhere, but that's hardly
           | the patient's fault.
        
             | prepend wrote:
             | I went through this with my provider and insurer, Aetna.
             | 
             | They had me rent the machine for 30 or 60 days. The machine
             | had a cell modem that reported data to medresair, the
             | manufacturer, and my sleep clinic checked that. A nurse
             | called me twice to check in, sent the something to the
             | insurer and after 60 days submitted a new claim.
             | 
             | It was actually one of the most efficient processes I've
             | ever had with my insurance.
             | 
             | Like everything in the US health system, experiences vary
             | depending on provider and payer.
        
           | logbiscuitswave wrote:
           | How do you feel about the new surgical options like Inspire
           | Sleep as an alternative for people who can't tolerate CPAP?
        
             | _qua wrote:
             | It's a lot more involved than CPAP. You need to have a low
             | enough BMI to qualify which excludes a not insignificant
             | proportion of apnea patients. You need to have
             | predominately obstructive sleep apnea since the device
             | can't treat central apneas (where you just stop attempting
             | to breathe). You need to be fit enough to tolerate surgery.
             | You usually need to have an induced sleep study where you
             | get put to sleep with propofol while someone uses a nasal
             | endoscope to watch what part of your airway becomes
             | occluded when you sleep to see if it's even something that
             | can be treated with the device. And then even after all
             | that the device essentially zaps your tongue to make it
             | move and open your airway and for some people they find
             | this intolerable, and the device needs to be turned off.
             | After all that I think it's effective in about 50% of
             | people.
             | 
             | So given all of that, I think it's better to work on trying
             | different masks and other strategies for getting used to
             | the mask before considering the implant.
        
       | yegle wrote:
       | I too had my bad interaction with my insurance company. Out of
       | blue they start rejecting my doctor's prescription for a very
       | common (and cheap) medication. It took me more than 1 month with
       | my awesome primary care doctor's persistent to figure out that
       | the 1000mg version of my medication is the reason it got
       | rejected. My doctor has to prescribe the 500mg version and I
       | simply take two pills.
       | 
       | But no communication from the insurance company told me that.
        
         | francis_t_catte wrote:
         | I had a similar experience with a common, cheap medication,
         | where my insurance started denying the prescription out of the
         | blue. it took several weeks of back and forth with my doctor,
         | and then a lengthy amount of time on hold with the insurance,
         | company where the exasperated pharmacist and I were eventually
         | told that only 15, 24, and 90 day in person pickup supplies
         | were now covered.
         | 
         | my prescription was for a 30 day supply.
        
         | ncallaway wrote:
         | I think every denial from an insurance company (that's denying
         | care prescribed by a doctor), should be required to come from a
         | named and licensed doctor, who is responsible for your care as
         | if they are the treating physician (and thus subject to the
         | same medical malpractice laws).
         | 
         | A denial should be required to come with either an alternate
         | treatment plan, or an alternative diagnosis and treatment plan.
         | 
         | If a doctor issues a denial after reviewing your case for 3
         | seconds (as has happened in the past), they should be liable
         | for medical malpractice lawsuits.
         | 
         | In your case, that would mean the denial would be required to
         | come with an alternative treatment plan, which would say
         | 2x500mg.
        
       | EasyMark wrote:
       | Got rid of mine by going on keto/16-8 fasting by dropping 80lbs
       | over about 9 months.
        
       | Glyptodon wrote:
       | The longer I've had a CPAP the more I've thought they should be
       | more over the counter because literally any problem is
       | unresolvable without it taking too long. Though this case is
       | extra insane.
        
       | dmazzoni wrote:
       | I use Kaiser Permanente as my health care provider. For those who
       | aren't aware, it's one of the few "integrated care" providers in
       | the U.S., meaning they act as both the health insurance and
       | health care provider.
       | 
       | Now, Kaiser is FAR from perfect - they have their share of
       | problems.
       | 
       | But....this sort of nightmare is not one of them. With Kaiser,
       | doctors are free to prescribe whatever they think is medically
       | necessary, and if they prescribe it, it's covered, guaranteed.
       | There's no separate claims department.
       | 
       | Obviously there are some exceptions, like if it's an emergency
       | and you need to get care outside of Kaiser and then submit a
       | claim.
       | 
       | But, the vast majority of the time it just works.
       | 
       | Now, sometimes we aren't happy with what Kaiser offers. So then
       | we go outside of Kaiser and pay out-of-pocket.
       | 
       | Our friends sometimes tell us we're crazy when we do that. We
       | just spent $1200 out-of-pocket to see a specialist because Kaiser
       | didn't want to refer us. What they don't realize, though, is that
       | we saved $3000/year by choosing Kaiser over the next cheapest
       | health insurance provider from our employer. So we're still
       | coming out ahead.
       | 
       | And most importantly, we have the peace of mind knowing that any
       | time we end up in a Kaiser hospital, we'll never once see a bill.
       | 
       | I think we really need more integrated systems like Kaiser.
       | Imagine if there was actually competition in that space, where
       | you could choose between competing hospital systems that came
       | with complete integrated coverage, no middle man.
        
