[HN Gopher] Farscape and Henson's Lasting Legacy (2011)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Farscape and Henson's Lasting Legacy (2011)
        
       Author : indigodaddy
       Score  : 76 points
       Date   : 2024-02-01 06:00 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (reactormag.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (reactormag.com)
        
       | aredox wrote:
       | Farscape was a great show with bold choices. I really miss it and
       | wish it had more recognition.
        
       | throwup238 wrote:
       | _> I could go on for more pages than anyone would care to count
       | about Farscape. It is, without any doubt, one of the greatest
       | science fiction television series' ever created. Please quote me
       | on that._
       | 
       | A'men! It holds up incredibly well to modern scifi because
       | there's very little CGI and it doesn't look as badly dated as
       | say, Babylon 5. It's sad that there's no one who really does
       | animatronics like Henson anymore and if the show were to be
       | remade today (god forbid), all the characters would probably be
       | Andy Serkis in a mocap suit.
       | 
       | My favorite puppet to this day is the Seer Creesus [1] which
       | would have given me nightmares if I had watched the show as a
       | kid.
       | 
       | [1]
       | https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/farscape/images/5/55/Cresu...
        
         | RajT88 wrote:
         | My wife and I rewatched it recently. She is not particularly a
         | sci-fi geek but she really liked it - until season 3.
         | 
         | Some of those Season 1 episodes are some of the best TV I have
         | seen.
        
         | indigodaddy wrote:
         | And btw it's still on sale on iTunes for 19.99 for the complete
         | series. Just picked it up before I posted this :)
        
           | altruios wrote:
           | *The license... you aren't buying the series, just the
           | license to stream it from iTunes.
           | 
           | The Blu-ray box set is $200.
           | 
           | The price difference between revocable streaming licenses and
           | physical media is worth it, as physical media is not
           | revocable.
           | 
           | (You might find it cheaper on eBay)
        
             | gettodachoppa wrote:
             | If that iTunes license goes away that's a morally green
             | signal to get a non-revocable license from The Pirate Bay.
        
             | indigodaddy wrote:
             | Yep yep I know how it works. But fwiw I've never had
             | anything I've purchased on Vudu or iTunes not be
             | accessible/playable subsequently. Sure it may get removed
             | and not searchable anymore, but still playable and present
             | in your library. And I have over 700 movies (peanuts by
             | comparison to many though).
             | 
             | And also, re: $200 vs $20, $200 for the physical is most
             | definitely NOT worth it to me.
        
       | Verdex wrote:
       | As a teenager, I really enjoyed watching Farscape. As an adult, I
       | definitely feel a lot of the flaws that the show has. But, they
       | didn't compromise on wardrobe or set design or on the
       | characterization for the main characters. Pretty much everyone
       | had some sort of arc going on more or less all the time. And
       | besides all that, it was legit scifi.
       | 
       | But the thing that stands head and shoulders above the rest was
       | Wayne Pygram's Scorpius. You simply do not get villains of that
       | caliber every day.
       | 
       | Interestingly enough, Pygram also plays Tarkin in a blink and you
       | miss it scene in Revenge of the Sith. Which makes me think that
       | we missed out on something very special with Rogue One. Instead
       | of CGI Tarkin, I really wish they could have had Pygram sprinkle
       | some Scorpius magic into a Tarkin role.
        
         | 7thaccount wrote:
         | The show definitely has some campiness to it and some episodes
         | are a little cringe, but overall it's wonderful and a breath of
         | fresh air. I didn't watch it until I was a young adult and
         | enjoyed it. The Farscape corner of the galaxy is so bizarre it
         | does feel actually alien in a sense.
         | 
         | Scorpius is a terrifying villain. He's brilliant, ruthless, and
         | seemingly always one step ahead.
         | 
         | If anyone hasn't seen it, I'd recommend giving it a go if you
         | like scifi and anything Henson.
        
