[HN Gopher] The company that sells your lost airplane luggage
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The company that sells your lost airplane luggage
        
       Author : Anon84
       Score  : 63 points
       Date   : 2024-01-28 12:36 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (thehustle.co)
 (TXT) w3m dump (thehustle.co)
        
       | ggm wrote:
       | A point is high value items, investment grade diamonds, expensive
       | watches could reunite with their owner trivially because their
       | sales are tracked. The point being insurance and compensation has
       | been paid. So the closing ethical concern is perhaps overstated.
       | It's the more personal effects, a treasured family memento,
       | letters which beg questions.
        
         | pessimizer wrote:
         | If they didn't exist, the headline would be "The company that
         | dumps your lost airplane luggage into a landfill."
        
           | behringer wrote:
           | sounds good to me. Then nobody's making money off of stolen
           | goods except the landfill.
        
             | graphe wrote:
             | So you want to buy stuff that the landfill owner sells?
        
           | wvenable wrote:
           | I'm more worried about the perverse incentive structure.
        
             | graphe wrote:
             | Like when high value items are "dumped" and when the
             | "garbage" is stolen, or when landfill owners take a
             | kickback?
        
       | ProllyInfamous wrote:
       | I've been to Unclaimed Baggage in Alabama, just once, and it was
       | no nicer than the nicest thrift stores in my hometown. An
       | interesting concept, but it seems that the best items are priced-
       | out.
        
       | lifestyleguru wrote:
       | To quote the man interviewed in BBC who was sorting "lost
       | luggage" after Heathrow's Terminal 5 fuckup
       | 
       | "don't you feel bad that it's someone's else possesion?"
       | 
       | "no, that's why it's such a good stuff"
        
       | Jun8 wrote:
       | I'm a sucker for found antique/goods types of shows and bought &
       | watched a few seasons of "Baggage Battles"
       | (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baggage_Battles) on Amazon Prime.
       | It was OK but they _very_ rarely discovered valuable stuff and
       | even those were kind of meh.
       | 
       | Still the art of the selection (should you go for the expensive
       | bag, the heavy one, or the well-used one) was exciting. If I had
       | the money I'd see myself attending baggage auctions just for the
       | entertainment value; but doing it for flipping is not profitable
       | I think.
        
         | IshKebab wrote:
         | _Surely_ someone in the chain goes through these bags for
         | obvious expensive things beforehand. Why would that not happen?
        
         | giarc wrote:
         | I suspect a show for entertainment would script it a bit and
         | add some high end stuff. So the fact that even after watching
         | you say it's rare to find good stuff tells me it's even worse
         | than the show lets on.
        
       | rnotaro wrote:
       | In a related note, some canadian passengers found their Air Maroc
       | luggage at a liquidation center in Quebec, Canada in even 3 weeks
       | after being lost this month.
       | 
       | https://www.bladi.net/colere-royal-air-maroc-perte-bagages,1...
       | 
       | https://www.tvanouvelles.ca/2024/01/28/saga-des-valises-egar...
        
       | akshayshah wrote:
       | Luggage is fairly expensive and easy to reuse - sizing isn't
       | personal, and most designs are fairly bland. I'm surprised that
       | the bags themselves aren't a substantial source of income.
        
         | FireBeyond wrote:
         | Probably comes down to how difficult it is to gain access, and
         | whether that's destructive.
        
           | bdavbdav wrote:
           | I guarantee they have TSA keys
        
           | itishappy wrote:
           | You can put whatever locks you want on your bags, but the TSA
           | can and will cut anything they can't easily open.
           | 
           | https://www.tsa.gov/blog/2014/02/18/tsa-travel-tips-
           | tuesday-...
        
             | FireBeyond wrote:
             | I absolutely get that. But this private company is not the
             | TSA, either.
        
               | itishappy wrote:
               | Right, but in order to lose your bag, it has to first
               | pass through the TSA. I doubt a bag would make it all the
               | way Unclaimed Baggage with the locks intact.
        
       | magneticnorth wrote:
       | If anyone in your life needs secondhand used underwear from
       | unclaimed baggage, you can buy the "10 pc mystery underwear bag"
       | or "women's lingerie mystery bag" online:
       | https://www.unclaimedbaggage.com/collections/mystery-bags
        
         | chankstein38 wrote:
         | It's advertised in a creepy way and it's sold out. People will
         | never stop being sketchy lol
        
           | swozey wrote:
           | Maybe someone buys them for a few bucks and dropships them
           | for $25 as a vtuber?
           | 
           | Think I have a new side gig
        
             | bozhark wrote:
             | Need an AI character to model said wares?
        
         | lifestyleguru wrote:
         | It's absolutely missing dildos and erotic toys mystery bag, or
         | the people opening suitcases take these for themselves together
         | with more precious stuff?
        
           | KolmogorovComp wrote:
           | It's explained in TFA. They don't sell those.
        
       | oh_sigh wrote:
       | How does luggage ever get lost when they slap so many stickers on
       | it?
        
