[HN Gopher] The most interesting book cover designs are often le...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The most interesting book cover designs are often left on the
       cutting room floor
        
       Author : Vigier
       Score  : 48 points
       Date   : 2023-12-12 20:06 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.fastcompany.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.fastcompany.com)
        
       | arketyp wrote:
       | Associating the author's face with the book makes sense for auto-
       | fiction. Knausgard has an appropriately photogenic one congenial
       | with the tone of the book series. The draft on the other hand is
       | way too playful and does not reflect expectations, in my opinion.
       | As for the other drafts vs final version, I can't say I prefer
       | either over the other much.
        
       | solardev wrote:
       | Am I the only one who prefers the final covers over the drafts,
       | in pretty much all the cases?
       | 
       | I think the finals have better typography and composition and are
       | generally clearer than the drafts.
        
       | drakonka wrote:
       | I actually like the final covers more for most of the examples
       | used here.
       | 
       | This made me think about the cover design process for indie genre
       | fiction. The common advice is to create a grid of 10-12 best-
       | selling titles in the specific genre and niche that your book is
       | in, and use that as a guide for your cover.
       | 
       | Are the fonts sans serif of serif? What are the most popular
       | colors? Are most of them object covers or do they feature
       | detailed characters? How many characters, and how zoomed-in are
       | they? Where is the author name positioned and how large is it?
       | 
       | The thinking is that your own cover should fit perfectly into
       | that grid. For new indie authors this can seem counter-intuitive,
       | because the urge is to _stand out_. They think if they stand out,
       | readers will be more likely to notice them and buy their book.
       | 
       | In reality, the safest bet is to only stand out _a little bit_
       | while still fitting in the aesthetic of successful books in the
       | genre. Because genre fiction readers know what they like, and
       | they'll look for covers that look like what they'll like. It can
       | be a tricky balance: be _too_ generic in an oversaturated niche
       | and you'll seem bland. But stand out _too much_ (to the point of
       | not slotting nicely into that grid) and you'll be too weird for
       | readers to click on. They'll go click on a cover that looks more
       | like that other book they loved instead.
       | 
       | Some authors luck out or have such an established reader base
       | that they'll buy any oddball cover - and they could even set the
       | trends for future covers in the niche if so. But most of us
       | small-fry can't afford to take that gamble if royalties are the
       | goal, and the safer financial decision is usually to fit in.
        
         | thaumasiotes wrote:
         | > In reality, the safest bet is to only stand out _a little
         | bit_ while still fitting in the aesthetic of successful books
         | in the genre. Because genre fiction readers know what they
         | like, and they'll look for covers that look like what they'll
         | like.
         | 
         | I would expect more that genre fiction readers will be browsing
         | the section where all of the books are in their genre, and the
         | cover will completely fail to carry any further information
         | about the genre.
         | 
         | There's a semi-recent trend in fantasy novels for the cover to
         | have an abstract image instead of art. (Compare:
         | https://m.media-amazon.com/images/W/MEDIAX_792452-T2/images/...
         | for a "modern" cover, or https://m.media-
         | amazon.com/images/W/MEDIAX_792452-T2/images/... for a
         | "traditional" cover.) Art is better.
         | 
         | You're better off with a cover that _appeals to the reader_ ,
         | not a cover that looks like the cover on other similar books
         | whose covers were chosen for reasons other than reader appeal.
        