       | sirbranedamuj wrote:
       | Decided to watch Farscape on a whim after watching Ben Browder
       | and Claudia Black in Stargate. What a great show! It starts off
       | on an awkward foot, like most sci-fi shows do. But it eventually
       | comes around to a really amazing show with great performances
       | both by human actors and by puppets. Scorpius is such a great
       | villain for John Crichton. Pilot is one of my favorite characters
       | ever, and sometimes he feels more human than the humans do (yes,
       | I know only John is technically human but I mean the human actors
       | that play some of the aliens).
        
         | Verdex wrote:
         | Out of curiosity did you notice who the voice actor for Pilot
         | was? When it was pointed out to me, I had a 'no way' type of
         | reaction. It goes to show that some people really know how to
         | give a performance that goes beyond who they are as a person
         | and results in giving a spark of life to the character itself.
        
           | joeconway wrote:
           | I actually gasped. Wow
        
           | sirbranedamuj wrote:
           | I didn't notice before being exposed to that information (I'm
           | one of those "imdb in my hand at all times" kind of
           | watchers). It's way more noticeable in the movie because I
           | guess they lost the voice modification toolset they were
           | using and had to try to make it up again from scratch.
           | 
           | but yeah he does a great job!
        
       | flir wrote:
       | If you haven't watched it as an adult, in the era of binge
       | watching, you should give it a shot. There's more there than you
       | think.
       | 
       | What I get from it most clearly is the slow unravelling of one
       | man's mind under the assault of the new. If you focus on Ben
       | Browder you get something that's almost a character study.
        
       | simpaticoder wrote:
       | For anyone looking for a nostalgic, but honest, revisit, check
       | out "Farscape(1999) Retrospective/Review" on YouTube[1]. It is
       | comprehensive and I think picks out the strengths and weaknesses
       | of the show very honestly as a fan. My personal belief is that
       | the show peaked in Season 2 (the heist arc is pretty epic) and
       | then started going downhill after Crichton split, and the
       | introduction of some legitimately annoying crew, but they
       | regained some glory with the Peacekeeper Wars mini-series/movie.
       | The chemistry between the two leads (Ben Browder and Claudia
       | Black) was always a particular strength of the show. Highly
       | recommended but, like with so many series (The Walking Dead, GOT,
       | etc) if you skip the last season(s) you'll be fine.
       | 
       | 1 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0POJFs5PUM
        
         | titusjohnson wrote:
         | I was so amped up when I realized Crichton wasn't going to get
         | merged back together by the end of the episode. They took an
         | old Star Trek trope and _didn't_ resolve it neatly by the end
         | of the episode! They're just dealing with 2 now??
         | 
         | Far and away my favorite Sci-Fi TV show. I agree with another
         | poster here, it's a character study of a normal-ish human
         | losing his mind due to a continuous assault of The New. Poor
         | guy can never catch a break.
        
         | Gregaros wrote:
         | As seems to be the case for another commenter, the double
         | Crichton's was one of my favorite parts. What it introduced to
         | the storytelling and narrative and characterization was a
         | unique depth and capacity for analysis and consequence that I'm
         | surprised hasn't been emulated since.
        
         | bonton89 wrote:
         | Funny, I loved the that the split didn't resolve and let the
         | show go in an interesting direction that most shows chicken out
         | on. I thought season 1 was actually a little rocky and 2-3 were
         | the peak myself.
         | 
         | Season 4 was a complete disaster unfortunately. While Scorpius
         | is fantastic, he doesn't belong on the ship and that wasn't the
         | only nonsensical thing happening by a long shot. I was very
         | happy we got the peace keeper wars to give a solid end to the
         | series, even if it wasn't perfect.
        
           | simpaticoder wrote:
           | _> While Scorpius is fantastic, he doesn't belong on the ship
           | ..._
           | 
           | I agree, and so did the maker of the YouTube video I linked
           | to. Interestingly, Wayne Pilgrim, the actor who plays
           | Scorpius, mentions in an interview how difficult it was for
           | him to play the character, since his motivation became, how
           | shall I say, conflicted. It's an interesting case of the
           | story-tellers putting an actor in a very tough spot.
        
           | saalweachter wrote:
           | Yeah, I loved the Split -- most SF shows will make one of the
           | two disposable and then kill them off at the first
           | opportunity, usually within the same episode. Star Trek, I'm
           | looking at you.
        