         | lifestyleguru wrote:
         | When the computer says "no", or when the people working in
         | baggage handling system are illegal immigrants, working in
         | zero-hour or some other disposable contracts.
        
         | MattGaiser wrote:
         | They often don't. Most of the time my bag only has one sticker
         | and many people don't put other contact info on there.
        
         | happyopossum wrote:
         | > so many stickers on it
         | 
         | I travel 30-40 times/yr and I can't recall ever putting more
         | than one sticker on a checked bag...
        
       | swozey wrote:
       | Speaking of unclaimed property, do any of you Texans know of a
       | way to use this absolutely trash website to look for something
       | more specific than your First/Last?
       | 
       | https://www.claimittexas.gov/
       | 
       | I have a fairly common first name and there are literally 50
       | pages of results and "Your search returned 1000 unclaimed
       | properties."
       | 
       | One of my financial apps (mint/ck not sure) told me I had
       | unclaimed money and I have no way to find my name on this without
       | cdlicking through 50 pages.
       | 
       | You can't even sort the rows.
        
         | giarc wrote:
         | From the FAQ page. Providing your SIN/DOB etc will likely help.
         | 
         | What can I do if I can't find the funds I'm looking for on your
         | website?
         | 
         | If you are unable to locate your unclaimed property on the
         | website, fill out our search form. Our Research Department will
         | try to locate the property for you. Also see our Finding Money
         | page for more information on unclaimed property not held with
         | the Texas Comptroller.
        
           | swozey wrote:
           | Thanks, I missed that. It'd be nice if I could do this myself
           | and not need to send them a form. I'll continue to try to
           | find a way to de-paginate the results.
        
       | iJohnDoe wrote:
       | I would imagine the really good stuff is sorted through and sold
       | via different methods. What makes it to the store is left over
       | crap?
        
         | acdha wrote:
         | I had a bag stolen a while back and was surprised to learn that
         | SFO has no real security after you drop a bag off. The 9/11
         | crunch focused on bags going in, so they didn't even have
         | cameras in the baggage processing facilities and since the
         | airline terms of service limit payouts to like $3/pound they
         | don't care, either. Everyone involved was very casual about
         | theft being routine and expected, so I would be somewhat
         | surprised if the lost luggage didn't have a similar fate.
        
       | KolmogorovComp wrote:
       | In those days of ubiquitous information, these kind of stops have
       | lost all interest, because the prices are not better than the
       | average second hand item.
        
       | KolmogorovComp wrote:
       | > Some say the store has an ethical duty to reunite people with
       | their lost luggage -- especially highly personal items, like
       | jewelry inscribed with names and dates, or electronics with
       | identifiable information. But historically, the store has
       | maintained it has a business to run.
       | 
       | I'm quite surprised by the opposition here, I'd assume that the
       | high sentimental value could be converted in a much higher price
       | than its off-the-shelf value.
       | 
       | Now would it be more ethical than not contacting them? That's up
       | to debate, but at least the owners would have a choice.
        
         | AceJohnny2 wrote:
         | > _Now would it be more ethical than not contacting them?
         | That's up to debate, but at least the owners would have a
         | choice._
         | 
         | There's the rub: luggage ends up at UnclaimedBaggage _after_
         | the airline has exhausted all other avenues to try and find the
         | owner. (this particular article doesn 't focus on that aspect.
         | Here's another I quickly found that does:
         | https://www.afar.com/magazine/what-happens-to-airline-
         | passen...)
         | 
         | There are no contactable owners, so the ethical dilemna solves
         | itself.
         | 
         | This is why it's always good to put contact information
         | _inside_ the luggage, where it can 't get ripped off in
         | handling.
        
           | newsclues wrote:
           | Do companies have a true incentive to do the work?
           | 
           | Or can they provide limited token compensation minus the sale
           | of the lost luggage, and come out ahead vs doing a good job
           | at not losing luggage and returning it when found?
           | 
           | If government/contracts limits compensation liability, then
           | cut costs as much as possible and bring in some revenue
           | selling luggage?
        
           | dataflow wrote:
           | > There's the rub: luggage ends up at UnclaimedBaggage after
           | the airline has exhausted all other avenues to try and find
           | the owner.
           | 
           | > There are no contactable owners, so the ethical dilemna
           | solves itself.
           | 
           | Er, that's a very... convenient excuse for absolving people
           | of ethical responsibility. Geez, there's no contact info on
           | it, how could I possibly reunite it with its owner?? It's not
           | like we have any clue who's lost their bags or what those
           | bags looked like, right??
           | 
           | The owners are still able to describe and recognize their
           | bags and their contents... the fact that an airline doesn't
           | provide adequate means to search through lost bags doesn't
           | mean it's somehow impossible to pair some of the owners and
           | bags correctly.
        
