[HN Gopher] The absurdity of the return-to-office movement
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The absurdity of the return-to-office movement
        
       Author : DebtDeflation
       Score  : 34 points
       Date   : 2024-01-22 22:18 UTC (42 minutes ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.cnn.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.cnn.com)
        
       | DebtDeflation wrote:
       | >The internet and cell phones obviate so much of what was once
       | done at the office, which is, after all, largely an artifact of
       | the 20th century thanks to the rise of mass transportation, the
       | ability to build tall office buildings and the previous
       | immovability of the "work" telephone, which was stuck to a desk.
       | All this, thankfully, is going the way of the dodo.
       | 
       | This seems to me to have been forgotten as technology evolved
       | over the last 2-3 decades. There was a time when you HAD to be in
       | the office, because that was where your desk phone was, your
       | desktop PC (including local software) was, the physical access
       | point for your corporate network/applications was, etc. With
       | laptops, smartphones, the internet, VPNs, SaaS applications, that
       | hasn't been the case for a long time, Covid was just the CATALYST
       | that forced people and companies to actually utilize the
       | capabilities they already had.
        
         | ghaff wrote:
         | I sometimes like to ask provocatively "What would have happened
         | had COVID happened 25 years ago?" (Don't sweat the exact
         | timeline. I'm about right.) Yes, vaccines/medical issues but
         | that's somewhat orthogonal.
         | 
         | I think the answer was that most office workers would have
         | struggled to work. Yes, we could have mapped home phones to
         | office numbers, bought people cell phones and paid for their
         | plans, subsidized a second phone line, etc. But it would have
         | been hard and difficult; most people would have been nowhere
         | near prepared. I suspect at the end of the day, we'd mostly
         | have made do for a month or three, said screw it, and reopened
         | offices even if we knew more people would probably get sick.
         | Oh, and forget things like grocery delivery or streaming TV
         | (Netflix DVD barely existed) for the most part.
        
         | Spivak wrote:
         | And invest in them for the whole office instead of them being
         | limited to specific departments. Like it used to be that only
         | sales got Zoom licenses because they were on calls with remote
         | customers, only devs got access to Slack everyone else was on
         | Teams/Outlook. The pandemic made everyone build out the
         | infrastructure for work anywhere. It's got to be in the top 5
         | advancements in the information age that obviates so much waste
         | moving people back and forth to office buildings and execs
         | desperately want to go back for some strange reason.
        
       | wcunning wrote:
       | It's been a "fun" time in Detroit lately. The Big 3 have been
       | forcing people back into the office some, with increasingly
       | shrill demands. Last year, GM required us to come back 3 days a
       | week, you pick the days. Managers looked at that, listened to
       | employees and it was quickly 2 days, then they weren't enforcing
       | it at the HR level at all, so it was no days. Until suddenly in
       | December, after a bit of a struggling year, we got an email (at
       | the same time as our managers and senior managers, make of that
       | what you will) that they had actually been tracking badge swipes
       | in aggregate and that we would all be returning to the office 3
       | days a week, Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday starting the second
       | week in January. Then it got delayed two weeks because there
       | literally weren't enough seats for everyone, much less seats in
       | the building you were assigned to, much less parking, much less
       | parking for the building you were assigned to. And wouldn't you
       | know it, about 6 years ago, GM had moved to "hoteling" or "hot
       | desking" with an intentional 90% capacity for the number of
       | people assigned to the building, but the COVID hiring binge hit
       | us too, so now there were main buildings with as low as 60%
       | capacity for the number of people assigned. Then, we got an
       | updated email, some teams were going to come back a few weeks
       | later, so that IT and facilities would have enough time to fix
       | problems as they arose and get desks setup, etc. Then we had an
       | ugly winter storm. Then it got delayed another two weeks. Now
       | it's the second week in February. Order, followed by counter
       | order, equals disorder. Isn't RTO fun guys?
        
         | Liquix wrote:
         | > Now it's the second week in February.
         | 
         | They're even trying to force time travelers back into the
         | office? Grim
        
         | kibwen wrote:
         | To be fair, forcing employees to while away their lives by
         | wasting their own unreimbursed time sitting in a car commuting
         | every day represents a non-negligible portion of every
         | automaker's bottom line.
        
       | Zacharias030 wrote:
       | This article simply doesn't reflect my personal experience. I'm
       | rather at the beginning of my career, but feel like personal
       | growth, enjoyment and satisfaction with the work is much higher
       | when I go to the office and when my colleagues do the same (we
       | have full freedom to never do though).
        
       | pdimitar wrote:
       | Here's what the ever-so-helpful CNN is giving me when I visit it:
       | Browser Blocked              We apologize, but your web browser
       | is configured in such a way that it is preventing this site from
       | implementing required components that protect your privacy and
       | allow you to view and change your privacy settings. This
       | functionality is required for privacy legislation in your region.
       | We recommend you use a different browser or disable the "EasyList
       | Cookie" filter from your "Content Filtering" settings (found
       | under "Settings" -> "Shields" in the Brave Browser).
       | 
       | How sleazy can their language get?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-01-22 23:00 UTC)