[HN Gopher] What happens when you trigger a car's automated emer...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       What happens when you trigger a car's automated emergency stopping?
        
       Author : rntn
       Score  : 32 points
       Date   : 2024-01-20 15:00 UTC (8 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (arstechnica.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (arstechnica.com)
        
       | Kirby64 wrote:
       | Interestingly, based on the title of this article, I thought this
       | would be discussing automated emergency braking systems that are
       | standard on most cars, not the "what happens when you stop paying
       | attention with adaptive cruise control, and ignore all the
       | warnings". Mercedes calling their call center seems a bit
       | aggressive... since it doesn't sound like the journalist was
       | actually in a collision.
        
         | pinkgolem wrote:
         | To be fair, when a person is not reacting after the sequence
         | described a medical emergency seems likely & a checkup might be
         | a good idea.
        
           | Kirby64 wrote:
           | Sure, I'd agree, but the report is that they asked if they
           | were in a collision. Seems like some better reporting to ask
           | if they were ok (and not assume a collision) would be better.
        
             | dist-epoch wrote:
             | People in state of shock have reduced cognitive abilities.
             | Makes sense to ask a series of simple yes/no questions to
             | determine what happened. "Are you ok" is too generic.
        
               | bombcar wrote:
               | Exactly this. After a collision people will be walking
               | around with half their guts spilling out and insist
               | they're "ok".
        
               | tialaramex wrote:
               | Yeah. In the rush to board a train to my mother after
               | hours of delays just before Christmas, I tripped and
               | bashed my leg pretty hard against the step of the train,
               | a woman asked if I was OK and I reflexively answered "I'm
               | fine".
               | 
               | Once seated I thought I ought to see exactly how "fine" I
               | really was, rolled up the leg of my heavy black jeans and
               | discovered I was now bleeding significantly. I thought
               | about it, decided if I tell the train operator they're
               | going to insist I go to hospital to have somebody check
               | it, at hospital triage will (like me) conclude that I'm
               | not in real danger and put me at the back of the queue
               | and I won't get seen for hours, so likely I don't get a
               | train until tomorrow, meanwhile I'm in the wrong city.
               | So, no, I'm going to stick a Kleenex over this wound to
               | keep it clean(ish) and stay on the train.
               | 
               | It wasn't mortal, but it was a sizeable hole, a day later
               | it was still bleeding so my mother drove me to an Urgent
               | Care and a nurse practitioner glued it shut. Kind of
               | wasting their skills, but it feels better to have someone
               | overqualified do it than guess I can just use glue at
               | home & never know if that was a good call.
        
               | dist-epoch wrote:
               | Regular superglue can produce heat when applied to skin,
               | to the point of thermal burn. Medical glue is safe in
               | this regard.
        
               | tialaramex wrote:
               | Huh. Today I learned.
        
             | pinkgolem wrote:
             | Yeah, that seems like a minor improvement that could be
             | implemented... But the call is the important thing, check
             | if someone answers.. if not -> call emergency services.. if
             | yes, discuss next steps
             | 
             | Calls are also sometimes available when data is not/just
             | plain faster
        
         | solardev wrote:
         | Yeah, I've wondered that too. I've triggered the audible alarm
         | many times, but I'm still not sure what happens if it actually
         | needs to emergency brake and cut engine power.
         | 
         | How does it handle steering/skidding? Is it gonna cause the
         | person behind me rear end me? I hope I never have to find out,
         | but it'd be nice to know ahead of time...
        
           | Erratic6576 wrote:
           | I've been wondering this the whole time. Does it gently stop
           | on the right shoulders so you can comfortably get out the
           | vehicle to meet traffic from behind?
        
         | marcellus23 wrote:
         | I thought the same, it's poorly titled IMO. "Automated
         | emergency braking," to me, means the system that brakes if it
         | thinks you're about to hit something. I would have never
         | thought about the cruise-control hands-off-wheel behavior
         | (which braking is only one piece of, anyway).
        
