[HN Gopher] First tomato ever grown in space, lost 8 months ago,...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       First tomato ever grown in space, lost 8 months ago, found by NASA
       astronauts
        
       Author : koolba
       Score  : 86 points
       Date   : 2023-12-10 10:12 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.cbsnews.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.cbsnews.com)
        
       | mytailorisrich wrote:
       | If the camera pans to George Clooney making a pizza, run.
        
         | otikik wrote:
         | Love is the strongest force in the Universe anyway.
        
       | rodent_rodeo wrote:
       | No joy in this article, zero mention of state of tomato when it
       | was found.
       | 
       | Also, they blamed a guy for a while for having eaten the tomato,
       | his name is now cleared. I was blaming him too thinking that ISS
       | food was dehydrated or space paste. However, looks like they get
       | some decent stuff like taco kits and pizzas at least time to
       | time: https://www.nasa.gov/history/space-station-20th-food-on-
       | iss/
        
         | resolutebat wrote:
         | It's been sitting for eight months at room temperature in a
         | plastic bag, I think we can pretty safely assume it was in bad
         | shape.
        
           | Broken_Hippo wrote:
           | No, we can't.
           | 
           | We have some idea how it would look on earth. Pretty bad, if
           | recognizable at all.
           | 
           | But I have no clue how deterioration and rot happen in space.
           | Do the microbes that help break it down exist? Do fruit flies
           | hitch rides to space? How does gravity affect decomposition?
           | Do the conditions of being in orbit have any sort of
           | preservation effect?
           | 
           | Yeah. I'd imagine it wasn't fresh, but it just isn't a given.
        
             | theonlybutlet wrote:
             | Oxidation resulting in Lycopene degradation and
             | isomerization.
             | 
             | It probably is a shrivelled up dehydrated tomato.
             | 
             | But most probably edible. Wouldn't get much pleasure out of
             | eating it though. Don't see bags of dehydrated tomatoes on
             | the shop-shelf.
        
               | pcthrowaway wrote:
               | It might sun-dry pretty well without a pesky atmosphere
               | in the way
        
               | em-bee wrote:
               | i don't know if sun dried tomatoes are top shelf
               | articles, but they are sold as delicacies.
               | 
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun-dried_tomato
        
               | tomatotomato31 wrote:
               | In Germany you can get them nearly everywhere.
               | 
               | I'm surprised so many find it weird
        
               | Broken_Hippo wrote:
               | _Don 't see bags of dehydrated tomatoes on the shop-
               | shelf_
               | 
               | I do. I have a bag in the cabinet. I use it most often on
               | pizzas and pasta. Dehydrated tomatoes are delicious and
               | are generally labeled "sun dried" even when there is no
               | sun involved in the drying. Plus, I can order tomato
               | powder and use it for things. Admittedly, I don't care
               | for eating the dried tomatoes plain as it concentrates
               | the flavor more (or differently?) than tomato paste does.
        
               | justinclift wrote:
               | Sun dried tomatoes seem to work well in pizza dough too.
               | 
               | As in throw in a few chunks while making the base, and
               | the flavour seems to transfer well without screwing
               | things up. :)
        
             | saiya-jin wrote:
             | Well, you only need those bacteria to make it rot and I can
             | guarantee you that there are billions (or more likely large
             | numbers of trillions) of various bacteria there, I would
             | expect tens of thousands various subtypes (sorry for
             | incorrect naming, just an average Joe).
             | 
             | Just because they are now in low gravity doesn't mean they
             | will stop eating whatever they can. And without much
             | gravity to hold them down I would expect they can actually
             | spread more easily (imagine one cough or sneeze where
             | droplets just go in straight line till hitting something).
             | 
             | On their skin, behind their nails, in their mouth, in their
             | bowels and so on. Plus on and in everything else. No way
             | getting rid of those
        
               | jacquesm wrote:
               | Isn't the ISS a high rate of mutation environment for
               | such creatures as well due to the radiation?
        
             | akira2501 wrote:
             | > Do the conditions of being in orbit have any sort of
             | preservation effect?
             | 
             | There's no reason to suspect they would. Even so, it is
             | unlikely we could ever take advantage of this in any
             | meaningful or efficient way.
             | 
             | > Do the microbes that help break it down exist?
             | 
             | Almost certainly. They're in excrement and the astronauts
             | are allowed to bring some personal effects on board.
             | Speaking of excrement, on Apollo, they didn't have an
             | advanced toilet, so they just used bags. Apparently, they
             | were instructed to seal the bag after adding an
             | antibacterial agent, for fear of them eventually inflating
             | from decomposition products and then popping.
             | 
             | Also.. quick search shows that ISS astronauts after 6
             | months to a year have _more_ bacteria on their skin and
             | _might_ be why astronauts experience higher levels of
             | inflammation in general.
             | 
             | Finally, let me drop my favorite ISS fact here, if you're
             | doing work outside the ISS that requires turning a wrench,
             | you must turn it _very_ slowly, less than 1 full turn per
             | minute, because the low gravity environment means the ISS
             | as a whole weighs next to nothing and vibrational modes
             | from wrenching can setup very easily. This fact is
             | specifically flagged in several spacewalk manuals.
        