           | drakonka wrote:
           | > I would expect more that genre fiction readers will be
           | browsing the section where all of the books are in their
           | genre, and the cover will completely fail to carry any
           | further information about the genre.
           | 
           | Yup, readers do definitely browse the section where the books
           | in their genre are like you say. They also see book covers on
           | Goodreads, TikTok (BookTok), YouTube (BookTube) Facebook,
           | Instagram, book shelves, and a bunch of other popular places
           | where they congregate. Whether they're browsing a dedicated
           | section or not, if they're an avid reader of a certain genre
           | or niche, they likely have expectations for what they want to
           | read. Aside from a strong recommendation from a trusted
           | source, the cover and blurb are the first things that will
           | either catch their attention and communicate that this is a
           | book that looks similar to other books they loved, or have
           | them move on to another one that does.
           | 
           | > There's a semi-recent trend in fantasy novels for the cover
           | to have an abstract image instead of art. (Compare:
           | https://m.media-
           | amazon.com/images/W/MEDIAX_792452-T2/images/... for a
           | "modern" cover, or https://m.media-
           | amazon.com/images/W/MEDIAX_792452-T2/images/... for a
           | "traditional" cover.) Art is better.
           | 
           | Yup! The "abstract image" is what I meant by object cover. I
           | disagree that object cover is better by default. Though I
           | agree the specific _example_ of the object cover you linked
           | is better than the specific example of the character cover
           | you linked. You'll also note that the character cover you
           | linked is for a book from 1994. That cover likely fit in very
           | well with that niche at the time.
           | 
           | What's "better" ultimately depends on the goal and the
           | market: if the goal is money and character covers are at the
           | top of all the charts in those genres, a (more modern-
           | looking) character cover will likely be "better". Right now
           | there is definitely an object cover trend! Alternative covers
           | are also popular in some genres now, like romance. In steamy
           | romance, "manchest" covers used to be (and still are)
           | especially popular, but some readers love to have a more tame
           | paperback version with a nice object cover. This lets them
           | take the book on the train or coffee shop without feeling
           | awkward :)
        
           | araes wrote:
           | The general issue is the same as fast food. McD does not in
           | any significant way care about any of the 8,000,000,000
           | humans food preferences. Only aggregate.
           | 
           | If your market is selling billions of something, making niche
           | stuff that sells 10,000 barely registers. With a market cap
           | of $212.5B a 1% daily shift is $2B. Those sales don't
           | register. It's the same issue it always is with capitalism.
           | You think it's supposed to result in something, it doesn't.
           | 
           | Strategy: Make a cover that appeals to the broadest
           | demographic blandly, yet appealingly. Don't insult anybody.
           | Don't use imagery / technique / layout that drives away
           | buyers. Don't appeal to any single individual's tastes,
           | unless they drive huge sales. Effectively, SEO optimize your
           | covers.
        
           | sixo wrote:
           | > the cover will completely fail to carry any further
           | information about the genre.
           | 
           | The cover, as selected by the above algorithm, will convey
           | quite a bit of information about subgenre and niche and when
           | it was written / how new or fresh it will be. To people
           | already looking in the area, this is the most informative
           | signal you can send: where does your book fit on the existing
           | "landscape" of books within this genre that they have in
           | their head?
        
       | sequoia wrote:
       | Some of these are like:
       | 
       | DRAFT: conceptual work of art that the artist enjoyed making &
       | might impress other artists
       | 
       | FINAL: a book cover, a product of commercial design, designed to
       | sell a book
       | 
       | It's really not shocking that they went with the latter.
        
         | ghaff wrote:
         | I assume anyone seriously in the book business has a fairly
         | well-calibrated idea of roughly what a book cover should look
         | like to sell a book. And I imagine if you really studied book
         | covers for various genres, you'd see a lot of pretty common
         | patterns.
        
           | creer wrote:
           | I don't know about the book business. But in other fields,
           | it's shocking how often marketing does not provide a
           | marketing brief when asking for artwork. Some more
           | professional artists will prompt and help put one together,
           | but that uses up quite a bit of time = budget.
        
       | karaterobot wrote:
       | People's reactions may be "I like the final covers better". I get
       | that, I think I do too. But I suspect that's because they're more
       | like what we expect from book covers. They're safer and less
       | experimental. A lot of times our aesthetic evaluations are just
       | based on what seems more familiar--that 'mere exposure' effect--
       | and we find _post hoc_ reasons to justify a gut reaction. I 'm
       | not even sure that's a bad thing, from the publisher or the
       | author's perspective: they just want a quick visual shorthand to
       | tell people that a book might be for people like them. They're
       | not trying for much more than that. But I want these designers to
       | not be that cynical, and keep trying new things even if they just
       | run up against brick walls, because that's the mechanism that
       | slowly evolves visual design.
        
         | creer wrote:
         | Some of the covers exhibit a fairly common problem with
         | designer/artist work: That it's more made to showcase the
         | mastery of the designer rather than fit the marketing for that
         | author. For example "that author usually has some piano related
         | cover. I know: I'll do the opposite." There is rarely a need
         | for "experimental" (sometimes but rarely) - and for sure the
         | artist shouldn't be too disappointed when their genius idea
         | gets rejected (and they should have also submitted a more on
         | point design.)
         | 
         | Then again the marketing brief in some projects is non-
         | existent. The designer should prompt for some but at some point
         | does what they can.
        
