[HN Gopher] San Francisco Tried to Build a $1.7M Toilet. It's St...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       San Francisco Tried to Build a $1.7M Toilet. It's Still Not Done
        
       Author : 2OEH8eoCRo0
       Score  : 19 points
       Date   : 2024-01-24 21:15 UTC (1 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.nytimes.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.nytimes.com)
        
       | labrador wrote:
       | This is actually an interesting problem if people gave it a
       | minute. Here's the initial conditions: We don't lock up mentally
       | ill people anymore in California because "patient rights"
       | including the right to non-neurotypical. This results in mentally
       | ill people wandering the streets. They are too sick to
       | respectfully use commerical establishment bathrooms, so they rely
       | on public bathrooms. Since there is a shortage of those, they end
       | up using the street. So SF wants to build an indesctructible
       | public toilet for them so they don't use the street, which turns
       | out to be hard because the mentally ill are often clever and find
       | ways to make it a nightmare for everyone, so it ends up costing
       | 1.7 million dollars and take a long time. What would you do?
        
         | notRobot wrote:
         | Tackle the social conditions that lead to mentally unwell
         | people being helpless and homeless and foodless on the streets.
         | 
         | There are enough resources in this world to take care of
         | everyone. We should not tolerate the fact that so many people
         | struggle all their lives at no fault of their own, simply
         | because of the conditions they're born into.
         | 
         | You can help mentally unwell people without locking them up,
         | what are you on about?
        
           | labrador wrote:
           | I don't know where you're from but it wasn't just Governors
           | Brown and Reagan who created the problem, it was the
           | Psychiatric survivors movement which was against forced
           | treatment and forced medication.
           | 
           | I voluntarily take my medication and look upon those poor
           | schizophrenics on the street screaming at birds with pity and
           | sadness because well meaning do gooders don't believe they
           | should be forced to take meds or accept treatment of any kind
           | (because freedom) so they are left to suffer like wounded
           | animals on the street.
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychiatric_survivors_movement
        
             | pydry wrote:
             | Homelessness isnt a side effect of a mental illness
             | epidemic. Mental illness is a side effect of a homelessness
             | epidemic.
             | 
             | The reason for the focus on mental illness as a cause is
             | that it stops people from drawing a direct line between a
             | cult of landlord greed and drug addicts defecating outside
             | of your local drugstore.
        
         | proc0 wrote:
         | Hmm, it's almost like treating the symptom instead of the
         | cause.
        
           | cpursley wrote:
           | It's the American way.
        