             | simpaticoder wrote:
             | The only Star Trek splitting story-line that I recall [1]
             | was not actually resolved! Lt. Riker just sort of
             | disappeared into the background at the end of the episode,
             | with Cdr. Riker and the writers never mentioning him again.
             | 
             | EDIT: apparently Lt. Riker showed up in a DS9 episode[2]!
             | 
             | 1 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Chances_(Star_Trek
             | :_The...
             | 
             | 2 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defiant_(Star_Trek:_Deep_
             | Space...
        
               | saalweachter wrote:
               | There was also Sim, in Enterprise, a clone of Trip who
               | was then harvested for spare parts.
               | 
               | Stargate: SG-1 had robot doubles who were killed off.
        
               | bonton89 wrote:
               | Sort of both resolved and not resolved since I can't
               | remember him coming back. It did give Frakes an
               | opportunity to play a different character later on in
               | DS9.
               | 
               | I liked that episode and would have enjoyed Thomas Riker
               | showing up again from time to time. Although it was
               | another one of those "why can't they just restore dead
               | crew from the transporter beam?" episodes. Even worse
               | than the Scotty one since doubling Riker means that
               | Riker's matter didn't really matter much.
        
             | Alex63 wrote:
             | Canonical example? _The Enemy Within_ https://en.wikipedia.
             | org/wiki/The_Enemy_Within_(Star_Trek:_T...
        
         | CodeWriter23 wrote:
         | The Crichton Split of course was about coming up short in the
         | budget department. So the storytelling was limited to
         | interactions among 4 characters rather than 7. Those arcs were
         | split every other episode. I think they did a stellar job
         | despite those constraints but no doubt the production took a
         | hit.
         | 
         | But the most telling thing IMO about Farscape was the
         | dedication of the fans that actually pushed and got their
         | conclusion in the Peacekeeper Wars. Contrast that with BSG
         | where we basically got no resolution.
        
           | simpaticoder wrote:
           | _> Those arcs were split every other episode. I think they
           | did a stellar job despite those constraints but no doubt the
           | production took a hit._
           | 
           | As a casual viewer, I didn't catch every episode in order,
           | and so it was very confusing for me. No doubt it would have
           | been a lot better if I had done. Not being able to follow the
           | story-lines, I definitely started checking out at that point.
           | Another commented mentioned that the whole series is being
           | sold on iTunes for $20, perhaps it's worth a purchase and
           | rewatch for this reason alone.
        
         | RulerOf wrote:
         | >after Crichton split
         | 
         | I had missed a few episodes that season, and picked back up
         | after the two Chrichtons parted ways, but didn't manage pick up
         | on the fact that there were two of them.
         | 
         | I was so utterly confused and upset when the main character
         | just died and they cut straight to the credits.
        
       | horacemorace wrote:
       | As sometimes silly and campy as it was, Farscape was a
       | speculative fiction masterpiece. Outside of hard sci-fi books
       | I've never experienced more engaging world building. Even if the
       | individual characters sometimes weren't engaging, the backdrop
       | was rich enough to make up for it.
        
         | indigodaddy wrote:
         | Watching it a few days ago for the first time, I was taken
         | aback myself by the beautiful and detailed environment/world.
         | Not at all what I was expecting from a seemingly B-grade budget
         | 1999 show.
        
           | sandworm101 wrote:
           | >> a seemingly B-grade budget 1999 show.
           | 
           | Then don't watch the original Trek, or B5, for Stargate.
           | Farscape was far from b-grade budget. That was as good
           | budgets ever got for TV in the 90s. Definitely in the A-grade
           | budget of the time. For b-grade, look to Space:AboveAndBeyond
           | or even SeaQuest:DSV.
        
             | jshier wrote:
             | First season seaQuest wasn't B-grade either, unless you're
             | overly influenced by the use of mid-nineties CGI. Just look
             | at the interior sets and how much water they use! Add to
             | that the sheer amount of CGI they used (anything happening
             | outside the ship) and there's no way that show was cheap.
             | Of course, once they lost their major producers in season
             | two and three there was a definite drop in quality, but
             | season 1 was definitely up there.
        
