[HN Gopher] Dune: Part Two - Official Trailer 3 [video]
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Dune: Part Two - Official Trailer 3 [video]
        
       Author : marban
       Score  : 24 points
       Date   : 2023-12-12 18:14 UTC (4 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.youtube.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.youtube.com)
        
       | fjfaase wrote:
       | It contains a lot of new footage from scenes we have not see yet.
       | If you would put all the fragments from the three trailers in the
       | right order, you would already get quite a lot of the story. That
       | is a problem with trailers, they can become too revealing almost
       | leaving nothing to be looking forward when watching the film
       | itself.
        
         | devonnull wrote:
         | On the other hand, this film is based on a well-known and
         | widely-read novel that's had two adaptations already. For a lot
         | of people, there are going to be no surprises. The trailer is
         | just a visual treat.
        
           | boppo1 wrote:
           | I read the book and it seems there are some heavy liberties
           | being taken with the writing. I'll wait until it's out to
           | pass judgement.
        
         | yifanl wrote:
         | But how can you trust these visions of the future are accurate?
        
         | duskwuff wrote:
         | There's something incredibly ironic about trailers "spoiling"
         | content in a series which is, in great part, about the power of
         | prophecy and predestination.
        
       | hydrok9 wrote:
       | Richard Brody said it best: "Dune: A movie sanded to dullness."
        
         | ShamelessC wrote:
         | Who?
        
           | Slow_Hand wrote:
           | A critic so droll, elitist, and contrarian that Charlie
           | Kaufman wrote an entire novel (Antkind) satirizing him by
           | proxy.
        
             | hydrok9 wrote:
             | you left out "Correct!"
        
       | hrpnk wrote:
       | Highly recommended to read Book 1 before the movie comes out.
       | There is just so much more depth and context in the book that was
       | not reflected in 1st part of the film.
        
         | vitiral wrote:
         | I almost think it's impossible to enjoy the movie at all
         | without having read the book. The movie was more like visual
         | candy for a universe similar to the book.
        
         | hulitu wrote:
         | I would say, David Lynch did a pretty good job.
        
           | jmorenoamor wrote:
           | I strangely love Lynch's Dune, the atmosphere captivated me
           | as a kid, and the feeling has stayed there. The Harkonen were
           | disgusting, repulsive, and Irulan at the intro was a teen
           | crush for me.
           | 
           | I also love Villeneuve's version, the design is amazing and
           | has very clever ideas, I enjoyed it a lot! But Lynch's Dune
           | has a special place for me.
        
           | dredmorbius wrote:
           | I saw it at the time, having read the books (through
           | _Heretics_ , with _Chapterhouse_ being published after the
           | 1984 film). I 've yet to see any of the subsequent or current
           | production(s) absent online clips.
           | 
           | The biggest problem with Lynch version (I think of it as the
           | De Laurentiis version, as his name eclipsed Lynch's in the
           | promotions at the time, and Lynch hadn't yet risen in stature
           | with _Twin Peaks_ ) is that the story is simply too vast to
           | be told in a single film, let alone one of < 140 minutes
           | running time.
           | 
           | Other than that ... the De Laurentiis version was _very_
           | uneven. Parts of it were excellent. Kyle McLaughlin as Paul
           | was excellently cast, and there were several other notable
           | players and performances (many of whom I wouldn 't appreciate
           | until much later), and when the sandworms appeared on screen,
           | _I believed_. Other effects and editing ... not so much.
           | Critics overwhelmingly panned the film, and it performed
           | quite poorly at the box office.
           | 
           | The clips I've seen of Harrison's 3-part miniseries by John
           | Harrison, and the current Villeneuve production, look
           | considerably stronger.
        
             | hulitu wrote:
             | I liked that Lynch somehow preserved the mythology. In
             | contrast, the new Dune, looks like an action movie.
        
       | vitiral wrote:
       | Possible spoilers below (but probably not if you've seen the
       | first movie or read any of the books)
       | 
       | I enjoyed the first movie, but they fucked with things they
       | shouldn't have. Dune's technology was cleverly laid out to create
       | a kind of scifi fantasy world of swords and wizards. The 100%
       | effective shields could ONLY be penetrated by a skilled knife
       | wielder, creating a scifi world of knights. The bene Gesserit
       | served the role of mystic and wizard, which the Kwisatz Haderach
       | could finally unify.
       | 
       | It offers a very in your face style combat, which sets up the
       | Dune Fremen as the strongest force in the galaxy. However, the
       | movie effectively stripped the value of personal shields: they
       | are penetrated by dart guns as well as conventional explosives.
       | This effectively nullifies the whole advantage the Fremen would
       | give. AFAICT they did so in order to have more ships and
       | explosions.
       | 
       | (There's also the original shield+lasgun=nuclear-detonation,
       | which I always found absurd since it would be trivial to have a
       | remote controlled lasgun demolish any target. If they had nerfed
       | anything I would have nerfed the lasgun, not the shield)
        
         | duskwuff wrote:
         | > since it would be trivial to have a remote controlled lasgun
         | demolish any target
         | 
         | This is specifically mentioned, and carried out, in the _Dune_
         | novel.
         | 
         | The justification for why it isn't more common is that the
         | resulting explosion is indistinguishable from a nuclear
         | explosion, and the Great Convention strictly forbids the use of
         | nuclear weapons.
        
         | mlry wrote:
         | As far as I remember the explosion created by a lasgun-shield
         | effect was indistinguishable from a nuclear explosion. Nuclear
         | weapons were banned, their use heavily sanctioned. I think
         | there was a hint that the use of atomics would immediately
         | bring in the combined forces of the Landsraad Great Houses
         | totally annihilating the perpetrator. That effectively
         | prevented the use of the lasgun-shield effect. Though the
         | Fremen set up some shields during the final battle for Arrakeen
         | (in the first book) to draw Sardaukar lasgun fire, thus giving
         | them a lesson to be a little bit more restrained on the use of
         | lasguns.
        
       | jackallis wrote:
       | absolutely not watching the trailer; will watch the movie w/out
       | knowing single thing that is about to happen, visually, in movie.
       | 
       | book series is must read if you want richer experience.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-12-12 23:02 UTC)