           | phforms wrote:
           | I think it is important that the designer gets a feel for the
           | character and "vibe" of the book by actually reading the
           | manuscript and gathering as much context information as they
           | can, ideally in direct exchange with the author(s) to align
           | with their artistic vision. Book cover design can be an art
           | in itself and as a reader, I appreciate it if it is done well
           | and communicates some of the subtleties and nuances of the
           | content in an interesting way. Of course, as you mentioned,
           | it should not be about the ego/self-marketing of the
           | designer, but that does not exclude artistic expression.
           | 
           | I believe it is a disservice to the author and the reader to
           | focus solely on the marketing side of things. After all, the
           | design of the book is part of the product, which, as a whole,
           | sets the frame for the reading experience. Physical books
           | today have to compete with digital content and ebooks, so as
           | a reader I would expect that more effort is being made to
           | make a product that also looks and feels good and not only
           | carries the content to my eyes. That also applies to the
           | layout and typesetting of the inner pages, which is
           | unfortunately often careless and not aligned with the cover
           | design (let alone the choice of paper and binding, which is
           | of course seldom in control of the designer).
        
       | pivo wrote:
       | The final cover for Karl Ove Knausgaard's book is what caused me
       | to pick it up years ago in a bookstore and buy it. Not sure I
       | would have noticed the original design.
        
       | loughnane wrote:
       | I get that this is just how books are sold, but I like the look
       | of books without pictures on the cover. It means I've got nothing
       | but the words shaping my thoughts.
       | 
       | For example:
       | 
       | - https://fradive.webs.ull.es/sem/fuentes1/IMG_4869.jpg
       | 
       | - https://pictures.abebooks.com/isbn/9780872206007-us.jpg
       | 
       | - https://i.pinimg.com/originals/5e/e7/df/5ee7df38bef54cbf52a2...
       | 
       | and so on.
        
         | ghaff wrote:
         | I think, outside of some classic-looking hardbound books, too
         | simple a cover--e.g. #2--from an unknown author would scream
         | low-rent work. It's totally unfair. I sort of hate having to
         | get a decent cover design for a book that's going to be mostly
         | digital downloads. But I sort of feel I have to do _something_.
        
           | loughnane wrote:
           | For sure to some people, but not others. That second example
           | is hackett publishing and their sparse look is recognizable
           | to some.
           | 
           | Reminds me of https://xkcd.com/993/
        
             | a1o wrote:
             | There are definitely brands owned by the market itself that
             | does that nowadays.
        
         | caslon wrote:
         | The minimalist presentation style is in itself marketing for
         | all of these. The "Moral Philosophy" cover isn't set that way
         | for any actual constraints, and what I presume is a set of
         | initials or an abbreviation in the first issue isn't there for
         | practical reasons; someone had to go out of their way to make a
         | way to press that, if it's old enough, or to design it, if it's
         | newer.
         | 
         | Your thoughts are shaped by the minimalist presentation of the
         | books; it provokes a feeling of prestige. Minimal covers have
         | been very common with Ivy publishers for their non-GA books for
         | decades, and not because it's less manipulative. It just sells
         | better.
         | 
         | https://64.media.tumblr.com/e18edf5a69e02f776837247d12385d67...
         | 
         | The American first edition books in the best-selling series
         | "Harry Potter" are actually a _better_ example of what you 're
         | going for, because they were printed in such a mass-market
         | fashion. If you take the book sleeves off of them, there are no
         | words at all, ignoring the spine.
         | 
         | https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c8/Harry_Po...
         | 
         | This is a good thing, though. Buy American hardcover books with
         | book sleeves! More often than not, you can take them off, and
         | they look exactly like this.
        
           | loughnane wrote:
           | Yeah, I get that its part of the design, but since there's no
           | photo it doesn't predispose me to anything on the inside in
           | the same way the ones in the linked article do. In any case,
           | I do like it better.
           | 
           | The Harry Potter example is a good one, and you're right
           | about taking the sleeves off, that's my go to move.
        
             | caslon wrote:
             | Fair enough. I probably went a bit too hard into flamewar
             | argument style with my reply. I hope you have a good day!
        
         | infruset wrote:
         | It's interesting that historically, in France, the more
         | prestigious a publisher is, the more bland the cover. Book
         | covers with colors all over the place feel cheap over here.
        
