[HN Gopher] Can Earthquakes Be Predicted? (2022)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Can Earthquakes Be Predicted? (2022)
        
       Author : teleforce
       Score  : 38 points
       Date   : 2024-01-28 03:44 UTC (19 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (heritageproject.caltech.edu)
 (TXT) w3m dump (heritageproject.caltech.edu)
        
       | ken47 wrote:
       | What if earthquakes could not only be predicted, but manually
       | triggered? Imagine the warfare implications.
        
         | max_ wrote:
         | Yes, there is such a thing as an earthquake bomb
        
         | blueprint wrote:
         | https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-67860-3
        
         | ynniv wrote:
         | It's much easier to cause something than to predict when it
         | will happen naturally. As Alan Kay famously said, "The best way
         | to predict the future is to invent it."
        
         | tronicdude wrote:
         | Fracking does this on a small scale. I had an excellent geology
         | professor, Donald Prothero, who argued manually triggering
         | earthquakes could be a much better idea in high tension areas
         | than waiting for them to happen organically, as we could
         | prepare, and the triggered earthquakes wouldn't be as bad as
         | waiting for them to happen. But the paperwork would be a
         | nightmare(:
        
           | anonymouskimmer wrote:
           | Another issue is that an earthquake in one location can
           | trigger an earthquake in another.
        
           | dsr3 wrote:
           | Earthquakes triggered by fracking is usually small and non-
           | damaging (less than M5, mostly M4 or M3).
        
             | code51 wrote:
             | It's actually impossible to know for certain how much and
             | what size of land you're destabilizing. Duration of
             | expected destabilization is also varying I guess and at
             | least 1 year.
             | 
             | Oklahoma, 2012 seismic sequence in Emilia (Italy), Sichuan
             | Basin are already examples that triggered protests and call
             | for investigations: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Nort
             | hern_Italy_earthquake...
             | 
             | https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/2187718/chi
             | n...
             | 
             | https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1225942
             | 
             | An example study for US that states the activity is
             | exponantially linked to fracking sites:
             | https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10233410
             | 
             | > "Exponential relationship between the total number of
             | earthquakes and the number of wells in the Texas during the
             | study period 1998-2018 with correlation R2=0.726."
             | 
             | In the tragic earthquakes of 2023 in Turkey, this
             | relationship was again discussed in mainstream media: https
             | ://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Turkey%E2%80%93Syria_eart...
             | 
             | It's not fracking itself but actually wastewater injection
             | has a bigger influence in triggering bigger earthquakes
             | according to what I've read. Moreover, it's also known that
             | dams have a significant impact:
             | 
             | https://archive.internationalrivers.org/blogs/227/china-
             | eart....
             | 
             | > "The devastating earthquake in Sichuan, which took at
             | least 69,000 lives in May 2008, may have been unleashed by
             | the huge Zipingpu Dam. New scientific evidence suggests
             | that the filling of the Zipingpu reservoir may have
             | activated a dormant fault line near the dam site."
             | 
             | Shallow faults are _definitely_ activated. Probability of
             | deep faults activated through full destabilization of a
             | region? Unknown for now.
        
           | BurningFrog wrote:
           | Releasing the tension in small quakes every few months must
           | be preferable to letting it pile up and release every few
           | decades.
        
           | stygiansonic wrote:
           | Also who would cover the legal liability in case of damages?
        
         | grecy wrote:
         | The Core - Best b-grade disaster movie of recent times!
         | 
         | https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0298814/
        
       | throwbadubadu wrote:
       | Tension rods, logical idea, never seen before.. and ugly like
       | hell, or do you hide them? All I find quickly is about tension
       | rods for curtains. How common are they? Pluses no need to drill
       | and would work for freestanding, more over just securing with
       | screws to wall?
        
       | jamiek88 wrote:
       | The system is chaotic so even in principle it's likely
       | impossible.
        
         | lxgr wrote:
         | Then again, groups of animals seem to be able to predict
         | earthquakes and volcanic eruptions hours ahead of time:
         | https://www.icarus.mpg.de/11706/a-four-legged-early-warning-...
         | 
         | There are also reports of pretty interesting/odd
         | electromagnetic phenomena reaching up to the ionosphere, which
         | might be what animals are ultimately sensing:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthquake_light
         | 
         | A lot of these videos might be transformers blowing out or
         | swinging power lines touching, but given the ubiquity of
         | surveillance cameras and dashcams, we're fortunately getting
         | more and more data. If there's something there that can be used
         | for prediction better than seconds ahead of the earthquake, the
         | value would obviously be immense.
         | 
         | It might of course be that animals are reacting to something
         | else, like sulphuric gases being released from the ground,
         | infrasound of early earthquake acitivty etc. - we just don't
         | know enough about it yet, but the fact that there's correlation
         | between animal behavior and seismic activity seems worth
         | studying.
        
