[HN Gopher] Kids of parents making $158.2-222.4k/yr have worst o...
___________________________________________________________________
Kids of parents making $158.2-222.4k/yr have worst odds of Ivy
League acceptance
Author : Geekette
Score : 12 points
Date : 2024-01-14 21:23 UTC (1 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (nymag.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (nymag.com)
| amluto wrote:
| Moderators, the link is corrupt. It's presumably meant to be:
|
| https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/college-acceptance-r...
| tester756 wrote:
| >Roughly a quarter of the admissions advantage stems from athlete
| recruitment: Other studies reveal that athletes tend to hail from
| high-income families. Years of access to private lessons, club
| sports, better facilities, and niche teams (water polo, golf,
| squash, fencing) make a bigger difference than most people
| realize. The final 31 percent of the very-rich advantage comes
| from colleges judging these children to be stronger in
| nonacademic categories. That makes sense since they have greater
| access to extracurricular activities and leadership opportunities
|
| On one hand using anything other than final, school leaving,
| standardized at country-level exams that are fair and transparent
|
| feels like wanting to introduce shitton of bias and lack of
| fairness and transparency
|
| but on the other hand pure academic capability/output isn't
| perfect proxy for success and it seems like fancy higher edu
| institutions want to 'create' successful people, right?
|
| ehh, while im standing behind #1 option, then #2 aint stupid
|
| ____________
|
| >Marie currently attends a university that did not make the U.S.
| News & World Report list of top-50 public schools. Amanda tells
| me, "She's happy but often says, 'Mom, I just wish I hadn't
| studied. I would have gotten into the exact same schools.'" And
| Marie is probably right.
|
| This is fucking sad, imo.
|
| She didnt teach her the purpose of eduction, of studying, what
| the hell.
|
| You don't study to get better grades, to get better scores, to
| get to better school.
|
| That's just a means to an end
| nothercastle wrote:
| Not rich enough to get an economic advantage or poor enough to
| get Diversity priority.
| voicedYoda wrote:
| But i don't want my kids going to ivy League. I want them to
| study what they need to know, have fun, and explore. We aren't
| rich, and they know that, and that level of stuffy education
| would be better in graduate or post grad, when they pay you to
| study there.
| whateveracct wrote:
| That was my conclusion as teen too. I went to in-state to a
| Big-10 school with one of the automatic merit scholarships
| based on ACT/SAT scores. Still got a great job out of college
| and moved out west to work at a FAANG (they recruited at my
| university). Pretty much a top outcome money wise I would've
| gotten at MIT (where I did get in).
| gumby wrote:
| > She went on to explain that the couple didn't make enough money
| to be considered potential donors
|
| When my kid went to college the development office started
| shmoozing before said kid had even chosen his classes.
| gertop wrote:
| Is that an humble brag?
| gumby wrote:
| Not intended as so (and anyway I am not a likely donor). I
| was just surprised that they didn't waste a moment and got
| right down to it.
| gumby wrote:
| > I will tell you they have no fucking chance of getting in
| anywhere unless they have a legacy.
|
| What about schools that don't do legacies, like MIT?
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-01-14 23:01 UTC)