           | creer wrote:
           | And this french idea goes all the way to omitting any kind of
           | blurb. It's pretty shocking. There is no information
           | whatsoever on the book itself beyond author, title - and
           | publisher's name because that's important /s. ... The book
           | may as well not be on the shelf.
        
             | Arrath wrote:
             | Oh I would love for my covers not to be blighted by "New
             | York Times Bestselling author" or "Now a popular <TV
             | channel> show!" and the like. Keep the blurb on the back,
             | but don't pollute the cover!
        
           | mopsi wrote:
           | Those quotes from reviews that American publishers like to
           | put on covers make books feel particularly cheap and
           | disposable.
        
           | clydethefrog wrote:
           | Fitzcarraldo Editions is currently trying to ape this for the
           | English language market.
           | 
           | https://fitzcarraldoeditions.com/
        
       | dsign wrote:
       | I've seen great books ruined by their cover. And with them,
       | authors who had dedicated years of their life to what turned out
       | to be a great story, but not a great book--because of the cover.
       | That's why I tend to read blurbs and get an idea of the subject
       | matter, instead of putting much attention on the cover. Alas, it
       | takes longer to read blurbs :/
       | 
       | My personal opinion is that a good cover should, in this order,
       | do the following:
       | 
       | - Bring a mystery to the reader, or summarize the story in a fun
       | way.
       | 
       | - Be honest, and tell the reader if the story is for them or not.
       | If the story is fun, philosophical, and gay, there should be cues
       | of that on the cover. It's a service you do to yourself as a
       | writer, specially when you are not writing mainstream. Here's an
       | example:
       | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HX3wweY3S_Zpf1iD7a118IWNy96...
       | 
       | - Be visually pleasant.
       | 
       | - Distant forth: be "trendy". The cover should do service to the
       | book and the story first, and only in a second place, be a resume
       | piece for the graphical designer. With that said, most books
       | don't make money, and sometimes the only way a writer can get a
       | cover at a reasonable price is by compromising and letting the
       | graphical artist do what they want.
        
         | cosmojg wrote:
         | > Alas, it takes longer to read blurbs :/
         | 
         | Tangential thought, but this sounds like it might make for an
         | actually good application of large language models: reading
         | blurbs (or entire books) and making recommendations
         | accordingly.
        
           | creer wrote:
           | Yes! Only slightly joking: The AI overlords might become
           | useful after all (to us - they can do what they want when
           | they are on the clock) by doing a better job of lining up
           | novels for our consumption. They might even customize them on
           | the fly. For example fixing the characters' gender to
           | something they know we will prefer.
           | 
           | For that matter, they might edit some authors. Who greatly
           | need it.
           | 
           | That brings us back to misleading blurbs. They will have to
           | fix that too - which they can, by reading the thing before we
           | do.
        
         | creer wrote:
         | Aren't there just plain too many books by now to browse? And
         | the few browsable places are carrying fewer and fewer of them.
         | (And I have complained before about online stores and library
         | catalogs not being very browsable yet.)
         | 
         | And so I switched completely to third party recommendations.
         | Sometimes very tenuous - but still better than other methods. I
         | keep a deep file of notes such as "police in exotic places",
         | "commando/secret agent/police stories from Egypt" - or "time
         | travel, magic and bureaucracy".
         | 
         | In parallel, I keep notes on authors' writing style. I can then
         | favor the ones I usually like and push down the list the ones
         | that get on my nerves.
         | 
         | The cover is now irrelevant. - But perhaps will come back in
         | some variant when catalogs become browsable again. Perhaps the
         | new format will allow several images rather than just one.
         | Perhaps will completely separate title and author from the
         | cover? Will allow more than author and story blurbs? How will
         | the cover evolve for the online-first world?
        
         | BobaFloutist wrote:
         | But it's unfortunately beneficial to sell books to people that
         | won't ultimately enjoy them, so your second point illustrates
         | part of the problem.
        
         | kridsdale3 wrote:
         | It looks like you're missing the number one most important
         | factor in cover design:
         | 
         | Embed in to the image a large NETFLIX logo and add some text
         | "HEY THIS BOOK IS WHAT THAT SHOW IS BASED ON".
         | 
         | People love to reflect back on that, 10 years from now.
        