           | singularity2001 wrote:
           | Volcanic eruptions are predictable
        
       | dsr3 wrote:
       | Earthquakes might not be able to be predicted accurately, but
       | some recent research 'claims' there some physical signs that can
       | comes before earthquake comes. E.g. : helium and radon gas.
       | Research related to 2011 Tohoku earthquake also reported that
       | there is some magnetic anomaly before the earthquake.
       | 
       | People that noticed these anomaly, however, cannot correlates
       | these anomaly to the necessary parameter that is really required
       | for true earthquake prediction: Magnitude, Location, and Time.
       | Without saying what is the magnitude and location, you cannot
       | estimate the earthquake damage. Time limit is also important.
        
       | grecy wrote:
       | Hasn't it been known for a while that dogs and birds react before
       | an earthquake?
       | 
       | They must be sensing _something_ we can make an artificial sensor
       | for.
        
         | ducktective wrote:
         | >known for a while dogs and birds react before an earthquake
         | 
         | I think I've read somewhere that the ancient Greeks were
         | speculating on this...
        
         | deepsun wrote:
         | No, that's a myth.
        
           | lxgr wrote:
           | Groups of some animals can predict seismic activity at a rate
           | better than random chance:
           | https://www.icarus.mpg.de/11706/a-four-legged-early-
           | warning-...
        
             | jcranmer wrote:
             | Your link fails to establish that. The main problem with
             | animal behavior surveys is that they tend to report good
             | results when you start with a known earthquake, and then
             | look backwards to find unusual animal behavior before the
             | earthquake. If you instead try to define objective criteria
             | on animal behavior and then use that as a signal to predict
             | earthquakes, the quality of animal behavior as a predictor
             | turns to crap. In a nutshell, unusual animal behavior
             | precedes most earthquakes... and many more events that turn
             | out not to be earthquakes!
        
               | lxgr wrote:
               | That's a fair point; a detector that reliably detects
               | impeding once-in-a-century strong earthquakes as well as
               | every wolf or bear wandering too close to some herd of
               | goats is probably not that useful.
        
               | objektif wrote:
               | You speak of general animal behavior but Where are you
               | basing this on? Is there a study you can link to related
               | to the topic in discussion?
        
         | bragr wrote:
         | >dogs and birds react before an earthquake
         | 
         | Earthquakes have what are called primary (P) and secondary (S)
         | waves. The primary is a sharp high frequency wave and the
         | secondary waves are a lower frequency rumble that you feel as
         | the earthquake. The P wave propagates faster so if you're
         | distant from the epicenter the P waves might arrive fractions
         | of a minutes earlier. That's what you see in videos of dogs
         | jumping up and running off or birds taking flight "right
         | before" the earthquake.
        
           | lxgr wrote:
           | That explains detection seconds before the main tremors, but
           | there's some evidence that some animals change their behavior
           | hours before the actual earthquake, before there are any
           | measurable tremors, so there might be other mechanisms at
           | play.
        
       | mvdwoord wrote:
       | There was a recent article on predicting earthquakes with GPS
       | signals..
       | 
       | https://phys.org/news/2023-07-gps-earthquake-predictor.html
        
         | OlympusMonds wrote:
         | There is a response to this paper on the journal website:
         | https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adg2565#eletters...
         | (the eLetters section), which claims the signal from GPS is
         | just noise.
        
       | mnky9800n wrote:
       | There's a great set of research coming from Alexis Cartwright
       | Taylor's lab showing that it's quite possible that large
       | fractions of fracture mechanics information is not transmitted
       | acoustically. For example grain boundary rotations and change the
       | stress field without releasing acoustic energy as they are
       | typically elastic. This would indicate that even the very idea of
       | what seismology has been the last 60 years, acoustic detection of
       | earthquakes, does not produce enough information for
       | understanding the earthquake process and thus prediction would
       | not be possible using only data from seismometers. Of course,
       | Gutenberg Richter b value people will tell you that's not true.
       | But they seem to be a dying breed.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-01-28 23:00 UTC)