               | pcthrowaway wrote:
               | > Finally, let me drop my favorite ISS fact here, if
               | you're doing work outside the ISS that requires turning a
               | wrench, you must turn it _very_ slowly, less than 1 full
               | turn per minute, because the low gravity environment
               | means the ISS as a whole weighs next to nothing and
               | vibrational modes from wrenching can setup very easily.
               | This fact is specifically flagged in several spacewalk
               | manuals
               | 
               | Can you point me to a resource where I can read more
               | about this? The closest thing I could find was an article
               | from 1998 that stresses the importance of being tethered
               | while wrenching so that you rotate the bolt, rather than
               | the bolt rotating you:
               | https://www.csmonitor.com/1998/1204/120498.us.us.3.html
               | 
               | edit: I still can't find anything explaining this, but I
               | did find https://msis.jsc.nasa.gov/sections/section14.htm
               | and https://www.nasa.gov/wp-
               | content/uploads/2009/07/143159main_s... which suggest
               | bolt-driving power tools are used during spacewalks
               | (which presumably get more than 1 RPM)
        
               | jacquesm wrote:
               | Wouldn't those vibrational modes be damped by the _mass_
               | rather than the weight of the ISS? Because the same goes
               | for any other interaction between the ISS and its
               | occupants, torquing down a bolt is no different from
               | anything else. The biggest worry would be to upset the
               | orientation of the entire ISS but I 'm assuming that you
               | are going to be tethered and/or connected to the ISS, if
               | you didn't it would be _you_ that spins rather than the
               | ISS due to the difference in relative mass.
        
               | koolba wrote:
               | > There's no reason to suspect they would. Even so, it is
               | unlikely we could ever take advantage of this in any
               | meaningful or efficient way.
               | 
               | What about the higher levels of radiation impacting mold
               | growth?
        
             | m463 wrote:
             | For all we know, there could be effects from radiation
             | passing by:
             | 
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_irradiation
        
           | voytec wrote:
           | > It's been sitting for eight months at room temperature in a
           | plastic bag, I think we can pretty safely assume it was in
           | bad shape.
           | 
           | At some point there were no bacteria which could decompose
           | big fallen trees. More and more fallen trees increased
           | pressure on the ones beneath and some time later we've got
           | coal and diamonds.
           | 
           | Tomato in a clean-ish room in a space lab may have
           | deteriorated the same way that McDonald's burgers do in a
           | kitchen environment full of nasty bacteria and mold spores -
           | not much.
        
       | pvaldes wrote:
       | good time to seed it again, seeds could be viable
        
       | koolba wrote:
       | > Because of the weightless nature of space, any object that is
       | unsecured or not tied down is likely to float off. And in the
       | ISS, which is larger than a six-bedroom house, there's bound to
       | be a plethora of good hiding spots for a lone-ranger tomato.
       | 
       | The part about the ISS being the size of a six bedroom house
       | really stuck with me. I always imagine it being a single cramped
       | room. But now it's a floating McMansion!
        
         | dieselgate wrote:
         | Made me think of the Mitch Hedberg bit about "I just bought a 2
         | bedroom house but it's up to me how many bedrooms there are
         | though, isn't it? This bedroom has an oven in it... this
         | bedroom is over in that guy's house"
         | 
         | The ISS is larger (has more bedrooms) than I imagined too but
         | using the "bedroom" descriptor is funny
        
           | mkesper wrote:
           | Even mansion doesn't seem quite fitting to me:
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Space_Station#/m.
           | ..
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:View_of_the_ISS_taken_dur.
           | ..
           | 
           | And all that was transferred part by part to space, having to
           | be usable right from the start: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
           | /Assembly_of_the_International_...
        
         | sneak wrote:
         | It has an absolute fuckton of gear inside of it, however. The
         | camera equipment alone is quite a volume, to say nothing of all
         | of the racks of stuff for experiments, exercise stuff, life
         | support and water recycling, power storage, etc.
        
           | looping8 wrote:
           | Yes, the photo in the article looks very cramped. Probably
           | the same tightness in all other areas of the station, with a
           | few exceptions. I wonder if they make any changes to free
           | space from time to time?
        