               | sandworm101 wrote:
               | CGI looks expensive because of the nature of how it is
               | billed: one big cost to a CGI studio. But in television a
               | much greater expensive is on-location shoots. A few
               | thousand or tens of thousands for a CGI sequence is
               | nothing compared to keeping a hundred people fed and
               | working at a remote location.
        
       | mwilliamson wrote:
       | Although the linked article is missing its images (at least for
       | me), the archived version from tor.com has them:
       | https://web.archive.org/web/20160305081415/https://www.tor.c...
        
         | indigodaddy wrote:
         | Oh nice, that's way better with the pics and the formatting is
         | also nicer. Maybe @dang can update the URL in the OP.
        
       | tivert wrote:
       | It looks like the article was migrated at some point in a way
       | that broke the images.
       | 
       | I found this archived version with working images:
       | https://web.archive.org/web/20160330064639/http://www.tor.co...
        
       | vouaobrasil wrote:
       | I once made a comprehensive list of all the television I have
       | ever watched, which included the Star Treks and various other
       | science fiction shows, and Farscape was at the top. Highlights
       | include the chemistry between Browder and Black, Scorpius, the
       | above average writing, and the originality and catchiness of the
       | themes. It was hard to say whether it was better than DS9 at the
       | time but if I had to choose one to rewatch, it would be Farscape
       | for sure.
        
         | Verdex wrote:
         | I think my favorite part of DS9 was how many non-human / non-
         | federation cultures they had walking around in the spotlight.
         | There's a great little scene where Quark gives Garak some root
         | beer and they commiserate over how weird humans are.
         | 
         | Anyway, Fascape is basically ONLY that kind of thing. Only the
         | aliens are significantly more alien. Even the sebaceans and
         | crichton keep clashing because they both expect the other to
         | act more like themselves.
        
       | farmdve wrote:
       | Funny thing about Farscape, it was my favorite TV show as a
       | child. Fond memories. The only thing that doesn't hold up is
       | Rygel, maybe back then it was ok, but it's pretty horrific to see
       | it now in all of it's Animatronic glory.
        
       | vlachen wrote:
       | Far and away, one of my favorite shows. The characters, the
       | writing, the sets and the puppets are all top notch. Of course
       | there's campiness. Of course there are bad episodes and tropes,
       | but the thing taken together is a well done work of art. I'm
       | supremely impressed that they were able to pull together support
       | for The Peacekeeper Wars to wrap it all up.
       | 
       | One of the things that I find most novel and appealing about
       | Farscape is that the human might be the lead character, but The
       | Humans are not the galaxy's bad-asses. Quite to the contrary. If
       | not for the circumstances of Crichton's transport, he would have
       | just been some (galactic) low tech monkey from a backwater
       | planet.
       | 
       | I've always found the Hollywood trope of "plucky current era
       | humans face off against pan-galactic force and save the day" to
       | be abused and absurd. Farscape gave that a pass by making
       | Crichton "The dumbest smart person in the room" who didn't want
       | to dominate. He just wanted to be left alone.
       | 
       | Additionally, Farscape did venture a bit into the idea that if
       | aliens exists, they likely don't look like us. There were a lot
       | of bipeds walking around with heads on top, but there were also a
       | good number of extremely different types.
        
       | k3vinw wrote:
       | I remember being blown away by this show. It's a rare gem with
       | one of the best executed love stories between Crichton and Aeryn
       | that heightened the stakes as the series progressed. I hope other
       | writer/producer types are paying attention and taking notes.
        
       | echelon_musk wrote:
       | I can't see Farscape discussed without reminiscing on the episode
       | of Community where Abed "really likes talking about Farscape".
       | [0]
       | 
       | It still makes me laugh after all these years.
       | 
       | [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WT1QPFr6qPI
        
       | narag wrote:
       | The living ship and the blue woman are so powerful and so
       | different. There from the first episode.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-02-02 23:01 UTC)