[HN Gopher] Cerne Abbas giant is Hercules and was army meeting p...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Cerne Abbas giant is Hercules and was army meeting point, say
       historians
        
       Author : diodorus
       Score  : 45 points
       Date   : 2024-01-17 22:40 UTC (2 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.theguardian.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.theguardian.com)
        
       | kitd wrote:
       | The figure may even have been cut as a motivational act by the
       | mustering army itself. Not so far away are the Fovant monumental
       | badges, cut for similar reasons by WW1 soldiers preparing to go
       | to France.
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fovant_Badges
        
         | matthewfelgate wrote:
         | Wow thanks for sharing these, I had never heard of these!
        
         | jameshart wrote:
         | Thanks for sharing that link. Today I learned of the "Post
         | Office Rifles", which sound like something from a Terry
         | Pratchett novel:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_Office_Rifles
         | 
         | The fact they're commemorated in the Wiltshire chalk makes it
         | even more Pratchettian.
         | 
         | Also the "Bulford Kiwi" -
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulford_Kiwi "one of the few hill
         | figures in Wiltshire to be neither a white horse nor a military
         | badge"
        
       | thaumasiotes wrote:
       | The only argument given that the figure is Hercules is "clearly,
       | it's Hercules". I am not making this up.
       | 
       | Why even bother writing the article?
        
         | thih9 wrote:
         | Note that they also mention the missing mantle. The paper
         | linked from the article elaborates, compares it to other
         | representations of Hercules holding a mantle in his left hand.
        
           | thaumasiotes wrote:
           | The paper says that because the giant has a club, it is
           | generally accepted to be Hercules. It notes that an image of
           | Hercules _should_ also have a lion skin, but -- despite
           | extensive discussion of LIDAR scans showing what the image
           | would have been in the past -- presents no evidence that the
           | giant ever had one; it just says that, because the giant is
           | obviously Hercules, there must have originally been a lion
           | skin too.
        
         | Luc wrote:
         | Heracles holding a club and a lion's skin is a bit of a trope.
         | Do a quick search and you'll find dozens of etchings and
         | statues.
         | 
         | https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/372746
         | 
         | https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lansdowne_Herakles_G...
         | 
         | Wikipedia has an illustration of the cloak outline but the
         | reference is to a book I don't have access to.
        
         | msluyter wrote:
         | Yeah I was wondering about this as well. To what extent were
         | the greek myths known in that part of the world at that time? A
         | brief googling suggests that from the 6th century onward there
         | were various transcriptions of greek texts (Boethius, for
         | example), but it's not 100% clear to me what was known /
         | available in Britain in the 10th century, specifically.
         | 
         | Apparently Irish monks preserved some ancient Greek texts after
         | the collapse of Rome. Interesting stuff!
        
           | tootie wrote:
           | Roman culture was well-known and venerated among the Anglo-
           | Saxons and Hercules was venerated among Romans as much as the
           | Greek Herakles.
           | 
           | https://old.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/72f794/in_th.
           | ..
        
       | thih9 wrote:
       | > Cutting a chalk figure of Hercules as fighting warrior, with
       | club poised to strike, would have served as a fine rallying point
       | (...)
       | 
       | Are we really going to describe this figure with no mention of
       | the giant erection? Talk about an elephant in the room.
       | 
       | Especially since it's unclear if the ancient warriors actually
       | fought like this[1]. Plus, the phallus was not present in the
       | original drawing according to the 2020 lidar scans[2]:
       | 
       | "From a review of historical depictions, the Giant's current
       | large erection has been identified as the result of merging a
       | circle representing his navel with a smaller penis during a 1908
       | re-cut: the navel still appears on a late 1890s picture postcard.
       | Lidar scans conducted as part of the 2020 survey programme have
       | concluded that the phallus was added much later than the bulk of
       | the figure, which was probably originally clothed."
       | 
       | [1]:
       | https://old.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/6mwsbg/did_t...
       | 
       | [2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cerne_Abbas_Giant
        
         | taneq wrote:
         | Turns out humans have been drawing dicks on things basically
         | forever.
        
           | debo_ wrote:
           | Long before we had dictation, we had dicktation
        
         | AlecSchueler wrote:
         | They're talking about its function, so an appendage added 100s
         | of years after the original was being used isn't very relevant.
        
         | saalweachter wrote:
         | I'm going to headcanon -- you can headcanon reality, right? --
         | that that was just one in a series of events, of mischievous
         | soldiers/maintainers adding the erection and generals/the local
         | clergy ordering the giant clothed, with no way to know the
         | original state of the giant.
        
