[HN Gopher] Hexcodle
___________________________________________________________________
Hexcodle
Author : chat
Score : 36 points
Date : 2023-12-28 19:29 UTC (3 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (hexcodle.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (hexcodle.com)
| johnzim wrote:
| Brilliant and probably building a skill that's actually useful
| (if a little esoteric).
| KMnO4 wrote:
| You can only play once before it kicks you out. Kinda lame.
|
| Also, I don't think the hints are correct. It told me the digit 0
| was "way higher" than the actual digit.
| jdbartee wrote:
| I interpreted <<double up arrow>> to mean the correct solution
| was "way higher" than my guess, not that my guess was "way
| higher".
|
| The wording is potentially confusing, though.
| m000 wrote:
| You can only play once before you realize you can cheat using
| the browser DOM inspector.
|
| Nice idea though.
| mmanfrin wrote:
| > Also, I don't think the hints are correct. It told me the
| digit 0 was "way higher" than the actual digit.
|
| You have this backwards.
| croes wrote:
| You only need 5 guesses to find any number between 0 and 15. With
| 4 you can find any number in a range of 15 numbers.
|
| Just do a binary search.
| tedunangst wrote:
| Is there any reason to look at the target instead of just going
| for binary search? The least significant digit is kinda
| meaningless to guess without fixing the more significant one.
| jagthebeetle wrote:
| While I agree the LSD is somewhat meaningless, I personally
| find it fun to test my color matching/mixing. Binary search
| circumvents that (at least for the most significant digit);
| though I agree it really only applies for the first and maybe
| second guess.
|
| For instance, my initial guess was off by (+1,-1,-1,+3,-1-2)
| and my first impulse was to look at the target and see that I
| had too much red and not enough green.
| masto wrote:
| To have fun, perhaps?
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2023-12-28 23:00 UTC)