[HN Gopher] The math exams of my life
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The math exams of my life
        
       Author : lordnacho
       Score  : 40 points
       Date   : 2024-01-21 19:19 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.andreinc.net)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.andreinc.net)
        
       | ykonstant wrote:
       | The topics and problems presented, particularly the Bacalaureat,
       | are very similar to older Greek national exams problems for high
       | school students (up until the late 2000s I think). Nowadays the
       | mathematics problems for the Greek national exams are much
       | easier. However, we still insist on rigor and proofs (e.g. proofs
       | of continuity, differentiability etc.).
        
       | redrove wrote:
       | The fact that I could figure out the writer was a fellow
       | countryman just by reading the title of the HN post alone speaks
       | volumes about this country's obsession with math.
       | 
       | I went through something very similar to the author (went to the
       | best high school and yadda yadda), I then went on to get dragged
       | through even more math in Comp Sci. I was fairly good and I loved
       | the way of thinking math makes you discover, but I hated the
       | grind and my grades suffered as as result, started dropping below
       | a 9 at the end of HS and barely got passing grades in Uni.
       | 
       | IMO this system is thoroughly fucked due to how disconnected it
       | is from teaching students something that's actually relevant and
       | applicable in every day life.
        
         | paganel wrote:
         | It depends on the maths teacher on how good or bad one can be
         | at maths (I used to be bad at maths before HS because of a
         | teacher, I was actually good at maths in HS also because of a
         | teacher), even though I agree with you that we have an
         | obsession with it, and especially about those Olympics that are
         | of no use (I always like to point to people that no matter how
         | many "gold" medals we got at those olympics we've never had a
         | Fields medalist until now).
         | 
         | What's not told to students, or not instilled into their heads,
         | is that, first, maths as taught in uni has no connection to how
         | maths is taught in HS, and that's a good thing (there are a few
         | exceptions that confirm the rule, meaning HS math teachers that
         | "approach" the philosophy of how maths is taught at uni but,
         | again, they're very few and far between), and second, the first
         | two years of uni are some of the most important years in one's
         | education when it comes to his/her future professional life.
         | Later on during uni you're sort of specialising, but during
         | those first two years you should construct the theoretical base
         | for your future career in any field related to maths (which
         | covers a lot of today's tech).
         | 
         | You mentioned teaching students stuff that is not relevant, and
         | of course that many of my colleagues at uni (Comp Sci at
         | Bucharest Politehnica) at the end of the '90s - the start of
         | the 2000s had the same opinion, that's why the class that was
         | teaching Object Orientated programming applied to Java was
         | almost always full (or as full as a Politehnica class could
         | have been back then), while the _Matematici Speciale I + II_
         | class (I think the Americans call it Algebra I and II, not
         | sure, never been there) was attended at some point only by
         | 15-20 students out of a total of 100-120. It turns out that
         | nowadays matrices and manipulation of matrices (which those
         | classes covered quite in detail) is a lot, lot more important
         | compared to writing some stupid videos games in Java applets
         | (which I think was the subject of a class in like 2002-2003,
         | something like that).
         | 
         | Also, because this is an American forum and we're talking about
         | how maths is studied in Romania, I'll always remember our first
         | year Calculus teacher at Politehnica (mr. Rabanca, a legend in
         | his own right if you search for his name on the early Romanian
         | web) who was bad-mouthing the American Green Visa Lottery
         | system in between talking about some infinite series or what
         | have you. Apparently he had won one such visa sometime in the
         | mid-'90s, had actually gone to the States only to find out that
         | he was unemployable in his field of study there, or at least at
         | the beginning, to quote him: "I got there and they asked me to
         | mop the floors. Of course I came back". That was a big loss for
         | the States, a big win for us.
        
       | nrabulinski wrote:
       | > Back in school, I had to remember a few radicals to use them as
       | needed. [?]13 was one of them. I have forgotten them by now. We
       | also had to learn the algorithm to compute any [?] as needed
       | 
       | That's very interesting. In Poland we also had problems of this
       | type, but we were taught to solve them by simply bringing
       | everything under the square root and comparing the numbers.
       | Definitely resulted in much bigger numbers but meant less
       | memorization x)
        
         | georgecmu wrote:
         | The comment for that particular problem also caught my eye.
         | There's absolutely no need to remember radicals to solve it;
         | just square both sides and compare.
        
