[HN Gopher] Low-Power Wi-Fi Extends Signals Up to 3 Kilometers
___________________________________________________________________
Low-Power Wi-Fi Extends Signals Up to 3 Kilometers
Author : pseudolus
Score : 44 points
Date : 2024-02-03 17:50 UTC (5 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (spectrum.ieee.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (spectrum.ieee.org)
| leroman wrote:
| This is really cool! one use case I can think of is car to car
| communication to allow them to share some dangers up ahead for
| example
| Mjr_Mojo wrote:
| Vehicle to vehicle WiFi communication is standardised under the
| 802.11p and 802.11bd ammendments. They main difference between
| 11p and standard WiFi is they have halved the bit rate to
| increase the range and provide a way for vehicles to broadcast
| info outside a pre-established network context. 11bd builds on
| 11p adding more functionality. I don't remember the specifics
| of 11bd as at the time I was working with the technology 11bd
| hadn't finished standardisation yet.
|
| 11p and 11bd are more generally V2X comms of which there are a
| cellular variants (C-V2X and NR-V2X)
| westurner wrote:
| Could this [1] be possible with "Wi-Fi HaLow, based on the IEEE
| 802.11ah standard", too?:
|
| [1] "Sensor-Free Soil Moisture Sensing Using LoRa Signals" (2022)
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38768950
| westurner wrote:
| - "43 km line of sight with USB WiFi stick (2005)"
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30541576
|
| - Kreosan English's modded lunar rover WiFi antenna videos:
| "100s of km" https://youtu.be/Nk-nj_BwoBE?si=0iwpQBFs9ZqFP0p8
| ... 10x: https://youtu.be/GWq6L94ImX8?si=V2R8hpa3vAosbhvi
| zokier wrote:
| 1Mbps over 3km doesn't sound exactly impressive by itself. People
| have been doing multikilometer wifi links for ages now. Random
| paper reviewing some of them:
| https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281644239_Outdoor_L...
|
| Select example:
|
| > Next, Paul et al. [62] reported on their observation of the
| WLAN link performance in open outdoor networks. The deault packet
| size was 1470 B for all reported measurement campaigns. They
| achieved a maximum range of 1800 m LOS at 148 Mbps with IEEE
| 802.11n links in outdoor locations for back-haul connection among
| WLAN APs.
|
| I'm sure there are things here making the actual tech impressive,
| presumably biggest thing being power consumption and size. But
| just saying that the demo is not doing much when they don't
| provide any details of the setup.
| lxgr wrote:
| With what antenna type? IoT-like use cases often don't lend
| themselves towards the usage of highly-directional, large
| antennas and high-power transmitters.
| zokier wrote:
| That's exactly the problem, this demo doesn't tell anything
| about antennas or power levels, so it's completely impossible
| to say if their thing is worth anything.
| jokoon wrote:
| well at some point, long distance wifi is just a 4G/5G antenna
|
| of course the protocol is not the same, but it's not very
| different either
|
| 4g/5g might also have techniques to improve connectivity in a 3km
| radius when you have buildings and so many other problematic
| things, while wifi was designed for building interiors.
|
| I don't know how expensive is a cheap 5G antenna, but seems like
| it's a tech designed for longer distance, so why use wifi?
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-02-03 23:00 UTC)