[HN Gopher] The largest US dam-removal effort to date has begun
___________________________________________________________________
The largest US dam-removal effort to date has begun
Author : pseudolus
Score : 37 points
Date : 2024-01-11 12:15 UTC (1 days ago)
(HTM) web link (arstechnica.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (arstechnica.com)
| 11235813213455 wrote:
| Dams age with damages
| engineer_22 wrote:
| It's a dam shame
| k12sosse wrote:
| Was hoping I'd see some Post.10 footage
| londons_explore wrote:
| How does removing a dam compare with simply opening the gates and
| releasing all the water?
|
| A dam not holding any water back has far more strength than
| necessary and will probably last thousands of years.
|
| It's obviously far cheaper.
|
| You get many of the same environmental benefits (lake area no
| longer flooded, fish can traverse the base of the dam).
| mistrial9 wrote:
| > imply opening the gates and releasing all the water
|
| would that be step 1 perhaps?
|
| without much thinking about it, I would expect that the shape
| of the waterway structure may not really match a natural water
| course at all. For example, quite a lot of the release
| mechanisms would be at the top third of the dam wall, etc.
| Probably very specific to each dam?
| markedathome wrote:
| Switzerland are building a dam next to another dam that can no
| longer be repaired, B1M have a video going over the method -
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0vxzYvIHUk
| ok_dad wrote:
| That dam also holds back the largest (as far as I recall)
| pumped hydro storage system in the world. I'm not sure but I
| think they talk about it in the video you linked if it's the
| same one I watched a while back.
| dylan604 wrote:
| The spill way being opened won't release all of the water from
| a dam. Spill ways are just a type of pressure relief valve to
| keep the water from destroying the damn. So while it might add
| more water down stream, it will do nothing for restoring the
| flooded area upstream of the dam.
| parl_match wrote:
| First off, that's opening a spillway, and that will still leave
| a substantial portion of land flooded.
|
| > A dam not holding any water back has far more strength than
| necessary and will probably last thousands of years.
|
| And, actually isn't true, there's a lot of complicated factors
| when building a dam, and having a consistent, low lying
| waterflow (like a river). Depending on the type of damn, soil
| conditions, etc, it can actually cause disproportionate erosion
| that will cause the damn to collapse in on itself (in a
| surprisingly short time frame, under a decade even).
|
| So, engineers will sometimes do what you suggested when it's
| feasible. But, it's not always.
| pengaru wrote:
| There aren't gates at the base of any large dam. The only way
| to discharge the artificial lake behind a large dam is via
| destruction AIUI.
|
| It will deteriorate with age and eventually break in an
| uncontrolled/unplanned manner anyways.
|
| At least this way you tear it down gracefully with a gradual
| discharge of the water, and enable restoration of the
| environment/salmon breeding etc.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-01-12 23:00 UTC)