[HN Gopher] Serendipity is too important to be left to chance (1...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Serendipity is too important to be left to chance (1996)
        
       Author : thunderbong
       Score  : 91 points
       Date   : 2023-12-18 08:16 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (web.media.mit.edu)
 (TXT) w3m dump (web.media.mit.edu)
        
       | computersuck wrote:
       | The modern equivalent of this is basically Obsidian and the
       | "second brain" concept
       | 
       | Not like chatgpt, which is a random garbage spewing agent leaving
       | it to chance
        
         | _emacsomancer_ wrote:
         | Or Org-Roam, to stick with the Emacs connection.
        
           | JonChesterfield wrote:
           | Emacs is very awkward to use in a mobile phone sadly.
        
             | _emacsomancer_ wrote:
             | It's not as seamless as I would like, but I manage pretty
             | well with Emacs in Termux and files synced via Syncthing.
        
       | kulor wrote:
       | I'm working on a system similar to this to satisfy my own needs
       | but can open up to brave alpha users if requested.
       | 
       | I've a concept of boards/themes where you can add structured
       | information like people (to remember contacts in context),
       | bookmarks, thoughts, tasks and even RSS feeds to stay up-to-date
       | on a theme (e.g battery tech). Emails and calendar will be coming
       | soon so that your personal corpus is voluminous and of high
       | enough quality to make a personal GPT actually useful. E.g "who
       | was the CTO I met at the dinner last week".
       | 
       | FWIW I'm already a founder of a company so this isn't intended as
       | a commercial pitch.
        
         | suoduandao2 wrote:
         | I'd be interested in something like that, where do I sign up?
        
         | hiAndrewQuinn wrote:
         | I've been doing something similar based off of what I've been
         | calling "intentionally overspaced repetition". I'm interested
         | as well in how you're going about it.
        
         | huehehue wrote:
         | Years ago, I submitted an admittedly half-baked version of this
         | to YC. The concept is interesting, but the implementation
         | options are:
         | 
         | a) require considerable and routine manual data entry from the
         | end-user
         | 
         | b) suck up every bit of data from e.g. email, phone, messaging
         | apps, banks and end up with some privacy/security disaster
         | 
         | Anyway, there are all sorts of things you could do with that
         | data, like trawling for novel links in your social graph.
        
         | nikhilgk wrote:
         | Yes! Would be interested in trying it out if you are looking
         | for alpha users.
        
         | kirubakaran wrote:
         | I'm doing something like this with https://histre.com/ I'd love
         | to try your tool, and it would also be fun to chat about this
         | if you like (k@histre.com)
        
       | d1aesthete wrote:
       | When i read the title i thought the idea may have been to
       | engineer coincidence, which seems like a contradiction, but i
       | wonder if is not impossible.
        
         | j4yav wrote:
         | You can definitely engineer the chance for interesting things
         | to happen by surrounding yourself with interesting people in
         | interesting places, and it's highly recommended imho to do so.
        
           | d1aesthete wrote:
           | that's an interesting and fair point. what about the
           | computability of coincidence?
        
             | AnimalMuppet wrote:
             | "Engineer" was too strong of a word, IMO.
             | 
             | You can increase the odds, so that it is likely to happen
             | more often. You can't engineer an instance of it. You can't
             | compute it. If you could, it wouldn't be coincidence; it
             | would be design!
        
               | j4yav wrote:
               | Yeah, perhaps not engineer the time and moment in a
               | predictable fashion, but instead just maximize your
               | kismet per square meter.
        
         | jerry1979 wrote:
         | People talked about this on HN earlier:
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25968751
         | 
         | The short end of it is something like: serendipity = work +
         | telling people about the work
        
         | zoogeny wrote:
         | Consider an alternative view, that coincidence is an immutable
         | feature of reality that can be searched. In that case, you
         | aren't necessarily _engineering_ coincidence. Rather you are
         | searching with the intent to align your own actions with the
         | inherent coincident bias of the universe.
        
         | gwern wrote:
         | I think it's possible. One problem that I have with
         | Remembrancer, as well as all approaches based on the same basic
         | idea of 'show the user a list of similar items', is that this
         | is fundamentally guaranteed to be mostly useless because the
         | user will already remember many similar items and have
         | deliberately omitted them. Sometimes you will forget, and then
         | it can be quite helpful, sure, but for the most part, this
         | retrieval strategy is inherently limited.
         | 
         | What you really get serendipity is from re-encountering things
         | you don't know or have forgotten. And we know how to predict if
         | you have forgotten something: _spaced repetition and the
         | forgetting curve!_ To manufacture serendipity, you simply track
         | 'flashcards' of important things, but optimize for the opposite
         | of the normal spaced repetition goal: you want to review only
         | things you are predicted to have forgotten by now.
         | 
         | https://gwern.net/note/statistic#program-for-non-spaced-repe...
         | 
         | Then, as a Remembrancer agent, you make it show preferentially
         | items that are similar but you have probably forgotten. (The
         | Remembrancer agent can be treated as a fraction of a review, on
         | the grounds that even just showing you the title briefly can
         | trigger serendipity and if it didn't provoke any reaction from
         | you, then that is evidence it is not useful and that title
         | should be downweighted and show up less.)
        
       | datadrivenangel wrote:
       | Knowledge management reminds me of The Codeless Code on
       | documentation: http://thecodelesscode.com/case/215
        
       | distcs wrote:
       | > The current Remembrance Agent uses the Savant information
       | retrieval system developed in-house by the Jan Nelson and Bradley
       | Rhodes. The Remembrance Agent runs through emacs, a popular text
       | editor. The user interface is programmed in elisp, and the
       | results are presented as a three line buffer at the bottom of the
       | window.
       | 
       | There is a nice retro screenshot of Emacs after this. Looks like
       | a really old version of Emacs. A nice window into the history of
       | computer stuff!
        
       | smokel wrote:
       | I am sure some of you here will enjoy the etymology of the word
       | serendipity.
       | 
       | Apparently the word was inspired by the fairy tale "The Three
       | Princes of Serendip" [1], the latter being the Persian name of
       | Sri Lanka. In the story, the princes would constantly find
       | interesting things by accident.
       | 
       | [1]
       | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Three_Princes_of_Serendi...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-12-19 23:01 UTC)