       | RecycledEle wrote:
       | > She'd been tasked with designing the book covers for the
       | English translations of Karl Ove Knausgaard's six-part
       | autobiographical novel, My Struggle
       | 
       | I read "My Struggle," but I could have sworn it was by a German
       | guy...
       | 
       | I am trying to poke fun at the name of the book in a light
       | hearted way.
        
       | soupfordummies wrote:
       | I saw someone recently mention that book covers are really samey
       | now (BIG BOLD title and author name) and that's because they need
       | to stand out on phones for ebook stores, audiobook stores etc.
       | 
       | I remember book covers having so much more personality about 20
       | years ago.
       | 
       | Some examples off the top of my head: https://m.media-
       | amazon.com/images/I/91DEcBOO+UL._SL1500_.jpg
       | https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/0/05/Extremely_lou...
       | https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/513YI87BvhL.jpg (although
       | using Chip Kidd isn't really fair, it's just what popped in my
       | head)
        
         | ska wrote:
         | That is certainly plausible.
         | 
         | It's a bit like the transition from LP records to CDs (and
         | somewhat to tapes). With so much less room, covers became
         | simpler and blander, at least in aggregate.
        
         | creer wrote:
         | To be fair, so many illustrated book covers were designed and
         | chosen without reading the book - or perhaps deliberately
         | misleading the customer as to the contents. No fit to the story
         | or complete misreading of the story. This did become tiresome.
         | 
         | It felt like the artist had some paintings ready to go and the
         | publisher just picked one from THAT artist - the one they
         | usually like.
        
         | Semiapies wrote:
         | Really, book covers were getting terrible by the late 90s and
         | early Aughts. I remember the especially cringeworthy period
         | where a few female Asian-American writers got semi-
         | autobiographical books out, and the publishers slapped vaguely
         | arty photos of bowls of rice on them.
        
       | colinb wrote:
       | I'm interested in the way covers vary for different countries.
       | Even when the language is the same.
       | 
       | The Josh Kirby covers for Discworld [0] were a big draw when I
       | saw them in Ireland the UK. The covers in the US and Australia
       | much less so.
       | 
       | /u/cstross [4] has written in his blog about how little control
       | an author has over the cover of their work. That's visible when
       | comparing the UK and US version. Slinky sexbot in the US [1] vs
       | galleons in space (or whatever that is) for the UK version [2]
       | 
       | [0] https://www.tor.com/2014/08/25/12-reasons-to-read-and-
       | love-t... [1] https://www.amazon.com/Saturns-Children-Freyaverse-
       | Charles-S... [2]https://www.amazon.co.uk/Saturns-Children-
       | Freyaverse-Book-1-... [4]https://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-
       | static/2010/03/cmap-6-...
        
         | BobaFloutist wrote:
         | It's funny, because just reading your description I assumed the
         | US cover was a result of sex selling especially in the American
         | market and not all that accurate to the book, but then I read
         | the blurb and it turns out it's about...a slinky sexbot.
        
       | kazinator wrote:
       | If every book cover is selected out of, say, half a dozen
       | candidates, and if it's not selected for the property of "most
       | interesting", then it's statistically more likely than not that
       | the most interesting ones are among the rejects.
       | 
       | This is true for any property of book covers that is not being
       | selected for.
       | 
       | "The { most colorful | least colorful | most complex | simplest |
       | most realistic | most abstract | ... } book cover designs are
       | often left on the cutting room floor."
        
       | iambateman wrote:
       | This is true of all design when considering a large enough sample
       | size.
       | 
       | By definition, "interestingness" happens at the edges and not
       | everyone can or should be on the edge.
        
       | elliottkember wrote:
       | A friend of mine wrote a book. The publisher chose the title and
       | the cover, and my friend absolutely hates both. He had no say in
       | it, and his name is now associated with both the title and the
       | cover art.
        
       | jess-desu wrote:
       | Echoing most everyone else about preferring the final covers. A
       | lot of the alternate versions feel very "self-published,"
       | especially The Refugee Ocean.
       | 
       | For me, a lot of the unused designs have some issues with scale
       | and balance in the context of a book cover. When sitting on an
       | endcap or on a display table in the airport, the imagery should
       | support the copy in its starring role. Even the iconic Twilight
       | covers, which had strong images, had a very distinct text
       | treatment for the title that helped brand the book series.
        
       | BobaFloutist wrote:
       | Concept art is almost universally more interesting and creative
       | than final design choices.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-12-13 23:01 UTC)