           | bee_rider wrote:
           | What is the past anyway? If something happened far enough
           | back that all that we have left of it is stories and
           | architecture, what is the reality, as separate from those
           | stories?
           | 
           | It seems like the sort of thing soldiers probably did.
        
             | AlecSchueler wrote:
             | Reality is what actually happened and we can view different
             | past events with different levels of accuracy /certainty.
        
       | varjag wrote:
       | _Then research led by the National Trust that examined sediment
       | and snail shells came to the surprising conclusion that the giant
       | was late Saxon, possibly 10th century._
       | 
       | Just because the art is crap doesn't mean it's neolithic!
        
       | cjs_ac wrote:
       | If you need more dirty puns about the figure, the Metro has you
       | covered.
       | 
       | https://metro.co.uk/2019/08/29/volunteers-polish-giants-erec...
        
         | dmurray wrote:
         | If you missed some of the less obvious ones or are just
         | interested in helping with the restoration, the National Trust
         | is always looking for new members.
        
           | Angostura wrote:
           | Outstanding!
        
         | yazzku wrote:
         | They polished the erection...by hand? Tell me more about the
         | precise logistics of that operation.
        
           | adolph wrote:
           | I think it is an Eastern European thing in general, not just
           | Poland.
        
       | danparsonson wrote:
       | Coincidentally I just finished listening to Dan Carlin's two-part
       | "Hardcore History" podcast about the Vikings, Twilight of the
       | Aesir - highly recommended and currently available for free (via
       | podcast apps or https://www.dancarlin.com/hardcore-history-
       | series/).
        
       | debo_ wrote:
       | I took a senior classics course on the ancient near East when I
       | was in university. (It had no prereqs, and I wanted to do
       | something that actually felt like university.)
       | 
       | It was fascinating. One anecdote I remember is that Hercules was
       | potentially derived from stories of a Phoenician hero who walked
       | along the shore and discovered that the molluscs that crushed
       | beneath his feet created a purple hue. He was renowned for
       | turning this stuff into purple dye that came to signify royalty.
       | 
       | Anyways, I've never bothered looking this up further. I just
       | loved the potential origins of things. (Another interesting one
       | -- Jesus being in many ways derived from Baal. Given that our
       | professor was also a priest, I thought he was surprisingly open
       | to teaching this stuff.)
        
         | digging wrote:
         | > One anecdote I remember is that Hercules was potentially
         | derived from stories of a Phoenician hero who walked along the
         | shore and discovered that the molluscs that crushed beneath his
         | feet created a purple hue. He was renowned for turning this
         | stuff into purple dye that came to signify royalty.
         | 
         | Any more info about this? It's not clear how the two figures
         | are related from this description, but I wouldn't be surprised
         | if Hercules was derived from an earlier Phoenician myth. (Or
         | did Hercules have a purple cloak I'm unaware of?)
        
           | pvaldes wrote:
           | > a Phoenician hero walked along the shore and discovered
           | that the molluscs that crushed beneath his feet created a
           | purple hue
           | 
           | This can be taken littorally, but not literally. Is clearly
           | speech beautification.
           | 
           | In ancient times it was probably understood by the public
           | that the narrator talks about a task that is impossible (or
           | really difficult at least). Is clearly a metaphor to stress
           | that a character has heroic qualities like strength and, in
           | particular, a high tolerance to pain.
        
             | debo_ wrote:
             | I didn't intend for it to be interpreted literally. I wrote
             | "derived from stories of."
        
         | riffraff wrote:
         | interesting, a couple weeks ago I learned indo-europeists think
         | that "strong man kills snake thingy" may be a shared proto-
         | indo-european tale[0] (think Indra, Thor, Hercules).
         | 
         | I wasn't too convinced and hearing now that it might be from a
         | non-indo-european tradition is quite fun, thanks :)
         | 
         | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/*Trito
        
           | inemesitaffia wrote:
           | There's a similar story but in Africa. Actual snake though
        
       | bitwize wrote:
       | And if you glide to the right point, you'll find a Dragon's Tear
       | that exposes a bit more backstory.
        
       | helsinkiandrew wrote:
       | Why is the journal of the Medieval Academy of America called
       | "Speculum": A device used to "examine hollow openings in your
       | body, like your vagina, anus, ears or nostrils"
       | 
       | EDIT: oh, perhaps the medieval genre of speculum literature:
       | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speculum_literature
        
         | kemayo wrote:
         | It's a word with multiple meanings, though admittedly the one
         | you mention is the most common modern one. Presumably, given
         | that it's a journal and about medieval studies, it's a
         | reference to speculum literature:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speculum_literature
        
         | thih9 wrote:
         | I guess we can only speculate.
        
       | nsajko wrote:
       | The paper is open-access:
       | https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/727992
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-01-19 23:00 UTC)