         | iamleppert wrote:
         | Designing an indestructible public toilet for use by mentally
         | ill homeless individuals involves considering both durability
         | and accessibility, while also ensuring the safety and comfort
         | of users. Here are key design aspects to consider:
         | 
         | 1. *Robust Materials:* Use vandal-resistant materials like
         | heavy-duty stainless steel for walls, floors, and fixtures.
         | Surfaces should be easy to clean and resistant to graffiti.
         | 
         | 2. *Safety Features:* Design should minimize sharp edges and
         | corners to prevent self-harm. Incorporate non-removable
         | fixtures and ensure there's nothing that can be easily broken
         | off or used as a weapon.
         | 
         | 3. *Easy Maintenance:* The toilet should be easy to clean and
         | maintain. Consider self-cleaning features or coatings that
         | repel dirt and grime.
         | 
         | 4. *Accessibility:* Comply with ADA (Americans with
         | Disabilities Act) guidelines to ensure accessibility for
         | individuals with physical disabilities. Features like handrails
         | and appropriate toilet height are essential.
         | 
         | 5. *Emergency Response:* Incorporate a system for users to
         | signal for help in case of an emergency, like a distress button
         | that alerts nearby services.
         | 
         | 6. *Privacy and Dignity:* Ensure that the toilet provides
         | privacy while also allowing for monitoring in case of
         | emergencies. This could include design features that allow for
         | external checks without compromising privacy.
         | 
         | 7. *Lighting and Visibility:* Good internal and external
         | lighting for safety, while also considering features that
         | prevent people from using the space for activities other than
         | its intended purpose.
         | 
         | 8. *Simple and Intuitive Design:* The toilet should be user-
         | friendly, with clear signage and instructions to accommodate
         | individuals with varying levels of cognitive function.
         | 
         | 9. *Community Integration:* The design should be visually
         | pleasing and fit well within its surroundings to avoid
         | stigmatization of users.
         | 
         | 10. *Health and Hygiene Facilities:* Include handwashing
         | stations, and possibly needle disposal units for safe disposal
         | of sharps.
         | 
         | 11. *Monitoring and Management:* Consider integrating
         | technology for remote monitoring of the facility's condition
         | and usage to facilitate timely maintenance.
         | 
         | 12. *Crisis Information:* Display contact information for local
         | mental health and homeless support services inside the toilet.
         | 
         | This design approach balances durability, safety, and
         | accessibility, providing a dignified solution for a vulnerable
         | population.
         | 
         | Creating a high-level development and testing plan for an
         | indestructible public toilet designed for use by mentally ill
         | homeless individuals involves several stages:
         | conceptualization, design, prototyping, testing, and
         | deployment. Here's a general outline for such a project:
         | 
         | ### 1. *Project Initialization and Conceptualization (1-2
         | Months)* - *Activities:* Define project scope, objectives, and
         | feasibility studies. - *Headcount:* Project Manager (PM), 2
         | Researchers. - *Budget:* Initial research and administrative
         | costs.
         | 
         | ### 2. *Design Phase (3-4 Months)* - *Activities:* Detailed
         | design based on requirements, ADA compliance, safety and
         | durability considerations. - *Headcount:* PM, 2 Design
         | Engineers, 1 ADA Compliance Specialist, 1 Safety Expert. -
         | *Budget:* Personnel costs, design software, and consultation
         | fees.
         | 
         | ### 3. *Prototyping (2-3 Months)* - *Activities:* Constructing
         | a full-scale prototype. - *Headcount:* PM, 2 Design Engineers,
         | 2 Mechanical Engineers, 1 Electrical Engineer (for automated
         | features). - *Budget:* Material costs for prototype, labor, and
         | facility rental.
         | 
         | ### 4. *Testing Phase (3-4 Months)* - *Activities:* Durability
         | testing, user experience testing with focus groups (including
         | mental health professionals and target user representatives),
         | safety compliance checks. - *Headcount:* PM, 1 Test Engineer, 1
         | Safety Expert, 1 User Experience Specialist. - *Budget:*
         | Testing equipment, focus group expenses, safety certification
         | fees.
         | 
         | ### 5. *Feedback and Redesign (1-2 Months)* - *Activities:*
         | Analyzing test results, making necessary redesigns. -
         | *Headcount:* PM, 2 Design Engineers, 1 Test Engineer. -
         | *Budget:* Additional design and material costs.
         | 
         | ### 6. *Final Product Development (2-3 Months)* - *Activities:*
         | Finalizing the design, preparing for production. - *Headcount:*
         | PM, 2 Design Engineers, 1 Production Specialist. - *Budget:*
         | Final design and preparation costs.
         | 
         | ### 7. *Deployment and Monitoring (Ongoing)* - *Activities:*
         | Installation, community integration, and ongoing monitoring. -
         | *Headcount:* PM, 1 Installation Coordinator, 1 Monitoring and
         | Maintenance Supervisor. - *Budget:* Installation costs,
         | monitoring systems, and initial maintenance budget.
         | 
         | ### Total Project Timeline: 14-21 Months
         | 
         | ### Estimated Total Headcount: - 1 Project Manager (full-time
         | throughout the project) - 2-4 Engineers (varying specialties,
         | full-time during specific phases) - Various specialists (part-
         | time or consulting basis)
         | 
         | ### Estimated Total Budget: - This would depend heavily on
         | regional costs, material choices, and labor rates. A rough
         | estimate could range from $500,000 to $1,000,000, considering
         | all phases from design to deployment.
         | 
         | ### Considerations: - This plan assumes a single prototype
         | development. For multiple units or different designs, adjust
         | timelines and budgets accordingly. - Costs for land, permits,
         | and regulatory compliance are not included and can vary
         | greatly. - Ongoing maintenance and operational costs post-
         | deployment should be planned separately.
         | 
         | This plan provides a high-level overview and would need to be
         | refined with more detailed information and specific regional
         | considerations.
        
           | fshbbdssbbgdd wrote:
           | If we have a $1.7M budget, we could hire people to handle
           | each of those twelve points for $100k a pop. I got dibs on
           | "crisis information". This toilet is going to have the most
           | informative signage you've ever seen.
        
           | mvdtnz wrote:
           | Don't do this here.
        
         | matteoraso wrote:
         | Did you read the article? It has nothing to do with
         | homelessness, just city inefficiency.
        
       | delichon wrote:
       | This was not an extraordinary toilet. It wasn't a pilot for a
       | super duper new kind of public toilet. It wasn't an art project.
       | It was just a toilet. This isn't an extreme case, it's normal. It
       | just got attention because of our scatological fetish.
        
         | google234123 wrote:
         | What? It got attention because it's an egregious example of SFs
         | completely dysfunctional gov
        
         | InCityDreams wrote:
         | Piss is now scat?
        
       | TacticalCoder wrote:
       | > An expensive public bathroom project has come to symbolize the
       | city's bureaucratic inefficiencies.
       | 
       | There are too many words in that sentence, here's a fixed
       | version:
       | 
       | "An expensive public project has come to symbolize bureaucratic
       | inefficiencies."
       | 
       | It applies worldwide.
        
       | dventimi wrote:
       | Every single time
       | 
       | https://archive.ph/2024.01.24-205525/https://www.nytimes.com...
        
       | jlmorton wrote:
       | Is $1.7 million actually that bad?
       | 
       | I'm not sure this is unusual to San Francisco. Just a couple days
       | ago, I saw Honolulu suggest a new public toilet would cost $1-2
       | million, along with $400,000 annually in maintenance and damage
       | from vandalism.
        
       | jerrysievert wrote:
       | I still wonder why they didn't just purchase some Portland loo's:
       | https://portlandloo.com/faq/
       | 
       | they work well, are actually pleasant to use, and are nigh
       | indestructible.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-01-24 23:01 UTC)