       | McDyver wrote:
       | When it was founded 50 Yeats ago _maybe_ it made sense because
       | technology was not that advanced.
       | 
       | Now I'd say it's a company selling stolen goods.
       | 
       | Airlines know who is the owner of that luggage. They have the
       | sticker with flight, booking number, they have the contact
       | details of the owner, and most owners put a tag with their
       | contact info on the luggage.
       | 
       | They were hired to provide the sole service of transporting the
       | luggage and owner from A to B. It's their only job. And they fail
       | and steal your belongings and sell it for a profit, to a fence
        
         | pulse7 wrote:
         | Please read the article...
        
           | McDyver wrote:
           | I did. Are you saying 25m bags have absolutely no information
           | on them? Absolutely zero?
        
             | handoflixue wrote:
             | Did you read the sentence right after that one?
             | 
             | "Around 25m of them (5.7 per 1k bags checked) end up lost
             | or misdirected. The 0.03% of bags that are still not
             | reunited with their owners after 90 days are sold by the
             | airline."
             | 
             | 0.03% of 25m, and it's only after 90 days.
        
               | cpncrunch wrote:
               | But it doesn't explain why they can't use the tags to
               | locate the owners. I did find the answer (see my other
               | comment), but it wasn't from this article.
        
               | McDyver wrote:
               | Yes, although that doesn't seem correct. That would be
               | 7500 a year.
               | 
               | When they say the founder was buying 3k a month, either
               | the RF ids are great at reducing the losses worldwide, or
               | something is wrong with those numbers.
        
               | IanCal wrote:
               | I'm pretty sure that's a mistake. 1.3M are never claimed
               | according to the figures early on, that's 0.0 _0_ 3% of
               | the total figure.
        
             | graphe wrote:
             | What if they didn't want it back?
        
             | cpncrunch wrote:
             | I read the article as well, as there is no info on this at
             | all. After some searching I did find the information in a
             | different article about Canadian airlines:
             | 
             | https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/what-happens-to-unclaimed-
             | lug...
             | 
             | Air Canada and Westjet both open the bags to look for
             | identifying information so they can contact the owner. Then
             | they donate the bags to charity or dispose of them if they
             | can't locate the owner.
             | 
             | I think the moral of the story is to make sure your bag is
             | well tagged. We have been putting an airtag in my bag for
             | the last few flights, and it works really well. It's a pity
             | there is no Android equivalent, as I have no way of
             | locating my tags on my phone. (I just use an ipad).
        
               | victorarevalo wrote:
               | I use Tile for this purpose and they work well. Not as
               | good as airtag, but I don't have an iphone.
        
               | seb1204 wrote:
               | Will an air tag help the airline to identify you? That
               | would be rather bad in a privacy sense. I don't think it
               | is easy for you to call the airline and say my bag is in
               | this building etc please give it back to me. my point is
               | that the airline needs to be able to contact you.
        
             | paxys wrote:
             | 0.03% of 25m. And yes, why is that so hard to believe?
        
         | handoflixue wrote:
         | > Now I'd say it's a company selling stolen goods.
         | 
         | "Imagine this: An airline loses your checked bag. After an
         | extensive search, customer support comes up empty-handed. They
         | compensate you and life goes on."
         | 
         | It seems bizarre to call this stolen goods when the airline has
         | tried to resolve this for 90 days AND compensated you for your
         | loss
        
           | theturtletalks wrote:
           | Exactly, but the issue is that a person might be willing to
           | pay that compensation fee for the original bag back.
           | 
           | Some bags had valuable artifacts, a camera used by NASA, etc.
           | I'm sure the airlines didn't compensate for this sort of
           | items.
           | 
           | Regardless, the company selling this is not at fault for
           | selling "stolen" items. They believe the airline has done its
           | due diligence in trying to find the owner and are now
           | reducing waste by giving the items a 2nd home.
        
             | McDyver wrote:
             | > Some say the store has an ethical duty to reunite people
             | with their lost luggage -- especially highly personal
             | items, like jewelry inscribed with names and dates, or
             | electronics with identifiable information.
             | 
             | > But historically, the store has maintained it has a
             | business to run.
             | 
             | "I see this iPad or this laptop has your info, and I could
             | contact you but hey... Tough luck"
        
         | paxys wrote:
         | If the contents of the bag are worth $500 the airline isn't
         | spending >$500 worth of effort to track it down and return it
         | to its owner. It makes sense to just reimburse them and move
         | on.
         | 
         | Now the question is what happens to the bag floating in the
         | ether. Option 1 is sending it to a landfill. Option 2 is
         | cracking it open and reselling/reusing the stuff in it. There
         | are plenty of ethical arguments in either one's favor, but it
         | isn't as obvious as everyone is making it seem.
        
           | plasticchris wrote:
           | I once had my check bag lost and it arrived a couple of
           | months later via a courier. This was in '08
        
       | jabroni_salad wrote:
       | As someone who has been in a similar space, I guarantee you over
       | half of those luggages do have identified owners who simply
       | aren't contactable because they will not answer the phone, check
       | a voicemail, read their email, or open any letter addressed to
       | them.
       | 
       | It takes two to tango and nobody knows how to dance.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-01-29 23:00 UTC)