         | paganel wrote:
         | I'm about seven or eight years older compared to the poster (am
         | also Romanian) and most certainly we didn't need to memorise
         | [?]13, this is actually the first time I hear about it.
         | 
         | I think (and now that I've checked I'm 100% sure) that we knew
         | by heart the first two decimals of square root of 2, meaning
         | 1.41, and possibly Euler's number (2.71) too, even though I'm
         | not so sure about that anymore (this was 25+ years ago).
        
         | crq-yml wrote:
         | That problem can be solved with estimation of the roots on a
         | number line. It's not the most precise way of calculating it
         | but when visualized you can clearly see that the root of 13
         | will have a fractional part above .5, while the root of 2 will
         | have a fraction below .5.
        
       | gregsadetsky wrote:
       | One of my grandmothers, born about 100 years ago in Romania
       | (she's not with us anymore), told me many times she was denied
       | from pursuing math education because of then Nazi policies of
       | "numerus nulus" i.e. the exclusion of jews from public
       | universities.
       | 
       | There's a fascinating wikipedia page on the topic of racial
       | academic exclusions -
       | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerus_clausus
       | 
       | And related to math exams, this paper of problems that looked
       | easy but were quite difficult (and which were given to jews in
       | the USSR) is also quite interesting --
       | https://arxiv.org/abs/1110.1556
        
         | nomemory wrote:
         | Quite a lot Jewish people were influential in mathematics in
         | Romania.
         | 
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leon_Birnbaum
         | 
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Emmanuel_(mathematicia...
         | 
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Emmanuel_(mathematicia...
         | 
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meinhard_E._Mayer
         | 
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Jacob_Schoenberg
         | 
         | And many others.
         | 
         | My grandfather who become a math teacher eventually had a
         | Jewish math teacher. So was my grandmother's brother, he had
         | lots of Jewish math teachers.
         | 
         | Unfortunately things become bad during ww2, but before that
         | Jews were overly represented into teaching math.
        
           | gregsadetsky wrote:
           | Thanks for this. My grandmother came of university age in the
           | 40s, so this all makes sense.
        
       | matheist wrote:
       | The most interesting math exam of my life was my qualifying exam
       | for my PhD. It was an oral exam, and I prepared a syllabus and
       | gave it to my three examiners ahead of time. At the actual exam,
       | we all showed up and they took turns asking me their questions
       | that they had prepared relating to my syllabus.
       | 
       | I was expected to solve the problems at the board. They didn't
       | necessarily expect me to solve them immediately, but they wanted
       | to hear me think out loud and communicate my ideas. There were
       | around 5-10 questions total over the course of I think a few
       | hours, ranging in complexity from trivia (i.e. memorized facts)
       | to computations to proofs. Some of them I found solutions for and
       | some of them I didn't, and they assigned me some to solve later
       | as "homework" (though they did pass me without it being
       | conditioned on the homework).
       | 
       | In hindsight, it was very similar to white-board coding
       | interviews, but I didn't know anything about coding interviews at
       | the time. I can't really think of any other place such a format
       | would be appropriate as a math exam. When else would a paper math
       | exam not be sufficient.
        
         | sdenton4 wrote:
         | Yes, my math grad student time ws an excellent preparation for
         | coding interviews. In addition to the oral exams, I found
         | TA'ing was also an excellent preparation. Students show up with
         | lots of questions, which you get to solve on your toes at a
         | board...
         | 
         | Classes and competitions also generally have an allowed 'bag of
         | tricks' from which you build your solutions. White-board coding
         | interviews are the same. If you want to do well, you get to
         | know what the 'atomic' operations are in your bag of tricks,
         | how they combine into useful tools, and how to spot when they
         | might be useful in the 'wild.'
         | 
         | Restating/reworking a problem into a form where some tricks are
         | more obviously applicable is also a useful skill. These are
         | general problem solving skills, which are pretty independent of
         | what's actually in the bag of tricks... Draw a picture, try a
         | concrete example, identify the pen-ultimate step, etc.
         | 
         | When I give whiteboard interviews, I have a favorite question
         | with about four reasonable stopping points. My general approach
         | is to work with the candidate until they get stuck, and then
         | see how handle being stuck and getting un-stuck. So, even if
         | you have trouble with the 'easiest' part of the problem, I can
         | still get a good read on the general problem solving skills.
         | (And if you sail through to the hardest level solution without
         | getting stuck, you're probably worth hiring anyway...)
        
