[HN Gopher] FTC bans X-Mode from selling phone location data, an...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       FTC bans X-Mode from selling phone location data, and orders firm
       to delete data
        
       Author : marban
       Score  : 57 points
       Date   : 2024-01-09 19:31 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (techcrunch.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (techcrunch.com)
        
       | toomuchtodo wrote:
       | FTC press release: https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-
       | releases/2024/01/...
       | 
       | Sen Wyden fighting the good fight in usual form:
       | 
       | > Sen. Ron Wyden, whose office first revealed that X-Mode had
       | sold location data to U.S. military contractors, said in response
       | to the FTC's findings: "I commend the FTC for taking tough action
       | to hold this shady location data broker responsible for its sale
       | of Americans' location data."
       | 
       | https://www.vice.com/en/article/jgqm5x/us-military-location-...
       | 
       | https://www.wsj.com/articles/apple-and-google-to-stop-x-mode...
       | 
       | https://therecord.media/ftc-settles-case-geolocation-data-br...
        
         | 2OEH8eoCRo0 wrote:
         | Which defense contractor would want that data? Palantir?
        
           | eli wrote:
           | There are tons of contractors that are just middlemen,
           | collecting and packaging data from other companies. See
           | https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/06/how-federal-
           | government...
           | 
           | This way the government doesn't have to interact (or even be
           | able to identify) where exactly the data is sourced from.
        
           | smitty1110 wrote:
           | The contractor is just a smokescreen in this case. The point
           | is the Government pays the contractor, which is what shows up
           | in subpoenas and congressional budget hearings, and the
           | paperwork says the contract is in support of Such and Such
           | contract.
           | 
           | If someone is using FOIA requests to gather information, They
           | see DOD paid Foobar, inc. $56 million for the FUBAR contract.
           | You then go to FUBAR, and you find the request and
           | parameters, which are 300 pages of word salad, and then you
           | read the proposals, which are 150 words each of a combination
           | of buzzword bingo, legalese, and contracting pandering. None
           | of which makes it obvious that the contract is "Buy data on
           | our behalf, to shield the program from oversight".
        
         | rqtwteye wrote:
         | I guess Wyden is doing the right by keeping low profile and
         | just working on issues. But on the other hand I really would
         | love to see him run for president. I don't always 100% agree
         | with his initiatives but he really seems to be thoughtful and
         | making a real effort in creating policies that make sense.
         | Which is something that's out of fashion these days in DC.
        
       | beeburrt wrote:
       | What is X-mode?
        
         | wnevets wrote:
         | a data broker stealing people's data for profit.
        
           | JohnFen wrote:
           | Isn't that basically all of them?
        
             | wnevets wrote:
             | Wouldn't the FTC ban them if they were?
        
       | gnabgib wrote:
       | FTC Complaint 212-3038:
       | https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/X-Mode-Complain...
        
       | JohnMakin wrote:
       | This is a great example of something that irks me during data
       | privacy debates from the side of "well if there's no personally
       | identifying data, it's fine." It would seem that since X-Mode
       | only sells location data tied to a device, which is technically
       | "anonymous" then this is likely why it flew under the radar for
       | so long. It's not like they're saying "oh, such and such was here
       | at this time."
       | 
       | however, the reality is that ALL personal data is potentially
       | personally identifying, especially when collected and analyzed in
       | aggregate with other data sources. I wish the public conscious
       | would somehow accept this fact and understand that personal data
       | should always default to being in the hands of the user first.
        
         | lcnPylGDnU4H9OF wrote:
         | > the reality is that ALL personal data is potentially
         | personally identifying
         | 
         | To this point, an exercise for the reader might be to think
         | about everywhere they've gone and how long they've been there
         | for the past two weeks while considering every person who never
         | left their side for this period. For the vast majority of
         | people, that list will contain nobody, and that's why
         | "anonymized" location data is still personal information.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-01-09 23:01 UTC)