[HN Gopher] Postfix 25 years old today
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Postfix 25 years old today
        
       Author : sillystuff
       Score  : 78 points
       Date   : 2023-12-14 20:50 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (marc.info)
 (TXT) w3m dump (marc.info)
        
       | annoyingnoob wrote:
       | Thank you for all of the great software!
        
       | ChrisArchitect wrote:
       | The mentioned New York Times article that "that brought open
       | source on the radar of the CEO".
       | 
       |  _Sharing Software, IBM to Release Mail Program Blueprint. John
       | Markoff. December 14, 1998._
       | 
       | https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/library/tech/98/...
        
         | mrpippy wrote:
         | I love that "source code" was apparently too arcane a phrase to
         | appear in the New York Times, so they describe it as "original
         | programmer's instructions"
        
           | reddalo wrote:
           | Very interesting! It could've also been a choice made not to
           | repeat "code" which already appeared in the "open source"
           | expression.
        
       | mrlonglong wrote:
       | It's a nice piece of software, switched to postfix from the grand
       | old daddy of all, sendmail a decade ago. Haven't looked back
       | since.
        
       | spapas82 wrote:
       | It seems that almost everybody is using postfix these days... Is
       | anybody actually using sendmail? Are actually any reasons for
       | using it (beyond the expertise/preferences of administrators)?
        
         | koito17 wrote:
         | > Is anybody actually using sendmail?
         | 
         | Not sure if this counts to you, but I believe FreeBSD still
         | ships with functioning mail out of the box, and they use
         | sendmail. On FreeBSD 12 at least, sudo actually reports
         | incidents to root's mailbox :)
         | 
         | With that said, when I was engaged with the FreeBSD community
         | years ago, there would be periodic bursts of drama over
         | "debloating" the base install, and sendmail was one (of
         | several) programs people wanted to remove in order to "debloat"
         | the base install. So I wouldn't be surprised if the latest
         | version no longer has functioning mail, let alone sendmail
         | installed.
        
           | 1over137 wrote:
           | I believe FreeBSD 14 just changed the default from sendmail
           | to dma:
           | 
           | https://www.freebsd.org/releases/14.0R/relnotes/
        
             | koito17 wrote:
             | Thanks for pointing this out. In the release notes, I see
             | 
             | > sendmail(8) and its configuration remain available.
             | 
             | I assume this means sendmail still exists in base installs.
             | Do you know the rationale behind this decision? Upgrading
             | from FreeBSD 13 shouldn't result in the binary suddenly
             | going away, so I want to believe there are no backwards
             | compatibility concerns with simply replacing sendmail with
             | dma.
        
         | kiney wrote:
         | last time I've seen sendmail in production was at a job back in
         | 2014
        
         | palata wrote:
         | When I use `git send-email`, I believe it uses sendmail,
         | doesn't it? Also when I installed OpenSMTPD, it overwrote
         | sendmail. I believe `msmtp` also uses sendmail ("SMTP client
         | with a sendmail compatible interface").
         | 
         | Or did I misunderstand the question? I thought sendmail was
         | basically just an interface.
        
           | juped wrote:
           | Yeah, you misunderstood the question; sendmail refers a
           | specific piece of software and source of a lot of sysadmin
           | trauma.
        
           | ibotty wrote:
           | sendmail is both, a commandline client (interface, because
           | it's implemented by multiple projects) that sends mail from
           | the local machine, as well as a full-blown MTA (smtp server,
           | as in postfix).
        
         | sbuk wrote:
         | Proofpoint bought them in 2013, and I imagine that they use it
         | in some fashion, so a significant volume of mail may well be
         | handled by it daily.
        
       | adambb wrote:
       | Always thought QMail was the best option back when Postfix came
       | out, but it certainly has won the top spot over time.
        
         | justinator wrote:
         | Well that's what happens when you don't ever update the app
         | because you've decided that it's absolutely perfect.
        
         | kiney wrote:
         | the problem of qmail is it's author DJB. He considered it
         | 'done' which obviously isn't true. There are quite a few
         | patched versions around but no fork got enough traction to
         | become a living and maintained project.
        
       | bsdmeister wrote:
       | Good memories - mostly. Used extensively Postfix between
       | 2003-2011 when worked on ISPs. Back then our Postfix servers
       | handled around 150 Million Mails per month, we had very few
       | issues, mostly related to integrations with other tools like
       | spamassassin and database mailbox auth.
        
       | ipython wrote:
       | Wow. I had used Postfix back in the day for our mail exchange
       | gateways, but had no idea that it originated from IBM. Postfix
       | was a great piece of software- did one thing, did it well, was
       | easy to configure and manage, and was secure to boot.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-12-14 23:00 UTC)