         | dathinab wrote:
         | consider that:
         | 
         | > Mercedes calling their call center seems a bit aggressive
         | 
         | through necessary: I mean, let's be honest under which "normal"
         | conditions do you ignore the warning system _and continue to do
         | so even after the car stopped_?
         | 
         | Whatever it is if you are not a journalist testing something
         | out there is a pretty high chance you need help one way or
         | another.
         | 
         | So they call you to then figure out if they need to call you an
         | ambulance (e.g. imagine you had a heart attack, or passed out
         | due to some circulatory mall function) or a technician (the
         | warning system malfunctioned) or well if they can safely ignore
         | it (you are a journalist trying things out).
         | 
         | It's in a certain way just a natural extension of the existing
         | emergency call system (common (required?) in the EU) where on
         | detection a collisions/the airbag going off an emergency call
         | is made. It just now detect a user seemingly becoming unable to
         | interact with the system.
         | 
         | It might feel aggressive but it shouldn't trigger under in any
         | normal usage situation and even if there might be some harmless
         | situations it likely will save lives.
        
           | Erratic6576 wrote:
           | A lot of things can happen when you are out there on your own
           | rolling coffin, a Heart attack, hypoglycaemia (from Greek
           | "hypo-", meaning 'low'; "glyc-", 'sugar'; and "aemia",
           | 'blood'), low sugar presence in blood.
           | 
           | Now that diabetes has become a widespread problem for
           | millions, having a dead man switch for a case of
           | hypoglycaemia with a Big Bro phone call to check on you can
           | save lives, I guess, by letting the subjects quickly reach
           | the emergency room, where we are now
        
       | donaldihunter wrote:
       | It's an interesting experiment but knowing the behaviour in an
       | evolving collision situation would be more valuable I think.
       | 
       | My VW Caravelle (van) is quite aggressive when e.g. a car is
       | braking to turn left and I start to run close. It applies the
       | brakes hard, displays a crash warning and chimes. The chime is
       | almost irrelevant because the ABS braking shudders the whole car.
       | 
       | The rental I am driving today (a Kia) responded to emergency
       | braking traffic in front of me. I was already braking but the car
       | decided to apply more aggressive brakes, switch on the hazards,
       | sound an alarm and cut the audio entertainment.
        
         | jeffbee wrote:
         | You should reflect on the possibility that you might be
         | tailgating.
        
           | cosmotic wrote:
           | In some jurisdictions tailgating is essential. Most drivers
           | are super aggressive and cut in, making the people behind you
           | angry and you get nowhere.
        
             | antiframe wrote:
             | Unless you stop at 0kph you are not getting nowhere.
             | Keeping enough buffer between cars improves traffic instead
             | as it is abrupt stopping which backpropogates through
             | traffic. If there is enough space for cars to change lanes
             | safely the entire mass can go at a constant speed. That
             | might seem slower but it provides better throughput.
             | 
             | The trouble is that individual drivers optimize for
             | perception, leading to a tragedy of the commons situation.
        
               | AnthonyMouse wrote:
               | If you leave as much space as you would like to, other
               | drivers change into your lane to use the space to
               | advance, and now there isn't enough space, so you would
               | have to slow down. You are now traveling slower than the
               | adjacent lane, so more drivers move to the other lane to
               | get around you and fill the space you're trying to leave
               | again, preventing you from resuming parity with the speed
               | other traffic is moving. As long as the space is there
               | they'll continue to do this, which is a massive hazard
               | because you're inducing a speed differential and a large
               | number of lane change maneuvers.
        
             | loloquwowndueo wrote:
             | It's not your responsibility to make people behind you
             | happy.
             | 
             | It is your responsibility to maintain a safe distance
             | between you and other vehicles.
             | 
             | I'd be surprised if traffic regulations in your area don't
             | talk about minimum safe distances. Not maintaining those to
             | 1) get somewhere faster and 2) avoiding being honked at by
             | some psycho, kinda sounds risky.
        
             | wharvle wrote:
             | The main trouble in my city is certain snarley interchanges
             | in which you'll never make it to the lane you need for your
             | exit if you aren't, much of the time, way too close to the
             | car in front of you.
        