         | koops wrote:
         | Agreed. The best part is that you don't need to second-guess
         | decisions wondering whether or not the course of action is
         | better financially for the decision-maker.
        
         | seattle_spring wrote:
         | I'm a Kaiser member and have to get CPAP supplies through a
         | company called Apria. It has been the absolute most godawful
         | experience I've ever had dealing with a company. Worst than a
         | thousand Comcasts. I genuinely don't understand how you could
         | be a CPAP patient with Kaiser without dealing with Apria?
        
           | logbiscuitswave wrote:
           | My DME used to be Lincare was equally terrible. They were
           | awful. They never had replacement consumables in stock, and I
           | had to deal with months worth of delays to get things I
           | needed. That's why I went to CPAP.com (like OP) for a time.
           | It was annoying having to coordinate with my insurance
           | company to get reimbursements since they didn't direct bill,
           | but at least I would always have my equipment on time. (As a
           | bonus, it was cheaper than Lincare to boot.)
        
           | patja wrote:
           | I have Kaiser and when I need a new CPAP or supplies I just
           | order from CPAPMan or whoever, and pay out of my HSA account.
           | Not all plans allow HSAs though.
        
           | FireBeyond wrote:
           | My girlfriend had the same experience literally this week.
           | The whole thing was Kafkaesque.
           | 
           | She got sent an at home sleep study kit. Set it up, did it.
           | Waited, nothing. Had a run around between the sleep center
           | and her physician. Eventually got a hold of someone. "Well,
           | of course you don't have results, you need to send it back to
           | us. And if you don't they'll charge you $1200 for it". "Uhh,
           | the kit gave me a PIN and specifically said I could dispose
           | of it afterwards" (she hadn't, yet, in case she needed to
           | redo the test). "Oh, well, no-one told us that!" (How is this
           | surprising to you?)
           | 
           | In any case, someone reviews her study, diagnoses her with
           | sleep apnea, writes a script for a CPAP.
           | 
           | She surmises this, because she never spoke to anyone, or got
           | any messages in her portal. She realizes when Apria calls her
           | to verify and confirm details for the CPAP machine (I think
           | she pays $170, then $19/month for 3 months to rent it while
           | they establish compliance, and then if she is using it,
           | Kaiser will pay for it).
           | 
           | She confirms everything and waits. And after a while, sees
           | it's still in "label created" tracking status. Calls them.
           | "Oh, we're waiting for this form from you", that until now
           | she's never been told about. She gets it emailed to her,
           | signs, scans, sends. Asks questions about mask options. "Your
           | provider will discuss that with you."
           | 
           | Uhh, you're about to ship this now. She hasn't spoken to any
           | provider, and the sleep center and the physician are debating
           | over who should talk to her, I suppose?
           | 
           | So she looks over them with me. I'm not a doctor, though I'm
           | a paramedic. I'm experienced with ventilators and
           | occasionally giving acute patients CPAP treatments. So I can
           | talk with just enough knowledge to be dangerous. So we pick
           | out a mask, and finalize.
           | 
           | CPAP arrived on Friday. No-one's spoken to her about it, so
           | she's like "I guess I just start wearing and using it". I had
           | to adjust a few settings for her around pressure and ramp and
           | EPR (expiratory pressure relief) to help someone new to
           | therapy acclimate to how it works.
           | 
           | So, ironically, though not good by any definition, Apria
           | ended up being the best part of the process.
        
