[HN Gopher] Quarter of the Hurd 2023-Q4
___________________________________________________________________
Quarter of the Hurd 2023-Q4
Author : jlpcsl
Score : 13 points
Date : 2024-01-10 20:01 UTC (3 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.gnu.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.gnu.org)
| science4sail wrote:
| GNU Hurd has been in development for more than 30 years, long
| enough to see drastic changes in the computing industry (e.g. the
| shift to web and mobile). At this point, I do wonder whether it
| is more of a public art project than a viable technology, akin to
| Dwarf Fortress.
|
| https://xkcd.com/1508/
| duskwuff wrote:
| The project's also been running for so long that its hardware
| requirements have slid from "yes, you can install and boot Hurd
| on your computer" to "well, okay, maybe if you have an older
| PC" to "we recommend running Hurd in a VM".
|
| (To back this up: Hurd currently only supports the 32-bit x86
| architecture, can only use a single CPU core, and is limited to
| 1 GB or so of RAM. It also lacks support for USB, PCIe, or
| anything dependent on them.)
| asystole wrote:
| >(To back this up: Hurd currently only supports the 32-bit
| x86 architecture, can only use a single CPU core, and is
| limited to 1 GB or so of RAM. It also lacks support for USB,
| PCIe, or anything dependent on them.)
|
| Wow. I was aware of Hurd and that it's perpetually not ready
| for real-world use, but I didn't realise it was _that_ far
| behind. Sounds like even hobby projects e.g. the likes of
| SerenityOS have leapfrogged it.
| graemep wrote:
| Is a kernel (or, more precisely, I think a kernel replacement).
|
| Kernels have not changed that much. Android devices use the
| Linux kernel which is a similar age. Apple uses the XNU kernel
| which is only a few years younger.
|
| I think it is worth asking whether something that has failed to
| gain traction or reach after so long is ever going to be
| practical to use.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-01-10 23:01 UTC)