[HN Gopher] Who made millions trading the October 7th attacks?
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Who made millions trading the October 7th attacks?
        
       Author : lxm
       Score  : 54 points
       Date   : 2023-12-29 20:29 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.economist.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.economist.com)
        
       | mcguire wrote:
       | I can't read the article, but the intro is interesting.
       | 
       | " _The authors' most striking finding is a surge in short sales--
       | bets that a security's price will fall--of an exchange-traded
       | fund (etf) listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker
       | eis, which tracks an index of Israeli shares. In September an
       | average of 1,581 shares a day of EIS were sold short,
       | representing 17% of the daily total trading volume. On October
       | 2nd, five days before the attacks, a whopping 227,820 shares were
       | shorted, representing 99% of total volume. Rather than reflecting
       | a souring of market sentiment, the increase in activity seems to
       | have come from just two trades._ "
        
         | yieldcrv wrote:
         | > the increase in activity seems to have come from just two
         | trades.
         | 
         | its interesting how nobody not even a bot was interested in
         | copy-trading that, most likely due to the incredibly low
         | volume, kept everyone else far far away from that ticker
         | 
         | only 15,000 shares traded today. paltry.
         | 
         | curious if they, were they able to cover that short
        
           | quickthrowman wrote:
           | > curious if they, were they able to cover that short
           | 
           | Volume for EIS on 10/9 (first market day after the attack)
           | was ~341k shares, it's possible they were on the buy side of
           | 2/3rds of those trades, I'm guessing there was not a lack of
           | sellers on 10/9.
        
           | next_xibalba wrote:
           | > copy-trading
           | 
           | Is this a common bot strategy? I've never heard of this (not
           | that I would--I only casually follow finance).
        
             | belter wrote:
             | I only know of two similar strategies:
             | 
             | - Check Goldman Sachs recommendations and do the opposite.
             | 
             | - Hear Jim Cramer recommendations and do the opposite.
             | 
             | These two never failed to make money.
        
             | _benj wrote:
             | I don't think is a bot thing but a people thing... when
             | there's a sudden grow in volume whoever sees that assumes
             | that whoever took that position knows something that they
             | don't know and thus taking a similar position is often a
             | "sensible" action, even if only to hedge against
             | unknowns...
             | 
             | Source: best friend trades for a living
        
         | SoftTalker wrote:
         | To save anyone the trouble, the article does not identify
         | anyone specifically, only that "the most plausible account is
         | that whoever made the trades was familiar with Hamas's
         | secrets."
        
         | arkadiyt wrote:
         | Just turn off javascript and it'll bypass their paywall
        
       | noloblo wrote:
       | unpaywall : https://archive.ph/3Nk0U
        
       | rainworld wrote:
       | http://archive.today/2023.12.28-162826/https://www.economist...
        
         | neonate wrote:
         | https://web.archive.org/web/20231229204119/https://www.econo...
        
       | ajsfoux234 wrote:
       | The article does not provide any direct evidence that trades were
       | made with knowledge of the attacks. Also see a refutal at
       | https://www.bbc.com/news/business-67628380
        
         | jandrese wrote:
         | The article includes a rebuttal to the rebuttal. Basically the
         | trades were a few orders of magnitude out of the ordinary so
         | they looked odd even in such a tiny market.
        
       | dataangel wrote:
       | It's very sus but $1M isn't a huge profit by trading standards.
       | If they knew what was coming why didn't they bet more?
        
         | amadeuspagel wrote:
         | Maybe they didn't have more.
        
         | lxm wrote:
         | EIS is a thinly traded ETF.
        
         | mschuster91 wrote:
         | > If they knew what was coming why didn't they bet more?
         | 
         | The higher the payout, the more likely that government will
         | come knock on your door.
        
       | jandrese wrote:
       | This suggests Israel should have been paying attention to the
       | stocks to figure out when it was going to be attacked. Whomever
       | did this had the distinct possibility of blowing Hamas's opsec if
       | the IDF were slightly more alert about this sort of thing.
        
         | netsharc wrote:
         | They had a lot of intel, but thought an attack of such
         | magnitude was beyond Hamas' capabilities:
         | https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/nov/28/israeli-milita...
         | 
         | Or: https://www.yahoo.com/news/women-spotters-said-hamas-
         | prepari...
        
       | adtac wrote:
       | > In September an average of 1,581 shares a day of eis were sold
       | short, representing 17% of the daily total trading volume. On
       | October 2nd, five days before the attacks, a whopping 227,820
       | shares were shorted
       | 
       | It's misleading to compare an average with an extreme, especially
       | since October 2nd is the first Monday of the month and the fourth
       | quarter (probably books being balanced). It would be better to
       | compare with the maximum in the whole of September or July.
        
         | Baldbvrhunter wrote:
         | or previous peaks and the factors around those
         | 
         | and what if these particular traders had a habit of big bets
         | and got lucky this time
         | 
         | a bit like "these guys predicted the crash" and no-one looks at
         | their other predictions
        
       | rzmmm wrote:
       | Arent stock market transactions public information or am I
       | mistaken? Someone could find out who did the shorting?
        
         | quickthrowman wrote:
         | The SEC has access to all trade data, but public market trade
         | data doesn't have any identifying information, time and sales
         | data consists of just that.
         | 
         | For example, 'bought/sold _x_ units of _y_ instrument at
         | _timestamp_ '. You might also get the exchange it was traded
         | on, and possibly other information depending on who you buy
         | market data from.
        
         | im3w1l wrote:
         | The fact that they it hasn't come out who did it makes me half-
         | wonder if it's because it's very embarassing. Maybe someone
         | connected to intelligence agency, rather than someone connected
         | to Hamas.
        
       | reedf1 wrote:
       | My understanding was that there was a currency error in the
       | original research that vastly overestimated the flow. From
       | fantastic reporting here on the FT.
       | 
       | https://www.ft.com/content/cee5e4fd-2353-4958-a5f8-c4a802024...
        
       | Pikamander2 wrote:
       | The article's paywalled so I don't know if already mentions it,
       | but the attack took place on the 50th anniversary of the Yom
       | Kippur war and also coincided with Simchat Torah.
       | 
       | Hamas and other militant groups have previously used days of
       | historical and religious significance to launch a wave of attacks
       | (usually rockets), so there's a strong chance that some random
       | trader just made an educated guess that an incident would happen
       | on that day and hit the jackpot when the scope of the attack
       | ended up being larger than usual.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-12-29 23:01 UTC)