         | lepus wrote:
         | That works sometimes, but you could still get screwed if that
         | out of pocket care is wildly expensive. A friend of mine needed
         | a drug that costs about $85k total but was the only effective
         | treatment at the time, and Kaiser doctors told him they
         | wouldn't prescribe it until his condition started giving him
         | organ failure(!), so he had to switch insurance to get it and
         | luckily the timing worked out.
        
       | pgraf wrote:
       | Might have been useful to establish a paper trail instead of
       | calling them. Have a look at the great article by patio11 for
       | ideas how to establish one:
       | https://www.kalzumeus.com/2017/09/09/identity-theft-credit-r...
        
       | dramm wrote:
       | Anthem Insurance staff just following their Claims Manual,
       | Section U.
        
       | steve-atx-7600 wrote:
       | I'm fortunate enough to afford to buy my machines out of pocket.
       | Just trying to obtain a machine the insurance way was taking
       | weeks (before covid even) and I got pissed off and figured out
       | with my Perscription I could buy one on cpap.com with Amazon like
       | service. However, obtaining the equipment was just the first
       | hurdle for me. Thereafter, I approached finding the right
       | settings as a search problem and eventually got some relief.
       | Since I was not a severe case - at least by the "average of bad
       | events" metric from the machine - I wasn't able to get much
       | attention after trying several providers. I eventually bought a
       | bipap machine after reading forums and hoping that more knobs to
       | turn on the machine could yield better results. This helped a lot
       | and again I'm lucky to be able to afford a new one without
       | insurance. There's a lot of opportunity for improvement in this
       | medical tech space.
        
       | anonu wrote:
       | I ended up just buying a CPAP. Ultimately, its not easy to sleep
       | with one. I use a MAD now and my experience has been
       | substantially better in terms of persistence in using it and less
       | snoring. However, it has caused my teeth to move which is a
       | tradeoff I can deal with.
        
       | blincoln wrote:
       | Having one's tonsils and adenoids removed and getting palette-
       | hardening RF treatment seems like it would be a lot easier and
       | more permanent than this rigamarole. Worked for me, and I suspect
       | it would for a lot of other folks too.
        
         | elric wrote:
         | I don't think advocating for invasive surgery is a good way of
         | dealing with awful insurance bureaucracy. With OP's luck, he
         | might need 666 days to get his hospital fees sorted by
         | insurance.
         | 
         | Snark aside, AFAIK palate hardening is not terribly permanent,
         | it works by creating scar tissue, which can become more floppy
         | than the original tissue as you age. It's only useful if a
         | floppy palate is causing obstructions/snoring. Removing tonsils
         | and adenoids will may free up some space in the airway, but
         | it's not going to make any difference if they're not the cause
         | of the obstruction, and this may weaken your immune system.
         | 
         | While I'm sure you were trying to be helpful, I do wish people
         | would stop treating sleep apnea like it's something that's easy
         | to fix. Just have these body parts removed. Just lose weight.
         | Just get on CPAP. Just fix your allergies. Just have your jaw
         | broken and moved forward. Just have an electrode implanted.
         | Etc.
        
       | dekhn wrote:
       | I have one rule when it comes to these things. Play dumb. Don't
       | try to be smart. It's remarkable how the system detects people
       | trying to be smart and considers it abuse and deals with it using
       | high latency.
       | 
       | I found any number of people I worked with were much more
       | productive (car repair, internet service, insurance) if I avoided
       | any speculation about what the problem was, or what the solution
       | could be. Like other folks in this thread, I identify as mildly
       | autistic, and dealing with normies in the service industry took a
       | lot of retraining my mental model of how things work.
        
       | ivraatiems wrote:
       | God, reading this is awful. I have a CPAP and I would not be
       | willing to go one night without it. I'd buy the parts/machine out
       | of pocket and make insurance pay for it later. The impact on my
       | health and quality of life is way too high.
       | 
       | But I'm privileged to be able to do that. I can shell out $1,000
       | for a medical device in an emergency, and my doctors are local
       | and return my calls. Not everyone is so lucky.
        
       | globallyunique wrote:
       | For those who are looking for a cpap now in the US (maybe for
       | other countries - haven't tried) -
       | https://cpapx.com/collections/resmed/products/airsense-10-au...
       | 
       | You can order one for 450 before taxes there.
       | 
       | You will have to email your prescription though before they
       | process the order.
       | 
       | Ordering a backup one (or more) is very useful to leave in your
       | travel suitcase etc
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-02-04 23:02 UTC)