[HN Gopher] How a script doctor found his own voice
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       How a script doctor found his own voice
        
       Author : Caiero
       Score  : 37 points
       Date   : 2023-12-30 04:03 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.newyorker.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.newyorker.com)
        
       | CodeBeater wrote:
       | Frank's transition from script doctor to top screenwriter mirrors
       | a classic dev story: a shift from fixing bugs to building entire
       | systems. His journey underscores the universal truth in creative
       | fields: mastering the basics leads to groundbreaking work.
        
         | triceratops wrote:
         | From reading the article it sounds like he first wrote his own
         | scripts, had one of them produced, then adapted a couple of
         | novels. After the success of the adaptations he was "inundated"
         | by rewrite job offers.
        
       | BryanLegend wrote:
       | https://archive.ph/WjlR8
        
       | kleiba wrote:
       | _> For decades, Scott Frank earned up to three hundred thousand
       | dollars a week rewriting other people's screenplays_
       | 
       | "Decades" (plural) suggests this must have been at least 20
       | years. So let's see, what that would have made in the best case:
       | $300,000 * 52 * 20 = $312,000,000
       | 
       | Not the worst reason to keep that job.
        
         | epmaybe wrote:
         | "Up to"
        
           | kleiba wrote:
           | True. So, in the worst case, there was a single week where he
           | earned that.
        
             | grogenaut wrote:
             | It's a newspaper article. It's very likely there was one
             | week he was paid for the previous 5 years of messing around
             | with a script all at once. Or it was actually a week and he
             | holed up with some director for a week to save a show off
             | the rails. Is this how the final season of game of thrones
             | happened?
        
               | simonw wrote:
               | The New Yorker have an extremely strong reputation for
               | fact-checking every detail in every one of their stories.
               | 
               | A couple of fun New Yorker stories about that:
               | https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2009/02/09/checkpoints
               | and https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/10/15/daniel-
               | radclif...
               | 
               | I'd be really interested to hear what their fact-checkers
               | came up with for this $300,000/week note!
        
         | fieldcny wrote:
         | Yeah so that's the best case scenario, but it's an absurd
         | estimate.
         | 
         | I can assure you the first years doing this were hard work and
         | low pay.
         | 
         | What point are you trying to make, that he was just doing it
         | for the money?
        
           | merrywhether wrote:
           | He was doing it for the money (at least at the end)! That and
           | the psychological safety of not doing his own things.
        
           | kleiba wrote:
           | Honestly, I don't really know what point I'm trying to make
           | or if I'm trying to make one at all. Sorry.
        
         | owyn wrote:
         | That's not how it works. It's literally in the article. For
         | undivided attention on a script for a couple of weeks, for a
         | movie that might have a budget of tens of millions of dollars,
         | this is completely reasonable. The article also says he's
         | worked on scripts for 60 movies in 20 years. So yeah, maybe 3
         | per year. How much is it worth to the studio to have Saving
         | Private Ryan be a better movie?
         | 
         |  _For such assignments, which are generally uncredited, he
         | commands a fee that he acknowledges is "insane": three hundred
         | thousand dollars a week. Most jobs last a few weeks._
        
       | merrywhether wrote:
       | > "There is something so vulnerable and frightening about doing
       | your own thing, because it's your fault if it doesn't work. And
       | then there's this other kind of work, where you're paid an
       | extraordinary amount of money, you're the hero before you walk in
       | the door, you're not even held that accountable, because you have
       | a limited amount of time, and all you can do is make it better."
       | 
       | This quote from Frank resonated with me as very similar to
       | software dev. It's so much psychologically easier to work a day
       | job than even small side projects. And that's for a variety of
       | reasons but I normally focus more on the "mechanical" obstacles
       | like context-switching and the difficulty of shapelessness. But
       | with enough reputation your job can also give rise to something
       | of a "risk-free" external-affirmation loop that your brain
       | doubtlessly pushes you to keep spinning.
        
       | KyleSanderson wrote:
       | https://archive.is/WjlR8
        
       | simonw wrote:
       | I'm fascinated by screenwriting, and this profile has so many
       | delightful little notes about why it's such a challenging craft.
        
         | chrisaycock wrote:
         | Then you might enjoy Scriptnotes, a podcast about
         | screenwriting:
         | 
         | https://johnaugust.com/scriptnotes
         | 
         | It's hosted by John August ( _Big Fish_ , _Corpse Bride_ ) and
         | Craig Mazin ( _Chernobyl_ , _The Last of Us_ ).
        
           | simonw wrote:
           | Already in my Overcast!
        
       | narag wrote:
       | I read "Maltese Falcon" in the eighties. I remember vividly that
       | story about Flitcraft, even if I had forgotten where it came
       | from. It's really powerful.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-12-31 23:01 UTC)