[HN Gopher] Study: Water spritz before grinding coffee yields le...
___________________________________________________________________
Study: Water spritz before grinding coffee yields less waste,
tastier espresso
Author : CharlesW
Score : 16 points
Date : 2023-12-07 18:17 UTC (4 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (arstechnica.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (arstechnica.com)
| siraben wrote:
| In the limit, you can get coffee routines like this: [0]
|
| [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gst_NYxAg9s
| pkroll wrote:
| "...our very expensive grinder." To save you the effort: that's
| about $4300 of coffee grinder, in that video. (Weber EG-1,
| Black. White is $400 "cheaper.")
| wkat4242 wrote:
| Until my Nespresso can do this, there's no point :)
|
| However as a Nespresso owner I'm already taking a lot of waste
| for granted obviously.
| roflchoppa wrote:
| I guess you could do it too if you had a reusable pod...
|
| But Nespresso feels like it caters to "I want it now"...
| the_alchemist wrote:
| Lance Hendrick has a nice deep dive on this paper as well
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuqVUsMPs-U&
| satvikpendem wrote:
| Yes, this has been known for quite some time by coffee experts
| (and is presumably why it was tested in the first place, to see
| if the dogma held true).
| hagbarth wrote:
| Been doing it for a year or so. I grind for espresso and can see
| a clear difference in how clumpy my grinds are and how much is
| left retained in the grinder.
| ferfumarma wrote:
| Why would static charge affect the final flavor?
|
| In the event that static caused some ground beans to stick to the
| wall of the grinder (or brewing vessel), continued use of the
| grinder or brewer would quickly reach a steady state where the
| throughput is ultimately the same, because the "binding sites" of
| the grinder or vessel are essentially saturated.
|
| Can an expert help me understand this better?
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2023-12-07 23:02 UTC)