[HN Gopher] OpenAI says it's "impossible" to create AI models wi...
___________________________________________________________________
OpenAI says it's "impossible" to create AI models without
copyrighted material
Author : freeqaz
Score : 9 points
Date : 2024-01-09 22:02 UTC (58 minutes ago)
(HTM) web link (arstechnica.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (arstechnica.com)
| Raed667 wrote:
| Then don't
| zgs wrote:
| Bollocks. There is lots of out of copyright content available. It
| just requires a person in the loop to assess the status.
|
| If it truely were impossible, then it sounds like they've just
| admitted that they should have licensed the content rather than
| using it without permission.
| gorkish wrote:
| Would you be comfortable educating yourself or your own
| children without the use of any copyrighted material
| whatsoever?
|
| AI's gonna get trained on it no matter what; nobody wants a
| product that isn't. By the time OpenAI takes the bullet we will
| have killed nothing.
| achrono wrote:
| So much for all the altruism, and with this kind of an argument
| they really are scraping the bottom of the barrel -- it isn't the
| first time a company is lying to a government committee, it isn't
| the first time a company has claimed to be moral perfection
| incarnate only to turn out to be a non-repentant defiler, so we
| should all be prepared to expect worse going forward from OpenAI.
| JohnFen wrote:
| To be fair, OpenAI made it very clear what they were about back
| when they ditched being open and made that multibillion dollar
| deal with Microsoft.
|
| Don't listen to what they say, watch what they do.
| lotsoweiners wrote:
| I can't open a store without something to sell so it sounds like
| neither of us have an actual business model.
| JohnFen wrote:
| Tough.
|
| OpenAI's wholesale abuse of the internet has made the internet no
| longer an acceptable place for me to distribute data and writing
| to the general public. I have no sympathy whatsoever for them.
| kelseyfrog wrote:
| Let them fight. Copyright transfer as it exists regarding work
| for hire is a legal fiction.
| genman wrote:
| In principle they are not wrong as everything produced is
| effectively copyrighted and only released 70 years after authors
| death after what everything is completely outdated and
| irrelevant.
| tonetegeatinst wrote:
| I think the real crime is that they keep on getting the PR for
| being "open source" and for safe ai development.
|
| They arnt open sourcing their models and they are actually
| monetizing it. As for AI safety.....its so grey aread. Uncensored
| models have a place in this community, and trying to suppress
| them or claim their is no use for them is just insane to me.
|
| What one person views as a moral or ethical response another
| might view as wrong. This is all culture and also based on your
| country's views which help form individual perspectives.
|
| I think a big issue with AI other than the hardware barriers is
| that we have no clue if the amazing developments in the field
| will keep up with the same pace or stagnate. We can't accurately
| tell when we have hit the theoretical limit, or when we have true
| AGI.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-01-09 23:01 UTC)