[HN Gopher] Back to the Floppy (2019)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Back to the Floppy (2019)
        
       Author : doener
       Score  : 31 points
       Date   : 2024-02-03 11:30 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.markround.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.markround.com)
        
       | controversial97 wrote:
       | Until about the year 1993, 3.5" disks were very reliable if you
       | didn't abuse them.
       | 
       | Around the early days of windows 3.11, someone figured out how to
       | make cheaper 3.5" disks and putting data on off-brand disks
       | became a gamble.
       | 
       | Enticed by the low price, I bought several boxes of ten floppy
       | disks that had plastic shutters instead of metal. A few from each
       | box of ten had bad sectors from new.
       | 
       | I end up trying to only use TDK disks, though later in the 1990s
       | it seemed to me that the quality of new 3.5" floppy drives went
       | down as well.
        
         | greenbit wrote:
         | There were those double high density disks that never quite
         | caught on, but one fun thing was having the double hd drive
         | (2.8M) and doing anything that would write to an existing
         | 'regular' (1.4M) floppy -- the drive would write narrower
         | tracks than the existing data, and then when you went to read
         | that sector back, the head would pick up both the new narrow
         | track and the adjacent remainder of the wider track, hilarity
         | ensuing. This led to a certain amount of cursing cheap floppies
         | that weren't really to blame.
        
         | bobim wrote:
         | And in the meantime we were drilling cheap 720k floppies.
         | Strangely never had an issue with these.
        
         | cyberax wrote:
         | For some reason, 5.25" floppies always never failed me. But
         | 3.5" floppies had always been a source of problems.
        
         | Plasmoid wrote:
         | I remember I bought a box of floppies in the early 2000s. From
         | that box, I don't think I got a single disk that had zero bad
         | sectors. At that point, I moved to thumb drives, CD-R's, or
         | email for my data transfer needs.
        
         | roblatham wrote:
         | that sounds right to me.. worked universit help desk in the
         | late 90s. wow, the number of distressed people who kept their
         | only copy of their thesis on this one floppy drive that no
         | longer works. some harsh lessons in backups ...
        
       | zubairq wrote:
       | Don't copy that floppy!
        
         | actionfromafar wrote:
         | You wouldn't download a car.
        
         | cout wrote:
         | I do miss watching Stewart Cheifet.
        
       | johnklos wrote:
       | Even when using a FlashFloppy on a real computer (Amiga), it
       | still feels better. You know where your data are. You know how
       | and when it's being accessed.
       | 
       | Also, it's interesting how an Amiga can boot off of a floppy
       | faster than most modern computers can boot from an SSD. Floppies
       | required people to be deliberate about loading files. It's a
       | lesson I think most of us have forgotten now that a web browser
       | can be a few hundred megabytes on disk.
       | 
       | For the fun of it, not long ago I loaded all the DMF (1680K)
       | floppy images for Windows 98 onto a USB stick for a FlashFloppy,
       | booted the boot disk in PC-Task on an Amiga 3000 (with original
       | m68030), then proceeded to install Windows 98. It's amazing that
       | a modern device can emulate a floppy drive, that the Amiga could
       | read the emulated floppy whatever the data rate (Amigas can't do
       | HD floppy data rates, so Amigas cheated by using drives that
       | could run at half the RPM), and could even support the 21 sectors
       | per track that Windows 98 DMF disks use. Of course, it can be
       | done with real floppy disks, too.
       | 
       | Floppies are cool :)
        
         | Moru wrote:
         | Yeah, you really know where your data is. I have fond memories
         | of saving documents to a floppy, walking to the library to
         | print only to find an empty floppy disk. Going back home,
         | formatting it, saving again, doublechecking in a friends drive,
         | still there. Going back to library, empty floppy. Going back
         | home, floppy disk still empty. Had this happening several times
         | with different floppies. Friends had the same problem. Write-
         | lock didn't help a thing. It was less than 50% chance it would
         | actually work. But it did work now and then.
        
           | johnklos wrote:
           | That sounds like an MS-DOS problem. Some systems didn't
           | properly detect disk changes, so if lots of buffers were
           | configured, the system would just keep reading the same data
           | out of memory.
           | 
           | If your system is fine, and your data is on the floppy
           | according to your friend's system, too, then the issue was
           | most likely the library's system. That's not a floppy issue
           | ;)
        
       | cat_plus_plus wrote:
       | There is no good replacement for just giving out floppies without
       | worrying about cost to this day. 8GB SD cards, a practical size
       | to give out applications, photos or videos, are about $6 each, so
       | giving one to everyone in your class is a non-trivial expense.
       | DVDs are too fragile and many don't have an optical drive at home
       | these days. Online hosting requires remembering the URL and then
       | an extra download step.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-02-04 23:00 UTC)