         | helsinkiandrew wrote:
         | Is't it about 1000 m3 of pressurised space - presumably a lot
         | of stores and equipment. I imagine in zero gravity the same
         | size room would have a lot more 'space' too due to the lack of
         | everything tending to concentrate on the 'floor' - so lots of
         | places to hide.
        
         | croisillon wrote:
         | how many football pitch is a six bedroom house?
        
           | FartyMcFarter wrote:
           | 7 millilibraries of Congress.
        
         | ainiriand wrote:
         | It is so tiring to see these kind of 'measure' systems over and
         | over again. Is that because the general public is unable to
         | understand rational measures? Shouldn't be better to start
         | using them so maybe the readers get the urge to understand
         | them?
         | 
         | I am not sure about this but I think something can be done,
         | moreso from the people writing these articles. Maybe they can
         | put a link to some website that explains rational measures.
        
           | superhuzza wrote:
           | The actual measurements aren't important to the story being
           | told, at all. The story isn't about the ISS and how big it
           | is, it's just a detail to add colour to the article.
           | 
           | Writing a "six bedroom house" gets the idea across more
           | easily than 388 cubic metres of habitable volume. I have no
           | idea how big 388 cubic metres is but I have a rough idea of
           | what sizes houses are.
           | 
           | Communication is all about tailoring your message to your
           | audience. On the NASA page linked to in the article, they use
           | the house analogy in addition to the cubic metres - because
           | they understand that rough approximations can sometimes be
           | more useful information than hard figures.
        
             | galangalalgol wrote:
             | I've been in one bedroom houses with 370m^2 floor space,
             | and 4 bedroom houses with 175m^2. Those are outliers but I
             | still have no mental idea of how big a six bedroom house
             | is, at all. And the fact this is a usable volume makes the
             | whole comparison useless.
        
             | InCityDreams wrote:
             | Zillo new ads: "Half the size of the iss, open day
             | Thursday"
        
               | koolba wrote:
               | "Very secluded neighborhood"
        
         | aaron695 wrote:
         | > now it's a floating McMansion!
         | 
         | In reality it would be larger since it's used in 3D.
         | 
         | You have 6 accessible surfaces. Most people only use their
         | house in ~ 2 - 2.5 dimensions.
         | 
         | Lots of other savings. Like stacking anvils on top of eggs in
         | the cupboard and you can push things through space more
         | optimized without the constraints of gravity. ie doors and
         | hallways only have to be tight circles, you'll gain a lot
         | there.
        
         | ghufran_syed wrote:
         | The even more mind-blowing fact is that if SpaceX starship
         | succeeds, it will be possible to launch a space station with
         | half that volume in a _single launch_
        
       | accrual wrote:
       | I wish there was more details.
       | 
       | tl;dr:
       | 
       | - Astronaut grew tomatoes, picked the first one, then lost it
       | 
       | - Spent a bunch of time looking for it, never found it
       | 
       | - Returned to Earth, blamed for eating it
       | 
       | - Other astronauts found it, but failed to provide photos or
       | further details
       | 
       | - Original astronaut exonerated
       | 
       | - The end
        
         | adhesive_wombat wrote:
         | If you want juicy space gossip there's a great report[1], with
         | lots of complaints from space station residents, from food to
         | schedule to cross-cultural friction.
         | 
         | I always thought it would make a good Friends-meets-For All
         | Mankind TV series.
         | 
         | [1]:
         | https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?action=dlattach;...
        
         | greenie_beans wrote:
         | i feel the opposite. i enjoyed reading this article. amazing
         | details.
        
       | squarefoot wrote:
       | - take seeds from tomato
       | 
       | - plant them on Earth
       | 
       | - start a business selling space tomatoes
       | 
       | - ...
       | 
       | - Fund mission to colonize Mars in 5 years
        
       | popol12 wrote:
       | That's journalism ? Sounds like they asked chatGPT to turn a pair
       | of tweets into an article.
        
       | charlieyu1 wrote:
       | Now let's grow more
        
       | JCharante wrote:
       | It'll be pretty cool once they start growing more produce up on
       | the ISS. I hope it shifts from experiment to mass production,
       | although I guess there's plenty of optimizations (experiments) to
       | be made.
        
       | phendrenad2 wrote:
       | "While the President's press secretary Jim Richardson tries to
       | convince the public that no credible threat exists, the President
       | puts together a team of specialists to stop the tomatoes, led by
       | a man named Mason Dixon"
       | 
       | Wow that took a turn
        
       | inamberclad wrote:
       | Plenty of things get lost on the ISS. There is an entire team
       | dedicated to trying to keep track of all the tools and equipment
       | as they move around the station. One of the big selling points of
       | the Astrobee robots on the ISS is that they may be able to search
       | for lost tools without consuming astronaut time.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-12-11 23:02 UTC)