[HN Gopher] IBM Demos Transistor Built for Liquid Nitrogen Cooling
___________________________________________________________________
IBM Demos Transistor Built for Liquid Nitrogen Cooling
Author : rbanffy
Score : 36 points
Date : 2024-01-07 14:35 UTC (8 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (spectrum.ieee.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (spectrum.ieee.org)
| thanatos519 wrote:
| Can I overclock it with liquid helium?
| bgnn wrote:
| Only to a limited extent. The improvements don't scale at very
| low temperatures. Some weird stuff happens too: metals or
| resistors can get superconducting. Not always an advantage.
| cowthulhu wrote:
| Does anyone know if there any current or near-term applications
| for these? Seems super cost-prohibitive, especially if you can
| just throw more compute at the problem instead. Super cool (hah)
| either way.
| jiggawatts wrote:
| Just guessing since the article was information deficient:
| mainframes. They're so expensive anyway that adding on a closed
| cycle cryogenic cooler isn't even in the top ten line items on
| the bill.
|
| At cryogenic temperatures, even older architectures not
| optimised for it can hit 9 GHz. An optimised modern CPU could
| probably run at well over 10 GHz, which is a big performance
| boost for legacy single-threaded code. Cooling and
| "overclocking" the CPUs would be cheaper than rewriting the
| code.
|
| More extreme frequencies (over 100 GHz) can be achieved with
| existing but more exotic digital electronics such as Rapid
| Single Flux Quantum (RSFQ), which uses liquid helium cooling.
| This is used in some military radars, radio telescopes, and a
| few other similar high-speed signal processing scenarios. If
| ordinary silicon could run at, say, 20 GHz with cheaper LN
| cooling, that would lower the cost of some fancy radars.
| fbdab103 wrote:
| Liquid nitrogen costs less than a $1/liter. Not sure what
| kind of reservoir volume they are talking, but indeed talking
| peanuts in comparison to everything else. The salary of the
| guy who has to maintain the cooling is going to be more.
| snek_case wrote:
| The benefit is that you can speed up any single-threaded code
| without any changes, and not all code is easily parallelizable.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-01-07 23:00 UTC)