[HN Gopher] The Surprising Roots of Ancient Rome's Gladiator Fights
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Surprising Roots of Ancient Rome's Gladiator Fights
        
       Author : diodorus
       Score  : 16 points
       Date   : 2024-01-12 04:28 UTC (18 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.atlasobscura.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.atlasobscura.com)
        
       | mcbishop wrote:
       | I wonder if there were combat-training camps for at least some of
       | the slaves (and political dissidents).
        
         | nemo wrote:
         | There were a number of gladiator schools that trained
         | gladiators for combat, there's interesting ruins of Ludus
         | Magnus, the largest of them:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludus_Magnus
        
       | brabel wrote:
       | > Julius Caesar, wishing to further his political career in 65
       | B.C., staged a munus for his father (who had been dead for 20
       | years), during which 640 gladiators fought wearing armor made of
       | solid silver.
       | 
       | How can people be so blood-thirsty that it's ok to sacrifice over
       | 600 men for nothing more than a "spectacle"? It's really
       | difficult to understand how a highly civilized society for the
       | time could have almost no respect for human life.
        
         | detourdog wrote:
         | I can think of moments in my life where I feel a highly
         | civilized society would not be acting this way and sacrificing
         | so many people.
        
         | rm_-rf_slash wrote:
         | The fiction writer Brian Aldiss was quoted as saying
         | "Civilization is the distance man has placed between himself
         | and his excreta."
         | 
         | We are Neolithic animals with miraculous technology and far too
         | little time to evolve at the same pace.
         | 
         | Homo homini lupus.
        
         | graemep wrote:
         | It is hardly the only way the Romans lacked respect for human
         | life. They were very willing to kill for many reasons.
         | 
         | They were a slave society and were particularly harsh on
         | slaves, and particularly rebellious slaves. The cruelty of a
         | society where crucifixion (scaleable, low labour cost,
         | torturing to death) was a standard punishment is mind boggling.
         | 
         | Then there was all the rape (of slaves, it was fine, even
         | children) and other cruelties.
         | 
         | Civilized does not necessarily mean nice.
        
         | djur wrote:
         | Historically, one of the defining characteristics of
         | "civilized" peoples has been their capacity for spectacular
         | mass bloodshed. Sadly, there doesn't seem to be any meaningful
         | correlation between the ability to create great art, poetry,
         | architecture, etc. and respect for human life.
        
         | rawgabbit wrote:
         | Rome was not civilized by modern standards. They celebrated
         | wars of conquest. They enslaved those who could not pay their
         | capricious taxes. They were in Nietzsche's phrasing acting out
         | their will to power. A euphemism for doing whatever they can
         | get away with.
        
         | wolverine876 wrote:
         | I think that's the scary question for a lot of people. Many
         | ignore it, some like to embrace violence like they've
         | discovered something new (instead of old), and to show how edgy
         | and dangerous they are.
         | 
         | We all have good and bad in us, we are biologically the same as
         | those Romans, and as all the people who do good things. We can
         | choose, and we can bring out the good (or bad) in each other.
         | Look at the society we've built, where such things are
         | unthinkable.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-01-12 23:00 UTC)