       | belter wrote:
       | "As a fun fact, the current mayor of Bucharest, Nicusor Dan is a
       | two-time Gold Medalist at the International Mathematics
       | Olympiad."
        
         | sdenton4 wrote:
         | The famous reform mayor of Bogota, Antanas Mockus, also started
         | in math! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antanas_Mockus
        
           | belter wrote:
           | Do we have any mayors coding in C, Java or Python?
        
       | smeagull wrote:
       | If a school only accepts students capable of attaining high
       | grades, in what sense is that school good? That's no proving the
       | school teaches well, it's proof that they're trying to avoid
       | having to teach.
        
       | koolba wrote:
       | > Between a=5[?]2 and b=2[?]13 which one is bigger?
       | 
       | No need to memorize square roots here. Simply square both sides
       | and it's clear that 50 < 52.
       | 
       | If x^2 < y^2 then x < y (ignoring negative numbers...).
       | 
       | More generally, these types of "math tricks" are about solving
       | for the answer. Not solving for the parts of the question. It's a
       | great lessom for life, especially working in software.
        
         | nomemory wrote:
         | Author here, it's probably what I did, but i am sure i also had
         | to memorize quite a few radicals, and also multiplying numbers
         | up to 40X40 + other tricks to multiply fast.
        
           | koolba wrote:
           | Memorized non-integer radicals outside of 2, 3, and 5? Those
           | at least come up in geometry.
           | 
           | Any idea where I can get more English questions like the ones
           | you've listed? They're quite enjoyable! Though some of your
           | translations are a bit off:
           | 
           | > A cube has one of its sides 2cm. The total area of the cube
           | is ...
           | 
           | Pretty sure you mean "surface area".
        
             | nomemory wrote:
             | The sources are scarce at least for everything that's older
             | than 2010, but I did started to collect exercises like this
             | from various forgotten places.
             | 
             | I plan to put them into a github repo this month.
             | 
             | Sorry for the translations. I will try to check them again,
             | and maybe to some corrections.
        
       | ajuc wrote:
       | Is it really still this hardcore math meritocracy in Romania?
       | 
       | In Poland it became gradually less hardcore as 80s baby boom
       | passed through universities and at the same time private
       | universities started to appear everywhere. Now it's pretty laid
       | back comparatively.
        
       | dwrodri wrote:
       | I didn't experience this, but I was at dinner with someone who
       | had recently emigrated from Russia, so I decided to ask, "What is
       | it about the education systems in formerly Soviet domains that
       | created such a strong passion for computing?" He answered in two
       | parts:
       | 
       | 1. Scholars who might've considered studying literature and
       | philisophy might have a hard time competing on the global stage,
       | as the Soviet state didn't take kindly to the idea of promoting
       | anything that could be perceived as anti-Soviet ideals, even if
       | it's for the sake of an academic exercise. Not that the Soviet
       | Union was alone in this practice, but this practice in particular
       | affected their academic community to the extent that many who
       | might've considered literature or philosophy changed their minds.
       | 
       | 2. Trade restrictions between the 50s and 60s with large portions
       | of the West created a large demand for semiconductor products on
       | behalf of the state, as the USSR understood the strategic
       | importance of this technology early on. While trade restrictions
       | were gradually relaxed in the decades leading up to Perestroika,
       | the domestic industry for computer products had been established,
       | similar to China's own semiconductor industry and Deng Xiaoping's
       | economic reforms which opened the country to global trade.
       | 
       | This is mostly just the verbal account of one person followed by
       | my own personal research, so this is by no means an authoritative
       | take. If there are others with more knowledge (acquired through
       | research or lived experience) I'd love to hear it, as my
       | knowledge of the history of computing has a Soviet-sized hole in
       | it.
        
         | nextos wrote:
         | > If there are others with more knowledge (acquired through
         | research or lived experience) I'd love to hear it, as my
         | knowledge of the history of computing has a Soviet-sized hole
         | in it.
         | 
         | The famous book _Mathematics, its Content, Methods, and
         | Meaning_ by Alexandrov, Kolmogorov, et al. has two chapters on
         | computing, which is interesting both to take a sneak peak into
         | Soviet-era techniques, as well as to understand the importance
         | Kolmogorov and friends gave to the topic.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-01-21 23:00 UTC)