           | donaldihunter wrote:
           | Oh, I do. Tailgating vs efficiency.
        
             | strombofulous wrote:
             | Assuming you don't get in front of the car in front of you,
             | wouldn't the maximum efficiency gain be one car length?
        
         | cosmotic wrote:
         | My vw has a setting to for how aggressive it breaks in those
         | situations.
        
         | oivey wrote:
         | Echoing another commenter: I've never activated the emergency
         | braking function in 6 years of driving my Honda. A warning
         | chime rarely, but never the brakes. Never in various rentals,
         | either. You may be driving badly.
        
           | marcellus23 wrote:
           | I think this also depends where you live. Driving in NYC is
           | very different from driving in Montana.
        
       | smeej wrote:
       | I read that headline to ask about a _cat 's_ emergency stopping
       | at first and that sounded like a much funnier article.
        
       | RecycledEle wrote:
       | I wonder how many people will be injured or killed because of
       | errors in these systems.
        
         | dist-epoch wrote:
         | I wonder how many will be saved.
        
           | bombcar wrote:
           | Now I'm imagining a scene from _Fight Club 2: More
           | Fightening_ :
           | 
           | "Now see, there's a calculus. If our emergency systems save
           | ten thousand lives a year, those are customers for life. And
           | we look at those as currency to be spent - we have some lives
           | we can waste elsewhere, especially in areas that are
           | indicative of non-repeat customers. Customer who normally
           | doesn't drink, we detect as drunk? Probably lost his job or
           | got a divorce, we disable the emergency systems."
        
         | advisedwang wrote:
         | Given news coverage of collisions with self-driving cars, I
         | suspect we'd see any such crashes in the press. So it seems to
         | be pretty dang low.
        
       | netsharc wrote:
       | I hope the people getting calls from these cars are trained to
       | deal talking to hurt people, but I suppose the agency the
       | manufacturers have outsourced this service to can recruit 911
       | operators for a little better pay. They can say on the phone
       | "This is X from Mercedes help center" but I'm speculating that
       | X's work console displayed "Connecting you with a car in need of
       | assistance. Car brand: Mercedes" a few seconds before.
       | 
       | I wonder if the more expensive car brands can jump the queue of
       | getting help after an incident.
        
       | laweijfmvo wrote:
       | I recently backed into a parked car -- not a big deal, just left
       | it in Reverse while waiting for someone and then forgot. Bumped
       | the car parked 12 inches behind me the entire time. If my car
       | can't figure out to "not do that", then I have zero faith in any
       | emergency braking.
        
         | darkr wrote:
         | There was no danger to life in this scenario. It's not for the
         | car to figure out how to "not do this", it's for you.
        
           | laweijfmvo wrote:
           | replace "parked car" with "child". Would it have stopped
           | then?
        
             | bfdm wrote:
             | In cars with parking sensors, it would likely have beeped
             | at you aggressively unless you disabled that.
             | 
             | It doesn't auto-brake but does do a good job of avoiding
             | such impacts by alerting to objects nearby you might not
             | see, including cross-traffic detection when backing out of
             | parking spaces.
        
             | beejiu wrote:
             | The level of automation in cars today is designed to
             | _assist_ the driver, not replace the driver or absolve them
             | of responsibility for their vehicle.
        
             | darkr wrote:
             | I have no idea what car you're driving or what safety
             | features it has.. but more importantly, your response to a
             | crash caused by your own carelessness is to be morally
             | indignant... towards your car?
        
         | Aachen wrote:
         | Not sure how your backing into another vehicle gives you "zero"
         | confidence in emergency breaking systems meant for entirely
         | different situations
         | 
         | And keep in mind that it doesn't have to be 100% accurate to
         | save more than zero lives
        
         | RockRobotRock wrote:
         | How is your negligence relevant to the topic of AEB in a
         | highway setting?
        
       | Erratic6576 wrote:
       | My cruise speed control system effectively turns my car into a
       | kamikaze rocket if I ever lose attention.
       | 
       | It needs a dead man button like this one
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-01-20 23:01 UTC)